Thought Art

Good show ooooo ooo oooooo

@Yimpa Yup ”Lies lies lies!!!”

Seeing Arcadefire live wooh

Love don’t come easy its a game of give and take

@samijiben lol

Hey, I created my first 30 minute routine for YouTube. This was a fun project for me because it was my first time: 1. Combining Blue Dragon, YinYang and 5 Element Holden Qigong into a unique routine that has lots of benefits and feels great to do. 2. Using my DJi Neo drone to film cool intro videos. 3. Using two cameras for more angles in the exercises. 4. Using music in the intro. I think I am getting closer to the quality of content I want for my work. I think this video is a nice step forward. This was challenging to edit and I had to learn some new skills and techniques and I think it was a good push. I can make better videos with a better camera and more attention to white balance, and location in the future. But, this is a good step forward towards making world class Qigong content. Check out the video and if you try the routine I’d love your feedback. Great routine if you are into Yoga, meditation, Breathwork or Qigong. Clear stress and tension from shoulders, activate and nourish your energy system with calm cool energy. Embrace the practice with an open mind. Remember the mind leads the Qi. Stay Healthy! (I may have to reupload because I want it to be louder)

@integral Thanks for the feedback I’ll check out that link and use it in my contemplations for making better content. Definitely I can improve on my approach to making it more relatable. I’m still getting started. However, I know this style of routine is valuable for people familiar enough. This video is for people who have been following along for awhile, or are familiar enough with Qigong to follow along. I am not sure what you mean by cyberpunk though! I am going to redesign the thumbnail and title a bit too, maybe make it more intriguing.

@Leo Gura Touche Poor man got no place to put his 49,000 steal of a price Dino 😭 Honestly, it’s cool you are a collector of masks and bones and stuff.

Reflektor

@Yimpa Thanks! 🙏

Leo with the rich man flex “If only my house was bigger” I acknowledge people are at different levels of wealth.

Magikarp

@Nilsi Interesting. We think very differently about music. For me it’s more a spiritual thing I don’t fixate m genre that much.

Seems fine

Haha tease

I never understood the appeal or critical opinion of Skyrim either. Boring, poorly made. However, I was young enough to think Oblivion was cool. I also didn't own it so when I played it it was cool.

I wouldn’t

My responses are not AI btw

@xeontor It’s like you’re not grasping the predicament or Leo’s claims. Again, biased toward sobriety, ignoring philosophical biases, making claims of what a valid experiment is, without looking into Leo’s telescope. If you were trying to figure out if “other minds exist” or if “You alone are God”…. You’d have to know 1. If others are truly ontologically separate from “you”, if “you” is truly a separate notion from “them. How do you know you didn’t construct the “you” “vs” them in your mind? Does the universe really think. In terms of “God” that you and the other scientists are separate? Maybe humans had to invent “us” and “them” through conceptualisation. Perhaps “us” “them” “me” “self” and “other” are conceptually constructed notions of modern minds and not hard facts to be tested. This would need to be made clear to avoid inaccurate metaphysical assumptions of the researcher. 2. If you are God dreaming “others” what could would asking others to prove your little test do? Perhaps that would be a major trap. Imaging others to trick you to believe in your dream… how would you know the difference? It could be a strange loop issue. Perhaps the test you’ve described truly doesn’t test for God. 3. If you alone are God, wouldn’t anything you do in this dream just be you imagining finite things in your own mind? Including experiments and other scientists? So how would you verify this is a legitimate experiment in this domain? 4. What if the test “flops” not because it’s not true that you are God, but because your test and the limitations your forcing on the enquiry like using external authorities of the scientists, or that is has to be done “sober”, are the wrong way to test if you are God? How would you know? 5. May you’d have to take yourself and all the scientists and take 200-300 breakthrough 5meodmt doses? What if that was the experiment? “No no, that’s not a realistic experiment” well, okay then. 6. If you could gain direct insight into being “God”…. Why would God need another to verify this claim? Wouldn’t the other just be you? 7. Asking someone to take their “core ontological tenant” but then not letting them use or you using their method is bad science. “You can’t use your method! You have to use this one, even though I haven’t proven or disproven your method!” Tricky stuff

@xeontor Dirty AI haha. ”What I actually said” No, you didn’t actually say any of that in the quote I shared. You may clarify your foundation, but you didn’t said that. And the closing statement about states is suggestive of dismissing that mystical states could be useful. It also means ignored the concept of absolute truth encompassing true and false things and Zone 1 and 2.

Now the future's staring at me like a vision from the past, and I know these crumbs they sold me, they're never gonna last. Though we know the culture war, we don't know what it's for but we've lived the southern strategy. You know it's never gonna last, so keep it in the past. These are different times that we're living in. These are different times. Now the kids are growing up so fast. Paying for our crimes. You left while I was sleepin'. You said, "It's down to me". Oh I've read a little Bible. You see what you want to see. Oh, we know the culture war, we don't know what it's for but we've lived your southern strategy. You know it's never gonna last so keep that shit in the past. These are different times that we're living in. 'Cause these are different times. Now the kids are growing up so fast. They're paying for our crimes. The dominos they never fell but bodies they still burn. Throw my hand into the fire but still I never learn, will I ever learn? That these are different times. Now the kids are growing up so fast and paying for our crimes. We'll be soldiers for you, mommy and daddy, in your culture war. We'll be soldiers for you, mommy and daddy, but we don't know what it's for. We're soldiers now in the culture war. We're soldiers now, but we don't know what it's for. We're soldiers now in the culture war. We're soldiers now, but we don't know what it's for. So tell me what's it for. You want it? You got it, here's your culture war. You want it? Now you've got it, so tell me what's it for.

For those who have studied Leo’s work this is really gold! Read through these shared projections/ understandings/ interpretations to see how scientific lens relates to Leo’s work. My understanding is that this AI applied probable logical, scientific, cognitive, philosophical, epistemological models to Leo’s teachings based on assumptions of particular framing, bias and schools of thought which are consistent of modern scientific and materialist models of reasoning and knowing reality. I’d like to see an epistemic analysis of the claims done here by the AI. I have provided my own here. For example exploring number 1: “Treating phenomenological certainty as ontological certainty • 5‑MeO‑DMT induces a “noetic” feeling—a gut‑level conviction that what is perceived is Absolute Truth. • Epistemic error: conflating “I experienced X with maximal certainty” with “X is a fact about external reality.” • Analogy: A dream may feel 100 % real while it happens, yet that does not place the dream furniture in your waking living room.” I have chosen to provide a list of my perceived understanding of the assumptions made by these “errors” considered by this AI output. What assumptions, still unproven by science does this make? Without agreeing with Leo, openly what does science NOT KNOW FOR SURE, even by its own standards. 1. Leo’s experiences and understanding of 5meodmt is wrong. 2. There is no absolute truth. 3. Absolute truth is a “thing” or “object” with opposites or distinctions apart from something else. 4. State doesn’t come into play when it comes to understanding reality 5. That waking reality is “Real” “Physical” and not ontologically the same as a dream. That sober science isn’t the result of a “state”. What if all science or any human philosophical scheme or level of education was happening within and as a part of absolute truth? Making it impossible to grasp with logic only. State, being a hidden key….And that at a certain state of consciousness you Awaken to grasp this? 6. Science assumes experience is less than none experience in ALL inquiries or ways of knowing. Even though experience is central to science. 7. Assuming that absolute truth isn’t “phenomenology = Ontological Certainity”. That absolute truth should be “falsifiable”. Science doesn’t grasp the nature of “absolute” or “truth” which includes all false and true things and any dualities or differences in reality. As you read through each one… be open to it showing where Leo is wrong. But, be equally skeptical to each point made. What assumptions is the AI making on certain points it’s making? What assumptions is science making? What assumptions do logical arguments make about truth claims? Their own and that of Leo? What assumptions was I taught growing up? What are my cultural assumptions? What assumptions am I making? How firmly do my feet stand on my convictions? “What do I really know about these claims?” - nothing… just models and authority. What you’ll likely be left with after doing this once is a “not knowing”, questions, confusions, answers now only to be recontextualized, confirmed, disproven, deepened, or questioned at a later date. This work is deep and requires a depth, and breadth. And time.