RedLine

What you say is not related with what we are discussing. What we are discussing here is the oness quality of consciusness. In other words, the famous "everything is me" How can you know everything is One if I am experience something you don't know at all what it is? Yes, the accusations of solipsism make sense, Ruper Spira doesn't deal with this problem.

Somebody says: there is only One Consciusness that includes the Absolute and the Relative (includes everything) I say: if that is true you should know the Relative experience I am having in the present (the object I am graving, in my example)

The thing is if there is only One consciusness you should know, for example, what do I have in mi right hand and you don't know it.

the language is fucking weak, don´t ask too much to it

Anything you can imagine, that is not dead. It means death is not "dark" as atheist think but other cool stuff like paradise or reincarnation neither. All the answers in these thread are spiritual ideology.

Intuition.

It would be great if one day you invited some of these unknown people to the forum to describe their exoteric permanent stage phenomenology.

I dont´understand this. You are a bad person because you are attach to your ego (evil=ego attachment), If you go beyond the ego, you actually have a higher morality since you are more compassionate and less selfish. Of course it does not mean you are perfect and you cannot hurt your wife but in general terms you are a better person. Dont´you agree?

Everything is always new so yes, everything is different from everything. But we use languaje as a tool to map reality (remember the map-territory methapor). And from outside there seem to be clear stages that people go through. I don´t know anybody describing wierd permanent stages beyong classic non-dual stage phenomenology.

@Enlightenment Your posts in this thread are very interesting. I would like to ask you a question. Would you say there is more stages of consciusness beyond what you called PNSE (I guess it is the same Ken Wilber call non-dual stage)? I accept you can go deeply and depply in consciusness as Leo stated but I mean permanent stages (not as a temporary state trough pshcyodelics or momentary intuition) . Thank you.

stalker, three of life, over the silver globe, evangelion, drive, arrebato, solaris, la grande bellezza

Don't expect explanations here. It is a practicall orientated subforum. I made the same mistake by trying to introduce theological questions here. "This is what it is because this is what it is ta-da!. Go and see (cheers)"

That is what enlighment/hapiness is. Just that. Understand that fear does not exist. What should you do to get enlightment/be in permanent bliss? Pursue fear. What is fear? Fear of death. All the others fears are derived from that. If you access and observe the final fear, wich is fear of death, you will see that "nothing bad happens", then you finally realize fear does not exist. Everything is good. You can do this right now. You don´t need years of meditation. Just open that door. Jump into the cold water. One day you realize, everthing was good since the begining, everything was always perfect, how fool you were trying to deal with that problems that didn´t even exist.

What you don't understand is if there is one consciusness then there are not worst or better things, everything is equally ok; so pain is "neutral", the same that pleasure.

haha how can i awake if you are stating there are always distinctions and God is by definition the absence of distinctions? Maybe because you are wrong and there are not distinctions if you go beyond the language, so pain just exist as a linguistic concept?

How do you know God? How do you know everything is the same? How do you know everything is One? According to you everything is relative and distinct always.

so what is "the absolute sense"? what is the Absolute? An abstraction to points to what?

Maybe it become too theorical so let me put it in this way? Can you accept there is fear of pain and pain, so fear of pain can be removed? Can you separate sensation and interpretation of pain? If fear of pain is removed what is pain now? Is it different of pleasure? How can you know that it is different without an interpretation? That's the kind of things that somebody should research in their consciusness.

Study The Great Chain of Being and Pre-trans fallacy.

The dog actually label things. And he is not awake. Awakening is transrational not prerational.

Yes. But you wouldn't accept it so the thought fear would arise.

You can't analyze politics using only pschycological categories. "Trump is bad because he is narcisist", it is childish argument. You can extrapolate self-actualized concepts to politics. The victory of Trump is key for the well-being of humanity. If neoliberal globalism (republicans) triumphs and impose its model to different nations with different spiral dynamic states it will bring kaos and destruction and also more vice to the West.

I am talking very clear here, no mental masturbation at all. How the fuck do you how babies experience crying? I can just talk about what is pain for me and guess for other people similar to me but I cannot know how the phenomenology of the baby is.

Trump has many virtues. It is curious that here in this forum most of you only highlight his vices. Maybe you attack Trump because or your shadow more than because of some "objective reasons"?

I agree. I was talking in general terms, not about you specifically.