Thought Art

@Leo Gura No hate here. Just asking, while restating your own words and offering appreciation.

This is a demo of a song. I’m gonna make the next demo this week as an experiment recording a demo in my op1 so it will have drums, and maybe a synth.

@Leo Gura That’s all fine. But you made a very clear, strong promise about the timeline. So I asked. Now you are backing off which is why I asked because I know you now in this regard. I appreciate the work you do and I’ll watch it when it comes out. But, consider not making those promises if you know this about yourself and your work and what it may take to ensure quality At least I interpreted the promise of a full series by end of this month with one episode every 2 weeks. I say this with humility that you are the only one making this content and with appreciation.

@Leo Gura Hi Leo, With respect you promised me something in the video about your timeline. I just was wondering if you were going to follow it. You did not answer my question. That is up to you. I’ll watch it when you release it. Have a good day hope you are well. Art

A none answer. All good

@Leo Gura Like you said if someone is intellectually dishonest you don’t listen to them

@danniel Looks great!

The 100 million dollar series by Alex Hormozi, The Code of the Extraordinary Mind by Vishen laikhiani, and High Performance Habits by Brendon Burchard. Also, The personal MBA by John Kaufman is a great book.

Leo are you sticking to your production schedule as promised with this series? @Leo Gura

A song demo!

Rude

Song demo: Waiting

Something I’ve noticed is that to understand Jordan Peterson speaking to these individuals is very complex, requires deep levels of consciousness, epistemology, patience, capacity for recontextualization, empathy, and not assuming to understand Jordan Peterson. We have to put the whole conversation IN the context of human survival, development, history, brain types, etc. it’s a very complex situation which I think is useful to watch these videos if you want to grow yourself. He has a rock solid sense of the brutality and seriousness of these ideas which the people he speaks to do not. He is battling egos, assumptions, limited perspectives, youth, logic, etc He sees religion in the context of actual human existence and survival which I think is important. Someone like Rationality Rules actually isn’t a serious person and therefore his philosophy is shit. It’s shit because he doesn’t see how stupid he is, how foolishness his framing toward these topics is, and he is corrupt because he has no foundation that Truth is the highest value…. or the seriousness of proper epistemology and its consequences on survival. His use of rational tools, does not make up for his stupidity.

Meta rationality and infinite perspective IS fundamental in proper governance. Truth IS fundamental to proper governance. I have a perspective that is so powerful, it may take me years to implement, grow, flesh out, etc.

I intuitively know what a woman is. I feel like you don't need to be a genius to know what it is, and Greek Skepticism comes into play with common sense. But, I admit as we explore it very deeply through philosophy and ontology It's hard to define what a woman is. But, I know a women when my see one by using my penis (natural intuition). I know a woman through being a man. But, I also know that everyone is undefinable and a mystery. Yet, it's knowable at the same time. I know my mother is a woman, or my girlfriend is. I know a human vs a dog. I can know what something is, but not know what it is.