Someone here

Dude did you read what I said ? Nobody said nothing about going to the pub or drugging your ass ( although you guys love the taste of 5 Meo up your assess). I said Sadhguru teaches relative knowledge..stuff like chackras for instance ..which is just new agey hindu nonsense. If you follow Sadhguru he is going to make you subscribe to belief systems and that's 180 degree the opposite of enlightenment. Its antithetical. To awaken you must kill yourself mentally. Completely surrender. Not intellectualize about hippy spirituality bullshit.

I actually agree with @Breakingthewall. I never was able to swallow the nonsense hippy spirituality of Sadhguru. If you want to seriously awaken..or to attain freedom you must negate your mind . Sadhguru teaches stuff that adds mental backage to your mind .it's basically relative knowledge. I'm not saying it's valid or invalid .I'm saying it's accumulation of relative knowledge. To attain nirvana or liberation you must destroy your mind not add to it . Because of that you should listen to people like Robert Adams or Jim Newman.

What's that bro?

@Javfly33 I didn't make it myself. I found it online. I'm just now seeing the thread so I don't get yet what's the fuzz is about. Like you said before "this forum sometimes kills me ".

Thank you . Yes I want both technical and historical perspective. I obviously studied science and physics In school . But ever since I left high school I avoided anything related to math and science because I hated these subjects. I would actually get nightmares about mathematics before my exams lol. That's why .

No I actually meant the opposite. That you are very intelligent. Why are you insecure lol 😂?

Thanks Carl . Does he have any free ebook about the hard proplem of consciousness and materialisim? You say he is an idealist but I don't quite remember where did he say that consciousness is epiphenomenon from neurology. He is a brilliant guy brw .

Yes of course. It was accumulation of knowledge throughout centuries. But it has gone exponential in the last two centuries . Hoe do you explain that ? Air planes were discovered in the 18th century. And now we have chat gpt ..how do you explain this ?

PM Leo.

No thanks . What a burden. I'd need to inspect every single thing I say .

@NoSelfSelf slow down and self-reflect.

Could not agree more .I don’t see at all how is this guy a mod .

@Reciprocality look..whatever is true is true .do you agree ? Whatever it is what reality is is whatever it is ? Does that make sense ? Agree ? So When you ask what a specific object is..what you are really trying to do is you are trying to define it in terms of "something else " ..but realize that there are nothing else . Sensory direct experience is rock bottom.it is what It is . That's really all we can say. Nobody can say more because it's RIDICULOUSLY direct

What's Bernardo's qualification in metaphysical stuff ? I saw him appearing on so many podcasts that discussed consciousness and mysticism..if he is professional in computer science he must be a materialist...why are you so in love with him after all ?😁 Anyways..I think it's only a matter of time before we create conscious AIs ..you really think there are limits or restrictions upon whats possible within the next couple of centuries in terms of technological advancement? @Princess Arabia can you answer this ?

@Princess Arabia what's your IQ?

Cut your dick off . Proplem solved . <don't do it I'm just joking >

What's consciousness? What's the world ?What's the earth ? What's anything? Keep rotating the wheel . Nobody knows anything. You might think that a question have a right answer and that there is a wrong answer. But can't you see that every answer will branch into more questions ? And then when it's gonna end ? Nowhere. Right back where you started. Try contemplating something from scratch without any presumptions .and notice that you can't. If you bring presumptions to the question then you're wrong because you have to justify them endlessly . And If you don't Bring presumption to the question and inquire from scratch then you are also wrong because without presumptions you don't know jack shit.

@Schizophonia @Keryo Koffa brace yourselves ..my next topic is going to be : How to make sense of pornography?

Difficult to understand. I'm a total noob in the feild .can you please tell me how do we go from manual machine to discovering electricity and how was the internet and computers developed? Thanks I will read that book.

i didnt understand a thing . It's easy to string together a bunch of complicated word salad of buzz words with jargony technical mumbo jumbo dressing for the salad. I can do it if I want to . But I won't. Because I'm authentic. You seriously need to work on your authenticity. Don't spout intellectual meaningless text walls out of your banana-craving mouth . Anyways..There seems to have been extremely quick advancement in technology in recent years (AI is in every single thing these days ) but my main question is if you go back a few thousand years then humans were just as intelligent but there was nothing like the same advancement every year. What was it that needed to be in place for all this advancement to occur?

@Keryo Koffa I would have to ask you to get the **** out because you are derailing the thread. This thread is serious.

No you . My "banana "🍌 is much bigger than yours BTW 🤣

@Keryo Koffa I would lay aside the drugs for a while buddy or else you gonna go bananas

Its a towel to wipe your asshole with when it's hurting you . See how easy that was ?🤔