Ulax

So sassy 😂

LMAO that is hilarious

Yes, I watched a video by Todd V talking about this and he's an absolute expert. So, the guys implying its just cope aren't correct and being black-or-white in their thinking. Todd said similar things to you about not finding women regularly that he liked and not recommending to approach girls not attracted to. That said, he did caveat that by the fact that he has very high standards because of the calibre of girls his skills has allowed him consistent relationships with. But maybe you just have high standards too. The sneaky alternative is its your brain rationalising that so you don't approach. But sometimes high standards is just the case. Don't be gaslit into thinking you have a problem you don't have.

Damn. I would have expected Dallas to be perfect for game.

I would moderately agree with that. Social dominance is definitely a core high-value trait for women, and being prepared to be polarising is more likely to lead to attraction. The disagreement is that the value provided by the authenticity can also be undermined if the authenticity implies a non-high value trait. For example, if i tell a girl "I love being homeless. Its great." (assuming she doesnt think im joking) you'll get value from being able to go against social norms (implies you're strong enough to do so, or have had positive experiences doing so in past). But you'll lower your value because of how she likely perceives being homeless (incompetent, low social status). So, I'd say being authentic from a place of high-value is much more effective. Also, a minor one is its about her perception that you are prepared to be polarising, not that you prepared to be polarising.

Pick up theory would push agree with the more likely to sleep with part but disagree with the it being more mature part. Because it says women psychology has 3 camps for men. Non-sex worthy, provider, lover. Non-sex worthy is rejection. Provider is highest value guy i can get who will actually protect me and raise kids well. Lover is the best genetics guy, idea being she could get his genes and then get the provider to raise the kids. She's more likely to sleep with lover because she just wants bro's genes. But in terms of mating strategy its not necessarily immature for her to sleep with the lover category guy because she gets the good genes she was after from the lover. This theory is also in the book Sperm Wars.

I agree. That's why I included the life experiences/ social conditioning parts in my description of high-value. I'll also add present life circumstances too. For example, that will affect her mood. So, high-value to her could change day to day. But the core of what counts as high-value will always be there.

I get what you're saying about women being emotional creatures. However, I'd push back on them not caring about anything else. Because what causes them to be highly emotional in a way that leads to sex is perceiving a guy as high-value and trusting him (enough). So, really the emotions are a consequence of the image she has of the guy in her mind.

? If you mean that what is high-value in the context of female attraction isn't an objective status signal for men, then I agree. Whenever I say high-value guy I mean it in the context of what female attraction regards as a high-value guy.

My opinion is they are attracted to high-value guys who's value they see as relatable and attainable. Or you can also say trust instead of R&A. Value is mainly determined by what made sense in caveman time as value. And then life experiences/ social conditioning adds a unique twist to what value ultimately looks like for the girl. Examples of cavemen value are: - Competence, power & influence, social status And things like humor are attractive in so far as they imply you have one of these caveman values. I.e. humor implies competence of intelligence. Further its an honest signal you're relaxed enough to have fun which implies social status and competence, as if you had had terrible social experiences you wouldn't be relaxed enough to be humorous, or feel safe enough to attempt it. Trust works the same as value in this way. But these emotional things you describe I'd mainly class as in the trust part of the equation. And, these emotional things you list only make her happy if they see him as a high-value guy who they trust. So, if she smiles receiving a flower, she isn't smiling because its romantic. Its because its a positive thing occurring between her and a high-value guy who she trusts, or she's smiling because its bumping the trust levels up.

My goat

How tf is it insulting to be hanging out with a girl and not be thinking about sex with her

@Valach i agree. But that's a different discussion

I mean to be fair in part looksmaxxing is a response to the bs about looks not mattering. Which was also pushed a lot by RSD.

Pick up. And. Looking at the cute boy in the mirror.