Thought Art

Moderator
  • Content count

    11,672
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Thought Art

  1. @UnbornTao or, it can be ineffective at first but you need a refresh rate so you adjust based on feedback
  2. Most of your result come from actually doing the thing
  3. @Rigel All good points. I will read this book. I also have some other singing courses in mind as I know there is room for improvement. this recording is by no means my best singing technique. But, I can improve in general. I was also singing in a shared space so I down played a lot.
  4. @OBEler Claude is better
  5. New routine:
  6. I am more gentle with my art and more generous with my inner artist. I share more openly and more playfully. I am a good artist and my work comes to good.👍
  7. Thanks! A big part of me is very satisfied with its repetitive nature. I’ll consider these points, and a bridge is a good idea. the fact that it is repetitive is what I like about it. I’m unlikely to change any of the chords or add new lyrics to the verse. Normally I would, but I actually enjoy the repetitive and simple nature. I listened to it like a bunch of times yesterday and I’m satisfied. I will as a bridge for sure. Changing things up and making it too dynamic can be good for songs. But, not this one . I personally find it engaging, but I guess it’s my own taste. Playing it around camp I’ve had people come up to my looking for the song in Spotify so other people seem to think so too. But, you’ve got me thinking regardless. I love this song. I record it in a month or two. I recorded my song Mountaintops a month ago and will share it with you guys once it’s on streaming services. Biggest thing for me is getting the breathing down, and smoothing out the tempo, and adding the melody to the chorus. I am luckily a lot more relaxed with my song writing than years ago. I stressed myself out of it honestly.
  8. @Oppositionless me? Not really. I studied different sources. loosley I’ve applied some principles from Holistic Song Writing.
  9. @Rigel yeah I am open. Also, the song isn’t what I would call completely refined. Definitely open to suggestions. If you have links to resources showing the techniques as well that could be an additional bonus. However I should say I personally enjoy it. It’s not a perfect take. I don’t fully know the song yet. New friend. I also didn’t EQ this phone recording which could help. I also haven’t fully worked out the breathing and I’m not convinced of the chorus but, I like the feeling a lot
  10. @MarioGabrielJ Thank you
  11. @Javfly33 Thanks man
  12. Hard to say can be hard to remember the trip
  13. I like how deepak points out that the quantum is a mathematical concept and not a “physical or objective object. This points out a double standard in science when it treats it as such.
  14. @Javfly33 Peak experiences regardless of catalyst aren’t meant to last all the time.
  15. The question is not whether Qi exists but what are the possibilities of working with it? And how accurate are our current maps?
  16. @Yimpa haha, no. One of the hardest and least profitable days ever Luckily, or not. Today is a surprise off day for the camp. I am enjoying contemplating with ChatGPT and Claude about western models of the nervous system and human energy system and Chinese model of Qi. It’s the same body we are coming at it come different angles. Very different models. They are also developed via different approaches. Many Toaist ideas come from meditative traditions where modern science doesn’t. Chinese medicine is more holistic and focusing on balancing the whole. For this reason Qi is a broad word for the bodies aliveness/ Homeostatic nature. There is clearly energy in the body if we require electrolytes and have a complex electrochemical nervous system, a beating heart, the ability to move around and be alive, that we can be tired or full of energy. That we have different emotions that effect how we move, stand, sit, breath, facial expression, choice of words and vocal tone, cognitive behviour.. But, thought art what about hormones, calories, neurons, pH and Alkaline, cells, mitochondrial, blood, nerves, etc don’t these things disprove Qi because we can observe them and not Qi? We take for granted this divine homeostatic intelligence and animating capacity if the human organism. It’s been doing this for millions of years with no end in sight… made of infinite intelligence and Consciousness. The highest will. Does physical reductionism disprove Qi? No. I would argue not at all. Traditional Chinese medicine is a a holistic practice focused on balancing the whole. It involves things like preventative maintaince through healthy balanced living. It sees the human as part of nature and that all of life has this force flowing through it. When we balance this force we can live in health and harmony. All these reductionist elements do not disprove of a life force. Because all these components come together to keep you alive. What is all the breathing, digesting, absorbing, emitting of heat, heart pumping, hormones, biochemical reactions, electrochemical reactions, and nerve signals, and consciousness and thoughts and emotions and feelings, and life! All that, and viewing it as a single process and looking to create balance in this system… a useful meta term for it all is Qi. We all have to agree that when we live healthy life styles we are generally healthier and that the body has a natural tendency to stay alive and be healthy when in the right conditions. This homeostatic tendcy of the body animating capacity is Qi. All these newly developed reductionist, materialistic, mechanistic views on the human body are extremely insightful and important. But, I do not see them as opposing Qi. You could even have the lens that the physical manifestation of such a complex being and the energy it has to keep living for millions of years is something special. How did the first heart start beating? It’s very mysterious. That, without some kind of force that runs through life we would just be rocks and dust, and water. Traditional Chinese medicine doctors were not reductionist. There goal was to maintain and restore balance too the whole body. So, they developed a different map than a reductionist one. The idea of Qi, is a useful one for such a holistic framework that sees each organ and part of the body as essential components in the body’s homeostatic ability and also that the body has an animating capacity… it can move around and think and stuff. Viewing the whole body as a totality and looking at health this way is way of looking at health and wellness. Western science has taken a more reductionist approach. There is strengths and weaknesses to different approaches.