Lyubov

Do you think this is the industry to be in to ensure remote work going into the future? I enjoy this work. But I also largely got into it because it seems to be the best field to be in to be fully remote going into the future.

It’s hard to say conclusively. I don’t think toxins / chemistry plays a role nearly as much as beliefs do. There has always been all sorts of stuff out there in our food. Society values are always changing. In my dad’s lifetime you could be arrested for being gay and today you can get married if you are gay. That is a pretty big shift and I think you can look for chemical explanations to make sense of the data but it won’t actually tell you much. Look at stage blue / red countries. Is their food somehow cleaner? Some of these countries say that gays don’t even exist in them North Korea must be all about that all organic gmo free food. I think some people may have just natural gay / trans tendencies or preferences, but due to the environment and beliefs surrounding this, you have more people choosing to adopt this lifestyle, sometimes even if it’s just “trendy.” the body will give physical pleasure for a lot of things.

Fair enough. it’s not known but by my estimate it isn’t just one or two. This is where I disagree with you and I think you’ve made a number of mistakes. I believe your work’s dangers aren’t always apparent, even with a warning label and I think elaborating isn’t necessarily sufficient and much more of a token gesture and lip service even if that isn’t your intent. I presume you believe elaborating is sufficient to solve this problem, but it is not. I haven’t watched the YouTube video in the OP. I just saw this thread turning into a critique of your work and used it to share my thoughts.

A large portion of your community is what we could label or call “not sane” though or rather unwell / immature, etc. It’s ultimately their responsibility to upkeep themselves and keep themselves safe. I believe this. I also believe it’s your responsibility to use your platform in a way to not spread thoughts/ideas/beliefs (you call them teachings) that could be dangerous in “the wrong hands” or rather do so carefully / maturely.

I tried this once. It makes you seasick and then when water is dumped on you it goes away. that’s all it did for me. I was not sick going in and had nothing to treat. It didn’t improve my life in any way except leave some burns on my arm. I believe it may be able to treat certain medical conditions BUT I also believe these Amazon medicines that have now been adopted by new age communities are very dangerous. There isn’t really any rational thought given to how to administer or use them. Everyone will tell you something quite different. Also there isn’t any oversight or the support of an institution or large body of research to guide your treatment. Things can go wrong in all medical settings but this stuff I think starts to cross into dangerous territory. I would not do this unless you do a massive amount of research and maybe even look for a doctor who went to medical school to administer it. They have some in Spain.

We need better moderation tbh. Too much lunacy gets platformed here for the sake of “thinking holistically” or “confronting self bias” example: that MLK thread there is re-examining historic figures using a sharp, well educated comparative mindset and then there is sitting outside writing “MLK was bad, prove me wrong” like that guy from YouTube.

Romania is corrupt but they are turning a new page and under the watchful eyes of Brussels. Not saying it’s a perfect system of accountability but the influence is better than none and does slowly make these countries less corrupt.

What if that 30 something year old loitering is one of the professors?

I just can’t get behind Tate. Even though I disagree with the radical gender wars and all that radical left wing stuff from the USA. I can’t support someone that’s just so corny and will soon be on trial for rape. It’s like when trump first got into politics in 2015. The guy to me was such a joke and I couldn’t understand how anyone could actually support the guy. It’s the same with Tate even though I probably would agree with half of the thing he says. Integrity is important.

more sex definitely does for some weird reason make my girlfriend less bitchy and annoying as well, she will get angry sometimes if I don’t fuck her for a few days and she definitely won’t ask for it either. She wants to feel wanted and desired and for me to make all the moves.

It doesn’t look as dire as you make it sound. No COPIUM on my end, unlike from the Russian side. What we see is a stalemate with both sides gearing up for offensives in the spring. Remember how the last stalemate ended? For Russia, the best they can do now is a stalemate and hope for a frozen conflict.

What do you guys think of this? It’s actually incredibly interesting and I think he makes some great points. I really hope this doesn’t lead to a war though. I could see China wanting to take Taiwan with force and double down as a fascist ethno state like Russia has with Ukraine the close they get to their colapse. time to reorient the world towards stage orange/green

Get a really deep long term relationship under your belt then go and enjoy being single. Sometimes I think we have to experience both of these. I’m personally not going to fully commit and sacrifice am the opportunity to shag more women in the future. I’m clear about that. If she still decides to follow me then that’s her problem.

I don’t disagree. I’d say there are lots of factors and forces which lead up to where we are now and I think everyone is responsible in some way for what’s currently happening. I grew up right at the tail end of what I’d describe as less politically divided times. Wasn’t a time free of these issues but society has def given greater focus to such issue to do with gender/sex and this idea of an incel wasn’t nearly as wide spread as it is today. This is also mostly a USA thing and I do believe some responsibility goes towards the radical left and their brainchild of experimenting with breaking traditional systems. What I’m seeing is zero focus on any problems men face, especially from this side that is a part of this sort of social discourse. The only voices I see appealing to problems men face are Tate and Peterson type people. The radical gender fluid left has definitely played a role in this as well. The radical right has also with their violent beliefs towards women but the radical left has created a crazy environment that demonizes masculine men and tradition courtship. Both sides needs to recognize their role but both are too stubborn to do so.

I do think the American left is partially responsible for contributing to an environment that allows for a Tate type person to rise in popularity. I can’t help but wonder if he would nearly as popular if men didn’t have it so hard in the USA getting their needs met with women. The left has definitely indoctrinated women to a degree and made them afraid of masculinity and even shamed them for wanting a man to lead them like in more traditional cultures. To gloss over what’s going on in the USA like it isn’t an issue would be a mistake. There is a huge gender culture war going on with all sides having things not go their way and one of those sides is the average guy being totally priced out and pushed out of the dating market.

You are creating this through your beliefs. I don’t know exactly what you believe, you have to ask yourself, but why do you believe it’s bad if your girlfriend went with this other guy who promotes some silly stuff a social media influencer says? What are your beliefs around this situation and especially what is says about you. You’re never a victim to your emotions, you create all of them. So what do you believe here? Why do you create grief around this issue ? I would presume you are telling yourself you are less than amazing / less than a man, etc. I disagree with that. I think you have value. You have your true spiritual value and nothing outside of you can ever compare to that. You can’t align with what society says or what some girl says is valuable to her. This stuff is always changing. At one point in time, there were different conventions and there wasn’t even a viral Tate guy. He will be replaced and carried away with change. Don’t hold onto beliefs that are out of alignment with your true value and integrity. Her making different choices says nothing about you as a person.

Too far right and you get some really nasty, disgusting bullies like Tate. Too far left and you get people who just say fuck it like Lizzo and kind of live in a delusion. I think it’s possible to stay in the middle and not shame or bully but also work toward a healthy diet.

Your belief is “there is no choice” you have much more to realize

You have some blind spots you haven’t fully explored or resolved or you wouldn’t the choosing to be with this person. You need to ask yourself why do you choose to be with this person. What are your beliefs around this person and this relationship.

you are offloading human responsibility on a belief that “we are one among many species of animals.” Wrong, humans go beyond animals and have the de facto ability to never act out of animal instinct if we so choose. You think some de facto force out of your control exists which does not, it’s simply your belief that limits your sight to see it’s entirely a human creation with no walls around it. That angry drunk man chose to be drunk and chose to be angry. No one forced him to be like that. You don’t make any point here. World peace will happen when every human realizes this potential and chooses not to be the angry drunk man. There is nothing stopping anyone from having this realization except themselves. How could there be? Humans behave like animals out of choice. There is no outside truth to it. They choose to be like this. There is no reason for violence to exist. You believe violence exists for a reason? Why? All you can list is another belief which will have an endless number of beliefs behind it, going in a circle. I can just keep asking “why?” You place a belief over why it exists. It simply exists because it exists and it will stop existing if people change their beliefs and choose for it to no longer exist. It’s as simple as that. When humanity as a whole roots itself in true spiritual value, violence will cease to exist, but this does not guarantee a world without survival challenges or other problems we will still have to overcome, or what new challenges change may bring. We are simply taking about evolving past violence.

No topic leads to extreme violence. There are simply topics and people choose to have them lead to violence over other choices due to their beliefs. We are always the de facto force behind anything that occurs in our actions or behavior or thoughts or feelings. There is nothing outside of you that can force you to do otherwise (including coercion, there are still beliefs there, still not a justification for trying to coerce people)or believe otherwise or act in any way unless it literally physically forces your body to do so by physical force. And even if it does trespass physicality it still can’t cross into your belief system or spiritual value. Many people place this force outside themselves and blame it on outside circumstances when they are always responsible for themselves whether they know it or not. Violence is not baked into anything. It’s a result of unconscious belief. Violence here is not the same as what Animals are doing. Animals do not have the ability to change their beliefs or see the world in a rational way so they act out a baked in belief system which we call instincts. We can call this survival for animals because it’s basically as high as they can go but not for humans. Survival has violence baked into it for animals but not humans. But like I said many things about how humans see the world will have to change before humans choose to no longer use violence.

I disagree with you too here lol. I don’t believe the logical concept of “agreeing or disagreeing” with another person’s beliefs is what leads to violence. you are basically saying “because people disagree it leads to violence.” Why do you believe because people disagree it leads to violence? These two things are not mutually exclusive. They are two separate things chained together. Not everyone has to believe the same thing for there to be world peace, but they do need to be on the same page about violence. You can have a disagreement with someone and have both people believing the issue does not have to be solved with violence. It happens all the time in modern society. We have courts for this very reason. This issue has been resolved on some scales in modern society already, it’s just expanding it outward. There was a point in time when issues were resolved purely with violence and the concept of a court didn’t even exist.

Definitely leverage this. Get it over to your social media and social circle. Let it seep into your personality. Can get some of them as a body if you ever break up with your girlfriend if you have one ? plant them seeds

I don’t believe it is and tbh I don’t agree with him. It’s simply a belief system the society / collective conscious shares. It will be several generations before people have the right level of development / consciousness and mindset so violence isn’t necessary to solve societal/state problems. A lot of facets and stuff to do with survival and resources will have to be able to support this belief system so lots of different stuff will have to be resolved before this is possible. I don’t see it happening on earth for easily another 200-500 years.

Horrible hopefully humans one day are advance that they believe they don’t need to have a war to stay entertained.