IAmReallyImportant

There is nothing that can be considered sweeping in reality. You don't know what others really want or don't want. Everyone is far too individual for that. Love is to let others be the way they want it to be and not the way you want it to be.

Nope, not true.

I think hyperinflation is probable if you take a look at the current world-economic and political situation. Major things are happening, not only COVID-19 but also more subtle events you might not recognize and this for a good reason. Of course you must learn to invest. I don't think you should trade stocks and real-estates but rather focus on currencies and raw materials. And a skill people need which you can trade could be useful as well. Something in a niche, which is part of a area with a high market-capitalization.

https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cannabis/21/11/23877099/this-psychedelics-unicorns-stock-is-up-50-in-one-month-beating-bitcoin-ethereum-and-dogecoin

https://amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/620185/ Research is biased to the left, which additionally influences society in this direction and suppresses independent thinking. I think one should listen to all opinions neutrally.

In addition, there will probably be expropriations, just like in the Nazi era. That in combination with suppression of opinion looks to me like the next German Reich in green. Then CO2 taxes even though it is not clear that humanity has caused the climate change at all. For this amount of uncertainty regarding the topic, they affect the economy in a negative way and all the little men then have to pay for it. And so on.. It is just stupid. I know many people and all of them are getting loud and angry if you tell them you have to listen to every opinion. Or if you say, there were also good things in the WWII (not things like expropriations), even though most of them were not very healthy. Nazis also could be right in certain points. I also don't blame them for being Nazis, they can be good persons in other areas etc. . Moreover, it seems hypocritical to me that people who are against other people that want to exclude certain demographic groups, do want to exclude Nazis as well. It is the same situations but from the other end of the spectrum. Doesn't make sense at all. A better solution would be to change education etc. .

Please inform yourself, before you make such arguments. There are laws in discussions, which are aiming to restrict free speech. For me this looks like rhetoric questions. Revolutions of any kind. I don't think you are serious about the question, you only want to find next arguments to proof you are supposedly right.

The problem is that accepting things as normal that are unhealthy doesn't change anything. If people thought like you, we would still be in the Middle Ages. Moreover, people are not left-oriented, but excessively left-oriented. And no, the climate is left-biased because the country wants to separate itself from the past, but at the same time uses left-wing opinions to suppress political opinions that the politician lobby doesn't like for capitalist reasons. I am neither left nor right, I don't care about your petty political interests and about the fact that most left-wingers are only left, because they want to push their egos in terms of moral superiority. It is the same with vegans. There are exceptions, but these are rare. For me the best solutions for most people count, the equilibrium. And it is certainly not this left-drift currently happening.

I don't think you can make a blanket statement that right-leaning people are cavemen. There are very many Greens who are reminiscent of hunter-gatherer times, only on the other side. In any case, I also think that most right-wing people are rather unreflective and according to people who are simple citizens - often times not very smart. For this, most Greens are unrealistic, pushy, overbearing, naive and often make very stupid decisions.

Not true. It doesn't matter which party "ruled". I am speaking about political decisions and the demographic climate. As you can see our economy is not as strong as you think of. And in addition, we are at the end of the top 10 rankings according wealth in the EU if you take a look at reasonable statistics. Moreover, we have a very old population. The average age is over 40 years. Hence, most of the people are baby-boomers, who are more wealthy because they had to deal with a much higher interest and lower inflation. They got over 20% interest on their bank accounts e.g.. Now, the younger generation has to deal with the debts of the baby-boomers. And this will affect the economy alongside the left-bias in the news and population as well as in political decisions.

In Germany e.g. most people are almost extreme left-wingers. This leads to bad political decisions, which weaken the economy and is dividing society into fractions. Because left-wingers in general don't look for consense either. And opinions are surpressed by the left and certain demographic groups are excluded from society, even if they have to hostile preference in any way according to other people or groups of them. Unnecessary government restructuring and tax additions makes it harder for small businesses to grow and people are getting less for their money. Today, Germanys inflation e.g. has reached its 28 year high and this is not exclusive for this country. It is also a global problem. Like yesterday politics were too much right - now it is the opposite direction.

The desperate attempt to ensure the survival of the company after Cambridge Analytica destroyed its reputation.

In society there is so much bullshit available, it is not possible to put this in words if you just became 10^(-3) % aware of it.

Correct, every idiot nowadays programs. I had a conversation with a person at the top in the industry - I mean worldwide not just some random manager or the 100th startup CEO at SV. A genius at her work. She said programmers are basically assembly workers. Only a few do know the craft really.

@28 cm unbuffedYouTube is only one platform to express yourself. And it is oversaturated. You need money, insider information and would probably better off joining a syndicate which shares information about the algorithm. As it didn't work for you that long I would try another approach. Hopefully something completely different. If you concentrate only on one thing, you overfit obviously.

Getting a masters degree is not future oriented, as the salaries will be lower according to rising inflation. Experts speculating about hyper-inflation right now. Moreover, more than 30% off all jobs will be replaced by automation in the next 10-20 years. And 6 figures is not much even currently and it will probably like 4-5 figures when you are ready for it using the above mentioned part. In the future, developing not only a skill but also the necessary business and investing skills will become more and more important. Working at companies no matter what kind of will become unattractive to most people. Even people working at Facebook or Google are more or less average. You should concentrate on an area with a high market capitalization.

Not true

Yes, but "average" depends on both distributions and cannot be isolated in that specific case. In special localities your statement applies. But not globally or absolutely in this domain considering the visualized data.

Peter Ralston (from the booklist ) wrote some interesting things in "The Book of Not Knowing" about pain..

Yes, of course. This is not what I am saying. Even if you take into account all the data, the correlation between the metrics is still nonlinear in the same way. And the green area is a massive one, which takes most of the weighting anyways. The way you explain it is like you are talking about a concentric-circular map. Then your statement would apply. However, obviously this is not the case.

look at the graph and on the axis which do represent each score.

Nope, if you have 1.25 primary psychopathy and 0 secondary psychopathy you would be above average. If you had 1.25 primary and 1.25 secondary psychopathy you would be in the average domain. These metrics are obviously only another way to describe the percentage values. You seem to be closed minded, open yourself. I bet you can do it

Average means in the average data area. If you have 5/5 it would be closer to average as 1/5 as you obviously see on the graph. The percentage does not say much because it is about the correlation of both metrices in this case which is not hard to see for everybody.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7296064/ "...Overall, results indicate that the LSRP is a valid instrument for measuring psychopathy in Bulgarian community samples..." https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00223891.2018.1519830 "...Results speaking to the construct validity of the LSRP total and scale scores were mostly in accordance with conceptual expectations. First, the LSRP total score had the strongest correlation with the SRP total and scale scores, with a relatively weaker association with the Antisocial factor, consistent with the absence of items capturing antisocial behavior in the LSRP. The correlates of the LSRP total score seem to indicate that the LSRP conceptualizes psychopathy as fundamentally linked to antagonistic tendencies and self-centeredness (e.g., antisocial behavior, attitudes toward infidelity, moral disengagement)..."

If I see people get screwed over, I don't care unless it is me.. And if people get abused then I think to myself that people should not get on my nerves with their problems or arguments. I see things mainly pragmatic, also spiritual wise. And I don't think I have HFA, as I don't show any of the symptoms.. But I think I can feel empathy, but sometimes it feels like a trained fake-version. And I can remember situations where I felt guilty and so on.. However, I think it doesn't matter if I would be a psychopath, as you couldn't do much about it anyways and I don't suffer from it.