Thought Art

@ZenSwift Letting Go - David R Hawkins and a book called Adversity Quotient by ? and Pathways to Perfect Living Vernon Howard

@Leo Gura

I know.

Hey, can anyone explain this to me in a simple straightforward way as I am not sure I understand it. Rule of a Conditionalization: ‘Upon learning evidence e,P*new*(H) should equal P(H/e)’ I understand it explained out that upon learning new evidence the possibility that our hypothesis is true improves or gets worse?. So, when our theory makes correct predictions then… we increase the confidence in our models, hypothesis and world view? This the Bayesian view of scientific inference right? I find the algebra a bit mind confusing and will need to sit with it for awhile I think. I understand the logic when it’s explained out but the algebra confuses me a bit.

Is this coherent? Isn’t it more when new evidence comes into play given a hypothesis you already have? or is that the law of Conditionalization. I’ll take a look when I have free time tomorrow to look at this is in more detail

I don’t appreciate it at all. Reason my trust is low with intimacy

I don’t think it is antagonistic the mystic perspective that I have because my mystic perspective includes science within its scope. Doesn’t it really mean as we gain new evidence it affects the Creedence on our initial hypothesis?

Yeah, whether idiots use it or not I wanna understand it because I think it’s actually a facet of my thinking anyway

Reality is just the raw experience there is nothing behind it or, you just get infinite regress

Leo you are DEBUNKED and no good. jk

That's what I meant yeah but, also integrating some healthy green. A nice, green blue... with a splash of understanding and application of the strengths of orange.

@ZGROPIUS hmm, it depends on the work. Some healing work can be painful. When I teach a Qigong class it’s healing through pleasure for the most part. What you are saying is what I experience as well. Really, healing is a complicated thing. Healing can feel very pleasurable, neutral and very painful. There’s a wide spectrum of feelings. Parts of our brain/mind are timeless nature and we still have pain from when we were 15 years old etc… even old personality patterns lodged in us. As a Qigong teacher I teach people to smile into the body as well. Which I use more and more and as you get better at it it gets more powerful. Be open to the full spectrum of emotions if you are serious about healing I think. There is a good book called the ‘Tao of feeling fully’. Great book about developing emotional intelligence around the difficult emotions. When we are doing healing work from traumatic memories, or transference work that can be very painful. This is why I think Qigong is important as a keystone habit because it helps you develop a daily dose of: 1. energy 2. relaxation 3. joy 4. resilience 5. groundedness/ centeredness The work I do with others is mainly healing through pleasure. What healing work are you doing?

It’s a clip from professor Dave’s channel here he talks about Leo at the end and makes some pretty big character assassination attempts. I didn’t really think it was called for, nor was it scientific. Seemed more his projection and bias. He probably hasn’t watched Leo’s videos in any depth. He is reacting emotionally and pulling in his fears. If he watched some of Leo’s videos (which is tough because their so fucking long and why would you waste hours listening to a cult leader right?).

LSD is a great psychedelic. So healing, so friendly and beautiful. It’s like a cosmic hug. Also, I find it helps me realize and embody my values. But, set and setting is crucial with it…

Here is a cool podcast episode from Sounds True on the subject you may find helpful https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/sounds-true-insights-at-the-edge/id307934313?i=1000545647378 Many humans when young or old want to explore. Totally normal.

Read Mastery (the whole thing) by Robert Greene and buy Leo’s book list and read the books on mastery there and then put the work in

@SQAAD Sounds like you need to work on your mental filter. I have sImar thoughts from time to time. Stop wanting people , complete strangers doing their jobs to kiss your ass. They have their own shit going on. Learn to embrace when someone gives you a matter of fact response without needing them to please you emotionally. She hasn’t heard of it, matter of fact. There’s nothing more to it. You should be so full of love you need it not in return.

Arcadefire lead to me awakening

@Oeaohoo Honestly… I wonder if more Americans need more stage blue embodiment not less. As the higher stages are likely out of reach…

Yes, many of us carry around emotional trauma which is stored in the body. As we become more aware of this through increased states of consciousness we can also use things like yoga or Qigong to start to purge and undo these things in the body. This is how and why I do and teach Qigong…. 1. Breathwork 2. stretching 3. Self massage 4. energy work also, get massages, chiro, acupuncture etc

I don’t think he was an oracle or a able to see the future. I think he was just way ahead of his time, and likely just a super awesome mystic. Very loving. One of the great prophets but not the only one.

1. 60 Principles of Actualized.org 2. Motivational Speech, Oct 2021 (this felt like a birthday gift ?) 3. The episodes on what is wisdom and integrity 4. The myth of science series. but really, for me it’s how the whole catalogue builds upon itself as a whole that matters.

I think when you do it right, life becomes more interesting and you can enjoy the simple things. Give all this a break if it isn’t serving. It sounds like it’s back firing on you and making you less connected to reality. Enjoy the small things.

Your vommiting toxins from the body which the body likes ? Your brain is in your stomach, and your skull. They are connected. For a deeper reason, I don’t know. But google likely has an answer. is it a stomach issue, or were you just really drunk?

Is this why Leo says everyone uses rationality and why rationality is so limited ? I don’t really grasp the final sentence though. Basically deduction through probability as an escape from induction? Doesn’t work and points to something higher… because Bayesian reasoning assumes our initial creedences are subjective (this seems tangental to inductive)? not knowing?