TheEnigma

The weird thing is that my parents are not bad people. And are mostly compassionate. Just when they kill to eat, they believe in that if the creature suffers the longest then the blood rises to it's head and it will taste better. If the animal is lively and strong, then it will also taste better. IS me feeling sorry for it my own ego then?

Okay, well written response. Then why do all high conscious philosophers teach humans not to harm or dominate living things? Leo even said the more violent the lower the consciousness. My mom and and dad are happy people. But they have lots of denial that allows them the happiness. In fact, I see many low conscious people happy. Because they don't have the ability to realize what they do is harmful. Like Trump, as Leo said if Trump realized all he did was harmful he'd never be able to live with himself. Yet Leo said the higher the consciousness generally the happier the individual.

Death is an illusion.

(Canadian here) We have our own problems! Would you like me to get into the details?

Can you please give some examples of human mass delusions?

This video is one of your gems. So it was at 27:11 you said that. It actually took me a few years of experiencing and thinking, to really feel what you were saying. I am an extrovert, but then I realized when I connected with so many people, I really didn't connect with anyone and still had to face a lot of my challenges alone. But then an introvert can also go out and socialize, and seem very extroverted too. But also still feel they have to face their challenges alone. I spoke with my brother about this and he is an comp sci AI vision nerd, extremely introverted. And he once mentioned "Because I think in the end of the day extrovert or introvert, we all want the same things. But never cut at introvert off when they are speaking, because they already don't want to talk, so you will discourage them when you cut them off. With an extrovert, an introvert almost has to learn to cut them off. But when talking to an introvert, expect them to think, because they all also expect you to think. It's like playing chess in classical time control. Talking to an extrovert is like playing bullet. it's a different style. Think of an introvert as a foam that is pressed inwards when interacting, the foam will eventually come back up when they recharge alone. Where as for an extrovert, the foam is already pushed outward, so when they interact, they get pushed down too, but it's already facing outwards."

But Leo didn't you say in one of your videos that if you are so introverted, you actually become extroverted. And when you are so extroverted, you end up also becoming so introverted. Can you please explain what you meant by that?

Can you please give some examples of flimsy or inflated investments?

Yay congratulations!

As an extrovert, isn't my mind already disadvantaged for truth seeking then? I do long for high quality companionship and deep topics that can be discussed all night. But as an extrovert don't I create a lot of my own suffering by desiring that? But I can't help it.

What box?

I think when you are on these drugs dental problems are one of the least of your worries

Get well soon !! All the best ❤️

Thank God he's gone. But I'm from Canada, and it's got far deeper issues than just Trudeau.

Pay him on twitch? Send him a superchat.

Don't look at online ratings. That is meaningless as there's so many casual players on there. Look at USCF ratings. The average tournament player is about 1500 OTB. On chess.com that should be about 1700-1800 rapid depending on the individual's ability for faster games than classical. More than 800 million people in this world know how to play chess. But maybe only a million to couple of million of those are average tournament player strength (for USA). If you are beating 1600 bots on chess.com you are well above an average casual chess player in this world. You'd be like a club player level. But one of the weaker ones in a serious club. Maybe class f USCF 800-1000 otb. Hope this helps 🙂

1400s OTB should be able to defeat 2000 rated bots. bot ratings are just for a bit of fun. They're just trying to make lower level players feel good.

None for now. I do want them someday.

My friend said well Trump was only joking about that. Plus he doesn't have the power to actually pull that off. But by the end of the century it probably will actually happen. Because Canada really does not produce much. So combining countries would actually make sense and USA can become more powerful that way.

Ahhh no wonder. Thanks for clarifying. I checked out his posts now

But how can you sense he's just coping? Well lets be fair, he's entitled to feel how he does. We can't sure he's just coping or will change his mind.

Thanks! That's a good question I'm sorry I don't have the answer to that. But I would think it's the latter. First of all simply because even if someone was given power if they never had strong hunger to maintain it, they'd probably lose it very quickly. And secondly I do remember some of my co-workers saying that by the time someone reaches high levels in management or ceo positions of large companies, or became a famous politician, they've backstabbed a lot of people to get there. I had a friend that was in politics, and she said she simply had to step down because it just required too much lying.

Just speaking by experience. I have to acknowledge that whenever someone has power, it's much easier for them to do corrupt things. For a man if he does indeed have power, it's difficult for him not to get cocky when he's loved by many women. I Have met some genuinely good men that have lots of power and don't take advantage of women or their situation. But it's more an exception than it is a norm. I have to say thank you all those men who do have self control and don't abuse their power! And for sure it goes the other way too. When a woman is so gorgeous or impossibly beautiful. It's difficult for her to not abuse her powers by using sex. It's too tempting for most of us. Again there are exceptions. Beauty also draws so much attention. But I think it just makes it so hard for a woman to tell who actually genuinely likes her for who she is, verses just for her beauty. It might also attract a lot of unwanted attention. It almost ends up being a disadvantage for the beautiful woman in so many ways. Because a high quality woman also has to work hard and be able to genuinely introspect and be able to contemplate, do inner work within herself, learn skills... etc if she wants to attract high quality men or to have a high quality life, regardless of how beautiful she is. I think you give good advice because it's true, I don't think of the men I spend time with as a payout or "what job or career they are in??" Nor am I thinking "he's 6 foot 4, or aww he's only 5 foot 3.." Good looks do help to a degree, but I'm personally not that picky about looks or height or race or physical appearance or whatever the man might have in his net worth or what his career is. I've dated men from every social class, I genuinely just enjoy people's time and connecting with others. Men or women. So you explained and elaborated things pretty well. His personality is honestly so much more important. Now obviously if I am going to consider having kids with a man, then for sure, having more resources is better than less. Just because I'll be out of work for many months and physically more vulnerable for at least a year or two. But that's a very late stage of any relationship. I've met many men that are very well off that wanted me, but I've chosen men that had far less or almost nothing in their wallets, simply because of the connection I had with them. Man or woman, you give good advice because vibes are very important, and it's more important to be having a good time and enjoying life. Not everything is about money. Especially you are correct that now many women can make their own money. It wouldn't be about how much the man makes as the strength of his character. So if he was just given a lot of money or power but he's extremely socially uncalibrated, awkward, poorly groomed, with poor hygiene and doesn't look like "he gets it," it's far more of a turn off than a man that has no money, no power but has confidence, wit, social skills, stories to tell, and a man that's genuinely fun or interesting to be around. There are some women that do value money or power more than other women. I know some women that will only date a man if the man can pay for her complete expensive lifestyle, vacations, dining, food etc or only if the man has an expensive car. And I know some women that place almost no emphasis on money, but value other things. But yes, I would agree that it's almost never a good idea for a man to lead with his wallet! So keep coaching them

He's giving good advice. I'd say it's a good idea to at least consider what he's saying.