Raze

1. It’s absurd to think people should accept leaving their homes because you say a religious text written thousands of years ago declares it your land 2. The Palestinians are also genetically descended from the levant http://www.ucl.ac.uk/tcga/tcgapdf/Nebel-HG-00-IPArabs.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs004390000426 https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/blood-thicker-than-water-welcome-home-abraham-a-van-kempen https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212583/

Try emotional mastery by David Tian and break through difficult emotions by Shinzen Young

But how does Biden represent traditional culture? He’s been pushing the same lgtbq, trans, blm, feminist messaging which is considered woke. He doesn’t necessarily back it up with action, so the wokes don’t like him either. People who don’t like woke, don’t like Biden either.

The centrists were the ones who lost to trump in 2016 and are now trying to force a man who can barely talk to challenge him, maybe it’s time the wokes get a shot.

Obama, a black man won against stronger candidates than trump

https://archive.is/VMY4D https://www.reuters.com/article/world/palestinian-children-tortured-used-as-shields-by-israel-un-idUSBRE95J0FR/ https://www.972mag.com/sde-teiman-prisoners-lawyer-mahajneh/?

So you are saying inflammatory slogans are the same as violence? Should the police shoot the knees off of college protestors because they used inflammatory slogans?

- inflammatory slogans are not the same as violence, if the protest is not using violence it is non violent even if they are being inflammatory. I am not saying they have to agree to whatever is demanded because they are being non violent, but what if the response to a large non violent movement was discussions, negotiations, and opportunities, rather than… https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20200306-israel-snipers-boast-of-shooting-dozens-in-the-knees-during-gaza-protests/ - the Israeli establishment - - yes, but the reasoning at least of the most recent transfers was to purposefully empower violent Hamas to hurt the PLO, putting Israelis at risk to have an excuse to hurt any chance of peace with Gaza

Gavin would be better but not by much, he comes across extremely slimy and and massively disliked. Trump will just spam campaign ads about Californias issues and claim he’s going to bring them to every state. They would be better off with a Democrat from a swing state, like Gretchen Whitmer, Tammy Baldwin, or Josh Shapiro.

So they shouldn’t be shocked when Trump beats them.

Provide proof for this claim beyond just racist assumptions all Gazans are violent. You can not shoot someone who poses no threat to you and claim it’s justified because other people later attacked you. By your logic Oct 7 is justified because Hamas can just assume all the Israelis were the same idf who bombarded Gaza multiple times.

- Again, no it doesn’t. If you just accepted the right to return for first Gen refugees that’s just tens of thousands of old people. And again, even if it does, that doesn’t change the nature of a protest. If Russians were holding a protest without violence calling for that, that would still be a non violent protest. - it’s almost like they don’t want peace… - Folke Bernadotte James Miller Tom Hurndall Rachel Corrie Shireen Abu Akleh Rouzan Al-Najjar Adan Al Bursh Ahmed Abu Artema Ibraheem Abu Thuraya Refaat Alareer - this is abjectly false. Israel rejected ceasefire proposals from Hamas multiple times and directed funds to them when they were using armed resistance and PLO wasn’t.

No they weren’t, a different group organized them but Hamas endorsed them https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/CoIOPT/A_HRC_40_74.pdf So according to you it’s ok for Israel to shoot the kneecaps of peaceful protestors because hamas might be testing Gaza’s defenses, yet you won’t criticize Israel for funding Hamas and removing guards from the border of Gaza

- No it isn’t, a right for refugees to return to their stolen homes isn’t calling for all of Israel to fall. And even if they were, that doesn’t change the overwhelmingly peaceful nature of the protest. - The PLO gave up armed resistance years ago, yet Israel just expanded settlements and settlers have killed hundreds of Palestinians - If Israel wants Palestinians to resist non violently, why do they assassinate peaceful figureheads and fund Hamas?

- What is your evidence? - How did IDF targeting medics, journalists, and children stop this?

the last time Palestinians held a mass non violent movement, Israel killed over 200 of them in the great march of return. It’s not a cult of victim hood if they are victims, Israel keeps millions of them without rights and brutalizes any resistance. Israel society is absorbed in toxic stage blue victim politics which is why they constantly reference the holocaust which has no relevance to the Palestinian cause. Even some Israelis themselves admit it

This makes no sense -all data we have shows extroverted men are much more successful with women then introverted men. -how are men in power in society lying about what women are attracted to in this way? In the mainstream the message is usually that women are attracted to looks and signals of wealth (fashion, car, watch ads), or that women are attracted to special connections and huge shows of romance (romance films). Where are the powerful men sending the message women like toxicity?, and even if they are, how does that help them retain power? The people saying women don’t like beta males is a underground message.

You are misusing terms. Change just means different from status quo. It can be negative or positive, a decline or progress. Establishment just means status quo. What is established at the moment. The political establishment are those who are already in politics and seen as making the current situation persist. The anti establishment are those who are seen as coming from outside to work against what is already established to create something else. 10% of Bernie Sanders primary voters went on to vote for Trump over Hillary. How can that be when Hillary is closer to Bernie’s positions? Simple, they saw Clinton as establishment and they didn’t like that.

Trump was calling for change, even if that change was returning to the past, it was still a change from how things aee. Establishment entails more of the same. Trump was anti establishment because he wasn’t in government. He himself constantly talked about how he’s an outsider and will drain the swamp. Everything about him from the way he talked to his controversies gave him a anti establishment edge, It’s the same reason why polls showed Bernie Sanders winning the general and he appealed to independents, he had a anti establishment flair with his populist messaging. People were in a anti establishment mood, so candidates like Trump or Bernie had the advantage among the general electorate.

We both know you don’t believe this.

Bernie is older than Biden.

You don’t need general appeal to win a primary, you need primary appeal, as you are appealing to primary voters not general election voters, they are different demographics. That doesn’t automatically mean radicalism does better in a primary than it does in a general. What makes the general different is independents, and for the hundredth time Bernie did significantly better with them. If what you’re saying is true explain why hypothetical general election polls had him with a much higher lead than Clinton over Trump, those sample general voters not primary voters. The dem primary polls between Sanders and Clinton had them neck and neck or Clinton winning, which is what happened. Meaning samples of primary voters liked Clinton, but samples of general voters liked Sanders. Yet Hillary Clinton was the epitome of a established mainstream status quo politician and she lost the general to a reality tv star with no experience. The general electorate was in the mood for something else, they didn’t want establishment. In that case obviously because Hillary and Bernie would split the left leaning base.