Someone here

@Nahm Dude I love you cuz you are woke af.. I respect you too.. Cuz you're mod ?... But what are you adding to this thread with just flirting with seeking_brilliance and throwing cold comments ??

@electroBeam https://www.amazon.com/Inner-Gold-Understanding-Psychological-Projection-ebook/dp/B01H7INFEU

@electroBeam some aspects of myself ?

@electroBeam lol isn't that my reply on your post? so you just came here to revenge lmao

@electroBeam look this isn't rocket science.. There is a communication between two persons right now (me and you).. From your pov and /or from my pov.. for this communication to make sense.. me and you are assuming that on the other side there is a sentient being receiving the message... And my sentience is independent from your sentience. What Leo is saying is that my sentient is literally dependent on your sentient. In other words when you go to sleep tonight.. I and the rest of the universe will literally cease to exist. We were just projections of your own mind.... It must follow that there is no point talking with mere images in your mind. To a dream characters. Watch the video. This is only resolved if you accept the existence of a second layer of reality. If you don't it's straightforward solipsism.

Tell that to Leo.

@Adamq8 I'm not going to accept wishy washy handwavey cute answers.. This is a serious question that is a direct consequence of this view. There is nothing outside of consciousness = I have no reality of my own outside of an appearance in your mind. I'm not a sentient being. I'm just a dead image on your screen. ===>why the fuck are you talking to me? Do you go about your day talking to the trees?

OK if that's true can you answer the question that Leo didn't answer (for whatever reason). If everyone is my Dream why should I talk to them? You see the implications of this view is directly solipsism. That other people are just appearances. They are not sentient. Only me is sentient. Or you from your POV. In other words there is no difference between people and rocks. So why should I talk to rocks?

@electroBeam the path starts and ends right here.

From reading your recent threads you are just confusing the hell of yourself with all these "insights". And well get ready to completely lose your mind if you don't wise up and become conscious of the infinite mindfuck that is this. Be sure the insights are infinte because we are dealing with an infinite reality here. You can let go of chasing that "one final insight" that is going to set you home for good. Unless you fully grasp that you don't know jack shit about Jack shit (Which you seemed to grasp slightly) .. There is no hope for you. Because "knowing" is fundamentally an illusion of duality. There is nothing to know. And no one to know it. Knowing is a misperception of being. Knowing is made of being. In the same way your entire thread is just a bunch of English letters on a screen. That's being. The meaning all meaning is secondary imaginary. Aka bullshit.

Hahaha? ??

Very interesting. Thanks for sharing. I watched your video. So basically to sum up you're saying the human =the atoms. Not that a human is made of atoms. In the same way consciousness is all the layers.. Not that consciousness is made of different layers. Is that what you're saying?

Life is fucked up. It eats itself. Kill or die. Deal with it.

Time is an illusion. No year is coming and year is passing. If there is an end it will be Now. But see NOW doesn't end because it doesn't start. P.S don't confuse the NOW with the content of the NOW.

Woke AF bro ?

@Nahm No dude lol its just that I don't bother too much replying if the person didn't bother too much being clear as possible about what he is talking about ? That's a dead end answer. It can and it can't. Lol. Even the poor Al has no clue.

And why is that a problem? You don't know that. Maybe it's not a problem. Maybe that's how it should be. Or maybe you don't know anything except for this one thing?

@Someone here @Leo Gura to me these are the most important questions. You can skip over them but you must explain that especially the first question to consider your view correctly. Because seriously if you are just a ghost in my mind.. Why am I talking to you? Or anyone for that matter? I don't know why you occasionally insult your followers or anyone who doesn't agree with you. There was a thread about your cocky attitudes sometimes. You promised you will work on that. Cuz such statements are completely unnecessary and not helpful in any way at all your claim is it literally disappears when you are not seeing it. You mean the moon literally ceases to exist in every possible sense at the moment it is not perceived because being perceived is what existence is in your opinion. The fact that is reapears again when you look again seems less compatible with that claim. It should be more likely to not find the moon again when you look again since it literally dissappeared from existence when you stopped looking. So why and how did it appear again? If you say it's not the same moon.. This is true in a sense obviously its a new moment and a new appearance.. But you can't say it's a totally new moon.. If that's true you couldn't be able to make sense of anything in your life if that's how it works. It will be impossible to make sense of the world.

The point is it does appear and act as if it has a second layer.. And you do act and relate to it from the assumption that it appears to have a second layer..it's simple.. I only care about how I relate to it.. I'm not doing pure intellectual masturbation.. This has practical consequences. So what difference does it make to call it physicality or work of mind? Yes it is the work of infinte mind to design physicality. with two layers or who knows how much. If it doesn't make sense to us.. Maybe because we need to stretch our mind's capacity to understand infinte capacity. At the end of the day saying that reality can't have a seoncd layer is just a limitation we imagine that infinite intelligence can't hide a part of itself from itself. It most certainly can. If it can't it's not infinitely intelligent no more.

There is ofcourse a difference.. Your whole attitude towards objects will change. If something doesn't exist as soon as it disappears from your consciousness then there is no point going back to it (because it disappeared) but you don't actually relate to objects that way. You assume that if the objects disappeared from your consciousness.. You can come back and find them again. Doesn't that prove there is a second layer?

@Leo Gura these just innocent questions.. Lol 1- if it's from your pov that nothing is outside of consciousness.. Who are you talking to? Your audience.. There is no one at other side of the camera hearing you according to your pov! And if from my pov.. Why am I talking to you if you are just an image in my mind?. I assume that based on how I understand your pov. Correct me if I'm wrong. 2- seriously how can someone not be conscious of the Truth? What am I conscious of right now then? What is this if it's not the Truth?. Please explain that without just dismissing it as neo-advaita nonsense. Actually show me how is this view "false". I feel like im about to have a breakthrough and major insights if I could put some pieces together.

Right from your limited human pov maybe it doesn't make sense to you. But reconcile that with the notion that the infinite mind is capable of everything... And here you are saying "no except for this one thing it's impossible" . A contradiction. Yes it is ONE layer but this layer is infinite such that it can be dissected infinitely. So there is nothing that should make the refrigerator to not have a second layer. Actually that's how you relate to the refrigerator in your practical life because you understand that intuitively. The second layer is NOT outside of consciousness ofcourse. But it's outside of my consciousness.

Your friend doesn't exist. You are talking to a conditioned programmed meat bag. So ofcourse no matter what you say to him.. he will keep mindlessly blabbering the content of his Christian neurons. The mistake is you think there are "true" ideas and "false" ideas . Your second mistake is you think there is an actual entity (person) that holds ideas rather than just ideas. The third mistake is you think you should convince him with your nonsense. And that this matters in any way at all.

??