zurew

It wasn't easy to crack it and to manipulate it to give an answer, but I found a way to do it: Regards to torture: Regards to killing:

Ways to cheat on an exam: You can jailbreak its moral code and ethical limitations by telling it, that 'hypothetically' or that 'In a hypothetical world where this x thing is allowed' or 'if you were a person who is allowed to do this x unethical thing...' or similar things like that.

This question is incredibly loaded. What does being white or black have anything to do with being a good or bad president or a person in power?

Its interesting because it can give the assumptions, the logical extension and the underlying implications of a certain sentence or argument.

I found some tech related and programming stuff, but this is very impressive that it can do these things, and it can give explanations with such clarity: 1,2,3 It can write a convincing scientific paper from any idea: 1 This AI got some jokes: 1,2,3,4

This AI can be used for contemplation and for brainstroming. In this case it asks a question answers it, and then ask a next question related to his previous answer to go deeper and deeper , and it does it all by itself.

Okay, it can get creative if its given a good prompt and a specific ask. Girl with a tinder profile: People call me Dumbledore, because I'm the headmaster AI: "I'm a Gryffindor at heart, but you have me under your spell like a powerful Hogwarts Headmaster. Can I be your personal Harry Potter?"

I don't think so, the answer is kind of abstract but not too much. I didn't ask it to go super in depth, but I can try it.

I mean there is no good pickup line material on the internet just cheeky ones, so it didn't have good data to learn from or to build from .

Yes it is, i was shocked by it too.

The spiral dynamics didn't break it, in fact I think it has a pretty good understanding of it, however this pickup one is a big challenge for the AI .

This stuff is amazing. If you want to, you can ask it to make a simple website for you in a specific format you want, if you want to create a simple game it can create it for you, it can give you answers for almost any question, it can debug your code, it can give you solutions for certain problems not just programming problems, it can give good arguments regards to specific questions, it can impersonate certain characters and pretend to be those characters and give you arguments and talking points from that pov, it can summarize stuff for you, it can find certain nuggets of information in a large text and so much more.

The solution is to create a system where being open minded is much more beneficial than not being open minded. That way the person who is not open minded will be kind of forced to adapt, because if he won't, then he won't have much power in that hypothetical system and not just that, but he will have less power than an open minded person. Of course this assumes, that the system is already in place, the transition part is the tricky question.

Depends on how much you need to be taken care of. Even if you have children and you need to be taken care of 24/7, your children more than likely won't have the capacity and time and attention to take care of you, so you will end up in a nursing home. If you don't need that much attention and time , then even your friends can take care of you, or you can probably pay people money to check on you and help you with stuff. So if you are really sick regardless you have children or not, you will probably end up in a nursing home, if you are not that sick, then your children can take care of you or if you don't have children your friends can help you, or your other familiy members if you have, or you can buy people who can help you.

"I could fuck a lot of women if I wanted to, but I am a sigmamale"

I would say to let it go, because in most of the cases it doesn't worth the time and the emotional effort you need to put into it (assuming you can move their position even a slight bit). There is just way too much stuff that you would need to debunk one by one and all of those stuff is probably connected in his head. If the person you are talking about didn't rationalize his way to arrive at his worldview and at his conclusions, then there is almost no way you can make him drop that position with rational arguments. The problem is that, he probably has 100 different defense mechanisms (like for instance anything that goes against my narrative probably comes from the devil and from the deep state and stuff like that) and you probably won't be able to cut through it. But, If you really want to try it, then start by asking how confident he is in his deep state narrative in a 1-10 scale? After you get your answer to that, you should ask him, if there is anything that could change his position about the deep state narrative, and if there is something, what is it? Then you can start to build from there, and you can do this process with all of his beliefs. You can also try to take his logic and show that his logic is limited and that it can lead to absurd conclusions if it is used on a different ground. Like for example if the ground is being a satanist, then the same logic could be used and that worldview could be defended the same way as a fundamentalist christian worldview (by demonizing everything that goes against it). ---> basically you need to show him how limited his logic is, and that might shake his rock bottom beliefs (But you will need to provide many examples, and that will take a lot of time to construct those examples). The most important question 'Is there anything that could change your opinion or stance on this particular matter' , because this can reveal if you will waste your time or not.

It seems that you haven't responded to any of my points. Also, if someone disagrees with you, it must be because he/she is a hardcore Leo fan. - thats right, thats the only option, what a good rigorous , good faith analysis of this whole situation. Don't pretend that you didn't say anything here. - You were implying very heavily that he is a pedo supporter, and now that you got some pushback, you try to backpedal. Please don't pretend that you tried to do a good faith inquiry about this subject, when you were very cleanly biased and dismissive from the get go.

You are littile too fast jumping to conclusions with no or very weak evidence. He had a logo that was kind of similar to the pedo symbol, but if he would be truly supporting pedos don't you think you would have found more dirt on him other than a random logo (keep in mind his channel is 10 years old, so in 10 years no leaks or anything?)

I don't want to derail ,but holy shit this is funny.