Raze

Like I said, you’ve consumed propaganda and don’t understand basic facts about the conflict leading to your close minded view and justification of war crimes. I didn’t link to any echo chamber, the Arab peace initiative is a public offer on the table. The former head of shin bet admitted they’d have peace if they accepted it. You don’t even know what this is and just act like it doesn’t exist because it conflicts with your predetermined bias. The deal Arafat walked away from was calling for israel annexing large swaths of Palestinian land and controlling borders, airspace, and having a military base on the territory and the right to invade any time, it was permanent occupation, the American negotiator themselves said they’d reject this deal and israel refused to negotiate further. Israel has been consuming the West Bank, which hasn’t had a rocket attack in decades. Stop ignoring this point, explain to me how installing religious extremists onto Palestinian land and letting them attack civilians is just because Israel wants self defense? Israel itself considers blockades acts of war, they had Gaza under blockade, they had killed dozens of children in the West Bank that year before Oct 7. What you say is the opposite, the world ignores this, then when Palestinians resist it you say they started it and use that to justify further war crimes. Israel doesn’t have official borders for this reason, because their goal is expansion. You continue to ignore the question. If israel wants peace why did they expand settlements and fund Hamas to weaken the PA after the PA gave up armed resistance? Why do they reject the Arab peace initiative.

Again your comments show a massive lack of knowledge about the conflict and dehumanizing rhetoric / double standards Just for starters, - completely ignoring the peace initiatives supported by Arab states and Palestinians like the Arab peace initiative which I brought up - complaining only Israel and the US are blamed yet removing all blame from them by ignoring the US vetoing every diplomatic solution at the UN and blaming Hamas for war crimes israel commits, ignoring how the PA ceased armed resistance to Israel yet Israel ramped up violence against West Bank Palestinians - why is Hamas to blame for killing civilians in response to Israeli occupation and violence, but israel isn’t to blame when they massacre hundreds in bread lines, block food and medicine to starve children, block rescue equipment and destroy 70% of residential infrastructure to leave thousands buried under rubble. It’s a blatant double standard to justify violence against Palestinians. - blaming Palestinians for arabs collectively and blaming arabs collectively such as suggesting they don’t deserve human rights because of what your random friend said. Some Jews say the holocaust was punishment from god, should we just conclude Jews deserve the holocaust since we are assigning collective blame based on what individuals say? - Qatar sent money to Hamas at the direction of Israel because Israel wanted to make Hamas stronger because they were designated terrorists by the US so it would stop israel having to negotiate peace, this was the stated aim. Was your reaction to Oct 7 “israel has blood on its hands for letting settlers attack civilians and funding Hamas to continue it”? The Arab states ignore the Palestinians because they don’t want to enable Israel’s war crimes and the US lobbies them to not defend their rights. The US was actually pressuring the Arab states to normalize with Israel without Israel ending its constant violence and occupation of Palestine which spurred Oct 7 to try and stop the world leaving them to permanent occupation. You ignore all of this context to somehow imply because Arabs don’t solve the problem they are blocked from solving Palestinians deserve not having basic human rights. Really you don’t realize it but you’re exactly the person who would have excused apartheid South Africa and the Jim Crow south. Whatever rationalizations, deflections, and excuses necessary to blame the victims of injustices placed upon them.

Netflix has withdrawn its offer to buy Warner Bros / Discovery, so Paramount will be buying it. Paramount is controlled by David Ellison, a Trump supporting billionaire who already got control of CBS and put Bari Weiss in charge. His father Larry Ellison is the founder of tech company Oracle and a major Trump donor and largest individual donor the IDF, he recently got control of Tiktok, and once said he supports mass surveillance because it will make citizens “be on their best behavior”. Soon after the purchase Tiktok banned the Emmy award winning Palestinian journalist Bisan who covered the Gaza conflict.

YouTube doesn’t pay enough and Comedy Central already has the daily show, three political comedy talk shows would be pushing it

1) by that logic israel brought Oct 7 on themselves through the illegal blockade of Gaza and constant massacres of Palestinians, this is collective punishment, justifying civilian deaths collectively is a sign of low cognitive development and a lack of morality. 2) That’s a complete lie. The PLO pushed for a equal federation for decades before relenting to a partition. Palestinians agreed to the Arab peace initiative, israel built settlements to sabotage it. Even Hamas proposed a long term ceasefire for ending the occupation and later disarming which Israel still rejects. Israel continued its war on Palestine perpetually then plays victim when they resist occupation. If you can’t sympathize with thousands of children being killed or millions of people occupied without basic human rights, you are just stuck at a lower developmental stage, who falls easily for propaganda and selectively ignores the constant blocking and violence towards Palestinians who do seek peaceful resolutions as a way to demonize them when they turn to violence to defend themselves. It’s also a stupidly ahistorical way to demonize a group, every population in history subjective to violent occupation does decades has groups that eventually turn to violence to resist it.

No, you just don’t understand statistics. Having casual sex doesn’t mean sleeping with dozens of people. https://zipdo.co/casual-sex-statistics/?utm_source=chatgpt.com Correct, you were wrong and were promptly corrected. I am glad you swallowed your pride and learned. Now do so again.

He’s trying to do some weird sarcasm thing to prove a point he made in a previous thread where he got resoundingly mocked for saying conservatism encourages casual sex and other absurd notions

Most men don’t have casual sex either regularly, the average partner count for men is only slightly higher than women. Also, other studies indicate men tend to slightly exaggerate their count where women slightly undervalue theirs. One study had college students put up to a lie detector and found when aware of it women reported having slightly more average partners the men.

How can a body of work from one individual be better than an academic body of work that involves thousands of people testing it across tens of thousands

That’s not a pickup artist thing, it’s a human nature thing to look past morality for personal benefit For example when Israel blocked all food and medicine for months to Gaza you said “But am I expert in war strategies to tell what should be done or not? No.” and talked about how it was effective, so you won’t speak against it. This resulted in children getting amputations without anesthesia and multiple children starving to death, but you looked past it. Similar to how Nazis looked past starving Jews in ghettos. Many said it was “ugly” but they thought it got the job done so they didn’t speak against it. So be careful judging others for being Nazi like as though it’s a separate thing.

https://www.npr.org/2026/02/10/nx-s1-5703636/nj-primary-election-mejia-malinowski In the democrat house primary there were two pro-israel candidates and one progressive anti-israel candidate. Malinowski, the favorite to win and one of the pro-israel candidates, said he doesn’t “unconditionally support” everything Netanyahu wants, despite his pro-israel record. AIPAC, the pro-israel lobbying group then went on a crusade against him dumping millions into ads against him. The ads were not about israel however, mostly instead accusing him of supporting ICE because of a vote he made years ago. AIPAC backed a third pro Israel candidate, Theresa Way. In the end, Malinowski has no conceded to Aneja, the Bernie sanders supported progressive who is much harsher on Israel having accused them of genocide. Way came in third. Malinowski put out this statement:

That wouldn’t help and would make things worse. Democrats don’t have power to do this ans they’d just be accused of being authoritarian censors.

I finally finished the video, and frankly her points are silly. She projects how women view things onto men, and ignores the biggest issues with modern dating. Women wearing more makeup is not making it harder for women to attract men with a makeup arms race, men barely can tell the difference.

It clearly causes a lot of resentment towards men, so often when you dig down into why a woman is bashing men is because she projects her experiences onto the entire group. Like once I read an article from a feminist about how she knew men who were sleeping with dozens of women through manipulative tactics or were pumping and dumping women one after the other, and women in the replies were saying stuff like “this is why the male loneliness crisis is good” or “I hate men”. It made me realize a lot of the man bashing is because they are referring to a small segment of men as men and not factoring in everyone else.

I made a thread a while back when that survey came out. It did change, it was closer in prior surveys from years before. However that survey was a soon after COVID, as far as I know more recent surveys found the gap isn’t as extreme anymore (though still larger than before). So it probably inflated a bit from more people using apps after COVID.

I can’t get through her videos in five sittings. These women advocating for mens dating struggles channels keep popping up and it’s obvious they don’t know or care and are just reading some script from AI because they know guys will watch it because it’s weirdly therapeutic to have a woman agreeing with you so it’s an easy way to make a quick buck. Its so insincere and dumb.

If you want to be taken seriously you need to not be so generalized. I get what you’re saying, there is definitely a thing about women being more prone to tone policing as a way to enforce social order. https://expression.fire.org/p/male-students-show-more-tolerance However just blanket saying you “rarely” see this is wrong, there are many examples of men doing this as well. You need nuance or your point will get dismissed out if hand if people can instantly think of many counter examples.

A matriarchy can’t form because women still demand the special privileges they get from patriarchy, they just want to deconstruct the parts they don’t like. That’s not how balanced systems work so it just results in confusion and chaos in which case feminists just double down and blame men. We see this in liberal feminist culture being toxic and unsustainable socially with high rates of mental illness and collapsing fertility rate. Rather than address this they just want it to spread. The American black community is one example of this, they didn’t have any real defenses to it (aside from a significant amount of religiosity) since they relied on the left movements due to discrimination, and they didn’t build up a lot of wealth and stability to have a more managed decline since they only got more equal economic participation relatively recently. Socially, the American black community got hollowed out. Massive single parenthood rate, tons of chaos with radical beliefs and gangs filling the void. From what I heard dating in that community is a nightmare. I see a ton of black women and men actually brag about dating outside their culture and moving elsewhere. Lately white people are following a similar trajectory, theirs is just less extreme because they had built up advantages before hand since they didn’t have the same repression / had a longer period to grow power and wealth as a group. Really what a lot of feminisms cultural push was, was a minority of mentally masculine women resting the feminine cultural role and wanting the roles of men and women to be the same. Since women are mostly feminine and follow masculine leads they followed these women. Feminism became more democratized and included more normal feminine women however it just becomes incoherent because it is more about them just rationalizing their vibes and feelings creating hypocrisy and double standards that don’t make sense and rather than having concrete specific goals instead have vague demands and periodic hysterias.

Are you sure? This poll found disapproval of israel increased in Germany in the last two years.

They don’t need to whack Massie. He said a bunch of Israeli billionaires are dumping millions against him in his primary. Trump also endorsed his opponent. It’s a closed primary, only registered republicans can vote in it. So all this support Massie is getting from independents and democrats won’t help him. Politically his goose is already cooked.

Is it written in the form of narration or a systematic treatise with graphs, tables, lists and charts? Are you studying the structure of writing process of any books to base its organization on?