Husseinisdoingfine

Spiral Dynamics integral Blue propaganda. I'm joking, but this is a very blue take.

MASSIVE UPDATE TO THE KANYE SITUATION Pics below are from his X.com [Twitter] account. It's also official that he's launching a coin called "swast-a-coin".

I grew up in Frederick, Maryland most of my life. So I'm debating whether or not, if I were to get into football, to support the Ravens or the Commanders.

https://censor.net/en/news/3521597/pistorius-compares-the-number-of-weapons-produced-by-russia-and-the-eu

And to make it worse, Vladimir Putin has made it explicitly clear that in any future peace negotiations, they get to keep all of the land they annexed. Pete Hegseth in a recent speech said that Ukraine reclaiming this land was highly unlikely, implying that demanding the return of this land was not on the table in upcoming negotiations. I don't know what to say, other than why?!?! The Russian Federation is already the world's largest country in land mass. America has only four time zones, Russia has eleven. And yet, in terms of per capita income, Russia's not just worse of than us or Italy, its worse off than the Maldives or Palau. Its a massive country, with an economy roughly the size of Italy's. Its only economic output, is oil and gas [as well as organized crime, private military mercenaries, and corruption]. And even their oil and gas sector is so lame, that it relies on foreign companies to build the technology to extract oil. Instead of fixing and developing the land we already have, we for some reason need to annex more. Why? Is that going to increase our living standards? Don't we already have enough land and natural resources?

What’s especially tragic is that I don’t predict that Ukraine will ever get its land back. The parts that Russia annexed are too fortified with dragon’s teeth, barbed wire, trenches, mines, etc… and it’s getting too expensive to support Ukraine. Even the NATO general secretary admitted that Russia produces more (military equipment, artillery, and more) in three months than NATO in a year.

Pretty much my schedule. I get all of my news from Russian News TV, but I only check in really once a week to watch for an hour or two, on Sundays, and bits and pieces scattered throughout the week. Anything more than that is a waste of time. Link below is basically where all of my news comes from. https://smotrim.ru/video/2930282 https://smotrim.ru/video/2936101

Bumping this thread, you're absolutely right to post this. America is def backtracking our commitments when the founders drafted the constitution and declaration of independence.

Certified pedophile. くまくま━━━━━━ヽ（ ・(ｪ)・ ）ノ━━━━━━ !!!

Thank you @Beans for casting a vote. I encourage more people on this forum to cast a vote, send this thread to people.

I found this video to be quite funny, definitely worth the watch and definitely my parents when watching the show.

No, please, as an American, I'm begging you. You Canadians have such a beautiful thing going on, you don't want our Government.

Dating apps such as Hinge and Bumble allow users to list whether or not they're a Conservative or Liberal, allowing you to weed out Trump supporters, if a dating app is the approach you choose to take. Women tend to have a much easier time on this apps, so it should work. But in all do seriousness, if you're a serious truth seeker who is committed to seeking the truth, otherwise why else would you be into Actualized.org and spirituality, then don't date; Trump supporters, those who identify with being part of an organized religion, those on the far right, etc... These types of people have a deeply corrupted and lazy epistemology and don't care about the truth. No one who supports Trump cares about reading books about politics and studying it seriously to find truths. Trump supporters don't care about the truth, period. They don't care about epistemology, metaphysics, spirituality, raising one's consciousness, nothing. And people vote for whichever candidate reflects their values. So someone who supports Trump is going to have a more nationalistic, traditional, and materialistic outlook on life, and if you care deeply about Actualized.org, such a person may be incompatible with you. A gross materialistic view on life, these are the Patrick Bateman's of the world. Not highly conscious people.

JUST IN — Trump administration pressuring Romanian Government to lift restrictions on Tristian and Andrew Tate. 🇷🇴 🇺🇸

I don't mean to take sides, but you did assault someone's dog. One time a big bulldog charged at me when I was walking my dog. To avoid that dog from hurting mine, I simply picked up my dog and cradled it in my arms like a baby, while the bulldog tried to climb my leg. And there you go, problem solved. The owner of the bulldog ran over and apologized, and all was well. Now imaging the needless cruelty and suffering that would have been inflicted if I began kicking their dog.

SDi ORANGE vs GREEN men in a nutshell.

I think Kendrick Lamar did a good job. My parents are immigrants and didn't at all understand this African-American hiphop, n'or did they know who Kendrick Lamar was. So they weren't able to appreciate the show. Although, I don't like him playing a diss-track against Drake so publicly. At least 50 to a 100 million people screamed in unison, "A minor", that night. What did Drake do to even deserve this? Isn't this a bit excessive? I don't think that's a fair comparison, as football is entertainment and Leo is a University philosophy lecture without the University. I was referring to the type of person who enjoys NFL, versus the type of person who enjoys Leo. Because Leo has commented numerous times in the past that a person's consciousness affects how they; vote, what food they eat, the entertainment they enjoy, etc...

Okay deal. Those who live in countries where American football and NFL is significant may vote. Americans who live abroad may vote as well, as well as anyone (non-Americans) familiar with American culture.

I know the Super Bowl has long passed and this is kind of old news, but the results of this thread-poll are revealing to the type of person who is an Actualized.org viewer. So... as of February 16, 2025, eight people have answered the poll. Five of those eight people answered that they were not going to watch the game. So a majority of Actualized.org viewers do not watch this sort of thing. But, even the three who said they were watching the Super Bowl, ZERO people answered that they were regular fans of the NFL. But why? Why do you think this is the case. What is it about Actualized.org and the NFL that makes it so that there is no overlap in their fandoms? What do you think?

I literally want to learn how to C-Walk solely because of Serena Williams.

What Slovenia essentially did was decentralize the economy. Instead of businesses being run by the government, those who worked in the enterprises managed and owned them. To achieve this, they created workers' councils, consisting of 75% workers, to make administrative decisions for the businesses. Businesses competed with each other, preserving the market system, and were allowed to set their own prices. In contrast, in other socialist societies, businesses were not allowed to set their own prices at all. This was a form of socialism that integrated a market system of free trade, as enterprises competed against each other and with other countries in an open and free market. [Referring to the 10:55 minute mark] It's interesting to note that this form of "reformed" socialism (workers managing their own production in their own factories) is actually much closer in spirit to original Marxism and other early Communist/Anarchist ideologies than the centrally planned state economies of the Soviet bloc. The centrally planned economies ultimately disempowered workers and empowered a new bureaucratic/technocratic class, which is the opposite of the proletarian revolution that Marx and Engels envisioned. Bonus video:

Only a low conscious and psychologically damaged person would ever sell themselves for sex. This is not at the destructive level of prostitution, but OnlyFans girls are not the sharpest tool in the box, as in the end its a horrible career path which with tarnish their reputations and haunt them for the rest of their lives.

Good lord. I have nothing to tell you except hire a lawyer and start drafting your best court arguments. You don't want a criminal record, as its permanent and for the rest of your life it will show up on job applications. This can get so severe that you might have to live in another country. There's also the possibility that you might go to prison, if found guilty. If you do have to go to to prison or jail, stock up on whatever you need to survive. https://www.wikihow.com/Prepare-for-Jail https://www.wikihow.com/Deal-with-Being-in-Prison

I would actually like to add something else in this discussion, because I noticed something a bit awkward in Leo's North vs South Korea blog. I'm quoting the blog below: https://actualized.org/insights/north-vs-south-korea I would dispute this for one main reason, America's fight against Communism in the 20th century led to the CIA overthrow of many democratically elected socialist governments. The most infamous example would be the CIA removal of the President of Chile, Salvador Allende. There are other examples, such as the removal of Jacobo Àrbenz in Guatemala. These individuals were not Marxist-Leninists, but democratically elected. Their crime was largely land reform. Àrbenz, for example, legally purchased unused land previously owned by American businesses, and gave it back to the people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1954_Guatemalan_coup_d'état https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1952-54Guat/d287 https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1952-54Guat/d35 https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/allende https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_Chilean_coup_d'état ''I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves.'' -- Henry Kissenger Also, domino theory neglects the fact that these Communist countries and their people are sovereign agents responsible for their own destiny. This is the same realist logic that Vladimir Putin uses to oppose other countries joining NATO. Opposing NATO for countries bordering the Russian Federation, in their "sphere of influence", totally ignores the fact that these countries are sovereign countries with their own destinies and people. If a country wants to join NATO , elect a Socialist (such as Allende) or become Communist, that is their business, it is not up to America or Russia to decide foreign affairs.