Raze

It is massively censored so it is mostly for the minority who fall down the rabbit hole. There isn’t even a major active blackpill YouTube channel anymore, the last one quit months ago because of harassment.

I saw this a while back and think this is generally what the average woman’s preference is: Basically it’s not alpha v beta, it’s depending on the situation.

try break through difficult emotions by Shinzen Young https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYmenDQvFKQ

Title seems a bit misleading. Beta vs Alpha isn’t necessarily the same as ripped vs non-ripped. I read some comments from women about that pic and it seemed a lot of it was because his face looked older due to lighting.

Elon deleted the Epstein tweets, looks like he’s backtracking.

Sell your plasma and learn a trade try the almosthomeless subreddit for advice If you have internet access you can try looking for anyone requesting software tasks or a virtual assistant, or Craigslist Greece https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6NAC6ajkH8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbQr70rfwQg

Issue with that is she can view that as him trying to supplicate and buy her affection, and she’ll get the ick and reject at the drop of a hat if she gets a whiff of any neediness from him. I heard a story about a guy taking a PUA training and he was approaching women trying to woo them and getting rejected one after the other, then the instructor banned him from being allowed to take a woman’s number or take her to his room, basically banning him from actually getting any result with a woman, and suddenly women were interested in him, as he finally started interacting with them without seeking an outcome.

This is a good interview with a former blackpiller who managed to get success on what lead him to those mindsets Austen Summers also did a good video explaining issues with the blackpill This is a substack by a scientist that critiques blackpill beliefs with science https://nuancepill.substack.com/t/black-pill-critique @Leo Gura you can supplement a blackpill video with some info from these sources

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf1yt3XTQHM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w27nenP7fsQ&list=PLeztx1--I_i-Uup3kAW7okkR2uGVkJ7pv&index=1&pp=iAQB https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCl_zBm2iTM

This is one area I think the advice is damaging, telling someone to “just approach” or “just try” without actually giving them specific advice on what can cause bad reactions, and a path to improve will just result in endless rejection and them doubling down on the blackpill beliefs.

Conversations alone will not fix incels. They are buried very deeply in a self reinforcing ideology. I saw a dating coach discuss how he had a blackpill client, who he actually got to have success, but he said whenever they took a break from coaching he would come back insisting the blackpill was true and he’d never succeed (inspite of what he already achieved), he’d then coach him to more success, and the cycle would repeat. And that guy was not even a bad case compared to others since he was willing to actually listen to advice and try new things, very rare in this group. They are also prone to biting the hand that feeds them. The whole blackpill movement spawned from forums dedicated to doxxing and harassing guys giving male dating advice. The first incel forum before blackpill and incel were even used as terms got taken down because a PUA they went after was also a lawyer and went after them back. Another example is the PUA channel playing with fire had a whole saga where some blackpilled guy named Gangstar or something said their online dating advice doesn’t work if you’re ugly, so they did a interview with him and found he was actually relatively handsome but he used horrible photos and refused to make a move on dates, when they tried giving him simple advice he went nuts and spent years harassing them.

Even when the unattractive man tries to flirt or make a move? Women even have popularized the phrase “ick” to describe when they aren’t attracted to a man, ick is a signal of disgust

But then what causes women to date men soon after meeting them or even have one night stands? Are they looking past the neutrality to do it or do some men somehow have attraction arise organically very rapidly?

I think this is a tactic to try and regain liberal Tesla buyers.

It’s also not 99% of men getting coaching on attracting women, it’s probably not even 1%.

If they are down with sharing, they don’t need 80% of them. Plus estimates were nearly half would be a single and that was before it was clear we are a few years away from sex robots with AI personalities

This is one underdiscussed reason why I think all the talk about mens issues and loneliness will backfire. I was watching this channel from a woman who was a former stripper where she streams with advice to men on how to be attractive, and she actually said that she didn’t even realize the average man had so few options and had to put so much effort to attract women or had similar insecurities to her. While she was empathetic to it she also said it kind of made her less attracted to men, because before when she sees a attractive masculine man he was almost mystical to her, now she just thinks of all the insecurities he might have and all the ways he had to work to be like that. I think guys assume if everyone understood their dating difficulties it would help somehow, in reality it may just make it harder for them and everyone else. I used to be more outspoken about mens issues and wanting them in the mainstream discussing and to be more understood by women, but now that it’s actually happened it seems like a disaster. So many guys argue with women about the male loneliness crisis thinking if they convince them it’ll help them somehow, in reality a woman would likely be less interested in dating a man if she finds out he’s lonely.

I had a drive with most of them but sadly it just got removed. I’m kicking myself for not saving them when I had the chance.

How is that any different than for the guy if he is pursuing the woman he likes more than she likes him? If anything given that women are the ones to end relationships the majority of the time it seems more likely it’ll fail if the guy is the one who likes her more.

Expelling people is also a crime, just less so then annihilating them. The point remains. If Germans expelled Jews that would also have been wrong. I guess if Germans just killed a hundred thousand Jews and expelled the rest you would be ok with it then. Also the gas the Jews thing was one random incident in Australia. That wasn’t the “entire Muslim world hates Jews”. Meanwhile Israelis literally march in Jeresulem every year chanting “death to arabs“, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/thousands-of-israeli-nationalists-chant-death-to-arabs-during-annual-procession-through-jerusalem but you don’t complain about that or think that justifies killing and occupying Jews. Why? Because you have a bigoted double standard. Also, like I already told you, it’s not just Muslims, here is Israel’s worldwide approval, as you can see even the non-Muslim countries disapprove of them. Basically it’s the opposite of what you’re saying, you think it’s evil to kill Jews but fair to kill Palestinians, the rest of the world no longer agrees. https://www.pewresearch.org/?attachment_id=260877 Wrong on every level. - when Palestinains weren’t attacking, israel didn’t give them any more rights and kept stealing their land, and later funded Hamas itself. It has nothing to do with security. - the Israeli Arabs have parties, they don’t fight because they aren’t undergoing constant attack. Police do not control them, in fact currently Israeli media is reporting police are ignoring them while they beg them to help deal with criminals. - Answer this: if it was about security, why do they block food, medicine, wheelchair parts, and desalination equipment from Gaza when they aren’t at war? Why do they let settlers burn down Palestinian homes? How does this increase security? Basically in your world israel can reject any two states deal and permanently hold Palestinians without rights because of “security”, but any Palestinian attempt to even defend themselves from literal constant arrests, torture, killings, and land seizure is terrorism and just further justifies the oppression. It’s on the same level of moral reasoning as American slave owners who would say slavery was “holding the wolf by the ear”, as in it’s justified to keep an entire race of people oppressed because they might attack you if they aren’t. Completely wrong. Gaza was never given to Palestinians, Israel never let up control of the borders, air space, or anything that enters. What you mean is israel removed illegal settlements from inside. If you lived in a town then the US government removed all police and federal employees but blocked the entire perimeter and limited and controlled everything that came and left, you wouldn’t say they “gave you the town”. Hamas won the election for the same reason your entire argument is nonsense. Because after the PLO agreed to recognize Israel and give up armed resistance to Israel, israel just increased illegal settlements and refused to give Palestinians freedom, so they voted for Hamas because Israel rejected peace. In 1948 when they offered the state that was after they had expelled 400,000 Palestinians and killed thousands to seize all the economically viable territory for themselves. That would be like if Arab countries took half of Israel and kicked hundreds of thousands of Jews out then when Israel doesn’t agree to it, it’s their fault. There was already a blockade before Hamas won the election, they just strengthened it after they won. Again, Hamas offered a long term ceasefire if the occupation ended, so the reason they couldn’t develop was because israel blockaded it after rejecting this, not because of Hamas. A blockade is only a problem for economic development if economic interests are blocked, a blockade just for security could just block weapons and allow development. But leaked emails so israel purposefully blockaded it to crush the economy for civilians. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna40926651 We are talking about limiting food and medicine for over 1 million children, and all you can do is rant about how actually it’s Palestinians fault and Israel is right and if Palestinians ever do anything about it israel should reject it and they are just “crying” when Israel kills them by the thousand. You know very little about this conflict and demonstrate the moral development on par of a racial supremacist, all while thinking you can look down on a people who are currently facing a man made famine, it’s quite disgusting.

I definitely think there is something to the idea the feminine is pursued and the masculine pursues. However that can be taken as implying men and women are obligated to do those roles or it is the best most effective way. It actually isn’t, the highest form of game is getting the girl to chase you. In a sense that puts the man in the feminine and the women in the masculine, but it’s also the most effective way to gain her interest and investment. Though for a woman a bunch of men pursuing her is the best way as she becomes a selector from among many options and can pick the best one. But paradoxically this makes her crave the man she chases all the more because men who pursue her implies they are lower value than her / the pursuit makes them needy because they invest so much, and she is drawn to higher status men and repelled by lower status men. There is also a mechanism of the man pursuing itself as making the women more interested as his emotions of desire project onto her through emotional state transferences. A study found that straight women were physically aroused even by images of homosexual and animal sexuality, because the concept of sexuality being brought in their awareness at all seemed to automatically turn them on even if they weren’t interested in the subject. That and the whole love bombing thing kind of gives some credence to the idea of men pursuing being effective as well. Masculine and feminine are really like unstable dances within each person and between each relationship.

This is representative of maybe 4% of Israeli Jews and that is being generous.

In America it was stable until 2018 and began slowly declining after the great march of return. Odds are it will continue to trend downward after everything that happened.