Husseinisdoingfine

This is false. The word democratic in democratic socialism refers to a liberal democratic multi-party system, so the means of production are still going to be publicly owned and private property largely abolished, but its going to come through and exist within a multi-party electoral system. Granted, democratic socialists are more so opposed to centrally planned state socialism, but that doesn't mean they support private enterprise, for which they largely don't. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_socialism Socialism, and even social democracy, is not about the welfare programs that the government provides, it has nothing to do with healthcare, its about employee ownership and employee self management. Democratic socialists and social democrats just disagree on the degree and scale. DemSocs wants it full 100%, whereas as SocDems want it, hypothetically lets say... 50% or less.

Even to describe Scandinavia as socially-democratic is not accurate, as social democracy is worker self management within a capitalist market economy, which Scandinavia doesn't have.

Socialist direction? There’s so semblance of workplace democracy or employee ownership anywhere in Scandinavia. The public ownership of the means of production.

Update: Zohran won the first round of primary elections.

None of the Scandinavian countries are properly Socialist. They are Capitalist economies with large welfare states.

Is it this book?

Voting officially begins today! https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/06/24/us/elections/results-new-york-primary.html Lets see if we can have a socialist elected in America's financial capital.

This criminally underrated blog post from Leo explains it all: https://www.actualized.org/insights/why-bernie-sanders-lost

BREAKING: Iran's Parliament announces that Iran is seeking to pass a bill suspending all cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), meaning no more inspections from international bodies. https://t.me/Middle_East_Spectator/20883

The quote I have in my bio is ironic, I'm not a Muslim.

But what justification did America have to invade Iraq? What about Syria and Libya? These countries want nuclear weapons because they saw what happened to those countries.

According to Wikipedia, 8,000+ Israeli citizens have been made homeless and 3,800+ Israeli citizens have been displaced. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran–Israel_war * *Look at the right information table where it reads, casualties and losses.

The only thing having a nuclear weapon does is prevent the United States from invading that country. That is all, and that is why Iran wants a nuclear weapon.

Christianity is personality cult and no Christian is awake.

From Dmitry Medvedev 🇷🇺 https://x.com/MedvedevRussiaE/status/1936725544017567860 https://x.com/MedvedevRussiaE/status/1936725778701701276 https://x.com/MedvedevRussiaE/status/1936725872100217054 https://x.com/MedvedevRussiaE/status/1936725961568837823 https://x.com/MedvedevRussiaE/status/1936726074018164873 https://x.com/MedvedevRussiaE/status/1936726144814129190

This will never happen as our Government is too sold out to the Israeli lobby.

Tulsi Gabbard herself said that there was no evidence that Iran was producing a nuclear weapon or enriching uranium.

I hate the Trump administration to such a seething extent now. Marg Bar Âmrikâ!

I noticed from your blog posts that you too are also developing a fascination with niche American religions. I recently made a thread about this exact topic.

The funny thing about Osho was that he actively discouraged all politics, constantly demonizing politics and politicians. https://www.osho.com/highlights-of-oshos-world/osho-on-priests-and-politicians https://oshoworld.com/what-is-politics He himself has said that he never voted in his life and he forbid his followers to vote or to participate in politics in any way. He never considered that politicians could be good, or that politics and government was a necessity for managing large societies at a grand scale. https://www.osho.com/osho-online-library/osho-talks/politicians-anarchism-churchill-4875c941-0be?p=ef71d2db1bc99e4022455f39aeafafbf He once called himself an anarchist, then a spiritualist communist in a letter to Gorbachev were he stated that he would rather have the third world war than the dissolution of the Soviet Union. He thought that the Soviet Union could be preserved if it simply adopted his spiritual philosophy. " Buddha and Marx have to join hands – that is my revolution. Bring Buddha and Marx both together, hand in hand, dancing in the Soviet Union! " - Osho https://www.osho.com/osho-online-library/osho-talks/buddha-karl-marx-zen-25cb0515-b9c?p=c50a05715312689593c59eecb728ec90

To what extent were the scandals and sexual abuse at Rajneeshpuram the result of Osho’s teachings and leadership, versus the actions of his deputies, such as Ma Anand Sheela? Given that Osho faced no charges while Sheela did, was the commune’s downfall due more to his ideology or its management? https://sambodhiprem.com/Osho-talks-about-sex.html https://www.osho.com/highlights-of-oshos-world/osho-on-sex-quotes

I already have in college and I wouldn’t recommend it.

The suffering currently experienced by Israeli society represents only a minute fraction of what Palestinian society has endured over the past year.