RedLine

Buddha point of view about God would be something like what you called God is still an experienced (can be noted). Give to this experience an ontological status is methafisical thinking, not experience. This is the most honest and radical way to understand reality. The tricks of mind are infinite. Absolutism has some degree of wishful thinking when not power purposes. I sceptic about this point of view, just exposing it.

No. Buddha original teachings (theravada buddhism) is not what mainstream commentators think. I study the topic from the most advance researchers and that is what they conclude. I can share with you the sources. Buddha strongly fight spiritual Absolutism.

If they are dogmatic about the taxes is because they rationally get to some economic principles which is convenient follow under any circumstances. There is actually a higher degree of rationality involved in thinking under a system vs think without system. It is not a dogma like religion

Define the distictions between orange and yellow according to you clearly please, in order we can continue the discussion

So do you think that what is called "right" (yellow according what you say) in Europe, for example are more evolved that the "left" (green). Who is orange in Europe then? could you name someboy?

You clearly didn´t understand my point and you are treating me like stupid, I seriously studied Spiral Dynamics books, I even study the original database used in the original research by Dr. Graves, which is pretty hard to find by the way and I paid a lot of money for. Yellow-turqouise integrate previous levels, you still could have preferences in relation to the levels so you could be yellow-turqouise and have the next preferences: 50% green, 40% orange, 10% blue. So no my point, whay is the difference between be in yellow and not be in yellow and having 50% green, 40% orange, 10% blue. Name one.

I am pretty far from individualistic cosmovisions, actually I used to have a lot of confrentation with these people, so it is not the case here. I am just trying to test Spiral Dynmics based on my empirical observations. I am very interested in development maps.

Another thing I don´t understand is: if you are yellow-turquoise you integrate all levels, it means you can appreciate aspects from the different levels. On the other hand, you can be on several levels at the same time, for example 50% green, 40% orange, 10% blue. What is the difference between the latter and being 100% yellow-turquoise?

This is dirty game that spiral dynamic plays. If empirical reality agrees with the theory evertyhing is ok, is empirical reality doesn´t support the theoy it is a regression. In this sense the theory is irrefutable, Can´t you see the trick? All the people that I mentioned clearly evolved, they were idealist when they are young, then they grow and become liberals. How can you prove they had a regression?

Bashar comes from a parallel universe thousands of years in the future so maybe is easiest there to do nothing.

Ok, so frame it in this way: he is teaching us how to do nothing. It is not only applicable to spiritual but also to self-improvement. You want to get a job/bussiness to be present making that job/bussiness; otherwise you are desiring, you feeling anxiety, low self esteem, etc and this is doing a lot (you can have a lot of shit in your head just being sitted at home and "doing nothing" while working)

No. Actually I think this is one of the less toxic internet communities I have been in my life haha. Quite respetful compared to average internet site.

There is some green pathological mentality here when you get offended by everything and also relativistic (your opinion is worth the same as mine!), so tipical in this days. There is nothing wrong with making strong assertion if you are sure what you are saying and despite who is offended.

Absolute vs Relative paradox. Everything is equally perfect but it seems pretty clear that there are better things than others at the same time. I known how to deal with it in a practicall way but not intellectually and I don't think anybody can. It is true and false at the same time, is a big wtf

I also get to the same technique naturally while walking! What a coincidence. But I framed in a different way: I am not walking and looking at the landscape but the landscape is looking how i walk (it is like I am the landscape and I, as a landscape, am observing how the body is moving). When I got it I entered in al altered state of consciusness.

practice both

haha pretty accurate

No. All the traditions recognize that the Absolute=Good/Love, it is so obvious that they don't even mention it. You can perceive the ethical component of enlightenment through their behavior and their phisiology. If a master describes the Absolute as Emptiness or Love depends on their personality. In the same way somebody doesn't necessarily show you that she/he loves you saying it but through their behavior. For me, it was so obvious all of it was about compassion/love since the beginning and I am still not 1% consciusness as that people are haha.

In my opinion no, competition is not good since the goal is to be better than others. It goes in the opposite direction of compassion. Get a better version of yourself through some kind of sport/discipline -> good Train yourself to crush others -> bad I practice sports but I try to avoid all kinds of competitions where there is a winner and and loser.

You realize that she is just an image in your mind. You fell in love with an image that doesn´t even exist. Also, the image that you think she has in her mind about you is imaginary -of course it is not what she has in her mind-. I mean you could still love her as Absolute Consciusness but you are not loving your wife in the same way anymore. I got that realization year ago when I wasn't even involved in spirituality. I felt like love and relationship are based in fake asumptions. Also, since I started to pratice pick-up, this intuition become clearer and clearer: when I am doing pick up I feel like I am imagining her and also I am imagining myself. So I guess someone who is fairly most consciusness than me would have this insight x1000.

Nothing. You are creating all the forms. You need to go very very deep to grasp this.

Then why God created the ilusion of separate self? God (Absolute Love) created ilusion of others in other to allow you to love other. God created the universe, even when it is suffer. Never forget that. Why Jesus teaches compassion, love other and don´t teach "mediate and get enlighment to go beyond suffer"?. That is what make him the best teacher of all times becasue he choose to KEEP in the pain. That was God will. That is the great teaching of all times, beyond any non-dual kind of teaching.

@Someone here I am curious abut your answer to the question: Why is there something rather than nothing?, in other words, why don´t we rest in Absolute Coniscusiness and on the contrary there is the ilustion of separate selfs and suffer? Leo suggest that God creates -the ilusion of- others so we could love them (love himself). I agree.

If everything is the Self, then how can you love your wife over any other human been? This only make sense to me in this image game where you think she is something solid in your mind and you think you are something solid in her mind. Maybe this is something that is apart from enlightenment. I don't know.

Consciousness have people in the same way consciousness have a rock?