Raze

There have been multiple Queens and Empresses in history who have waged war. If women decided they’ll only have sex with men who go to war we’d be in world war 3 within 24 hours.

No, your mind is full of insecurities and inferiority complex, seeking fulfillment it latches onto the first excuse to express sadistic desires as a attempt to establish feelings of superiority. The issue is the immense stubbornness, arrogance, and poor understanding results in horrible analysis and poor insight as shown here so it just fails. As quoted you said Iran would fall in a year, even in that thread people were already telling you how idiotic that was by bringing up multiple weaker regimes which lasted far longer in worse circumstances in just recent history, as always none of these arguments penetrated.

This was always one of the dumbest takes from Manson and why I never liked him that much. Neediness is the result of having unmet emotional needs and seeking to fill them. Being vulnerable has nothing to do with it. In the book where Manson says that he even brings up an example of a needy guy who tearfully confesses his feelings to Marks ex gf and how that’s an example of neediness not working. His book is full of contradictions like this. You can be vulnerable all you want that won’t resolve neediness. Abundance is spreading your neediness out between many sources so it doesn’t show up as much. But it doesn’t resolve the root issue either. Though it at least can temporarily numb it.

Sadly you are underestimating the issue. The female version of the manosphere is far more insidious then just telling them those things and is far more powerful and influential than the male manosphere, which is just a fringe group and meme.

How does waging war make men dominant as a group? The men who fight the wars just do so to serve the people in power, those people could be women. Its not like the soldier comes home and somehow uses his military knowledge to conquer his woman. In reality women are the ones who demand he take the lead and go toil at the factory and be the breadwinner or she’ll drop him like a hot potato.

It’s important to remember in 2023 you were insisting we should go to war with Iran and they’d fall quickly Note the current conflict began after Iran was severely weakened after 3 years of sanctions and attacks. Meaning it would have gone even worse at that point. This is the example of the issue of policy when rather than being based on nuance and reason, it’s based on the bigoted emotional tirades of people like Trump who can’t comprehend complex information or critical thinking. At least in Trumps case he needed to be convinced after Iran became far more vulnerable.

I already posted multiple studies showing religious couples report higher marital satisfaction Blacks aren’t necessarily more liberal than whites, they are more likely to vote democrat but they more often say they are moderate or even conservative but support democrats regardless.

Some form of communism can probably work in a pure stage Green society. It failed because classic communism had too much baggage and the cultural context wasn’t developed enough. It would fail currently because stage green is too toxified and society isn’t far enough into green.

This says liberals are higher than conservatives

Other surveys find evangelicals divorce at the same rate https://www.christiantoday.com/news/us-evangelical-christians-are-divorcing-at-the-same-rate-as-the-general-population-study-finds Also this is just cherry picking a specific group. Evangelicals have many other issues such as living in rural areas that got harmed by jobs going overseas and the opioid crisis.

That’s nonsense. Justice isn’t what makes a relationship work, emotions are. Women will clown you for thinking there is any justice in the realm of romance.

Conservatives and religious people are more likely to be married in general which opens them up to the possibility of divorce more than others regardless of the actual rate per marriage.

- Irrelevant, it had standard survey procedure, there isn’t evidence they falsify data - No, it says “religious service attendance is associated with 50% lower divorce rates in later life”

Nope. The quote you posted proves my point. The data was from the American family survey which is from the Wheatley institute. The states overall rate is irrelevant, there are many other factors related to that such as poverty rates and different subcultures. Research consistently finds religious and conservative Americans are less likely to get divorced and more likely to be satisfied in their marriages. long-term Harvard-linked study found ~50% lower divorce rates among regular religious service attendees https://hfh.fas.harvard.edu/religion-and-divorce Higher religiosity is associated with higher reported marital satisfaction https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5319260/ Religious participation is linked to overall satisfaction among both married and unmarried couples in urban America https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2533156/

- The article is based on scientific data from a large yearly survey not collected by them. Just complaining about the organization is irrelevant to the points made. - religious and conservative people are less likely to get divorced

https://ifstudies.org/in-the-news/conservative-women-3-times-happier-than-liberal-peers-for-these-reasons

It’s an example of how demanding men pay for women on dates and spend money on them for courtship encourages a toxic possessive mindset, it’s entitlement that creates a harmful atmosphere but some women defend it for their own personal benefit. The truth is they don’t have a problem with traditional patriarchy when it benefits them at the expense of men or other women.

I’m not saying they’re literally studying the dark triad and purposely looking for guys who have it. If they learned about it, they’d actually be better off because they would know to avoid it. The point is claiming the solution is women need to follow their intuition and be pickier doesn’t make sense when in these instances they actually picked the guy that did this. The studies showing dark triad traits correlate with short term attraction are an example of why this is an issue. Its the same if you see men complaining about how they married a woman just based on her looks and end up complaining she was a bad person, and I say men should follow their desires more in who they marry. That’s actually contributing to the problem. But saying that isn’t justifying it.

Acknowledging reality of what contributes to a problem is not justification.

Yep, already seeing feminists spreading the fake news that it was 64 million men in the rape group. As always they spread lies to destroy gender relations and cause hysteria.

Then why isn’t there a correlation

The problem is these demands are incoherent and they just behave worse the more they are met. The feminist narrative for years was it was unfair that men were the ones earning and providing so they did everything to increase womens share of the workforce and income. They just resented men more and now complain it’s harder to find a guy who earns more than them and continue to demand men spend money on them while justifying it with “I do unpaid domestic labor”, or as shown in the other thread even more ridiculous notions like because the patriarchy oppresses women men need to give them money to compensate. Obviously that’s ridiculous because mens obligation to provide is itself part of the patriarchal system, but just shows how they cherry pick. But guess what, the amount of time men spend in childcare and doing housework is greater now than ever before on average. Did the rage at men decrease? No. They just got more frustrated and blame men more for the declining marriage rates. There are other examples of this, for example for years berating men for not being emotionally intelligent and not being vulnerable, then when men started to do it they immediately coined terms like “emotional labor” “he treats me like a therapist” “mankeeping” to shame men for it. My issue is it is incoherent and they just get more frustrated the more men give into their demands. Personally I think the traditional arrangement works best, but I don’t actually care that much. I’m open to any system from pure egalitarianism to role reversal if it is coherent and makes them happy. But it never does. They just demand contradictory things and double down in frustration the more society tries to placate them.

What if we had a way to detect them and put them in treatment before they committed any crimes

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/11/04/among-unmarried-adults-women-without-children-have-as-much-wealth-as-single-men/