DualityTheory
Member-
Content count
13 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by DualityTheory
-
Stop captalizing words, learn basic english, life needs no capital letters, it's cringe. and you don't need to emphasis "now", as if it would make any difference whatsoever.
-
DualityTheory replied to Identity's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
So people. The "Inlyitened" guy is using false analogies for reality, using games as example. He forgot that his example, which is already a false analogy simply doesn't work, as 'Mario' is simply another one of the 'bits' in the ROM data if the game, there is no "game" without the "bits", and the game is only formed by the separated bits, and mario is, again, only one of the bits. Mario can NEVER be anything else in the game, mario has its specific bits and other bits work to function other parts, nothing to do with Mario bits. And. Again, there is no "game" without their bits, it's completely nonsensical to say a single bit can form a game. Other bits are necessary. And that is from the false analogy. Of the person who loves to promote some idealistic notion of some "absolute" -
DualityTheory replied to Identity's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Says the guy typing on a phone. -
DualityTheory replied to Identity's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
No, it's not. Take the apple as an example of utter oneness. Apple is made of parts, an atom of apple is just an atom of the apple, if we were all of the apple (as a monistic interpretation), a whole big red one ball , then I would be an atom that would be contained at quantum to form the apple, you would be another. Each part of the apple would be totally unknown and outside of the others, so that would make of what is the whole "apple" . It's complete stupid to even think about an atom of the apple being the apple if the apple is formed of many separated atoms, even tho they were all contained at quantum scale to form the whole and each subdivision entangled only to the atom by its side. And that's a deeeeeper "oneness" example. But regards reality.. life, universe, objects, computer, etc, etc .. and beings/life. Is utterly another room of discussion.. Btw, the apple is just an apple, not "absolute" You're welcome. -
DualityTheory replied to Identity's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Contradictory BS. Therefore it's not possible. -
DualityTheory replied to Leo Gura's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
No. They're 》them《, NOT you, as only you are and can be you as you. No, they are not existence, they are simply people who happens to exist. Terms. learn. Basic english. How cool is to recognize this? Does it hurt? Why the desperation to believe otherwise? -
DualityTheory replied to Cameron's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
That would be a possible theory if there was any proof for God's existence. But there isnt any. But even IF, God was real, there wouldn't be no proof that God is more real than other Gods, and no proof God could be "bored", if God really had at least "billion IQ" intelligence (since infinity is a fallacy), or higher wisdom. God would absolutely know how to cure boredness himself, God wouldnt have to CREATE beings. I say CREATE, because 'imagining' is one thing, CREATING and physically existing, is another. Just like Picasso imagined his paintings. But paintings didnt create itself, Picasso had to create the painting (of course this has nothing to do with creation, consciousness, matter, light, life, planets, God, entities, etc,whatsoever) But applying that creating vs imagining understanding to it,..God (if existed), would have created beings then he Himself or "itself" (if it's an impersonal God spirit), could die LIKE PICASSO. And the beings he created (nothing to do with paintings btw, real beings with their own consciousness) painting would be a subset of what creation means, by art. So first beings created by God. remain, creating other beings. Before dying, like the first god who died. And humanity start being created. So. By this analogy, there is no God anymore. God is DEAD, IN FACT, "God" (if existed), has been loooong dead since the beginning of beginning. And we are all results of the first beings (first beings on earth, first ancestors of first humans) created by the first entity, God, which is dead. So, TRUTH = GOD IS DEAD. We exist by results of a bunch of other spirits and then born by codes in life. Your consciousness is limited by you and no other consciousness can be equal to yours once you born, your spirit has the potential to be immortal. But that if this monotheist God even existed. There is no proof for ANY god whatsoever. In fact, it would made more sense if the first god was a man and there was a goddess too. So beings could have been created out of it. And each being differently. Other gods could have created other beings. Racial differences. Etc. Dna, codes. Etc Which is why your body (unique to yourself, your DNA and code, which differ from others) exists independent of any beings and consciousness is something you as an unity of spirity possess. aalso, the body is a morror of the soul, more like a reflection of the soul. anyones body is a reflection of their soul, also a reflection of what they eat. Based on their soul, stress, etc. http://swatura-anamcara.blogspot.com/2011/03/body-as-mirror-of-soul.html?m=1 The whole panentheist notion of "bE oNe WiTh MaTtEr" religiously followed by some gnostic members here (which is just physicalism, monism disguised as "spirituality") is all false. Matter has nothing to do with you. That's the first step to raw spirituality, you want to "become" everything, as a "holy grail" but you have no f idea what it is to "become everything", no definition for it, youre just a person typing these things on a forum. Things that have zero sense whatsoever. By that I mean, meditating and imagining isnt becoming. Youre still an individual, apart from the whole (and there is not even a "whole" or a "all", none of it. Just like your soul is not connected and doesnt need matter. Ultimately youre not even connected to your mother, ultimately shes a totally distinct being from you. Ultimately youre not even connected to your mother. When youre making sex with a stranger, youre not making sex with some being that was somehow related to your ancestors. NO, ultimately youre making sex with a never seen, never touched, distinct being. Who you never knew existed. Because it never existed before its bIrth. Ultimately, a stranger is not even likely same as your ancestors. When you're making sex with another being/person/soul/their Higher self. Ultimately by touching its body youre touching the essence of their soul. Thats why Lady Gaga said she doesnt have sex with anyone because she feels people steal her creativity when making sex with her. Sex should be treated way more divine than it already is. Thats why we hide our bodies with clothes. And christian gnostics dont even kiss if not with the right person after long time, maybe after marriage. This Truth is the opposite of common BS you hear these days. it's whats hidings behind everyones noses. Off topic, Someone asked me about infinity parallel universes and other versions of you, Ultimately not even if parallel universes were true and an another version of you appeared just like you. Same self same everything. If you made sex with that other version of you. Ultimately you would not be making sex with yourself. According to the theory, once states are splitted that other person is not you. Was never you. Just a copy of you. Thats just something unrelated by that I needed to point out. -
DualityTheory replied to ZZZZ's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Your subconscious theory doesn't make any sense whatsoever. ?? If that was true, a soul who born in an island, all alone, with no society, no internet connection or friends to tell anything, wouldn't be attracted to woman, but we know this is false, it has nothing do with shape, shape is nothing. By your logic, gay people who born gay, it's because of their subconscious, total BS.