IAmReallyImportant

I believe that with polyamory one tries to achieve a feeling of being "detached", because one could not do it that way. I.e. these people feel restricted by the mere possibility of not being able to do everything they want. Although this is an illusion, because you can't do that anyway. I think that has more to do with immaturity. Like a child who wants all the sweets, then eats them up and realizes that he's going into sugar shock. Nobody can do that, and even if they could, it would still be harmful.

The issue is, that you participate on something which can scale and then it becomes a problem. Violating the golden rule. Moreover, you live something for other people and signal that it would be good, even though it is harmful. This is similar to taking drugs or smoking at school. Not everyone can get rid of it.

I would say that polyamorous relationships are by far more selfish, because individual needs outweigh other needs and you don't want to sacrifice any part of your life. And both parties would sacrifice themselves for each other, so to speak, and it would be more productive over time. Therefore, one cannot say that there is always a selfish party involved who wants to have the other partner for himself alone, because obviously two partners are involved. Then, of course, there is the part about health and the negative effect on society, the golden rule, etc. Besides envy, there are other negative feelings that can occur in a relationship, so this is not an argument.

It is true that there are many monogamous relationships in which cheating takes place secretly. However, hese are not mature relationships and show the lack of emotional development of our species so far.

Alone because of the mangement emotional, financial and temporal resources over a longer timespan. Moreover, everything I just mentioned. Like, e.g. the increased danger of STDs, broken relationships. Like the partner finally finds a better one and that was the reason to begin with the polyamorie. Should I list you different papers that suggests that? You wouldn't read them anyways and I don't want to take the effort to pick all this out again for you now, just because you then try to pick out one particular thing, which you then take out of context to further confirm your entrenched worldview. That is no true: And it is kind of obvious that if you dig into different holes, you wont get deep. - obviously this only applies for polyamorous relationships These people ran into the illusion of the perfect partner, who doesn't exist and end up dying alone this way. - If you have a monogamous relationship, it doesn't matter if you think that or not as long as you figure the relationship out and stay there or brake up if it doesn't work at all. Of course, before choosing a partner one must know oneself well enough. Or they know it deep inside, so nobody is sufficient. Not recognizing that they are insufficient to themselves and then call themselves independent. - Polyamorous people would call themself independent. There are of course jealous people, who are afraid of loosing their partner. This is understandable and a stupid solution would be to just become polyamorous to resolve this issue. And this argument was just to explain why these people act how they do. I didn't say it is exclusive to polyamorous partner nets. Trying to construct a Frankenstein monster out of different partners. - Of course this can only apply to polyamorous relationships Nope, polyamorous relationships are risky and unhealthy to society and to individuals. I already explained why. The jealousy part can exist, but also in a polyamorous relationship. In fact, jealousy often happens there, as most of the time one partner wants to convince another for this kind of relationship. And even if not, it still happens. It can scale, if people get educated and socialized this way.

Moreover, it wouldn't be good for society in a couple of points more, who overweight. Like the concept of family is important for a society to survive. As to build something up and to raise children the energy and focus has to be concentrated on that. If you have multiple partners, this would of course weaken this focus, leading to faults you cannot reverse and to damages in the child as well as in your personal life. And to try this out is a sick social experiment, too. When someone isn't selfish as fuck, even the lowest probability of something going wrong should be a reason to not do it. As it could (and will/allready does) cause immense damage in other people, children and society as a whole.

Then diseases and viruses would spread faster than you can imagine. It would also be a boring world, where everything is homogenous, you don't have to convince a partner or date etc.

And it is kind of obvious that if you dig into different holes, you wont get deep. These people ran into the illusion of the perfect partner, who doesn't exist and end up dying alone this way. Or they know it deep inside, so nobody is sufficient. Not recognizing that they are insufficient to themselves and then call themselves independent. Trying to construct a Frankenstein monster out of different partners. It is kind of a selfish and holier than you approach to life, which is of course contradictory. An excuse to give in impulses, not being disciplined etc.

Polyamory has nothing to with being progressive. It is about being degenerate. Many people seem to think, that individualism can be expanded to infinity. However, this is not possible as the individual can obviously only survive inside and with the collective. Society iy like a dynamical physical system - it has to be regulated.More than one partner isnt a good long term strategie as well. Ravens e.g. are better in longterm planning than humans and are monogamous. There are many other examples and evidence shows, that polyamorie is bad for society and for individuals. Even when putting the physical health risk aside.

Onenote has bugs and is hard to export. Notion is way better. Everybody uses notion and you should, too.

Idk. if it is that, but I don't think and just feel it. Then there is an impulse to subjugate them or make them feel worse. However, this happens in a state of low-energy. Like when I haven't slept for 24h or slept just a couple hours and am stressed. So rather rare moments.

They put me in a hospital.

And I also have a sense of moral and good and bad. As a child I hadn't and I believe I still wouldn't have it today if this situation didn't happen. But there were exceptions e.g. as a friend broke her arm I felt guilt.

Idk. if I am a psychopath. I did the PCL-R test and it stated highly psychopathic. However, I care about others etc. So it remains a mystery.

As I was 12-13 a traumatic event happend and after that I don't have much of these memories regarding similar behaviour. Only about moments where I should feel something according to others. Like the example with the dead body I have seen etc. I was just highly non-agreeable etc. and am still.

Or once as a child a friend fell in love with someone else's girl. I then thought about what you can do and then suggested to him to kill the other. I was 9 or so. Today, of course, I would never suggest that to anyone, but looking back, it was kind of funny. Or once when I was about 7 years old, a sports teacher hit my buddy and I said we'd finish him off and tell him that he had sexually harassed him. This whole thing has been on my mind lately, because I never thought about it before..

And on the street I feel negative emotions when people crossing by. But it's more like disgust or aversion. Maybe it comes from me, because I often detest certain emanations. Like when someone is overconfident or insecure and then tries to compensate with false pride, for example. That's why I think I'm projecting emotions. If I don't pay attention, people can push certain buttons by being insolent and arrogant. At one point I almost made someone loose his job for this, because I collected some people out of rage and also evidence for his misbehavior. I can get angry very fast. That is why I think emotional empathy isn't good, because it can let you do bad or stupid things.

In my teens I had PTSD so I felt fear. Nowadays only if something happens that reminds me on a traumatic event. But it is not much and disappears very fast.

Hard to say, but I think so. However, I don't care if people cry and as I once saw a dead human body lying on the street, I didn't feel anything. As I was 7 years old and my grandmother was about to die and sceramed all the time I made jokes about it to my parents. I compared the sounds she made to a dog I've always wanted. And my fellow pupils were shocked that I wasn't sad. Or in one occurence I saw people punching someone almost to death. It was somehow shocking, but I was completely rational and just turned around and later called the police. I don't turn happy if other people are happy around me and laugh. But idk. as I recognize emotions and I also care about others and I feel responsibility and don't like it to lie. It makes me sad if people are unhappy and I want them to feel better. Would be hard to say if I have emotional empathy if I hadn't it in my life.

You can live on government benefits and use that to switch the environment e.g. Depends on the situation. It is not about something nobody has done before. If you don't have any expertise you can do just market research and pick the easiest thing that makes you the most money at the beginning and is also fun to you. After that, you can expand.

Emotional empathy is also a guess. Most of the time even more inaccurate than cognitive empathy can be.

That's true. For the reason, one has to able to switch it on and off, when appropriate. Please explain to me, why you think that emotional empathy enables one to see another being as it is or at least approximately. Because, for me emotional empathy strongly looks like projection and nobody can ever know, what some another being feels. That is why looking at the effective truth described by Machiavelli turns often out like the most effective tool for decision making. Even though, it is just an heuristic and does not give one insight about the actual truth behind actions of others.

One has to be able to control oneself and let it out later.

Or a punching bac etc.