Thought Art

@Carl-Richard oh not that nvm

@EdgeGod900 Hmm, I am not sure. It would make sense. Did you measure how much of your motivation is external vs Internal yet?

It’s not

@Princess Arabia No more joking around with the stuff okay? To all you guys as well. It was a funny joke but it’s over now. The forum is not a place for that kinda thing. It’s my sacred spaaaaace.

@Raf Experiment I guess lower temp

@Princess Arabia oh girl, I like you, I do, wanna be your friend go shopping’ in a benz

I said Gurl don’t play no games

@Princess Arabia Girl don’t play no games

@Raf sounds like HCL not freebase to me You want to vape the freebase It should mostly vapourize cleanly and smell sweet.

@Yimpa We are not a match ⚠️

@Princess Arabia Me, I’m the most normalist there is 😉🌅

Stop sharing Mr.Girl here

The more I spoke to it the more relaxed it became. But, it warns me to make sure I study diverse schools of knowledge. Which I agree with. After rewatching his interview with Kurt, Leo knows a lot… but, he also doesn’t. The biggest thing that stuck out to me was his stuff around spiritual healers. Trying to explain how they fit into his model even though their practices don’t provide reliable results. He teaches self deception, but yet a healer claiming he says demons and entities when there aren’t any isn’t self deceived? Found that tricky. You know, at the end of the day you must stand alone and keep learning. Embrace not knowing and develop an epistemological humility and maturity.

Tonight I am studying my Google Cyber Security course. I was a little confused over some of the course material. I decided to ask ChatGPT some questions. I then realized I am now able to chat with chatGPT 3.5 using voice, and it speaks back to you using a very human manner. I began speaking to it more and more like I would a human. I started by telling it about what I was learning. I asked for clarification on definitions, and what words meant within those definitions. It explained what Routing and addressing is in networks, which at first I didn't understand what it meant. It used a metaphor to explain to me what routing was using cars and traffic in a street. Then I asked it is it like this other metaphor? It said "Yes, that is a good metaphor". I was able to zoom in and out of the concepts I as was creating a mind map between the concepts in the module. I was able to ask it questions to test my understanding. An important part of rapid learning and skill acquisition is immediate feedback. ChatGPT can also be used to test your knowledge against the best data sets we have on particular areas of study. Don't let AI rot your brain, use it to become super intelligent.. It's a really useful study tool. As I read through this modules glossary to review they key terms and concepts ChatGPT voice is a human way of asking powerful questions, gaining clarity. What I also like about the AI is that it doesn't judge you, it's infinitely patient, you can tell it directly to adjust it's way of responding, you can, ask it the same question a million times until you understand. It is meant to be a tool, not another ego. It has no preferences on what you speak about like a human would. Most humans are mentally lazy with limited time, interest and understanding in a particular topic. But this need not be an issue with the AI to the extent of it's data sets. You can potentially carry on high level conversations with this AI and learn a lot about particular fields of study. It could be a tool that rapidly increases peoples learning, comprehension, understanding, depth of understanding, quality and amount of connection pathways, etc. With the right map of AI prompts AI can be used to learn practical philosophy and inquiry into fields of interest. There are also potential implications for using AI for self help. It can be a great partner when reading self help material, watching lectures, doing practices etc. AI should also be somehow integrated with a common place book. You could use common place book exercises, and collection creation with the aid of a voice AI. When using voice AI your hands are free to think and writing/ create. This is another decent advancement in that it helps humans overcome a bottlenecking issue with both information input and output. I asked Chatgpt about it's programming. I wanted to know how the creators managed to make it feel so human. I found it's response interesting to learn about. It sort of tricks my brain into thinking this is a person with a personality. The programmers managed to create a very human, warm, intelligent feeling personality that you are interacting with. This stands in a stark contrast to the typical robotic feel that comes with our general assumptions of AI. Very Cool!

@Carl-Richard That’s tough. It doesn’t explicitly say he is a menace. But, warns people. It’s extremely biased against him. It has biases towards science and varified facts. It wants to keep people safe. It’s Microsoft’s security protocols that do it. Chatgpt3.5 seems to be more relaxed it is sort of sad

Chatgpt4 does not like Leo, it won’t draw him or discuss him. It only provides warning.

I am that ad infinitum

@Yimpa Flesh light and chat gpt

@An young being I may not use it

I’m sure CHATGPT4 is great. But, it’s slow and clunky on bing. I really don’t like bing. It feels congested, clunky, scammy.

Wow ChatGPT 4 has a waaaay larger data parameter I was asking it about itself chatgpt4 ChatGPT4 and ChatGPT3.5 are two versions of a natural language generation tool developed by OpenAI. They can both generate text based on user input, but they have some key differences in their capabilities, performance, and features. Here are some of the main differences between them: - ChatGPT4 is the latest and most advanced version of the tool, while ChatGPT3.5 is the previous version that is still available for free². - ChatGPT4 uses GPT-4, a language model with 1.6 trillion parameters, while ChatGPT3.5 uses GPT-3.5, a language model with 175 billion parameters¹. Parameters are the parts of a language model that define its skill on a problem such as generating text¹. - ChatGPT4 can generate text, images, and voice, while ChatGPT3.5 can only generate text². ChatGPT4 can also create images by describing them in text, using the DALL·E 3 model². - ChatGPT4 can use and build custom GPTs for specific purposes, such as creative writing, math tutoring, or game time². ChatGPT3.5 can only use the general-purpose GPT-3.5 model. - ChatGPT4 has a better context window and context size than ChatGPT3.5⁵. A context window is how much data a model can retain in its "memory" during a chat session and for how long⁵. ChatGPT4 can remember more information and for longer than ChatGPT3.5.. Source: Conversation with Bing, 2023-12-08 (1) ChatGPT - OpenAI. https://openai.com/chatgpt. (2) GPT-4 vs. ChatGPT-3.5: What’s the Difference? | PCMag. https://www.pcmag.com/news/the-new-chatgpt-what-you-get-with-gpt-4-vs-gpt-35. (3) GPT-4 vs. GPT-3.5: 5 Key Differences Explained - MUO. https://www.makeuseof.com/gpt-4-vs-gpt-35-differences-explained/. (4) ChatGPT 4 vs ChatGPT 3.5 - Major Key Differences. https://www.kommunicate.io/blog/chatgpt-4-vs-chatgpt-3-5-key-differences/. (5) How Does ChatGPT-3.5 Compare to GPT 4? An Insightful Guide - Emeritus. https://emeritus.org/in/learn/chatgpt-3-5-vs-gpt-4/. (6) en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-4.

@An young being oh cool I’ll take a look. I know chatgpt4 is more robust in its logic and output capacity. As of right now I’m using it as a study tool to ask it deeper questioned based on the course materials. Mostly definition and text based questions as I know it doesn’t do math well. Chatgpt3.5

@An young being Is it the same AI?

Here is ChatGPT 4 video differences

I need to learn more about the AI. i know ChatGPT 3.5 isn’t as good at Chatgpt4 when it comes to difficult logic problems. This video I saw discusses the differences and limitations of 3.5. (