Bno

@Inliytened1 Its to set an example of spiritual growth. He believes in Russiagate while nkt knowing enough about the issue, ignoring evidence when it's presented to him because it doesn't fit his preconceived notions, and also belittling and arrogantly treating people like doormats who politely challenged the notion with conscious facts. Much like he is doing rn.

@Inliytened1 If Leo is wrong and we know he's wrong, then we need to be conscious enough to point it out to him so that others aren't misled.

I agree with you that nothing is absolute. It could be aliens that caused all of this to happen. But based on the information the public has, we can say it's not very likely aliens are controlling our election. In the case here, it's like hypothesizing based on past events. If you see that a dog barks every time you show her food, it's likely that the next time you show her food she will also bark. We can't say absolutely she will bark, there's a chance that she may feel too sick to bark the next time you show her. But in the case we're dealing with here, with the same people moderating the establishment this time as last time, and with lobbying still being a problem corrupting them, and the myriad of other pieces of evidence, it's a pretty sound hypothesis to say that they were trying the same shenanigans again.

@Inliytened1 What you fail to recognize is that Russiagte lacks evidence. On the other hand, primary and election rigging by the DNC has an overwhelming amount of evidence to back it up. Your behavior of following Leo in ignoring the on the ground evidence and technical evidence analyzed by people who understand software programming shows your sycophantic bias to blindly agree with everything Leo says.

"It's just a bug! You're all conspiracy theorists!" Lol! Heres a reddit post called Iowa Caucus: List of errors in official data analyzed by people who understand software and coding. https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/ezl7iw/iowa_caucus_list_of_errors_in_official_data/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

@Leo Gura You actually think the DNC was trying to improve things to make the process more fair? Lmao! If they were blaming Russia for this you'd believe it without question. This isn't even just about Bernie Sanders. It's well known that the Intelligence community from their own mouths in interviews with the MSM that part of their work is to stop progressives and anti-establishment candidates. And it's really reflected in the way the DNC unfairly treated not just Bernie, but Mike Gravel, Tulsi Gabbard, Marianna Williamson, and Andrew Yang. But when it comes to a member of the elite who donates loads of money for them (Bloomberg), they change the rules to help them. Look at what they did to Tim Canova in 2018 and what Nancy Pelosi does in California. I called you out on your blindspots before and told you people are noticing. More people are noticing. Time to let go of your ego and admit you're wrong here. Set an example of growth instead of childishly holding on to a narrative of "Democrats good; Trump and GOP bad." You're damaging your own credibility.

@Inliytened1 Nothing new? The Twitter thread by Nikola? Idt you understood what I meant by "thread."

@Inliytened1 You didn't look at the thread apparently.

@Leo Gura You keep disingenuously ignoring all the on the ground evidence I presented. Listen to how childish and dogmatic you sound calling well analyzed videos "garbage" and coming at us with petty dismissals like "your conspiracy is a joke like flat earthers." Is this the kind of consciousness you want to promote? Look at how many people are noticing your ego when it comes to politics. It's also apparent you don't understand how this process works since you're letting yourself be deceived by MSM trickeries. It's actually Bernie who is winning by popular vote. The delegates don't matter until the convention. Those percentages you see projected on Google and other MSM outlets are the delegates. They're presenting the delegates to deceive people like they presented superdelegates front and center in 2016.

Yup, there's actually an overwhelming amount of polls reported since a year ago that show Bernie as Biden supporters' second choice.

@Leo Gura Lol, this is not a joke like the Russigate conspiracy you believe. I'm speculating based on national and international history that they were trying to rig the primaries again, only this time using the app. And when the results from the app weren't matching the results presented in the Bernie camp app, that's when people started reporting there being "inconsistencies" and that there was "a bug." More evidence emerging: https://thegrayzone.com/2020/02/04/pro-israel-buttigieg-seth-klarman-iowas-voting-app/amp/?__twitter_impression=true And more coming in:

@Serotoninluv With this issue I agree with you. It would solve so many problems. Candidates would also focus more towards propping each other up rather than attacking and bringing each other down.

@Inliytened1 We're saying it's highly likely and we're also going against the notion of calling it a "conspiracy theory" and locking people's discussions about these valid concerns.

@Leo Gura They didn't plan on the results getting delayed. They're only doing that now because they thought they could get away with rigging the results like they did in 2016. The reason for the delay is likely because the Bernie camp with their precinct captains and their app found irregularities and discrepancies with the Iowa app. Without staging the victory for Pete, they likely wanted to save themselves from embarrassment as well as handing the victory and moment over to the candidate that will change the status quo, Bernie Sanders. There were people on the ground witnessing all this. And yes, the DNC did commit voter fraud in 2016 by hiding and eliminating people's ballots in 2016. And there's also evidence of this happening in 2018 in the Florida primary and election between Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Tim Canova.

@Serotoninluv My concern is towards the establishment which have been proven endlessly to be working against the interest of working people and who've been shown historically to rig elections in their favor.