Origins

@Parththakkar12 Literally all you need to do. Seriously. Is focus in on your pure awareness (yes something an extremely small percentage of the population actually do, except rabbits, they have higher awareness status than most of us) and drive your concentration on it like a fucking beast. And you'll be all good .

@Gili Trawangan TLDR. I mean what the fuck bro, if you really wanted to be resourceful you would have written this with higher standards in mind. Fuck go take notes from the book Spot (Eric Hill), see how explicit that shit is.

@TheDude0 No problem! Stay true to your vision!

@SamC it’s always fucking awareness. Always. Don’t believe fucking anything else anyone else says.

@Jacobsrw you can’t just say “ungrounded” and expect anyone to believe that, based on what? This is starting to feel like broke back mountain, let me make it clear I’m not gay okay so don’t PM me just concede defeat or actually quote me like I said and refute like I said with actual backing rather than thin air from a dead corpse in a bar fight I had to finish off with wit of murder.

@Jacobsrw so I'm responding to you why exactly when all you're doing is reading my comments upside down it seems? You seem more interested in simply saving face than facing the truth of your door jamming against your own fingers. Seriously this will make for some humour, quote exactly where I made the claims you said I did? Also quote exactly how you managed to logically refute my own claims, even more humorously, without stabbing yourself in the humour throat. Bloods spitting everywhere and the crowd of the Colleseum goes wild! "Kill they chant" he is already beheaded I retort! You just say fluffy words without logically connecting to anything original or noteworthy in light of the rest of the discussion, I do the former but I always make sure I connect with the latter, because that's just what gods brain does.

@Jacobsrw oh he wants to step into the ring with his bikini wax done by an old grandma just back from hip surgery and she hasn't retired because Bill who she's been with for 69(er) years lost his war pension because he lied about receiving the medal of honour. Fine I'll yawn through your boring rules while playing with your comment like easy Tetris on my phone as I wait for my break coffee to get fucking cold while listening to the cohort of generation 2021 chattering around me in this modest cafe of cherry ripe advertisements and kiddies scurrying across busy roads in their plastic bikes. Let's get to work with model building then shall we. So the new inclusions you've made are: 1. Genetics 2. Epigenetics 3. Culture And even though you haven't explicitly said this you believe that there is obviously a governing variable concerning mate selection that falls outside of female intrinsic preferences that you're chalking up to culture? I'll say this nicely now, like a little kiddie doing their spelling bee, you're missing the fact that culture is an emergent property that is generated from what? Genetics. What is the emergent property for genetics? Environment. That's the effect of epigenetics you're referring to here which only has a modest effect on mate selection on a culture in a single generation. Yes if we completely changed our ways we'd see large effects over 100 years but concerning a single generation the effects will be experienced by those that undergo the changes as individuals and only very modestly pass on the effects to their offspring which still have the duty of conserving and extending those changes if they are in that way inclined (which is highly unlikely unless their family has some kind of weird cult like mentality or if they grow up in some kind of Ashram or Amish village). You made your claim between 20 and 30? So what. Age is your only demographic? You do realise we have hundreds of countries and other demographics within right? You haven't addressed all of my points there concerning making your correlations more intersectional, there isn't a direct correlation between age, appearance and sexual selection unless you take into consideration many other lollypop demographic colours. Kiddie gets splattered on their plastic bike, luckily not a kiddie, aged between 20-30, just has juvenile opinions digested from 4chan and cherry picking data without checking if they're poisonous first. Ego development? Maybe checkout your own development because of how easily you're jumping to conclusions based on words on a screen. Enjoy my words, not many people you'll find who's as good with them or the ability to abstract. Think before you speak, that's what Bills wife said at the dinner table while she makes him gag on his fake medal while FEMDOMing the hell out of him.

@Jacobsrw Leo could ban me it wouldn't bother me, he knows I'm right as well and so do you. I mean anyone with a braincell can see through the dumb arguments you're proposing. "The prettier the girl..." Dude is that your one fucking mathematical dimension? Albert Einstein here... She could also be stupid, narcissistic, drugged out, poor upbringing, badly educated. You've gotta work on developing your demographics. Let me tell you how it actually works. You have three main parts of the brain here that are theoretically speaking most important. 1. The reptilian brain 2. The limbic system 3. The prefrontal cortex Let's see if you understand that last one because so far not as you've not at all addressed my points you've just simply reacted with your reptilian brain underneath because you saw the word "fuck". Now you're using one metric, "the prettier the girl", what does that actually day about her brain? Zero. What do your conclusions actually say about a woman's choice? She only selects with her reptilian brain and limbic system, more so the reptilian brain. So basically you've insulted all intelligent women with your juvenile assessments. What so you found a correlation between women with high beauty and therefore on average scoring higher in sexual market value selecting guys with more higher survival value in the jungle? Big fucking deal. You want a medal? Do you think you've arrived at some Einsteinian assessment here? Isaac Newton please fall from the sky to show us how gravity works here! How about the women that have an above average IQ and higher? How about women who incrementally get higher scores educationally, financially, intellectually, spiritually and more? Ever heard of spiral dynamics? Shit like that, it matters how far up the spiral a guy is if the female is high up. Does this mean that reptilian characteristics don't matter for chicks that score higher on these other things? Of course not. What you're really saying here is that you think most women are stupid and most guys aren't cut out to make it in the wild to be selected by women in the mediaeval sense. So what's the solution if your theory is correct? Both guys and gals gotta get more wild and more intelligent. But there's more... You've added zero knowledge to the forum or me but look what I've done for you now youve got a neatly packaged 3 brain way of organising sexual selection that you still need to make unique for your chosen partner if you have or get one which will still be very nuanced and ultimately unique there. Let me say those three stages in a different way. 1. What gets them rowdy? 2. What makes them have fun? 3. What makes them think? That describes selection from still a simplistic level but ultimately still more sophisticated level than what you've described. People want the best right balance between the three brains if they can get it, but they're extremely biased in other ways the deeper they go into relationships. You're also talking solely about the initial stages of attraction, there's still many more factors that come into play the deeper into a relationship you go to (past histories, attachment style, personality, intersecting life paths, more). Thanks for being yet another user on here that talks shit with little substance. You're probably just a butt hurt "red piller" where they've been spinning the same nonsense for years. There's kernels of truth sure, but does it really take a genius to figure out that if you look like a snail you're not going to get laid? There's no need to make a speech about it on this forum. Just move on now. At the very least don't link me anymore you've just been destroyed already by others and now me.

@Jacobsrw God you sound such like a cuck! You have zero fucking understanding of the human condition. Grab your dick and learn how to use it. But first grab your squirmy wormy mind and flush all the fucking shit out of it then go after that pussy that needs your nice black dick inside and your sweet lovin. Give her the fucking of her life every god damn time. Release the universe son, release it. Just don't get pregs but which belly would the baby end up in yours or his? I mean hers... I mean what the fuck. No. Just no. You're not prepared for this topic AT ALL. I want fireworks, I want to see your mind light up a fury at the splendour of the universe. You have one fucking life and you're bringing us this shit? Grab a blow torch and start lighting up the world of inconsequentialism in your mind and start again son, WAKE UP YOUR BODY! I'm doing you a favour.

@deci belle I believe I may have reached nirvana now. Purity of mind. I achieved/achieve this by scrambling consciousnesses signal by self inducing a psychedelic state through the imagination alone. After I self induce (so no actual physical drugs as assistants) this state it's as if I've never experienced this reality before other than my memories to it. I'll investigate this further, perhaps its very easy to achieve and I'm just lucky to have stumbled upon something not many people have. Of course, you do need to have a mind that's practiced in the art of imagination to at least some extent as well as knowing how to scramble the contents of consciousness through the use of focused (chaotic) imagination.

@Preety_India no pressure and no big deal. Surfing all of the creative adaptations I've uncovered there right now that I may write about another time. Just a monkey that figured out how to make fire ? over here.

Firstly, let me preface this by saying that I'm not trying to "get over someone" (in the sense that they never existed) as this can often inappropriately be paired with "getting over missing someone", quite the contrary in my personal life at present, its my belief that someone can truly hold a close space inside your heart in the absence of missing, rather in my individual case here, I have that feeling of "missing" and I've fortunately diagnosed the root cause of it so I'm sharing my findings to be of aid as they have essentially successfully transmuted my state. Feel free to share any further theories, contemplations, methods and concerns yourself to share what you believe may be of aid to someone else here where my own course of action doesn't resolve the phenomenon. Secondly, in general I don't think we should aim to "get over anyone" per se anyhow, the goal for me at least should be integration. For we and they are all a part of the universe that we need to map accurately in order to traverse reality effectively, by "getting over them" as if they never existed, you're blocking out wisdom that would otherwise extend your life purpose on this planet as well as all like actions and relationships that corresponded therein. Thirdly, I do not think "missing someone" is necessary evidence to justify the continuation of a relationship, our human history after-all has well documented millions of relationships that ought to never have existed under ideal contextualisations of compatibilities. "Missing' needs to be understood in two senses, the biological and the parental, not through the lens of the personal relationship however, the latter being the mistake that most people including myself make. See the missing itself and associating it with extra meaning to the credibility of the relationship is just a projective device. By making this automatic association, we misjudge the relationship between the phenomenon, in this case the "missing", and its relationship to the origins of its manifestation in reality, in this case it having evolutionary biological roots as well as parental roots regarding repeating the responses you had as a small child while calling for your parents, for most of us, our mother. Evolutionarily, "missing", keeps the tribe together (at a minimum), from the perspective of our upbringing, "missing" is more or less a feeding response, in this case, an emotional feeding response. "Missing" is analogous to the desire to be touched by our caregivers, which is the same association that's being created between the person that generated oxytocin (for lack of a better way of explaining it) in your mind through repeated interactions and then their absence creating the phenomenon of "missing". By understanding this association and connecting it with the fact that analogously its literally just you in a cot crying until someone answers you, rather than evidence of your relationship having some kind of virtue towards the future, you'll be much more effective at contextualising your experiences. And I mean that quite deeply, to the level you're successful here you will indeed begin to self sooth and become very comfortable and at ease with how life is manifesting itself for you in the present moment in the context of the "missing" previously bringing discomfort. Thus, in the awareness of the above, sit in being, sit with the feelings and whatever arises. Resonate with it and this knowledge you now have at your disposal with a kind of knowingness and without too much headiness (to balance: sink as much as you can into awareness and (awareness of) the body) until you've been illuminated enough. Fourthly, in light of "missing' not really bringing any credibility to the relationship other than successfully describing the repeated release of oxytocin likely over any number of days to months, there is of course the question of what does bring credibility and therefore what justifies the continuation of said relationship after the space that created the original experience and sensation of missing has subsided. My view is that said merging to be done truly, should be a direct consequence of having a shared consciousness space with reality (so its even deeper than just shared values, though inclusive thereof), along with many other compatibilities that should arise, one most importantly being potential future life directions and their capacity to physically overlap, a complete lack of the latter and you'll never meet and a complete overlap and well they've probably at least at one point sat right beside you. Being predominantly online in the 21st century there are many distinctions to be made on the various kinds in which our consciousness spaces can overlap, the physical being the most visceral albeit still being just one of many of that creates an environment for said consciousness spaces to be created by individuals. Here's to building relationships that work based on sound wisdom and intelligence as opposed to merely, albeit sometimes a nice complementary pair from the lens of having sentimental value, missing someone. This same diagnosis can be performed in the context of many other potentially difficulties features within an emotional relationship, from jealousy to judgement. That is, the capacity to identify the false associations in the presence of being self aware of projection and rectifying it within the space of accurate knowledge and being-ness will largely render you free from many more evolutionary relationship chains than you otherwise thought possible, allowing you to keep the best parts awake in a relationship, from true care to true love, while allowing other aspects to intelligently remain silent where further integration or utilisation in reality does not serve to be a good counterpoint. Seek relationships based on truth (where truth is defined as the absence of falsity and your process there the identification and removal of falseness - the characteristics as well of said relationship having the qualities of (1) purity (2) simplicity (3) beauty), a mere feeling, albeit beautiful in a way, can have falseness if its locked in a cage of either impurity and/or too much complexity. All the best in your own relationships, with the entirety of existence.

@Preety_India “Missing” is also analogous to literally any feeling as well especially feelings we experience in relationships, more so even if you have any attachment style other than a secure attachment style, otherwise what I wished I could have added is the simple visualisation of walking up to yourself as a baby in a crib (or any more effective situational variable), picking up, holding them and soothing them, reassuring them relative to the feelings experienced in the situation. This is an especially effective visualisation I’ve found with emotions around attachment styles, overtime it’s one of many things we could do to change our subconscious modelling about our automatic responses to relationship situations and emotions. For example if our partner is away, we might not only experience feelings of missing but also different fears, say from fear of abandonment to unworthiness be used for whatever reason that’s the meaning we ascribed to when our caregivers were away from us which in turn modelled our belief patterns which such a visualisation would change the feedback loop of). I want guarantee that all my ideas work for everyone though but at the very least I’m glad you’ve got some ideas turning. Theres that important adage that was a very big game changer for me years ago, “Cells that fire together, wire together”, electrochemically thus mind to body, thoughts to emotions. It’s about repetition + emotion on the right signals that impacts the way we respond to situations overtime, which in the context of attachment styles that I know you’ve spoken about, we can move towards a more secure attachment style more and more overtime the more we understand our own behaviour and what we can do to slowly more and more move to a more secure attachment style, making it easier for us to feel safer around vulnerability and connection.

@TheDude0 start with looking for loyalty second a growth orientation. Everything else will be easy from here s just focus on yourself, what you bring to the table and your genuine compatibility with others. All the best.

@Strangeloop great stuff you'll shag eventually don't sweat it just remember your awareness is primary (to sex too).

Wishing you well @Preety_India!

Just appealing to your average conspiracy theorists narrative about our 21st century Netflix iPhone 9-5 working zombie apocalypse in the context of COVID. No this doesn't mean I'm pro-vaccination. I won't be getting it but in no way should that influence your opinion. Haha spent about 5 minutes on this one in Photoshop. See if you can understand it fully (in light of prior comment as well).

Origins wonders why there is such urgency on mass vaccination of Australians around COVID-19. Origins looks up top 50 richest people in Australia. Origins notices that most people in the list are above the age of 60, many into their 70's and even some into their 90's. Got it. (as part of the real explanation if there was any a little more invisible than what's being portrayed) The simplest explanation is usually the best, plain neuroticism makes sense first outside of imagining much more about conspiracy, although if I investigate further (haven't done a lot) and find something worthy of mentioning I shall. Who profits most from the vaccinations? Otherwise spending some time reciting all the countries and their visuals off by heart today (I mentioned a little while back that I was encoding all countries into memory, this was achieved). World knowledge continues. The virus can still mutate as far as I know hence the necessity of still vaccinating everyone outside of the elderly. Regardless, I don't like the picture at all.

@Cireeric Just years of research. I’ve developed so many connections between things I couldn’t just say it was “x piece of information”. There’s many gaps that I haven’t spoken about: Like all things neuroplasticity has genetic limits, so yes we’re not only plastic throughout our lives that plasticity has developmental and biological limits; the latter here referring to how two people with the same IQ, age and personality can still have a different levels of neuroplasticity potential. The falsehoods are merely around measuring the scope of that neuroplasticity. Our conventional scientific views were developed there from a half written and half read book that they got people to believe was the fully written fully read book on plasticity. If you want more info just PM me but you’ll have to be much more motivated than me to get and use the information otherwise I won’t be motivated to think about it and tell you. So only if you’re super keen should you contact me as well as describing your purpose. But yeah, just generally, sounds good what you’re doing. Keep opening up new pathways there.

No matter what level you reach you'll always be an NPC to someone, thus that someone is always an NPC.

"Awareness steps into the concert of activity, it doesn't create it if anything at most it influences it." - Origins It may arise out of it, but there's so many may's we could explore there. This goes back to my thoughts in the first post that I'm still completing regarding noise and trying to turn that into signal and what that signal even freaking is in the context of the rest of our brain, why and how it came to arise and how it could have otherwise arisen, etc. This is how I feel right now in terms of understanding all of this and then putting it into sentences haha. I'll be creating more of these little clever photoshopped images overtime. Film: Happy Gilmore, changed the golf ball to a brain

Brief introduction: I am convinced that my fellow species, including myself to varying extents (to this understanding I seek amelioration), knows next to nothing about what reality is. In doing so they do not know who they are, what they are, why they are, how they are. (1) This is a haphazard visual depiction of how I imagine my own experience and everyone else's, its representative of how I am projecting onto reality about what reality is. Everyone is a box, reality is the light beaming from, within, into and out of. (2) This second visual is depiction of the noice that we all experience in translating reality into meaningful content, this a process of processing chaos into order or order into useful chaos. This is something that would be representative of what's inside everyone's "cube/box". We begin with no signal and through our perceptual receptors we seek to translate something into a signal. If you don't understand that we're going through this feedback loop of no signal, to trying to create a signal, to some kind of signal, you won't have a foundational conceptualisation for how to think about literally anything you've ever thought about before. (3) this third aspect is representative of a heartbeat that is established, that is, a signal of the sorts with reality. This signal can be strong or weak, loose or fixed, flexible or inflexible, sporadic or not, etc, etc. (4) this fourth visual is meant to depict the different cubes/boxes that people are, and thus literally the kind of resolution they have of reality and therefore what they're capable of doing per square unit of time. Level 1 - Level 2 - Level 3 - The human brain is a relatively slow processor, it has many bugs (like cognitive biases), has great variability across the human species especially across humans altogether, and so there are many problems that exist within a human consciousness as it concerns the translation problem between reality, which is a language, and subjective coherence, which is our own inner language (which can include from simple understanding to complex strategies). I argue that for any human consciousness to properly relate to reality in a way that its memories make sense, it has to go through increasingly more sophisticated internal systems to establish reality coherence the more those memories relate either further back in time or further forward in time. Depending on the level of the consciousness in terms of processing and awareness, of which are related, this is a subject of repeating a number of steps one has come to learn they need to employ in order to complete an objective or, if the knowledge and time is available to the consciousness, literally growing the capabilities of their own brain so that they either don't have to perform as many steps as they did before / can improve the sophistication of those steps to save in time. In this sense, human consciousness as it concerns the human brain is not only a time traveling machine, it's a time saving machine in light of the sophistication of its processors around reality coherence. It is very important to understand our limitations, let's take the following consciousness for example. Look at this guy stuck in this cage for example, before jumping to fully feel or express the associations you're experiencing, I want you to reflect on them. Think about the judgements you're forming on the guy and the overall picture itself. Still completing this post....

@bejapuskas that’s interesting, what has been your philosophy in general concerning relationships? How would you execute the idea of boundaries across multiple situations? For me I rarely consciously think about it unless there’s an issue, or do you mean boundaries in terms of keeping people in? Like a dungeon? Because you did in fact phrase it like “create some boundaries as well for the people you want to keep in your life.” Yes.... Boundaries... Do you give them prison yard time, a little daylight once a day to do a workout perhaps? In the White House among the Clinton’s boundaries would be in the form of bribes, extortions, contracts for facilitating boundaryless acts First half being serious second half just kidding around of course

What are you representing in reality and how are you representing yourself in your perception of reality? Consciousness is a representational problem in the context of what images you are superimposing onto reality that exist, like a profile image to any person you think of in your mind to any object you think of in your mind. Representation is particularly important in the context of self awareness, how many modes of representation do you have? 1. Cognitive - I am aware that I am aware 2. Emotional - I am aware that I have a feeling experience 3. Kinaesthetic - I am aware that I am in a body (can correspondingly experiment accordingly) 4. Psychological - I am aware of any combination of all of the above and this is combined with other intuitive, concrete and projective experiences of mind that transform my ongoing awareness depending on the direction that I would like to take it. Number 4 is particularly important in the context of wrapping up your psychological perceptions of self and all the myriad to simple salient experiences you go through in that perception. As an experiment I want you to go in front of the mirror and see your reflection. What are you aware of? What do you see? What do you feel? What do you think? Why do you have these associations? How do you think these associations formed? What are your thoughts in relation to this reflection in the context of time (past/future)? The next step I want you to take is to begin to creatively construct your representation of self that you will encode into memory and recall the next day so you can orient yourself in reality that you've personally constructed as opposed to relying on the one that runs on autopilot. Because of how person-image orientated our brains are the best way to encode your own self structure is by taking a snapshot of yourself and importing into your memory followed by attaching associations to that image of yourself to remind your consciousness of all the primary elements that you want it to bring online when you're carrying out your sense of self in this world. This is the process of undergoing integration on those above associations you experienced combined with a process of individuation beyond the intersubjective reality that contributed to your perception of self in lieu of their various reactions to you. It is to abridge automatic reaction with self generated mental structure so that their is an easier opening for growth protocols to take place. This is taking advantage of the brains encoding of "how other people behave" in lieu of autobiographical recall. We don't have this ability in general of course because we don't naturally have any eyes on ourselves outside our technological capabilities. For me, all I need is my awareness. P.S - that's all I imagine "enlightenment" (for lack of a better world) is, just putting it out there. But my awareness has to do something in this reality of course so I strategically generate self structures that the brain can attach itself to into the receptor sites of "sense of self in the context of awareness". The above process is exemplary of this. The brain is so used to feedback looping on autobiographical memory however it is going to present itself to us, this keeps us in a loop of older programs that we'd rather rid ourselves of. In saying so, you can consider this more or less a backdoor, a secret passage way by which you can strategically over-write those programs that you'd rather have no longer automatically run in your subconscious about how to respond to various experiences. Moreover, you can continually use this process to question, refine, mature and grow all of those associations that you form because you now have a much more objective scope on not just your sense of self but conceptualisation of self in the context of how you're to navigate reality. In these associations you can plant your values, principles, life and world views, goals, ambitions and more, in doing so you'll be able to generate a much more objective perception of yourself in the context of your raw sensory and best abstract perception of reality itself. Consider this as well as something that requires preliminary ego development that I wouldn't be able to detail here without putting in much thought on it, secondly, it is also itself a good backdoor through and beyond the ego. Of course, providing that you're not being insensible with the kinds of associations that you're generating here. Lastly, by understanding fully how to implement this process, what should be occurring is when you recall consciously created self / growth self, your brain generates the same associational patterns that it would if it were perceiving and or recalling another person, meaning it falls for the exact same biases you need for the "growth self" as it does when its recalling another person in your imagination. Meaning biases that would have previously held you back by recalling older states of self are now being overwritten because those biases are now steered towards your growth self. This is an ingenious design I've never heard of anyone saying anywhere else so you're lucky if you understand this fully then . Feel free to ask questions, pose ideas, etc I'm open minded. ====================================================================== Questions I'm working with: What makes me do something? What makes me believe something? Where does belief occur in the context of being aware of thought as well as feeling and therefore belief itself? How about at different time segments of processing perception and thinking itself? How do my present beliefs influence my constructions here, what are the pro's versus the cons? What are all the limitations versus open points that allow me to construct meaningful reality based associations (as described above) versus avoid those associations that are intrinsically non-meaningful? Where is the above "consciously created map" in the context of automatic reactions and vice versa? How do you balance the "consciously created growth map" with the automatic reactions combined with updates on said "consciously created map"? How does the brain compare its actions against the "consciously created growth map" and what is the process by which it transposes its inferences when comparing present experiences with said map followed by generating the corresponding adapted action? What is the inner dialogue in context with the projected ideal dialogue that can be inferred as a consequence of the brain making inferences about the "consciously created growth map"? What is the mechanism by which the brain makes intelligent adaptations here? What is the process by which the brain fights the competing impulse, if it occurs (will explore the full extent of), with the "consciously created map"? Is this purely a subject of the brain now becoming completely convinced of the reality of the "consciously created map" being superior to and primary to (more the latter) the older programs? That is to say, that *belief* has been hacked in this sense on a subconscious level.