Raze
Member-
Content count
6,493 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Raze
-
Yes, but a smart woman ignores her instincts to chase avoidant men and gives a chance to the guy who is super into her and investing into her because she will get more out of the relationship. For example by default women like confident men and lose attraction if she shows visible nervousness. But the issue is if he’s nervous that can mean he really likes her and is afraid of messing up which is actually a sign he will be better for a long term relationship, if he’s confident it can be because he doesn’t care what she thinks because is a player or is he is narcissistic, which are all signs he will be worse in a long term relationship.
-
-
I think China miscalculated. Trump realized he has more leverage if he gets the rest of the world closer to his side and isolates China. If I was China I wouldn’t tariff the US but rather threaten countries that trade with the US but rely more on China with tariffs unless they tariffed the US, and offer them extremely generous trade deals if they maintain the tariffs. This would have pressured the US without giving the US an excuse to increase tariffs on China in “retaliation”. Then use that to buy time and prepare while trump pushes away other countries until closer to the midterms then unleash harsh retaliation tariffs to pressure republicans who would be at risk of losing if the economy tanks.
-
Allen Frances, one of the psychiatrists who wrote for the DSM, actually says severely mentally I’ll people were treated better in the 40’s then today.
-
-
-
-
Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/04/08/how-americans-view-israel-and-the-israel-hamas-war-at-the-start-of-trumps-second-term/
-
Except he could just lie to tell her what she wants to hear
-
-
That’s also how women feel when guys do that.
-
you’re proving my point. You are contradicting yourself. In one breath it’s about being a real men in the next it’s all men doing it and nothing to do with women. That isn’t true. Survey data shows women say they are less interested in men who earn less then them. This is my point, you can’t complain about men wanting traditionalism to return while also defending men being binded to their own traditional roles as protector, pursuer, and provider.
-
They are like that because that’s what they think women want.
-
Then why do women usually ask men to pay for dates and marry men who earn more than them?
-
Tying them to railroad tracks means limiting them to have a lane to be needed to be a “hero”
-
Read no excuses by Brian Tracy and atomic habits
-
Except women themselves demand men provide for them. You yourself reinforce this by saying masculinity is about men pursuing women with investment and being a paternal provider. It is women who demand of men earn more than them, take the lead, and be protectors. When women continue these demands while also removing the male position to do that, obviously men will try to advocate for a rebalanced system.
-
Assuming 10,000 hours for mastery, you can calculate how long it’ll take for each and how many hours a day to achieve that in a set amount of time. Then expedite it by hiring coaches.
-
It’s addictive. I wouldn’t do it.
-
-
https://archive.ph/V6RIV
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eit85FAj4wg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7p3-MJJm_R0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVqANXVTLN4 http://happinessbeyondthought.blogspot.com/2012/05/surrendering-i-letting-go-of-suffering.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU1Rp184IT4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_ddzLm9dNY
-
What China should do is go to countries that trade with the US but trade more with them and threaten to put tariffs on them unless they join them in increasing tariffs on the US. This would ramp up pressure on the US while giving them less of an excuse to tariff China, and it’ll look worse to Americans when trump tariffs countries they aren’t negative towards such as China.
-
I’m starting to think they’re trying to purposefully crash the economy so all the billionaires can buy everything and solidify control of the world economy. It makes sense when you follow the recent events. -> wealthy freaking out over occupy Wall Street, Bernie sanders popularity among youth, polls showing young people becoming pro socialism -> wealthy dramatically increasing their wealth post 2008 and Covid -> billionaires buying land and bunkers -> All of them suddenly aligning with trump after previously pushing wokeness Basically I think they fear a working class revolt and initially the tactic was to distract the public with culture war issues, while it worked for a bit it’s failing, they are probably also afraid of what happens when climate change and biodiversity issues start hurting the supply chain and the US national security establishment starts ramping up efforts against China. So they were probably setting up backup plans before and are now going for a Hail Mary to consolidate their power.
-
This chart is nonsense. It counts shows like Theo Von or Phil McGraw as conservative when they are mostly non-political and have interviewed liberals multiple times. Lex Fridman has roughly equal amounts of conservative and liberal guests. That’s not the same as a full on political show like TYT. It’s also missing the daily show and msnbc.
