Someone here

Most people when they take psychedelics they first don't understand what the hell just happened and it's understandable but because they missed the fact that the brain is in fact capable of hallucinating stuff and you can actually measure the brain activity that's responsible for this. So I would say it's easily explained mechanically. That doesn't contradict that they might reveal mystical insights. But what does it mean to our understanding when we know it was caused by a change in the brain state?

I think we are giving this kid more importance than he deserves. Let's just move on. He is a nobody (not in the enlightenment sense but even from the relative sense lol).

There's nothing to do in life but wasting time

Idk tbh. I think the first one who said it was the philosopher Socrates.

I know but one thing that I don't know a dam thing.

You don't know and can't know. No one else does nor can. Because existence is prior to knowing. Have a nice day.

I see Leo communicating in a normal straightforward fashion without complications and he is God himself.

Lmao haha

@IAmTheHolySpirit you keep telling people that everything they say is just a "thought" (that's obvious as hell btw) without realizing that your essays are also a bunch of "thoughts". You seem so passionate about spirituality and meditation (no-mind) and all that but try to distinguish between the relative perspective and the absolute perspective. We can discuss any issue in life like normal human apes without repeating "this is just a thought don't believe it" all the time. If you get hungry you are allowed to go and grab a fucking piece of bread without saying "it's just a thought it's just a feeling". Fact :The mind doesn't stop. Neurons are firing away in your brain all the time. Stop telling people to disassociate from their inevitable thoughts. Do that yourself and die in few weeks or be realistic and let go of the need to let go of thoughts. Important side note : everything I said here are just evil thoughts. Don't believe them.

These guys are talking about nothing at all and they wonder why they can't agree on it?

If so why insisting on the pointer "love" if it's just a subjective pointer?

Because that's what the word "love" mean in all human languages. If you mean something else then stop calling it love or create a new term for that. That would save us hours of arguing over semantics.

@freeman194673 If you want a scientific answer.. the chicken came first because all birds evolved from reptiles. They were giving birth directly and then they started growing wings and the procreating process evolved from nonsexual splitting into giving birth directly and finally by producing eggs. t's so simple. You don't have to be Einstein to get it.

Ever heard of evolution?

No!. It's a criminal behavior and these officers need to be put in jail and showed some tough love.

@Nahm may I ask you why you purposely always reply in riddles, koans and complex ways that can be so hard to even understand ?. I'm just curious because normally these kinds of topics are riddles already so they require no more confusion on top of confusion.

You will know the answer when you actually experience these things and it's gonna be more than obvious.

I'd like to see George Floyd's mother reaction to this. When a human being kills another innocent human being with cold blood like that and for no reason whatsoever you just have to realize this whole absolute love thing is a good quality load of horseshit. Now you can redefine love or write it with capital L but guess what it won't help you when an infinitely loving asshole is standing on your neck for 8 minutes until you die pathetically for no reason whatsoever. You can redefine love to mean anything and everything the same way I can redefine suffering to include everything even breathing can be looked at as somehow a painful process. Yes I need an awakening to see what I can't see. But some need an awakening to see what they already can see.

Looks nice. I might use it as my pfp idk ? lol. BTW regarding questions.. I really like this video by osho. Dude was on another level. Listen to him he knows what he is talking about and don't get carried by my endless questions .

Sure!

I downloaded it already and in the process of reading it. It's really deep and insightful. Thanks for sharing?

Yes that's what I meant by "real" VS "products or your mind" in this context. Either way they are real in the sense that they are in your direct experience as perceptions. And again the answer is you can't know that for " certain " unless you invent some technology that allows you to test whether other human vehicles are bots or not lol. Wait a minute.. I think I actually figured out a method to disprove solipsism at least as a theory lol.

LOL hello ❤️. I'm waiting to hit 500 posts and then I won't be a newbie anymore and can update my avatar lol.

@justfortoday you can't know for "certain" whether Leo, Galyna or anyone else are real or just a dream characters created by your own mind. Another way to put it you can't be "certain" whether you are dreaming or awake right now. That's the bottom line. Deal with it.

Why anything?