AtheisticNonduality

@EdgeGod900 Yes, I understood all of that already when I wrote my comment. However, dancing and/or kundalini awakening > nonsense. And if you want to be violent, senseless mindless violence is preferable, not coordinated and trained systems.

@Danioover9000 Pretty sure something like dancing or kundalini awakening is a more perfect expression of kinesthetic intelligence, not getting punched in the head.

The problem with visual mediums is that the human imagination is more powerful than our technology most of the time.

@Danioover9000 What was the username of the video maker?

I don't know, but there's this channel called Actualized Clips. The guy looks like Leo and talks about some of the same stuff, but there's less detail and he's more annoying.

Actually it's often anger that gets repressed and turned into another emotion.

LEO IS AN ART MASTER NOW.

The "thing in itself" is an intellectual abstraction, but if we were to make sense of what he was talking about experientially, we could say the phenomenal part of reality is Everything (sensations) and the noumenal part of reality is Emptiness (the Void). Forms thought of as forms say nothing about formlessness whatsoever, hence why people can't access what is outside of Everything (ie. Nothing- / Void-ness)---discounting "mysticism" of course.

AI would not make this simply because it would never have a reason to, and it'd be too autistic to develop it just from observation and mimicking various effects.

And what you are seeing in Chopin is not the cutting-edge of humanity. But anyway, you cannot have AIs making the work of the most genius humans because the complexity is irreplaceable/irreplicable unless you make an actual organism (+, because the emotions' effects being copied and studied does not allow one to understand what they'd actually do, just an example, never minding the rest of the human being).

Delusions.

@Tahuti

Well, that's why I picked it. But if that's the worst song you've ever heard you haven't listened to a lot of music . . . I like Chopin the best, and the blue-starriness of the Van Gogh matched the color scheme better. I picked that one because it's on Leo's playlist, it's like 2013, and because of the genre. So it was around this order: 1. Anti-orthodox "noisiness" done by obsessive / insane Australian. 2. Classical and "proper" piano piece with beauty. 3. Dance song with modern atmosphere and pop sensibility / rhythm. It's a variation to see how people define things, not necessarily endorsements of the greatest pieces of music to ever exist; though they are probably better than what you listen to. Something like THIS is art, not something some AI with no human context may create.

Well, there are a multitude of different definitions of art. And then in each definition there are a multitude of different definitions of high quality vs. low quality art. And what is "beautiful" in this context, and what is "amusement" supposed to mean? As in, listen to these three and see which one is the most like art or music and which one is better or such.

Types of meditation that help induce visions. Like staring at a light, closing your eyes, looking at the afterimage in the static and what it does, repeating, until you start seeing more complex patterns and possibly full visualizations. Or sitting in a completely dark room for hours and paying attention to the visuals your mind might bring up. Of course these don't work instantly and actually take concentration and effortful time.

Not the pyramids perhaps or not every piece of work, but haven't you ever read the Book of Exodus, with the plague of Passover?

Stage Green flattening of hierarchies.

Only the low ends of the human soul are affected.

You may have both, but to get your own "un-socialized" ones you have to at least temporarily get rid of the others.

Should have been an "official" video. https://www.actualized.org/insights/dpt-the-other-god-molecule

The idea AI will be at human level (or greater!) soon is laughably a waste of time anyway, so this is a hypothetical drivel-fest.

This is just time denialism.

The problem with this is that the human mind doesn't have access to what the "living room" really is. If it did, it would be "God-mind."

The current world population (estimated obviously) is 7,969,984,120. The current Actualized subscriber count (rounded) is 1,100,000. That means Actualized subscriber to world population ratio is 1:7245.44010909. Which means that the Actualized subscriber count is multiplied by 7245.44010909 to reach the world population, because Actualized is in the millions and millions times thousands is billions (ie. millions, then tens of millions, then hundreds of millions, then billions, so 1 subscriber per 7245.44010909 random other people or all subscribers per 7,969,984,120 because 7,969,984,120/7245.44010909 = 1,100,000 and 1,100,000 x 7245.44010909 = 7,969,984,120). But we have to narrow the system down to the subscriber base, which only is constituted by some tens of thousands of people, which means we have to divide by hundreds from the millions that make up the full subscription count. Today is Sep. 2, and the video of Leo's released closest to a year ago is "Understanding Bias - Bias, Love, and Mind Explained." So if we take up all of the videos' view counts from then to now, across the past year, the average video viewership is: Views per video: 65555.5555556, because 59000 + 63000 + 55000 + 91000 + 55000 + 49000 + 91000 + 61000 + 56000 + 165000 + 93000 + 78000 + 49 000 + 37000 + 103000 + 60000 + 55000 + 37000 + 65000 + 63000 + 61000 + 86000 + 66000 + 64000 + 50000 + 33000 + 25000 = 1770000, which divided by 27 = again 65555.5555556. Views per day: 4889.50276243, because 59000 + 63000 + 55000 + 91000 + 55000 + 49000 + 91000 + 61000 + 56000 + 165000 + 93000 + 78000 + 49 000 + 37000 + 103000 + 60000 + 55000 + 37000 + 65000 + 63000 + 61000 + 86000 + 66000 + 64000 + 50000 + 33000 + 25000 = 1770000, which divided by 362 (not 365 because a full year hasn't elapsed since the bias video; we're three days away) = again 4889.50276243. Progress If we want to check on the progress, we can divide the 27 in halves of 13.5, meaning the heavy metal detox video (and its view count) will be carved in two to separate the year's videos. So, 59000 + 63000 + 55000 + 91000 + 55000 + 49000 + 91000 + 61000 + 56000 + 165000 + 93000 + 78000 + 49 000 + 18500 = 983500 / 13.5 = 72851.85185 and 18500+ 103000 + 60000 + 55000 + 37000 + 65000 + 63000 + 61000 + 86000 + 66000 + 64000 + 50000 + 33000 + 25000 = 786500 / 13.5 = 58259.25926. First half of the videos had an average of 72,851.85185 views, whereas the second had an average of 58,259.25926. 72,851.85185 views - 58,259.25926 views = 14,592.59259, so there was a decline of that amount. But this is negligible if it's uncontrollably part of a system external to the Actualized output itself, if it's unrelated to the quality or quantity of the videos, or if it doesn't matter if the quality of the videos somehow affects the quantity of the viewership (perhaps the quality of the viewership went up despite the quantity going down). Anyway the total average viewership for it was/is 65555.5555556 per video and 4889.50276243 divided along the days. If Leo has exactly 65,555.5555556 followers () then that means the ratio of following individuals to the collective of the entire world is 65,555.5555556:7,969,984,120 or 1:121576.0289. As predictable by the subscriber count (millions' place) descending to the actual following (tens of thousands' place), which is a jump by a ratio of hundreds, the ratio of subscriber to world population (ones to thousands) fell to the ratio of actual follower to world population (ones to hundreds of thousands). One actual Actualized follower exists against 121,576.0289 random other people. Hypothetical Effects / Spreading Calculations (Still Preliminary) 1 Actualized follower might have their number of close friends in the ones or tens place (1-10 close friends). If the ideas spread from the 1 to the 10, that is 100% to 1000%, a total of 1100% then and a 900% increase of the ideas' flow. Now obviously the ideas will become less condensed and even less pure as they spread, but at their cores they will still exist in the spread; so the percentages make sense as long as the ideas survive. Also if you take into consideration the concepts of the Dunbar Effect, to some extent the ideas may even spread flowingly not just by a ratio of 1 to 10 but by 1 to 150, or even more. So that means the number of human beings under the most direct effects of Actualized's ideas are in definite actuality the 65,555.5555556 and in potentiality 65,555.5555556 x 150 + 65,555.5555556, which is 9,833,333.33334 + 65,555.5555556 = 9,898,888.8889. If we leave it to just close friends (somewhere from 1 to 10 close friends of each follower), then it's 65,555.5555556 x 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. 9, or 10 (plus itself), which is a range of 131,111.111111 to 721,111.111112. Now assume some small percentage of exceptional individuals reveals themselves out of all this and has an even greater effect. Now for the views per day count, of 4889.50276243 per 362 (or 4930.023504 for 365 days in a full year), that's a series of interactions. Some series of actions are more significant than others. But these have to be made to count. . . .

Of course I've considered this as the truth and had it as my direct experience. But it's not true. Consciousness, infinitely, is capable of imagining multiple moments/experiences of time even if you as a finite entity bound by memory have trouble visualizing that. It is my direct experience that the past is completely vivid and real, then fades, that the present is completely vivid and real, then fades into the future. Nonlinearly this makes complete sense, and it actually happens---because Consciousness' infinite capability may imagine this. Though it has to occur moment by moment where each one only seems real as an experience. Once people realize their experience as eternal, they lose conceptual access to the other experiences and come with ideas like "death isn't real" or "now if the only thing that's real" or solipsism and such. But all these ideas are wrong, because Consciousness is so much more.