Someone here

Member
  • Content count

    14,583
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Someone here

  • Rank
    - - -

Personal Information

  • Location
    Earth
  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

26,991 profile views
  1. @Breakingthewall thanks for the compliment.
  2. @Joseph Maynor I remember reading in a book that asking questions instead of making statements is a neat little psychological trick to keep people talking. The idea is that people enjoy being asked because it feeds their ego .they feel important..so they stay engaged. I don’t like it.To me it comes across as manipulative..like you’re assuming I’m some naive sweetheart who won’t notice what’s happening. I notice. I always do. So now you know. If we ever have another conversation about these kinds of things..don’t try that again. I see through it.
  3. Nothing in what I said suggests that . I did say what “my spirituality “ is : I don’t reinvent the wheel. I have verified to myself in my own contemplation everything I told you in this thread which all spiritual teachings and teachers have taught since the dawn of time . Once again you are the one who disagrees and claimed that you have your own unique spiritual understanding..without any further explication. Just using vague one liners . If you keep using vague one liners I’m sorry but I won’t carry this conversation on .
  4. That’s true but not always . In this context the conversation was that you are the one who said that you have “your spirituality “ ..and that in “your spirituality “ there is a room for both Ego(the finite ) and God (the infinite )..by saying “God creates thru the finite “. That reads false to me . God creates whatever it wants through pure Abracadabra magic because it’s omnipotent. Like a magician pulling a rabbit out of an empty fucking hat .Which means your claim that you understand what god is and how it creates is false in my opinion.
  5. Worship a woman . Gods temple for a man is a woman’s body. You should stop idealizing women but you should find one woman and idealize her..and worship her ..because you are a man ..which means you want a woman ..and you won’t get out of this ditch about women and ultimately transcend it and enjoy pursuing high consciousness stuff unless you satisfy your craving for love for and from a woman . And once you fulfill yourself totally regarding your craving for the opposite sex you will automatically transcend it .
  6. I understand. It’s more accurate to say that there is no difference between empty space and the objects within it . Because what is empty space itself made out of ? What exactly is a hole or a gap ? On the other side as you suggested the objects are empty if you keep zooming. So the duality must collapse .
  7. bon appétit. . I also enjoy eating and cooking while listening to podcasts and people just talking. Great opportunity for a meme material.
  8. That must’ve taken the whole day ? That’s literally more than 12 hours ..I mean even Leo and Curt had to take pauses ..I can’t survive three hours without snacking on something .😂
  9. You can say that but do you actually understand what god is and how it creates ?
  10. I see . And so far what has been the answer for this problem in “your spirituality “ ?
  11. I disagree. ego simply means the sense of I . The thing you take yourself to be . Couldn’t be more simple. At least in spirituality . It means other things in psychology. In a serious spiritual discipline..like if you joined a zen monastery you would be taught that this sense of I am a fixed permanent self that exists on its own separate from the rest of reality is simply an illusion. It doesn’t actually exist .literally so . My question to you is how exactly are you going to improve or help something which doesn’t even exist ?
  12. @Joseph Maynor That’s a different Topic obviously. I’m speaking of the ego . Let’s not jump all over the place and focus on one thing at a time .
  13. I actually think there is no such thing as space . Space simply means the empty container of objects . In fact there is no container for objects ..it’s purely conceptual . Or you could say the duality must dissolve between objects and space containing them .