AtheisticNonduality

Yes, the issue isn't just the language itself that may require a dictionary: the ideas themselves can be inaccessible or not have frame of reference for that person. His sentences can also be like informational webs you can caught in to be consumed by information spiders, if you so please or also if you're crying not to be bitten. However, most of that content can be explained by the context in which it's written, just taking time to decipher / just logic out what he's communicating. But Nietzsche at times, in cases where the understanding possible may be less clear, could very much be like reading poetry in a foreign language since you can read, feel into, appreciate, enjoy, and partially understand it but not really get its full logical meaning. Either route is fine, but to comprehend his sentences properly, you might have to "fix" something in your understanding. Maybe you need a more expansive vocabulary or maybe you need more life experiences or maybe you just need to read about Nietzsche for more contextual knowledge or maybe you just need to learn to think like him rather than how you would otherwise while reading him!?!?! Who knows?

@Oeaohoo Brahman is the world, this being a non dual realization that happens in mystical states. Whenever a human being realizes God, that is God realized pouring into this evolutionary world of "substance" and becoming, so God is not restricted from us. However, God in purer forms is incredibly restricted, thus requiring evolution. The idea that the process is not leading anywhere is simply ignorance and faith toward ancient culture, not basis in the realities of the situation. The "creation" stories of prima material that describe Purusha and Prakriti or Adam and Eve as cosmic dualities of masculinity and femininity created by an androgynous transcendental God outside of us and totally abstract from its creation is not useful in this context because that God is not something that may be returned to since it was never part of anything and thus must only be unreachable to us, with the exception of it existing as something else: in us unrealized the entire time and then becoming realized in us, through evolution. It is inaccurate to say using decay to go back in time would trace back to the emergence of God, since there never was a profoundly transcendental God at the beginning of creation (which would have to be completely outside of creation), only creation itself and a hidden God. The process up, on the other hand, is demonstrably true with all denial untenable. ?????? No, worship of matter is for the lower holons, not evolution.

He definitely has traits of an ethical egoist due to his personality plus the solipsistic tendencies. But he also has empathy, compassion, which prevents him from harming other people too much. He also understands goodness as a principle of being Godlike, so there are multiple facets at play. One side of him is the human side that goes by biological instinct and desire as well as his personal goals, and the other is rooted in some higher understanding of Truth. However, none of this is explainable perfectly by formalized models of morality since he does not subscribe to ethical egoism as a philosophy and probably doesn't believe in utilitarianism as a hard rule. He most likely has morality from his heart (emotionally, compassionately) and from Truth while not adhering to some strict elaborated code, all whilst following generalizing virtuous ideas like "wisdom" or "integrity" or whatever else.

Yes.

@thisintegrated He has no overarching structure or formulation enfolding (perceiving/prospecting); he has no true external objective (lack of judging). All of it, this project, is an internal process that is externally disoriented (Ti life purpose devoid of Fe, which is not a well-constructed and sensible Te plan) wherein he had described his entire catalogue of videos as documentation of his awakening and transformation (a Ti-exclusive illustration of this going on over time). He often is brought to tears through external people's emotions and meanings and traits (by naked images of other people or movies that other people have made, that being a signifier of Fe). This is all on top of the fact he actually scored as an INTP, which statistically points to him truly being one.

His two main drives have been for Truth and for what he used to call the good life. If we interpret the Truth as something extraverted, some information out there that has to be learned or manipulated, then we could say he uses Te more than Fe. But the Truth he is after is something Ti, apprehension of God. Since he presumably scored as an INTP and identified with that, and knew that he matched with the accurate indicator of less judging and more open-mindedness, we'll say he's simply an INTP with primitive Fe function due to unaccounted-for factors of callousness added on top of INTP-ness.

Emotional understimulation from only interacting with T-users could become an issue. Leo is an INTP BTW. Of course. He's always listening.

Haven't knowingly spotted one ever, though the mental aspect of the INTJs is interesting despite the paucity of F function, which is an extreme negative. The problem with ENFPs is getting dragged into their extraverted schemes and activities. So with INFPs seems like a better place to be in the world. But ENFJs are fine, and I like ENTPs.

That is not a modern myth. Things have gotten and will continue to get more complex teleologically, as has the standardized case of strings to quarks to atoms to molecules to organelles to cells to tissues to organs to organ systems to organisms to communities, etc. But communities are in the intersubjective/interobjective spheres and are not the only highest evolutions here; there are also changes happening in the compositions of individual humans as time goes on. This is definitely not reducible to SD, and Wilber doesn't even mention SD in SES, which has been considered his magnum opus. But even Wilber certainly does not understand the full scale of the upward process going on right now, and additionally no human at all may get anything but insights masked by dreamlike occlusions. Here is Pierre Teilhard de Chardin's model, which shows the physiosphere, biosphere, and noosphere and alludes to the Omega Point, which is an ascension, but also the decay alternative option, which I do not take seriously. As for what our experience is when we are not actively realizing God, that is God unrealized, which you may call "the demiurge" or the "the devil" if you like; Nothing, on the other hand, is Everything, including God realized, and is not just God unrealized.

INFPs and ENFPs would match the aesthetic more, of course. But the rarity of the unicorn applies more to INTJs.

Yeah, probably right. But it was a nice idea.

@Oeaohoo The greater always comes from the lesser. Complex beings are always made of simpler beings, and across time they must become that way through evolution that is upward in the structural holarchical complexity of their bodies and their minds and what comes beyond that. It is all God, but not all of it is a realization of God.

The end of history is up, not down.

Context?

Best dreams and most nightmarish horrors you've had while asleep. What are they?

Outrageous Experiments In Consciousness. Here:

When: ten years from now. Give a description of where.

No one is smart enough to be 100% wrong, as Ken Wilber would say.

@Nilsi The tantric god-communion might use a lower holon in its practice, yes.

The omnipresence of God, the omniscience of God, and the omnipotence too are well established in standard Christian dogma and can be used to prove nonduality. Because God is everywhere, he must exist as the world, the world being his incarnation. In this way, the world is not separate from God except by the ignorance, illusions, spells, and lies of Satan. The omniscience of God means God must know everything about everywhere, including what it is like exactly to be that everything. This means that God must experience everything, even observing all human lives as a cosmic unseen Witness in the background, as the clear space behind your eyes. The omniscience of God is the consciousness of God. The omnipotence is the ability to create Everything and the world from Nothing.

Because it's a holon that exists before rationality does in development, because rationality is more complex and takes more time to occur rather than just simple instincts.

Physically masturbating is better?

Exactly.