remember

@Haloman you are thinking in empowerment of money not in empowerment of thought and goal orientation. if the only solution to your problems is money then of course you will not come up with visionary solutions, you won`t even come up with visionary solutions of how to materialize money. if you think that money is printed you are not imagining it right. you can skip everything money can make you gain by finding a way to elevate your beingness by pure imagination on how to imagine it differently. but like with money it`s about getting your hands on the matter to get to results. remember, deconstruction before reconstruction discarding before accumulation. if you want to gain something, learn to live without it for a while. figure out what the real problems are - there is never only one way to reach a goal. pure survival is not the most elevated way on finding your way as pure survival enslaves you to what survival manifests in you, not what you manifest in survival.

i didn`t watch the movie yet, and never have been to the philipines but from what i`ve heard of others i`d say it has not so much blue more that a lot of people are in orange mixed with red and purple. could be wrong but south east asia is even though of course they are not the us or europe in sense of wealth often already very much in orange.

@Raze it sounds as if you could profit of doing chakra work - the bubbling feeling reminds me of something @Emerald said in a video. i don`t really have very strong vishuddha feelings as a grown up anymore, because i usually don`t let it go to the head so much anymore just speak what i think and if the emotion is strong i just sometimes engage in it even though i know it`s leading to nowhere. but you see if no one would speak up, these people would feel more supported in their worldview. for me it sounds as if your vishuddha asks you to learn to communicate in a way where you really reach a person like that and make them think about their standpoints, and even if it`s just for a minute. it`s not bad to communicate your anger, the anger is in a sense healthy, you just need to work on the way to express it. maybe journaling could be a way, too. you could even start vlogging on youtube if your content is good. maybe at one point you get so good with expressing it that 50% or more of the people love you for speaking up. you will never be loved by everyone as they might just not always get how much love you are, even though that would be a dream to be loved by everyone. i can say sometimes it`s worth it from own experience.

@Farnaby and where is outer and where is inner at the skin? where does skin separate from water or air or air and water separate from your skin? how can you know skin is more than your senses? would you say your vision is your skin? or what would you see your skin made of if it was not made of pure matter? what is matter anyways?

but then where does outer or inner begin?

@Farnaby what do you believe in? did you ever find out about that? except of how the bodysoulmind might or might not be recycled into its single parts that might or might not be separate entities. what if all of it IS just the illusion of a matrix, and this world is nothing but an illusion. how do you know? despite solipsism how do you know i am not you communicating with myself?

why would you want a girlfriend then in the first place? are you afraid of missing out on having a girlfriend? why not trying the gay thing right away? you don`t become gay... if you are gay you are gay if you like both you are bisexual... why not just try on different sexualities for a while? and if you fall for someone you try to stick like glue.

there is probably a difference in selfinduced and world induced loneliness - especially in old people or children it`s oftentime something that is not selfinduced but society made. there are models of adopting a granny or grandpa - you could make dinner where you invite random people you met from different backgrounds just throwing them together. go to a meetup. just share your smiles and help on the streets. loneliness is not always self induced oftentimes people who suffer under selfinduced loneliness overcome it by getting in contact with people who suffer world induced loneliness. on a deeper level of course all lonelyness is in a sense world induced and selfinduced.

does that mean the magnitude is gone now that you know others can have similar experiences, god doesn`t talk to you alone? it`s funny how that`s exactly what god seems to reveal. no wonder how ego backlashes are predetermined. in the end it`s probably all about the connections with the divine and how we nourish them - if god talks in many tongues to listen to what god has to say, because you never know, s/he might give someone else the better information sometimes, but you don`t know.

??? that`s probably some way to use the cards... but that`s probably also more black magic, or egoic magic. was this the interpretation of the magician card? the shadow magician? but look at the tower it`s devils who fall. and on the moon card there are two towers. but even there it`s the devil dreaming that. i guess if this deck is used wrongfully it doesn`t only distort the mind of the involved people, but the magicians mind as well. i imagine how someone in the middleages would have used these cards, even though the deck is maybe not that old. they must have completely overcome and integrated the fear of the devil using this or really believing in it, what would have made them devils anyways. i guess some cards are more dangerous than others, if it`s the cards which are dangerous. either we make it to the light or we get more involved in the dark. but light and dark are neutral attributes.

exactly it`s your definition - you are interpreting... who makes the difference you or the deity?

@Emerald found this deck, it`s supposed to be a very old one - somehow i like the symbolism. a lot of devils appearing on the cards. thought it might be interesting, also that there are hints to the shadows of the cards. as there is so much talk of devils and angels going on - i thought some kind of shadow tarot would be refreshing. some of the pictures are pretty funy - like the magician - who wants to become a table?

reminds me of the symbol of the karmik wheele, like the symbol of tibetan book of dead. could be a sign that you are hung up in some kind of karmik pattern that repeats itself, what creates a distortion/fragmentation of time may be past lives or present life. either you are trapped without noticing what entraps you or it`s a sign that tells you: there will be a breakthrough soon, some kind of wakeup experience. btw your body/soul/mind might also tell you that you need to work on a breakthrough. the notion of life might give you a hint where it might be going. it might be a warning and at the same time a calling.

you don`t make sense that`s why you don`t understand it - if you don`t try to understand you can`t solve the riddle.

there are always alternatives, but i guess it`s ok to put a copyright on open source information at least somehow it has to be protected to not fall into the wrong hands.© https://creativecommons.org/

this is how twisted words can get. the same as calling something lawful stealing, or legalizing crimes. there is really something like proportionality in every system that if out of balance speaks of an ill system. proportionalities are not only of importance when people walk through a door but also in sense of calling a country wealthy when it isn`t even able to maintain wealth for a huge part of society. it`s generally funny how neo-liberalism seems to rather be neo-colonialism and neo-imperialism the last neo in these directions was neo-naziism - how funny that these words fit so perfectly to your picture of neo-marxism. but generally speaking even hitler wouldn`t have made it without taxes at least not far. don`t even know if this even is orange as it`s so beige.

@Zweistein the angel would probably say: what do we need dollars for as long as there is water! quak

@Emerald they say a rose is a rose, but not one is like another.

@kieranperez sometimes sources are interesting as a reference for writers because they where the first to ever write or formulate insights/ideas/concepts through observation so it could become a part/starting point of a certain kowledge body. as these new approaches towards world perception mark a certain twist in the development of mankind. if authors reference certain other authors to reference the foundation they built their reflections/theories upon, sometimes they use the first ever source as they either are not deep in the matter of crossreferencing of different authors on the same phenomenon, or they try to state that their reflections are independent from further historical developments and in that sense pure and close to the source of the thought. of course it`s interesting to know where someone is coming from historically in some sense, and a lot of scientiffical struggles are about who said what first, in that they are not very different than designers. in the end it`s a bigger achievement to be the first than to get it more accurate as it stimulates the wow effect in a historical setting. but in sense of comparing the different approches to a certain terminological concept it`s very interesting to read about the small differences in the concepts to understand their mechanical/dynamical structure sensing into the different perspectives to understand fast what approach someone has to the world, without maybe even knowing themselves what approch they have. i`m not a person who does that, but i know people who are pretty good in that and who love to get hung up on these little differences sometimes, as exactly the point of how we percive the world sometimes makes the difference in how we interact with the world. if you don`t want to discuss these on a referencial level, don`t get too hung up on the reference, get into the concept and perception of it, for your own metaphysics, that`s much more important. but if you want to diskuss these topics with people who are in it very deeply they will always mention names, as if the name was the concept, as if everyone would have read it. compare the differences and similarities - that`s making it easier - in the end they all talk about the same, with some marginal differences that might not be marginal at all. also for words like reason - it`s in a sense important to find out in what context reason might have been used during that time. you can compare it to what reason is defined as today. also maybe you are lucky and if you read kant you can find out what he meant with the word, how he defined it.

@tsuki no not funny it`s a mystery, a quest. the card you nurish the card you gain, but there is more than one card in the deck and you never know which one is hidden. and which one is yours to play. sometimes the cards play you much more than you could say you play the cards.

tarot is a gateway to purple, blue uses purple for alignment structure higher metaphysics, while purple focuses on little dayly battles. purple can undermine or enrich blue by swimming in the water blue disconnected itself from through dogmatism.

does someone know if it`s possible to cicle bikes on the moon?

yes we are talking about the proportion of values.

it looks like it grew out of nowhere. but i don`t see dollar notes, i see trees.

well yeah, wealth can not be created - only value can. wealth sometimes creates terrible value.