Someone here

Yeah weird .not the perfect timing for it .he still have to mature enough first . It is not compulsory or necessary for everyone to get married and have children. We would advise everyone to get married if the human race was in danger of disappearing, but the human population is exploding. If you do not reproduce, you do humanity a great service. But if you get into marriage, and especially if you have children, it is a minimum 20-year project. That is if they do well. If they do not do well, it is a lifelong project. If you want to get into such projects, there must be a commitment to create a stable situation for at least 20 years. Otherwise, you should not get into such projects, drop it halfway and walk away. And there is no need to talk about marriage and divorce in the same breath as if they come together. No one thought of divorce in India until recently. If it so happens something went entirely wrong between two people, there is no way to fix it, and they have to separate, it is unfortunate, but it happens. But you do not have to plan it at the time of the wedding

Yeah i agree. Being responsible parents is necessary. And that can't happen without commitment from both the father and the mother. I would say though..that at least 25 to 30 per cent of the people do not need to get into marriage because it is just a passing interest for them. For another 30 to 40 per cent, it may be a little longer and they get into this. For 10 to 12 years they feel good and after that they think it is a burden. But there are some people for whom the need is very strong. About 25 to 30 per cent need partnerships for a much longer period – they definitely need to get into such arrangements. Right now, people have found other kinds of solutions. “Okay, I wonc’t get married, I will just live-in.” If you are just living with one person, it is anyway a marriage, whether you have a certificate or not. But if you think you can choose your partners every weekend, you are causing serious damage to yoursel. If you find that marriage is not necessary, that is it, once you make a decision, do not look that way. If you make a decision to go one way, do not look the other way. You must do one of these things. If you hang around in between, you will remain in a constant state of confusion. “Which is the best thing?” There is no best thing. Live your life in such a way that whatever you are doing, you are doing that absolutely. If you have this quality, whatever you do, it is fine.

As a human being you have physical needs, emotional needs, psychological needs, social and economic needs. People may not want to consciously think about these things because they think their marriage will become ugly if they do. But these needs and considerations do exist. For women today, the world has changed to some extent. She need not necessarily get married for social and economic reasons. She has a choice. She can take care of her own economics and social situations. It was not so a hundred years ago. There is a little bit of freedom now. At least two of the reasons why you need to get married are out. You have to consider the other three. Psychologically, do you need a companion in your life? Do you need emotional companionship? And how strong are your physical needs? You must look at this as an individual. This is not a social prescription – everyone gets married or no one gets married. It is not going to work that way. As an individual, how strong are your needs? Is this some kind of a passing need that you can easily go beyond? If it is, do not get married because it is not worth getting tied up. If you do, it is not just two people but a family that has to face the consequences. I am not saying marriage is wrong. Do you want it, that is the question. Each individual should consider this for himself or herself, not by the social norm

Interesting. Let us first understand why marriage exists. As a human being, either as a man or a woman, you have certain needs. When you were eight years old, if I had asked you about marriage, the question would not have meant anything to you. If I had asked you when you were fourteen, you might have been a little shy because you were considering. Because your body started growing in a certain way and hormones started infecting your intelligence, you were thinking about it. If I had asked you at eighteen, there would have been a clear "yes" or "no, not now" or "not at all", depending on what happened to you between the ages of fourteen to eighteen. The word “marriage” might have acquired a very negative aura around it in certain parts of the world now, because there is a sense of juvenile freedom. Young people in some societies perceive marriage as a bad thing. When you are young, you are against it, because your physical body is in a certain mode. Marriage looks like a bondage and a chain. You want to do things in a certain way. But slowly, when the body weakens, once again you wish there was someone with you in a committed way.

Why no marriage? Also how are you gonna have kids without marriage? You don't want the kids to have unstable family.

Well ..primarily that life is full of suffering and we don't ask the child for his /her permission if they want to live this life that can be awful sometimes.

Good idea ?

Well..you most certainly can . That's how powerful Leo's videos can be .

Hru Mr.one post ? Of course. You are the only thing that exists ..

@Cykaaaa you're welcome

Because I'm conscious right now. And you are conscious right now .yet there is only one now and one entity that is conscious right now and only one now...without simultaneously happening. according to the multiverse model, all possible outcomes are actually realized, not just "possible". By definition they are possible. The point of this theory is that all possible outcomes are indeed realized in some so called "parallel universe". So yes, according to this view, in these alleged "parallel universes" there are other versions of "me" --- the "me" that could have been, or could be, or could become, but not the "me" that actually was, is, or will be in this Universe. It's based on a well known theory in modern physics.

Its precisely because God is infinite that there cannot be anything outside of God/your consciousness.

It depends on which perspective you are viewing it from. Like I said from the absolute truth perspective...there is only your pov right now and nothing else. What about my pov ? You can view it as nonexistent and that would be correct. Or you can view it as your future pov and that would be correct. In both cases the only actual pov is the one you are living right now. Thats correct.

Impossible to swallow

@Zeroguy you are not showing enough interest or respect to the conversation for me to answer your question. You are not seriously asking. You are just fooling around. So no answer for you.

@Gesundheit2 no worries..I stopped taking you seriously a long time ago .

Look... Obviously other people exist as objects of perception in my direct experience.. That's undeniable.. I go out.. I see people everywhere. But are these things" subjects"? Do they have internal self-awareness as I do? Is there someone behind their eyes? It there anybody out there other than me?. The solipsism philosophy doesn't say yes or no to that question contrary to what most people mistakenly misunderstood it.. Solipsism states that one's own mind or subjective experience of the world is the only "certain" thing to exist.. And the existence of other individual minds is "impossible to verify". In other words you are absolutely certain that you are aware right now.. But it's impossible to be certain that I'm (someone here) aware.. In fact why I'm talking to "you"? .. I should say I am aware and "you" are the unsettled mystery. The problem with solipsism is not whether it's objectivey true or not(is it actually the case that I am the only one out there)..but is that it is absolutely true subjectively regardless of that. You are trapped inside your own subjective experience in any case.. So even though I am aware right now from my pov.. From your pov that doesn't matter and there is no such thing.. There is only your awareness.. There is no such thing as "my awareness" in your awareness.. There is only these words in front of you right now and that's the actualilty of what is.. Anything else is just assumptions you add on top of it.."ofcourse there is someone there writing these words.. They couldn't just write themselves lol".. Really?. In your dream.. The entire dream and all the people inside of it..and their actions.. Are nothing but your creation.. They have no Reality of their own outside your imagination.. The only real thing in the dream underneath all the scattered phenomenon is you.

This is not a belief system. This is something you can become directly conscious of .but you will never do as long as you are endlessly mentally masturbating and using toxic skepticism to avoid doing the real work of actually awakening and deconstructing your entire mind and reality . But hey ..that's the last thing the ego would like to do .so I totally get where you are coming from.

Yes .that's why I said my pov Is not actually happening until you EXPEPERIENCE it .any once you experience it, it will no longer be a "future ", incarnation but a present one. Of course it can't be certain. From the absolute perspective you are correct..only the present moment is real .the future (and the past for that matter ) are Imaginary. But then again from the relative perspective they do exist as thoughts .I mean even the present is imaginary absolutely speaking. But you have to consider both the absolute and relative perspective. I agree 100%

No. There is not multiple POVs happening simultaneously. I'm you in a future incarnation . Right now only you exist. Nobody else. You will reincarnate and live through my pov .but until then my pov is not actual for you until you actually experience my pov .at which point it will no longer be "my" pov but yours .

Good point. I see .yeah that's one of the reasons I don't want kids at this age .

@machiavelli watch this video of Leo from beginning until the end . It's about authority and where does truth come from. You basically are the ultimate authority in the university. What you say is true becomes true for you. Stop projecting your authority outwards into external sources like NDEs reports .and reclaim your sovereignty. Good luck my friend .?

Anyone who has kids or has spent time with kids knows how much joy they bring into the world. But nothing can beat the love parents have for their children! The love parents have for kids is everlasting and deep. This love will never reduce, even when children grow up. When i was somewhere between 6-8 my mom used to sing Me to sleep saying: "Butterflies have wings, so they can fly. Bunnies have legs, so they can hop and run. Fish have gills, so they can swim. I have a heart, so I can love you." She also used to tell Me that All I want to see in this whole wide world is for you to grow up happy and healthy. There is nothing more brilliant in this world than seeing your children growing up

?

@Leo Gura unfortunately up unitl now..the majority of the votes are "no". Let us know when you make up your mind about this .