Ulax

Agreeeed

🤣

Ahh interesting point, I understand your argument now. I hadn't thought of that before but makes sense.

What does this even mean bro hahaha

Compare that to Uvalde (22 deaths), Sandy Hook (27), Vegas shooting (60), Bataclan (90) etc etc. Apart from exceptions like the Nice truck attack, you aren't really getting double digits from non-shooting attacks.

Compare the death tolls of those stabbing attacks and shooting attacks. You aren't generally getting double digit death counts from stabbing attacks. If you look up those china stabbings, the death counts is usually between 1 and 6. Compare that to Uvalde (22 deaths), Sandy Hook (27), Vegas shooting (60), Bataclan (90) etc etc.

What you mean by prevalence?

I disagree in part. I'd argue the cause of mass killings is 'Intention' + 'Access to technology of extreme violence'. Taking away guns takes away one of the necessary causes. Compare the Southport attack and Sandy Hook attack. In one the attacker had a knife, the other the attacker had a assault gun, one had 3 casaulties and the other 28. But i agree that taking away guns doesn't affect the intention element.

For real. The dude is shameless

I disagree. This is not the USA, this is Australia. After the 1999 Port Arthur Massacre in Australia (35 dead), the Aussies passed the National Firearms Agreement, which seriously limited private gun ownership in Australia. This included a mandatory buy back scheme. That evidences that the Aussies are capable of making serious legal changes in the wake of mass shootings. I'd argue the lack of American change in the wake of mass shooting is to do with distinct American cultural & political reasons. I heard somewhere that the shooters were able to attain these weapons as members of a shooting club (need to check this). If so, I imagine that the Aussie government will pass laws seriously restricting people's ability to get weapons for recreational reasons, i.e. hunting, shooting club. So, I'm confident things will change in Australia.

Maybe might find this video interesting. He's a pick-up/ self-dev coach who had a fucked up childhood. I used to watch this video all the time when my life fell apart, was tormented and was on welfare. Most meaningful video on the internet to me. (I'd skip the ad at 2:00 - 3:15)

Hahahaha

I'm not a psychology professional. I think you would find value in this book list though: https://davidtianphd.com/recommended-readings/

I feel like this is the dude who had that dostoyevsky picture

😂