Someone here

I don’t think so . This has always been his writing style.

Okay . Let’s just discuss one point at a time . when you say that God is “ what Is “ rather then “ being “ . I honestly think we are saying the same thing. ”being “ could mean an entity or it could mean isness . I mean isness , which is the same as “what is “. my ultimate point is that that thing is nameless.

that doesn’t answer my direct question which you’ve quoted. This is deflection and changing the topic into repeating your baseless belief that I must not know . But I’m not distracted by your silly tactics , answer the motherfucking question . Again , “people must discover on their own “ isn’t the issue . If you understood what I meant then why are you repeating it again . how do you know there is validity to Leo’s pointers through his videos ? You don’t know that . You just believe in it because you don’t know. If gravity is a belief then go jump off the 11th floor without parachute. Otherwise you are full of shit . 1- it’s very obvious that YOU are the one who doesn’t know . Trust me , boy . 2- no that’s a layman answer . Answer with rigor : how do you know that Leo knows his head from his ass ? How do you know? 3- it’s obvious that you don’t know and you projecting your own ignorance on others. Just because you don’t know, doesn’t mean I don’t know. thank you .

What are you using to make sense of the world ? Your intellectual factuality and your knowledge you’ve gained from school , life experience, education, books you’ve read , plus how you yourself intuit and interpret your experiences? I’m not saying they should not. That’s not the point I’m making. Try to understand before commenting. This is simply false , and even silly . I didn’t discover gravity , Newton did . That means it isn’t discovered? 1- open yourself to the possibility that I do know . 2-how do you know that Leo knows ? 3- just because you don’t know , doesn’t mean I don’t know.

It’s not merely empty theorizing . It makes logical sense and is based on already established knowledge. Why does Leo make a thousand videos explaining god if that’s useless and people should discover on their own ?

no , that’s not true . The real reason is because what I said . your “challenges “ are endless . And therefore they will never lead anywhere . maybe you are a Type of person who enjoys the questioning more than the answers , the journey rather than the destination. You do you . Again thanks for sharing your reflection but I would refrain . No offense or ill feeling towards you whatsoever .

@Breakingthewall I don’t recall a single conversation between us that has ever lead anywhere . So I would just refrain from engaging you . But thank you for sharing your thoughts. We can agree to disagree.

You are . Because Reality is the same as God . And you are saying that God is a fairy tail. If it wasn’t for the usage of the word “ God “, you wouldn’t have any problem with what’s being said . Notice that you just commented by saying that God is a fairly tail and a concept that harmed humanity , instead of addressing anything else which was said in OP .

Yes , nobody said that you have to understand the reality you are living in . You can survive just as fine without understanding anything. A cockroach doesn’t have to understand anything to survive . But you can choose to understand if that’s your thing .

If the word “God “ triggers you , replace it with “Reality “.

Why not . Explain . I’m all ears . And I will engage you in good faith .

Yes. I just said that in a different way .

@Joseph Maynor I still don’t understand other facets to God . Such as Absolute Love , Absolute Goodness without opposite . It’s confusing to me because whenever I hear the word “love “ and the word “ goodness “ I can’t help but think of the relative meaning of these words. another thing I don’t understand is how to reconcile Infinity with logical paradoxes . Like if infinity contains absolutely everything then can it have square circle or anything that is logically incoherent. I only explained the facets of God which I understand.

Definitely not everything “beautiful “ . regarding “everything that is possibly logical “ I’d say no . But I don’t know how to explain it because obviously it will lead to paradoxes.

you’re welcome. @Leo Gura that’s all from learning from you .