Someone here

Member
  • Content count

    14,677
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Someone here

  • Rank
    - - -

Personal Information

  • Location
    Earth
  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

27,383 profile views
  1. I honestly have no idea what happened with his claim that he would demonstrate an alien transformation on camera. Only Leo knows what actually happened.. unfortunately he still hasn’t clarified it..but instead he’s offered excuses that avoid addressing the obvious possibility that it was another psychedelic experience he misinterpreted As @UnbornTao suggests. That said..this is exactly why I don’t see the value in aggressively attacking him. People make mistakes. Humans get things wrong.If he’s mistaken then criticize the claim..point out the inconsistencies..and move on. What I don’t understand is the endless hostile rants. They accomplish nothing. They don’t help us..they don’t help Leo and they don’t bring anyone closer to the truth. All they do is fuel ego battles between keyboard warriors and deepen the divide instead of creating any chance for understanding or meaningful discussion. If the goal is understanding each others then criticism should be rational and polite .If the goal is just to vent outrage and score points..that’s a different conversation. And stop calling me a Leo fanboy . It’s not like I hang out with him everyday ..I just watch him on a screen .
  2. You appear to make pretty wild claims lately without warranty and take it to extreme pipe dreams . Go watch his latest series on deconstructing rationally (as an example )..that’s some world class philosophy. how could a mentally ill person show such exceptional mental capacity? please explain in detail what do you mean by “insane “?
  3. How on earth is this polish ? This is a textbook definition of ranting like a maniac and expressing hatred towards Leo himself instead of his views .
  4. @zurew Could you at least criticize politely? I feel like you don’t even care about learning from Leo or simply feeling disappointed about him not keeping up his words .. but you just rant rudely against him and make fun of him and obviously crossing lines. This is no longer criticism but trolling him mercilessly .. please exercise some mindfulness and present your critique in a polished way .
  5. Interesting. I myself don't even know who is that person in the mirror but you know?
  6. @Inliytened1 I got my answer from him . Thanks .
  7. @Inliytened1 why are you so worked up lately ?
  8. Brilliant. Thanks again . I was talking to ChatGPT about this question and it literally told me this question will remain outside of human comprehension forever because the very nature of Brahman (ultimate reality ) is to be beyond any intellectual attempt to fully understand.
  9. No I’m not tickling his emotions. I’m totally serious. I read Ramana Maharishi and Robert Adams before Leo even appeared on YouTube but his videos made understand what’s being said very clearly.
  10. Thanks . Here’s the thing I want to understand from your point of view ..let’s talk about ultimate reality . Ultimate reality Is ONE. How does the one appear as many ?Hindus say duality apppears because of ignorance.But philosophers have long asked:How can ignorance arise inside perfect oneness ? Again Hindus say it’s an illusion.. my question How can illusion exist at all? This question has no answer in all spiritual traditions. Only Brahman is real . The world is unreal . Brahman is the world .
  11. Ok got it .although I struggle to understand this position.i respect that you may have reasons for not sharing. If you ever decide you want to share with us in the forum I’m happy to listen. Until then..I’ll continue seeking understanding in my own way. Which honestly it (my understanding) is 90% borrowed from you . You made me understand spirituality like no other spiritual teacher did . I respect your choice not to tell me but repeatedly saying you know something without sharing it doesn’t really help our conversation. I’d rather talk about what we’re both willing to discuss. I just hope it’s not just absolute solipsism again and you make statements like this because you enjoy the sense of mystery or authority it creates,. I hope you genuinely believe the insights can’t yet be expressed Casually on the forum and they require a serious intellectual product like a book . much love .
  12. Can you put it into words at all or is it completely ineffable?
  13. Do separation and duality actually exist ? Or are they illusory ?
  14. What is a thought? You didn’t answer the question. Think a thought..what’s that?
  15. I don’t disagree that much with you . Of course the foundation of attraction is that the masculine seeks the feminine and the feminine seeks the masculine because each party lacks precisely the qualities which the other party possess. This one is obvious. I disagree with you about claiming that what is “high value “ man to a woman in this era is simply the same things that were considered high value during cavemen times . As human society evolved to what we are witnessing today obviously the standards for attractiveness and its diversity has evolved. For example no attractive woman nowadays will ever get attracted to a caveman looking guy ..women actually care about physical appearance. You have to be well groomed and hygiened and you have to be casual and cool and open minded ..not some caveman gorilla dude with toxic masculinity.