Thought Art

I saw a comment saying "The seatbelt is to protect us, not him".

*Fist bump* Real recognize real.

YUH!

That’s a yes 🙌

I like this song but my family and many friends hate it. Thoughts?

Since when. I know non-mods who had banners. What u being a banner narc

@Davino yeah I gotta finish reading meta . Com

I admit after some contemplation, though I don't know much about her I can't judge her. I don't trust her right now but I also don't know her well enough.

Sheesh

Star light shine Sun of mine Walking through the Ancient empty Forest with you…. Soon we will All return… Be together again… Ahahhhhh!! ohhhh!

A lot of the positive feelings I associated with weed were just myself.

Neil Breen is releasing all the files and supporting documents.

@Carl-Richard You are likely right about not just relying on the studies. Philosophy based training. While, using the science as a field of probabilities. Then, you yourself become the experiment n=1, and the scientist. I used ChatGPT as well after this and it helped me spell out what top body lifters use: They use a combination of: 1. Science 2. Coach Experience 3. Athlete Intuition 4. Technology 5. Practice Refinement. Interesting stuff!

I think science based lifting makes sense…. Top athletes use science in their training which is why they outperform people from 100 years ago. It’s funny because pills have the same problem with weight lifting. Science done to represent populations rarely work on individuals which is why doctors often struggle to get medications “scientifically proven to work on populations” to work on an individual. I would also suggest it is possible that pills do offer far more complexity than lifting weights. Each pill is a unique chemical compound which can be extremely hard to measure how it effects the human body and especially when people are taking a mixture of medications….. People lifting weights is largely the same process for everyone. People may have different recovery times and stuff, and each body may react somewhat uniquely but it’s not the same level of adding a unique compound to the body. That being said, science based lifting does make sense. It just has to be done intelligently, and allow for direct experience of working with an individual to adjust and make personalized fixes. It’s unrealistic to take scientific studies of soccer moms when looking at highly motivated weight lifters and that makes sense. But, are there not studies in your chosen population group that you can study? And not all science is simply controlled trials… some science is looking at things like cellular metabolism, nutrition, etc…. This backlash against science in lifting is dumb. Is it conformity? I think your overall premise of philosophy based lifting is interesting. But, I also bet that science is being used in your decision makings. Coaches who train professional athletes to be the best in the world have a strong understanding of sport science. That is how they create consistent results in their field. So, I’m open to criticism of science based lifting but I do not think it would hold up as a complete move away from science based lifting. My sister works in sports nutrition and she studies sport nutrition science very deeply. It’s obvious to her that through her scientific education individuals have unique nutrition and training needs. That’s what the science shows. They don’t just rely on population studies alone. There is also data collected from individuals….

Leo, I am among the 0.4% of your viewers according to my YouTube 2025 reflection thing. Flex. 💪 Big brain big brain