Ajay0

Perhaps, but I would say it is his egoic motivation to emerge as a winner that motivates him, and not to become an eternal loser and failure in the event of a nuclear holocaust. His drive comes from his self-image which is addicted to the idea of being a winner and not a loser, and he will do anything to protect and enhance it.

Musk himself had demanded Zhelensky to step down as president. https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20261014-musk-says-us-govt-responsible-for-any-starshield-restrictions-affecting-ukraine There could be a number of reasons for this, starting with staunch chinese support for russia and China's influence on western capitalists. Second factor would be Musk's fears of a nuclear war and holocaust that can wipe out the nation states of the US, Europe and Russia permanently and derail his dream of going to Mars. Musk might be okay with the conflict if he can get to Mars first and end up as a survivor and winner, but not before that.

I don't think the earth is under any kind of danger of an invasion from malevolent alien species at this point in time considering the possible military resistance that can come from various countries that would view them as a threat. Alien technological advantages can be offset by human numerical superiority and tactical methods. However the aliens can excel in manipulation of perception, engineering destructive wars and conflicts between the most powerful nations on earth, and ensure their annihilation. This would soften up any potential resistance and would set up the foundation for a successful alien invasion later on. Any abductions and theft of earths biological and mineral resources would cease to be clandestine any more after such an invasion, imho. I have been reading reports of alien hybrids infiltrating influential political circles and penetrating the deep states in some powerful nations for decades now, possibly in pursuit of some agenda of their own. I used to think it was fantastic imaginary yellow press and reporting for mere sensation-mongering, but now I feel that perhaps there maybe some substance to the same in the light of the above hypothesis.

This is true. Around two decades back, the Indian police warned me not to stay outside on the streets after midnight. I think they suspected me to be a robber or something, but I was innocent. And there is no general law in India that bans citizens from going out or roaming in public places after 10:00 PM.

India is considered to be the only country on earth which has never persecuted its jewish population. Similarly the Persian Zoroastrians were granted refuge in India by Indian kings after they had to flee Persia due to persecution during the arab invasions. Even now you can see a large flourishing persian community in India with their zoroastrian temples intact. The Indian jews and persians live together in harmony, which is a microcosmic model of integration that Israel and Iran can emulate at a macrocosmic level. The Persian emperor Cyrus the Great is also mentioned in the bible and honored by the Jews as a dignified and righteous king. The humanistic code of Cyrus the Great is recorded on the Cyrus Cylinder, a baked-clay artifact dating back to 539 B.C. Discovered in the ruins of Babylon in 1879, this text is widely celebrated as the world's first charter of human rights. So the ancient Persian civilization has made a lot of contributions to the world civilization and culture.

Have no idea what you are talking here ! Russia did not allow Napoleon or Hitler to have bases in russia and defeated their invasions back then. Why should a neutral Ukraine allow Nato to march to russian borders ! It would be infringement of ukrainian sovereignty and needlessly would subject Ukraine to a possible conventional and nuclear attack !

The Self, our Being, is awareness. ~ Sri Muruganar If human beings become conscious, the need for domination and conflict will dissolve. ~ Sadhguru To remain unconscious of Being is to be trapped within an ego-driven wasteland of conflict, strife, and fear that only seems customary. ~ Adyashanti The Ego’s job is to kill everything but itself. ~ Byron Katie “The moment you become aware of the ego in you, it is strictly speaking no longer the ego, but just an old, conditioned mind-pattern. Ego implies unawareness. Awareness and ego cannot coexist.” ~ Eckhart Tolle "If you are driven by fear, anger or pride nature will force you to compete. If you are guided by courage, awareness, tranquility and peace nature will serve you." ~ Amit Ray

I reach samadhi or nondual perception speedily in high prana environments like the beach or forests devoid of pollution and unconscious human company. I also reach samadhi faster in meditation spaces consecrated by meditation experts and enlightened sages. Keeping excellent koans or nondual teachings in notebooks and referring them regularly also helps me stay oriented, focused on the Self/Awareness and undistracted from the chaos and multiple stimuli of the material world around me.

On the contrary... https://www.reuters.com/world/china/putin-says-russia-doesnt-oppose-ukraine-joining-eu-2025-09-02/ https://www.voanews.com/a/a-13-2004-12-10-voa48/308427.html https://www.dw.com/en/vladimir-putin-comments-ukraine-eu-nato-membership-v2/a-73877328 Putin maintains that while the EU is an economic bloc which countries have a sovereign right to join, NATO expansion into the post-Soviet space is a direct security threat to Russia that Moscow strongly opposes. Putin had himself suggested in the 2000s of Russia joining the EU as a western country itself.

The armies of Napoleon and Hitler used Ukraine as the neighboring base to attack Russia. Over 25 million Russians and Ukrainian Slavs died during the Nazi onslaught of eastern europe, as nazi racial doctrine considered the eastern europeans as racially inferior, similar to the gypsies and jews. The incredible counter-attack waged by the russians in stanlingrad however ended the nazi genocidal plans as well as war machine, and ensured the survival of the Slavs, Jews and gypsies later on. The russian counter-attacks ended permanently the Napoleonic and Nazi regimes, which were the most powerful militaries on earth in those times. However they sustained heavy damage during the invasions especially the nazi one. This is one of the reasons why the Russians are paranoid about hostile military alliances on their very borders. Hungary does not border russia. The russians are not hostile to these countries including ukraine joining EU, as it is an economic alliance, and the russians are also open to joining EU as Russia is a white european christian nation itself . The russians themselves were open to joining Nato many times, though this was rejected by the western leadership even under the times of Yeltsin, who was a staunch western ally back then. Imo, the only reason the western leadership rejected Russian membership in nato could be due to lack of a bogeyman or perceived external threat back then to raise fears against, that would justify high defense budgets and the existence of Nato itself at the expense of western taxpayer money.

Obviously prevention of conflict is considered to be an attribute of superior leadership skills than mere cures through military responses! If you were a leader of the west, what steps would you have taken to prevent the devastating two world wars which originated in europe and the present ukraine war as well !

Yes, but Yeltsin also vehemently opposed nato expansion as such. https://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/02/world/yeltsin-opposes-expansion-of-nato-in-eastern-europe.html https://jamestown.org/yeltsin-repeats-opposition-to-nato-expansion/https://cdclv.unlv.edu/pragmatism/ds_nato.pdf https://cdclv.unlv.edu/pragmatism/ds_nato.pdf https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/12/russias-belief-in-nato-betrayal-and-why-it-matters-today So you can see here poor and incompetent leadership in the west is responsible for needlessly making an adversary of a staunch western ally like Yeltsin, and which is reminiscent of the incompetent and poor western leadership responsible for the devastating two world wars which originated in the west and which could have been easily prevented if competent leaders with good judgement and character had been at the helm, as per historians.

See, the true culprit in this regard is Yeltsin, not Putin. Everyone is condemning Putin but not Yeltsin who was the man who installed Putin. After the western leaders decided to expand Nato eastward dishonestly inspite of their verbal promises to Gorbachev and Yeltsin on "not one inch eastward", Yeltsin made many diplomatic and friendly trips to the west to remind them of their promises and found that he was ignored because he was considered poor and weak by the wealthy and powerful west and not worthy of much consideration. So consequently, Yeltsin himself installed putin as his successor due to Putin' s military background, and also supported by the russian military and bureaucracy who saw Nato expansion a threat. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50807747 If the west had honestly observed its promises to Gorbachev and Yeltsin, checked its Shylockian greed for new weapons markets in eastern europe, and not expanded eastward to eastern europe and finally to the very borders of nuclear-armed Russia, I don't think this mess would have happened. Seeing that the west was honoring its promises on "not one inch eastward", Yeltsin would have relaxed and would have promoted an economist or diplomat or sociologist or lawyer or even a baby-sitter as the next president of Russia. He and Russia would have trusted the west more and would have become more aligned to it. However the dishonesty of the west created a trust deficit with Russia and also destroyed their credibility in front of the rest of the world as well. Until the west develops honest and competent leaders who can manage the situation properly, I don't think they will see an end to the incessant warmongering in europe and the west over ludicrous issues. This is consideration of the fact that the two world wars which originated in europe killing a hundred million people , were said to have been largely preventable as per historians, provided there were competent, capable and far-sighted western statesmen, leaders and diplomats involved.

A long war is profitable to the western military complex, not Russia which is losing its own weapons markets to western competitors due to sanctions and so on. Ironically the US, France and Russia are the top three weapons providers in the world at the moment. As the war progresses, it is possible that Russia will slide more down the ladder though it can later make a comeback with its brics partners which encompasses over 50 % of the world popuation and 35 % of the world's GDP. Even though the US-Nato was defeated by the Taliban in afghanistan after twenty years of fighting, heavy casualties and trillions of dollars down the drain, many weapons contractors made plenty of money during the duration of the war. So it is possible that the ukraine war will be similarly milked till optimal profits are obtained with western taxpayer money as in afghanistan.

The longer the war wages, the more widows and orphans are created, and the greater possibility of a nuclear war and holocaust. The only one's profitting from this war is the western military industrial complex with high weapons sales and profits and skyrocketing share prices. They have also successfully captured weapons markets in Sweden and Finland after these two joined nato recently. A long war would also boost profits greatly. As Julian Assange stated, " A long unsuccessful war is more profitable than a short successful war." So I don't see any chances of this war ending until all the profits are milked out.