RedLine

Evolution is also a game. The relative exists because we move towards something. If only the goal of evolution matters and we move to Absolute Perfection, why Absolute divided itself in the first place? What it actually matters is the process. It is like a videogame, the end of the missions doesn´t really matters, it is just a pretext to play the game, otherwise the videogame would not make sense.

@Breakingthewall I would say that suffer is one of the games God likes to play. We enjoy suffer. And the fact that we dislike suffer and aim for happiness is also a game we like to play. I know it sounds frivolous and maybe offensive for you but it is the metaphysical theory that make more sense for me: everything is Perfect and we like suffer and we like to dislike suffer. God prefers to play the suffer game rather than rest in his infinite blissful.

You are projecting your personality over the others.

He is the spanish Connor Murphy. Has been promoting "toad posion" for years and then that unclear misfortune happened. Now because of that retarded 5-meo-dmt has been demonized here forever.

God, in is his absolute perfection, decided to create the illusion of division, to create the illusion of separate selfs. Thus, he could observe himself as Other. He chose relative world over absolute perfection. He coose suffer over absolute blissful. And now we want to return to the Source??

I don't understand this. Why forget and then remember. Wouldn't have been better to never forget?

+1 I procrastinate a lot about this technique even when it is the most powerful tool -apart from pschycodelics- I know.

that rectangle that icludes my laptop, my legs and part of my room, some pain in the chest and behind my head and thoughts mmm it seems a little bit depressing...

Yeah, what I don´t get is you preference to label it as infinte rathern than label it as a, b or c. Why infinite? Sometimes I feel that I am not separe from the rest of what I experience but I would not label it as Inifite, it is too grandiloquent. I am not sure if you are exaggerating or actually you are being honest with that label.

I suspect that when you guys talk about infinite experience, you mean all the concepts you know are present right now. It is like the sensation that everything you know (in the form of thoughts of mental images, becuase there are not anything out of concsiusness) is happening here, so that´s why you describe it as infinite. Am I wrong?

What do you mean by infinity? For example, the moon is here? the thoughts about the moon is here? you mean inifinte thoughts are here? all of them at the same time?

Am I the only one that thinks that this idealism vs materialist debate is stupid??. Both are false from the pov of direct experience, and I don't think one is more useful than the other to understand reality.

Most of the philosophical problems are languaje problems. What do you mean by that question? I don´t understand. You mean we are in your thoughts? Of course. Isn´t it obvious to everybody?

Why Red shadow?

That is a belief!

That is a believe you have, it is metaphysics. Yes it was a discontinuity of consciousness because Rupert Spira wasn´t consciousness during surgey, as simple as that.

Straight to the point:

according to some people here that wouldn´t exist either because you don´t know you are giving birth until you interpret that in your mind, so it is not present anymore for me all this stuff are just word-games; real, non real, present moment, thoughts, just words...

You are the one who is making distinctions: finite mind vs infinite mind. You are saying that he wasn´t aware during surgery because he was in finite mind mode. What a metaphysical believe!

That distinction between the not awaken finite mind vs an hypothetical infinite mind always present is an intellectual construction you are making, it is not direct experience.. The fact is he wasn´t aware during surgey.

I don't understand why Rupert Spyra says Consciousness is always present but at the same time he says he wasn't conscious during surgery. Isn't it contradictory? Can somebody explain it to me?

that´s true, but you just to go back to your previous version; it is not something you can do on a regular basis, permanent shifts are rare

Why do you say his teaching are very advance? I don't see he is saying something new about psychology and spirituality, something that Leo didn't say for example. So that guy for the future is not saying anything you can't find in the self-, improvement/spirituality shelv of library, mmm.

pschycodelics (insights) body work (remove body repressions) shadow work mindfulness meditation concentration meditation The best you can do is combine these 5 methods. You can balance what area is more urgent for you each day.

He si personal developed to some degree. Not awoked. He has little shadow. He doesn´t overreact and stay very chill when people spike him. He doesn't care much about anything, in the good sense. Here the interveiwer is retarted and he stays completely polite and chill haha: