Ulax

@Dorje Chang imo That's cool af! You planning to dedicate your career to this, or is it more of a hobby?

@MarkKol I'd say I'm in a somewhat similar spot, tho am a bit older than you. I think this is not an uncommon issue for folks who have done the course. Tho I think also it can be a result of not being in touch enough with one's intuition, or having doubts about trusting our intuition.

I think there's some use you could get from watching a show for these reasons. However, its a drop in the ocean when it comes to actually learning game and success in attraction imo. Even doing 10 approaches in a nightclub and analysing them using high quality teachings is going to teach you more than any show imo. Watching these shows can easily just become mental masturbation for avoiding doing what it actually takes to get serious results in dating imo.

@something_else lmao

@soos_mite_ah Cute! What kind of guy is he? I.e. is he super masculine? More in touch with his feminine side?

@Danioover9000 Ye that is the one ? He used to be big on alt right youtube back in like 2014. I used to be a fan. He was like a political prankster. Then he sort of became a pedo and got cancelled ?

@Consept Word bro ?. Milo been watching too many movies ?

@DrugsBunny Lmao I was most surprised at seeing Milo again. Haven't seen that guy doing anything of significance of years. INteresting new look for him too.

@Loveeee I'd probably look into integral theory folks

Any recommendations? Shame (2011) & Manchester by the Sea (2012) are examples of what I'm looking for. I'm willing to watch some pretty dark stuff, so don't hold back on suggestions.

@no_name I don't see an issue with the actions of the guy in these two paragraphs

Any recommendations? If you have seen 'I stand alone' by Gaspar Noe that is something like what I'm looking for.

@petar8p I'd say it is a trigger of mine I'd say, i.e. I get annoyed too. Yet, I don't think we deserve a no. Also, my understanding of why I get triggered is different now. Firstly, my chosen code of ethics means that I believe she has the right not to reply to me, as I have the right to not reply to others. And, my thoughts around thinking she should reply are just entitled thoughts. Not that I, from a conscious perspective, want to condemn those thoughts but that's how i classify them. (I base my code of the assertive rights code in 'When I say no I feel guilty' by Manuel Smith). Second, I just try to sit and process the feeling of annoyance using the letting go technique. Which I find pretty effective. Though I find it somewhat difficult to let go of thoughts. Thirdly, I understand that if I believe i am annoyed at the girl for not replying, that I am just projecting, and it is a way I unconsciously have decided to regulate my emotions. Tho I struggle to do this in the moment sometimes.

@Juressic I'd say I used to be in a somewhat similar friendship group. I'd personally leave them asap. Their bad vibe will likely be pulling your own vibe down.

Sincerely tho @Leo Gura, here is my feedback. I think more focus on conscious relationships. More understanding of how people with personality disorders will exploit the forum. Keep your ego in check. I think you're doing a lot of great things overall though. You've already accomplished a lot of special things with this site imo.

I've said it before and im not the only one. And honestly im getting tired of it. But start an only fans already. The universe told me that its the next stage of your evolution. Just make sure to start one before Nahm does, or im leaving you for him.

Yo Mama so fat thanos had to click twice

@bejapuskas I think you're jumping to conclusions in your most recent reply to me and also the way you seem to me to understand the points I'm making is different from the way I intend for them to be understood. I'm going to end my discussion on this thread with you here.

@bejapuskas If you had a film recommendation instead of articles I'd be grateful tho

@Tyler Robinson Agreed

@bejapuskas I agree that I don't know what its like. I'm just trying to provide a perspective on how you can be more effective at achieving your goals. Speaking plainly, I don't really care whether your anti whatever. What I care about is the actual effects of people's behaviour. Just being anti something does not mean you are helping, sometimes you can be hindering the very goal you are going after. For example, if a discussion on race realism gets banned is that good? Maybe the discussion stops. But maybe the poster feels alienated, and leaves forum, and joins 4chan instead. And on 4chan he gets radicalised further into racial hatred, and gets more and more people to join his 4chan space. Which leads to a black person being harmed. And if you are someone who encouraged the banning then imo you are partially responsible for that person's radicalisation. Maybe you consider that the effect of having the discussion actually has the consequence of harming a lot of people too i.e. an african american dude ends up feeling increased feelings of shame and fear, and on the balance of things you decide that the consequences of getting the discussions banned would be better. Its a complex thing to think about imo. And, I think righteousness is an indication of not understanding that. On another note, I'm not that interested in reading those articles at this time.

@bejapuskas I think you could get value out of studying something like conflict negotiation or non violent communication. I think you have some pride that blinds you to your own limitations, i.e. this claim around it not being possible to persuade people. I think if you added skills in those to your repertoire you could be a pretty powerful force for progress. It seems to me you have a fair degree of will, courage and tenacity.