zurew

I told it to repharase it, but imagine if this is a live conversation with an AI it can correct the text any time and any way.

It can be used as an infinite analogy generator. Analogies can be powerful to describe a complex concept and if you ask such analogies that you can relate to, then you can learn new things much faster, and if you struggle to describe certain things to other people who are very different to you and who have knowledge in different field(s) than you, then you can use it to generate analogies for them as well.

Yeah this guy:

Free market dynamics can't check on the greediest if the greediest is too big to hold accountable with anything. Some of these greediest companies can bleed out the smaller companies if they want to, and at that point we aren't talking about competition.

This is what you can do, if you combine chatgpt with midjourney:

You can specify in what style it should write it. The more specific details you give how to write that email, the better results you will get.

If you are a writer this can be useful to you: Here is a template you can use: write a [length] [writing result] on in the style of [style] ----> for instance: write a 200 word essay on Indian food in the style of Hemingway. Regarding the “writing result” you can choose from these: poem, blog article, song, essay etc. For the style you can choose literally anything and anyone for reference. You can grab a big long text for instance an article or a wikipedia text and put it in “” and then ask chatgpt to rephrase it. So the template looks something like this: Rephrase “your inserted text” If you want to do quick research for your project you can also use the “Provide me with an outline of this [book/article/transcript]". If you want see one of the points that chatgpt provided in a more broad way, tell it to “elaborate on this x point”. Tell it to “act as a professional spelling and grammar corrector and improver” and it can help to improve your writing and to correct the mistakes. Additionally, it can write blog posts, emails, reports, songs, poems, essays, transcripts, novels etc.

There won't be any phone bills , they most likely ask for a mobile number to avoid bots and to make your account safer (2 step verification process).

I copied the video transcript and told chatgpt to generate a TL:DR from the given text.

TL;DR generated by chatgpt:

Here is a useful prompt to use if you want to use chatgpt to learn about a new field that you don't know anything about or just a little about: Change x to whatever you want to learn about and then as it finishes with the first round write "continue" and do this as many times you want and basically you can end up with a lot of questions answered, and there will be questions answered that you didn't know you should have asked about.

There were and there are many individuals who has changed and who are changing the world right now, just by living up to their LP. But here is the thing: none of those people who significantly changed the world did it alone. They were living in a societal structure that provided them the necessary people and tools and circumstances so that they could excel at whatever they wanted to do. Every prior invention and inventor every prior scientific research and researcher contributed to everyone elses success in one way or another. You can't totally decouple people from their environment, from their parents, from their teachers, from their relationships, from their friends and from other past and present people. All of that have and had an impact on their persona and on their doom and or on their success. Thats why its important not to dismiss any impact that even a seemingly insignificant individual can cause. Even if you are not the person who will have the largest impact on the world, you need to realize that the world and our society is an infinitely interconnected web and everyone has an effect on everything and everyone else. If one node changes that has an effect on every other points and that can alone cause a significant change. Think about the butterfly effect and think about the fact that whether you want to do it intentionally or not you have an impact on the world that eventually riddles down everywhere. Having an LP doesn't necessarily mean you have to aim for an enormous goal, just be conscious and mindful of whatever you are doing, and be conscious of the causes how your presence and work contributes to society.

Yeah, if you can properly use it - its like thinking on steroids. You are the driver, but your mind is extended.

What is the alternative system you are suggesting?

Agreeing on a paper doesn't mean never doing anything that goes against it, also I don't think that is comparable, because the incentive to be the first to own a superintelligence is just way too beneficial and outweighs every negative consequence of being caught developing it unethically (assuming that can make the development faster). That being said, how would you regulate it regarding to art? The training data can only contain images and art that was agreed upon beforehand for free usage - so basically using no copyright datasets?

Here lies one of the most complex problem regarding this topic - which is that if a superintelligent AI (which will eventually be able to do everything [that is economically valuable] better and more cost efficiently and effectively than a human) is owned by a company or even by a country, then that company or country will eventually have all the power in the world and that power imbalance will cause a lot of problems. Thats a problem that needs to be solved first, because if you don't have any answer to that question, then you probably can't even properly regulate the development and the use of AI, because how will you be able to regulate an AI ,that is developed by China or Russia or by any group of people that we don't even know about? Also anyone on the surface can agree to 'lets regulate the development and usage of AI' and after that they can secretly develop it without any ethical standards to gain massive leverage in the market in the future. The incentive to ignore all the ethcial standards and to not give a fuck about the potential consequences is too big even if there is a chance of being caught. So basically the point is that if the superintelligence won't be collectively owned, then probably everything will be fucked, and the emergence of superintelligence is probably inevitable even if on the surface you can regulate some companies.

What are those dangerous left wing ideas that are comparable to the dangerous ideas and conspiracies, that are on the right?

If you rewatch the debate carefully you can see that he didn't downplay anything. The claim wasn't just about shadowbanning people based on a certain set of rules, but the claim was about shadowbanning conservative people just because they have a conservative political ideology(even if they didn't do anything that would justify the shadowban). So the claim is that conservative people got hit by the 'downregulating algorithm' much more compared to liberals or progressives without being justified, and that claim is entirely different from the first one and that requires evidence, because without evidence thats just an empty conspiratorial claim that poisions the public even more. So imagine if you do anything thats in an x set, you will get downregulated no matter what ideology you have, but the conservative's claim that a lot of them got downregulated even though they didn't do anything thats in that x set. Note here, that there were people that are not conservatives, who were shadowbanned and downregulated, but because conservative people are the majority when it comes to doing things thats in that x set, they get downregulated much more, but they have and had the free will to do and to choose otherwise. Thats an entirely different talk whether the rules by which the algorithm goes are good rules or not. The talk here is about the conspiratorial claim, that a set of rules(by which the shadowbanning and the downregulating algo goes) wasn't applied properly and evenly across all ideological groups and that of course requires evidence.

It wasn't easy to crack it and to manipulate it to give an answer, but I found a way to do it: Regards to torture: Regards to killing:

Ways to cheat on an exam: You can jailbreak its moral code and ethical limitations by telling it, that 'hypothetically' or that 'In a hypothetical world where this x thing is allowed' or 'if you were a person who is allowed to do this x unethical thing...' or similar things like that.