Thought Art

@Leo Gura Hi Leo, With respect you promised me something in the video about your timeline. I just was wondering if you were going to follow it. You did not answer my question. That is up to you. I’ll watch it when you release it. Have a good day hope you are well. Art

A none answer. All good

@Leo Gura Like you said if someone is intellectually dishonest you don’t listen to them

@danniel Looks great!

The 100 million dollar series by Alex Hormozi, The Code of the Extraordinary Mind by Vishen laikhiani, and High Performance Habits by Brendon Burchard. Also, The personal MBA by John Kaufman is a great book.

Leo are you sticking to your production schedule as promised with this series? @Leo Gura

A song demo!

Rude

Song demo: Waiting

Something I’ve noticed is that to understand Jordan Peterson speaking to these individuals is very complex, requires deep levels of consciousness, epistemology, patience, capacity for recontextualization, empathy, and not assuming to understand Jordan Peterson. We have to put the whole conversation IN the context of human survival, development, history, brain types, etc. it’s a very complex situation which I think is useful to watch these videos if you want to grow yourself. He has a rock solid sense of the brutality and seriousness of these ideas which the people he speaks to do not. He is battling egos, assumptions, limited perspectives, youth, logic, etc He sees religion in the context of actual human existence and survival which I think is important. Someone like Rationality Rules actually isn’t a serious person and therefore his philosophy is shit. It’s shit because he doesn’t see how stupid he is, how foolishness his framing toward these topics is, and he is corrupt because he has no foundation that Truth is the highest value…. or the seriousness of proper epistemology and its consequences on survival. His use of rational tools, does not make up for his stupidity.

Meta rationality and infinite perspective IS fundamental in proper governance. Truth IS fundamental to proper governance. I have a perspective that is so powerful, it may take me years to implement, grow, flesh out, etc.

I intuitively know what a woman is. I feel like you don't need to be a genius to know what it is, and Greek Skepticism comes into play with common sense. But, I admit as we explore it very deeply through philosophy and ontology It's hard to define what a woman is. But, I know a women when my see one by using my penis (natural intuition). I know a woman through being a man. But, I also know that everyone is undefinable and a mystery. Yet, it's knowable at the same time. I know my mother is a woman, or my girlfriend is. I know a human vs a dog. I can know what something is, but not know what it is.

@Leo Gura I then went and watched about half of the Jubilee event. It clearly shows the limitations of everyone’s understanding of rationality, debates, and models, maps, etc for speaking about God. No one (even Peterson) has the proper epistemic foundation to discuss God, science, etc. One of the core issues was no one made a distinction between absolute and relative truth, the limits of symbols, or even a solid definition of what God…. Or any of the terms used for that matter. The entire conversation gets essentially nowhere. Peterson is right about God. But, he also is wrong about a lot of things, right about a lot of things and he doesn’t stick to strict use of language or words. He does have a grasp of language and the content of which he speaks. But, is not given the chance to fully explore. Even then, he lacks the direct consciousness and knowing. Though, his intuition is very good. He makes good distinctions but his mind blows like the wind and it’s impossible for him to hold a place at times which makes it hard for the two people to explore the conversation from a well rooted foundation. He made a very good point about how science can't be used to explain morality because human morality existed pre-science. Which is very subtle, but he got blown away like the wind before he could explain it and clearly layout the distinction that science is is a cognitive framework and philophical system used to explain what is there, but it not reality itself. As animals develop morality without science something else is developing the morality, ie evolution and universal Will, which I think Peterson is defining as God. This being said, I myself am developing my own understanding of these matters. I am given through your work and my own contemplations, trips, etc a good foundation to work on. I struggle to understand my recent trip. Because my sense making mind tells stories and it’s hard to know which is true or false. The altered state and direct consciousness and my recollection of previous trips makes me being, my reading sacred texts, your work, my own conclusions since I was a kid makes me being God a very obvious truth. But, I know there is deeper truth to be grasped and understood here. It terrifies me to know the truth as the altered state is profound and kills me. But, I should be responsible to get to the truth, and to practice pure philosophy. The Rationality Rules guy is simply wrong, and extremely sloppy in his use of rationality and his application of logical fallacies toward Jordan Peterson and likely in general. He is focused on debating, proving wrong, fighting against, pointing out technical flaws based on arbitrary logical systems which he applies without solid foundation that that is the truest way of applying that piece of logic’s Though, I do think Jordan has logical fallacies too. I can’t fully articulate it all. The reality is extremely complex and full of wrongness coming from everyone involved. No one is really that close to the truth as all have the wrong epistemic foundations. The format is fundamentally flawed for truth seeking but does act as good material for understanding the limits of conversations, differing views, arguments, limits of rationality, poor rational arguments, the issues of lacking truth as a direct experience, poor understanding of God, science and religion that exists among all participants and society at large.

This rationality rules guy can’t see the limits of his rationality. It’s amazing to listen to. Bias plays a huge role into how he himself rationalizes but he ignores that. He actively postures and creates rules which, aren’t inherent to conversation, words, etc. He conveniently ignores things Peterson says and it’s very interesting to contemplate. A Socratic conversation is far more powerful than a debate.

@Leo Gura Yes, I will. I’m not satisfied with my understanding. It can’t be understood rationally. God? Is God the right word?

@Leo Gura Alright, alright haha Let me take another look and I’ll get back to you.

@Leo Gura Yeahh… an infinite singularity that IS exitence. Total subject object collapse. Like… eternity and infinity and consciousness? Perfection and love? Those make sense. Man, it went on forever…. And yet I’m here now writing this how is that possible? I thought it was gonna go on forever. But, here I am… I just don’t get it. I don’t mean to come off as an idiot here. But, I really don’t know what is going on…. There are things that make sense and I know more than someone just completely confused. But, I have questions.

@Leo Gura Yeah, this trip was profound. I just need to step into my own conclusions and to make sure I’m not parroting at all. Or, filtering it through someone else’s lens. It felt so total…. So complete and perfect. It… yeah, it was infinity. As I’m come down and I’m reflecting. I’ll continue to contemplate and trip. It seemed like…. Everything. I don’t have the words for it. Is that what God is? For me questions, contemplating and trips are more appropriate than bold claims or labels. They can come when it’s mature. I want to really inquire into what is true about this state. What the hell is that experience? It feels like infinity,… it’s far bigger than me, than my human ego…. But it’s also so personal. I realized my consciousness is truth. But, I’m doubting my own ability to understand this right now. I think that is okay and when I’m mature and experienced I’ll know. I was convinced I was an infinite singularity at the time of the trip. That my true nature is beyond beyond. That it was love and absolute. I realized there was nothing I could do to not be that. That was what I was. But, I want to be really sure.

I’m still not able to understand the actual 5meodmt trip and my thoughts and feelings about it. It’s so unitary…. I guess that is non-duality. But, I can tell my rational mind and ego don’t understand it. I want to experience it with less and less resistance, less and less story telling (like, in reality it’s just infinity and I never existed) because you come down from the state. There is a lot here to explore and try to understand. I want to let go of any ideas and fantasies I have and also let go of any teachings surround the substance so I can trip with full consciousness openness. My recent trip, again has me feeling like time doesn’t exist and it’s just the infinity. It does feel like I’m in that state for a long time. But, I think I need more meditation and longer trips. I do not understand the implications of 5meodmt. I don’t understand what the trip is saying to me. It seems to be what is described as non-duality, oneness and an absolute state of consciousness. It seems like time should not exist in that state, but it does. It feels like the trip is happening for eternity but, it’s not. There is potential more and more for completely selflessness, self love, surrender and total destruction of myself as an ego. But, not destruction of myself as a perspective or set of memories at the same time. If I hadn’t have learned about infinity would I say I experience infinity? I don’t know. Would I call it God? No. It’s hard to say. It feels very final, very total. It feels like I grasp something very deep. But, I’m not sure what it is. It definitely felt like a solipsistic, absolute unitary experience in which I realized I was this thing which was the source of existence and non-existence. But, again, I is an interpretation I am sure is fake. Because, in the sober state it’s like… that makes no sense.

@SimpleGuy Mindfulness isn’t about stopping thoughts. It’s essentially meta-cognition or meta awareness. Mindfulness really should help creativity.

Is that Gay or Non-dual? Contemplate that.

@jacknine119 Buy books and audios on business, offers, sales, marketing etc

@Leo Gura

@Jannes A lot of girls I am have been with don’t care about dick size. It doesn’t really matter. A lot of what makes great sex is your energetic framing, touch, fingering, etc. You don’t need a massive Hog. I mean, a nice dick is a plus. But, from what they tell me they don’t mind smaller dick guys. Average is good. I am not admitting my dick size here btw that’s only for de ladies to find out.

I do suspect she lies a lot to make her seems special. Like she is a reincarnation of a great yogi is one of them.