Raze

I didn’t say femininity is machiavellian. Manipulation is defined as: the action of manipulating something in a skillful manner. "the format allows fast picture manipulation" the action of manipulating someone in a clever or unscrupulous way. "there was no deliberate manipulation of visitors' emotions" Arguably femininity is more manipulative and masculinity is more brute force. People who participate or are more accepting of transactional and unrestricted sociosexual relationships are more likely to exhibit dark triad traits, and people who are involved in sugar dating are shown to be more accepting of transactional or unrestricted sociosexual relationships.

Then that guy is a dumbass, that shows she isn’t that Machiavellian and hasn’t been desensitized and experienced at manipulating men. Granted it shows she just wants his money but if he’s doing sugar dating it sounds like he’s ok with that. Sugar dating is already dealing with transactional and manipulative relationships, he is just filtering the ones that aren’t good at it. Hes basically doing what girls do when they reject guys for any slight shyness, neediness, or lack of smoothness, then complain all the guys they date are arrogant manipulators or players. That’s who you are filtering for because they’re the ones who don’t do that.

Switch to practicing yoga and metta meditation to become grounded

3 of their candidates won despite being massively outspent with major endorsements to their opponents from centrist democrats https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/04/politics/live-news/primary-election-michigan-virginia https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/05/us/politics/michigan-house-primary-mckinney-thanedar.html https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/progressive-activist-wins-democratic-primary-one-nations-biggest-house-rcna590892

How many approaches did he do?

That’s pretty depressing. I heard a former PUA admit in the industry over 90% of guys drop out in 6 months with mediocre or worse results. I don’t know why it’s so difficult to succeed with this and the teaching methods are so ineffective. Its funny Owen and other former PUA guys bemoan the current situation of guys dropping out of society, dating nihilism, and Chad situationshop harems, and say it only happened because they got cancelled. In truth even at the height of the PUA movement maybe 0.01% of guys were actually using it successfully, it was barely making a dent. Though at least it sucked up enough oxygen so the blackpill and redpill bs couldn’t blow up like it did, but it may have actually created them by creating so many drop outs some of whom went negative.

@Miguel1 Do you still have a YouTube channel?

Except you endorsed RSD Luke and he said comfort comes before attraction Quote: “When cold approaching in a social setting you want to open in such a way that builds comfort first. This also applies to cold approach game as well” & “Now that we built comfort you can break it in order to spark a baseline level of attraction” Source: social circle blueprint 2.0 module 4 action plan page 14

Except Bradicus himself said comfort through safety and empathy is more important than attraction

Yawning

Who understands women more, the average man today, or the average man in the 90s?

https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/03/politics/us-military-iran-war-troops-punish Not sure what random troops can know that the analyst’s and generals don’t.

Their biggest weakness is they’re most popular among young voters and least popular among older voters, but most voters are older.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3miuaOWsj8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eit85FAj4wg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5JJQt_nHzQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88za65h7h70 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IqVDvnDEJU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cn1qj1oE67o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJXDoKZhGYs

This was Owen Cook’s most viral clip https://www.instagram.com/p/DYCslvgJRnQ/?hl=en

That is false, the entire war was 3.4 to 1. But the majority of civilians were killed in the civil war and by insurgents. Coalition forces had a ratio of 1 to 2.

3 to 1 or 4 to 1 is far worse than average. US in Afghanistan was 1 to 3.5.

And he TACO’d. Its now proven Iran has the cards. Catastrophic strategic failure.