Someone here

I would say there is no difference between the two . There are sensations in the body . And they feel different. This has nothing to do with mental judgement. A feeling of smelling a perfume is different than a feeling of your palm bleeding . The mental judgement arises to urge us to seek one and despise the other .to survive. But when I'm in the moment of something bad It seems like seeing through it mentally doesn't resolve the physical annyonance.

They follow each other but I don't think they cause each other . The conditioning and identification with my thoughts dissolves to a huge degree when I'm alone and relaxed physically and mentally . But whenever I'm involved physically or mentally in an a "negative " experience I lose that enlightened state of detachment . Are you saying this very judgement of the other state perpetuates it?

I feel like there is a conflict between two places in my life . They are NOT "places " really but modes of being or experience. The first one is the story of my life and getting involved in the details of the movie of life .again there is no "movie of life " ..these are metaphorical expressions. And the other mode is pure presence..pure silence..pure acceptance..unconditional acceptance of what is as it is . I will try to describe the two modes . The mode of pure presence..is the silent mind .the place where All is well and there are no problems of any kind whether physical or mental . Like when I'm in deep sleep ..or when I meditate ..or anytime I'm alone and relaxing and just being in the moment with zero or so low distractions. That is a very good place to be . I feel calm ..grounded ..peaceful ..even "enlightened ". The other place when I'm totally disconnected from that place .when I'm dealing with physical problems..like a sickness ..or a fight with other guys..or some traffic stressful situations..or when my body is feeling lack or discomfort like it needs food or It needs to rest yet the rest and food are not available at the moment and there is no alternative to experiencing the discomfort and "sucking it up ". Or when I'm REALLY mentally annoyed by an existential question..like I'm really confronted by it not just doing armchair philosophy...but really annoyed by the question and I can't meditate or forget about the question . I'm always either in the first place or in the second place . I'm wondering for how long do I have to be in one of these two places? Are there people on this forum who have transcended this duality?

Thanks. Thats my point .it arrived. Figure out the implications of this on your own.

@Ziran listen . A guy has Tumour in his brain that makes him only sexually attracted to children. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221026121630219X?__cf_chl_tk=3bb13oQPQb_RjtFaUCFjKygQVsBol9gW0m6qlEDmr_c-1771441711-1.0.1.1-9Eqamx4igNB.1GGINtNl.Pm2m6FyZe8.kGvQaQggJbA Pedophilia is brain tumor. So a Pedophile guy sees a child ..brain signals send orders to his body to move and go rape that child . Its called Casual Determinism. "Wrong " is NOT found In The casual chain. Philosophical argument: wrong means this thing should not happen . So unfortunately it did happen. Its a fact .how could something "wrong " even exist ? I would like a respectful answer that deals with my reasoning. .

Why ?

Thank you for honestly expressing your opinion. Let's contemplate together..a question: Is it objectively wrong to have sex with children or sell your "soul " to the "devil"? Don't you define evil as bad things happening to you ? Is bad objective? Obviously not .then evil is just created by your judgement. Do you agree ?

@thierry the devil is a religious metaphore for the ego. You are the devil. You are the only source of evil in the world .that's the insight you have to have. Me? I'm a lonely broken angel ! No. You are the devil .because anything "wrong " or "evil" in the world or even your life is not evil its just nature doing what nature does according to laws of physics. Then you come along and think there is actually something wrong somewhere. It's not possible to fix a problem that doesn't exist . Please watch this

I want to write an entire file disecting and nitpicking and arguing against every argument and point Leo uses on this video. Like there is so much nonsense he gets away with and so much minducky things as well. But the climax of this episode...or where you might ignore the entire episode is this one "But Leo..aren't you having your own consciousness right now as you are speaking to me?" "You are dreaming. You are in a dream. When you wake up from this dream ..it will only you .nobody else .just you " So Leo..if you are not conscious right now then obviously the very claim that you are not conscious is itself false. You are not conscious then why should I believe you in this very claim itself ? Also you are not being honest here .

If you don't know why you don't know then you don't know that you don't know, do you ?

You have it right that you know nothing .but do you know why it is that way ? You'd have to be exceptionally brilliant for this . Why is it that "you know nothing " ?

Look at the pathetic dude called Hugh Hefner( founder of PlayBoy). Watch his interviews on YouTube. He is dead now btw.he died not so long ago. in his 80s and basically only a sneeze away from dying and he is saying pathetic shit like "all I care about is high quality Viagra ". Because guess what .. age is not just a number ..when you are in Your 80s your dick is going to soften like tomato juice and go limp but you will still be obsessed with sex in your head if you were obsessed about it in your youth . So Leo is spot on about ditching women. But he got even worse by saying satisfy yourself .if he means fucking cum to porn he is definitely kidding.

Terrible argument. How can you be God if there is no you ? Oh come on.

How can God be God without being nailed on a cross though ? Like have you ever thought about that ?