Osaid

I doubt his prostate was stimulated from a fan, it's hard enough to stimulate through physical means, but maybe he's just built different. Seems like everyone is different when it comes to sexuality. Will do

Like, anything. Coding. Writing articles or essays. Searching the web and creating a comprehensive synopsis for you based on what it found. There was even an article where they banned it in NYC schools. It's a real "threat", in the sense that it undermines previous methods of education: https://ny.chalkbeat.org/2023/1/3/23537987/nyc-schools-ban-chatgpt-writing-artificial-intelligence

I'll try it with a normal fan I guess. Never found standing up to be more pleasurable though, or any sensitivity in the back. Might be idiosyncratic or related to some specific kundalini state.

Depends on what you want. Are you actually interested in learning this stuff? Yes? Ok, and how good is ChatGPT at helping you learn compared to traditional methods? Better or worse? Depending on the answer, ChatGPT might be ideal or not ideal. Are you just interested getting high grades? ChatGPT is probably more efficient then. Otherwise, there's nothing unethical about being efficient and not wasting time.

Connect with a label that can promote it for you through Twitter or other platforms. Promote it yourself through some online space, Reddit comes to mind. There are subreddits for everything. Somehow have it used in some other creative medium, maybe a video game or visual animation, either yours or someone else's.

Lol it got copyrighted while I was halfway in. It was a pretty insightful documentary though.

That War Room seminar gives me cult vibes, was my first impression. And then a few seconds after the woman says "my boyfriend was radicalized and brainwashed by his cult".

Nice

Interestingly, the guy from VICE who interviewed the assault victim was actually on the Emergency Meeting podcast with Andrew and Tristan. So he was planning this for a while, and Andrew and Tristan knew he was cooking up a hit piece but allowed him on anyways. BTW, I edited in a few more details to the initial post you're replying to here.

I'm sure VICE is wise enough not to dirty their name with legal ramifications. Also, apparently the prosecutors themselves leaked the messages in the last video. VICE seems to be going out and interviewing people who were related to the previous allegations against Andrew and then getting information through that. Not sure how exactly that would affect the current hearing, if at all. Anyways, I also may have heard that in Romania arrest dates for high profile people are publicized to media outlets so that the media can take footage of it when it happens, which is what happened to Andrew Tate. Apparently it's to show publicly that the police are doing their job or something. So they might be more lax about it. Not entirely sure about this though.

Look for the intentions behind what they say and do. Look for hypocrisies in their behavior.

I am not pointing to concept or imagination. I am saying that "not seeing" is actually something you can become conscious of and that it exists outside of concepts and imagination. The lack of seeing is a form of perception/consciousness which you can experience. It's just that your mind is myopically focused on the presence of qualia rather than the lack of it.

You become conscious of it. It becomes much easier to become aware of this aspect of reality if you can enter a complete state of nothingness. This is one of those things where it's hard to comprehend without experiencing a certain state. It is a paradox, and it exists. You can't imagine it, because nothingness is infinite, and your imagination is finite. It's like trying to imagine what having no eyesight is like, it's just absent. There is the experience of it being absent. You don't see black, you don't see any colors, it's just completely gone. That's what pure nothingness is like, but extend that absence to all of your senses. Then, you just exist there. You are actually experiencing nothingness to a certain degree right now. For example, you can't see anything behind your head. That "not seeing" isn't something that doesn't exist, it is actually a form of perception which is being contrasted to what you can see in front of you. A recontextualization has to take place here to understand this. The only reason you can see in front of you is because you can't see behind you. They both equally exist together and they both define each other.

That's cool, I can see the similarities

Aw, not Lily's. Good find. Well, now I'll know where the lead and cadmium came from if I do a test.

What's the alternative to being me? "Not me" is an imaginary distinction you're making. "You" only exists within me. People underestimate how subjective and personal their experience is. Everything you perceive is biased and anthropomorphized by your specific psychology and the human condition in general. When you're viewing a table, that's not some strictly objective and impersonal thing. That specific angle, that specific interpretation of the colors, the way you categorize the object as "table" in your head, these are all things specific to you. Even your own physical biology limits your perspective. For example, certain animals can perceive ultraviolet colors floating around us, whereas you can't. My experience of "you" is intimately tied with my experience of "me." This is exactly why people are able to have different opinions about the same person, it's because they are literally perceiving different versions of that person. Also, as a thought experiment, consider that I am already you. But, in order for me to be you, I can't be conscious of my experience as "Osaid", otherwise you wouldn't be "Someone here" anymore, you would become a combination of "Osaid" and "Someone here", which would be an entirely new entity. For example, in order for me to become a kangaroo, I can't have memories of myself as a human while I am a kangaroo, otherwise I wouldn't be a kangaroo anymore. I would be a combination of a human and a kangaroo. If you follow this line of reasoning, you'll realize that my identity is basically cancelled out by your identity in order for you to exist. And this is exactly how all finite forms exist. In order for one finite form to exist, every other possible existence must be exempted from it, because that is what it means to exist as something finite, it exists through exemptions and limitations. Otherwise, it would be infinite, and not finite.

I would say it varies depending on how your body reacts to it. People react differently. A lot of people aren't in tune with their body and easily get addicted to stuff, though. So keep caution. It was probably just a general word of advice.

Not banned, demoted and left on their own accord

I considered it but was too lazy to rummage around for another tweet

Sorry, I was just being sarcastic about Keemstar being credible. I actually predicted someone might critique that part of my post. Anyways, my point is that in this case Keemstar is reporting things correctly, so it doesn't really matter that it is Keemstar reporting it. I just wanted a third party source in the post. And, if you don't trust Keem, you can easily look into it further and find many other sources saying the same thing. So, I don't think it is that important.

From what I've gathered, cessation seems to be another way of referring to turiya/pure consciousness, which can be described as existence/consciousness without any content. In all fairness, such an experience would include "feeling one" and "ego death" all at once. I tried asking for clarification on what it is on that one thread about cessation, but everyone just ignored me and continued on their arguments lol

Define vanilla sex, first. It seems like sex by default involves a merging of two people, I don't get the sense that it is based in separation. You're both getting vulnerable and intimate with each other. Unless that's not considered vanilla? Not to mention, sexual desire overrides normal egoic desires. It's a very unhygienic and irrational thing. It's way more intuitive and illogical. Suddenly, you don't care about the fact that you're mashing body parts where piss would normally come out of. It overrides your initial survival bias for being clean and replaces it with an indiscriminate love for something you would normally want nothing to do with. Maybe most people do have sex based on separation and I just look at it differently, I dunno. Anyways, I've never gotten the sense that sex or climaxing has put me in some sort of low-consciousness comparative egoic delusions. I just feel really happy and peaceful after it. It feels like I've combined my emotions with another person and we both got the opportunity to bask in it together, it's a very unifying experience for me. Perhaps, you might be conflating game/pickup with sex?

Because KEEMSTAR is one of the most credible news sources. If you don't trust KEEMSTAR for whatever reason, you could always look into it yourself and find many other sources saying the same thing.

Yeah, that's why he made the thread. Most of the thread consists of many different perspectives which aren't necessarily from the OP. At the end he did create a post where he attempts to define it though: