Ulax

@vizual Agreed, for different reasons

Erm i think you'll find that im god

Da plug. I've been lookkng for this shit everywhere

@Carl-Richard Nah

@StarStruck Brother I'd jump straight onto the IFS modality. Its the real fucking deal. And i know you're a hard hitting mf. I reckon you'll dig it.

@Jacob Morres Nice. We love a bit of shinzen game lmao

@Medhansh Tom torero. Daygame guy.

@Terell Kirby Guys a fraud

@Karmadhi looks matter a lot. I dunno how PUA marketers managed to swing it otherwise

@integral Boss buy some colgate and a toothbrush, and brush the fuck outta your teeth.

Sounds like Pure OCD. Accept, accept, accept.

Kobe Bryant

San fran comes to mind

Psychodynamic therapy can cause deep, meaningful, dramatic change that CBT is simply not capable of.

nice

@Raptorsin7 Women in contemproary society have that issue. Not women.

@decentralized Done body awareness meidtatio and or/ loving-kindness meditation?

You depressed OP?

@Consept Been there dude. It can be psychologically devastating. I personally no contact it. Its a power game to my mind. If it stops through humour the power will be claimed through another channel by them. i believe that it will only stop in the way we want it to stop once they break unconscious cycles. That's usually through some depth psychology based therapy modality to my mind

@museumoftrees Yep. This one is gold. Edit: Actually, I don't know what I'm talking about.

@BlueOak You're welcome, chief.

@Carl-Richard I see. I find that to be a thought-inspiring perspective for me personally. I think I sense the beginnings of a natural contemplation process beginning for me regarding these words of yours, "It's highly relativistic but lacks a proper meta-theoretical lens of hierarchy or progress, which is re-discovered in the type of evolutionary lens presented by people like Don Beck". Part/ part(s) of me also quite quickly thought about my plans for graduate school in light of your words. I look forward to reading further posts of yours.

@mw711 I would recommend you do the following three things: 1) Cultivate a 'Loving-Kindness' practice. Firstly, you will like yourself more, and people will tend to respond to you accordingly. Secondly, you will like other people more, and people will tend to respond positively to do this. 2) Cultivate a 'Body awareness meditation' practice. I believe you will consequently be more grounded, and retain a greater sense of self. 3) Get clear on your personal boundaries, and preferences. Firstly, regarding the former, identify/ create an idea of what behaviours towards you, you will tolerate before moving on from a person. Secondly, regarding the latter, identify/ create an idea of the traits of the people that you want to connect with socially. I believe this screening approach will prevent socialising being toxic, and will cause you to emanate a vibe that demands more respect, makes for a more pleasant social experience, and increases the chance that you'll make the type and abundance of social connections that you presumably want. I wish you the best.

@Carl-Richard I think that's a great find! I haven't watched the video yet. However, I'm curious to see how this video allows me to develop my understanding of stage yellow v stage green. Sometimes, in some ways, I struggle to understand what stage yellow materialises as in actual discourse. I still am unsure what 'post-intuitive' means in the context of 'post-intuitive' being a stage yellow trait. Thank you for presenting me with the opportunity to learn more about this. @Leo Gura your words here, "It's going to boil down to a difference in emphasis. Vaush's emphasis is on practical political action and progressive victory. This guy's emphasis is not that, so Vaush will struggle to see the value in it. The problem is that higher perspectives don't seem valuable or practical. But what isn't realized is that value and pragmatism becomes its own dead-end. Lack of value isn't a bug, it's a feature as you evolve to higher perspectives on life. But don't expect those who are mired in survival concerns to understand that.", remind me of the critical legal theorists, particularly Duncan Kennedy. They approach the project of theorising law through the lens of pragmatism, postmodernism, Marxism, and legal realism. I bring them up because although their postmodernist and Marxist influences lend themselves to appealing to universal notions of truth and knowledge. I find that they decide to argue through internal criticism. To my mind, that entails that they argue using the values that are deemed important today in judicial/ extra-judicial/ academic discourse. It strikes me as stage yellow stepping down to stage green so as to bring about the change generally desired by critical legal theorists. General comment I'm unsure whether to class postmodernism as either stage green, or yellow. I would like to hear people's perspectives regarding whether they think postmodernism is stage green/ yellow, or perhaps, even Turquoise. Thanks in advance.

@preventingdiabetes There is plenty of time. Watch it. Edit: I'd like to add the following. I believe all 'wants' are acceptable, and worthy of love, respect and protection. I caveat that with my belief that one should not act on a want where it would be abusive to other beings to do so.