Raze

- so far israel has provided no proof Hamas steals food according to mainstream outlets and a US official https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/u-s-envoy-says-israel-has-not-shown-evidence-that-hamas-is-diverting-un-aid-in-gaza at the same time israel has aided other gangs who loot aid https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/05/israel-accused-of-arming-palestinian-gang-who-allegedly-looted-aid-in-gaza https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2024-11-11/ty-article/.premium/the-idf-is-allowing-gaza-gangs-to-loot-aid-trucks-and-extort-protection-fees-from-drivers/00000193-17fb-d50e-a3db-57ff16af0000 - you should also mention the GHF has shot and killed over 200 Palestinians trying to get aid

Todd is smart enough to cover his tracks

Outsider as in someone lesser known not associated with their current brands of politics. I think AOC could get the nomination, she’s really popular with the base now and the base is massively fed up with establishment dems. Dem voters have lower approval for the current democrat party then the republicans had for the republicans party when they elected trump. Will she be the best to win a general, or does she even want to run for President, I don’t know.

Right, but that post was saying the spaces make men high-value but don’t teach them to commit to women so the women become bitter. If women don’t like the type of high value men those spaces cultivate and prefer regular men, they would not be getting women when they stop being regular and become high-value according to what those spaces advise, and if so few women engage in short term relationships the high value men not committing should be rarely an issue since it’s only with the few women who do engage in it. As most women would be going for the regular guys they prefer for long term relationships, at least that’s what I gather from what you say.

Ideally I’d like an outsider. Democrat are deeply hated. It’s a tarnished brand.

This is the vid where he seems to mention the Todd drama briefly at 14:00 and 1:02:30 Also I think he is talking about John Anthony at 59:23 he says the embezzlement thing in a different video, I don’t remember which

- that doesn’t mean it is all profit - he said he dumped most of it back in the business which then imploded

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vl4E81_3YJ8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRzdqh4sYPQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwQcXggR0Jg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqIMPGgXYZI

Where did he say that?

This conflicts with what she’s saying actually. According to her this doesn’t really happen, women don’t go to the high value,en and get used, they prefer beta regular men who chase them.

The neoliberal establishment democrats loved the messaging during trump 2016 that he was racist for his anti immigrant speals because it allowed them to attack him without having to do so over corruption which their donors also benefit from. Infant many of their donors probably liked illegal immigration for cheap labor. But as per usual their strategy backfired when democrats didn’t stop trump from sanctioning Latin American countries and Biden continued it which caused a flood of illegal immigrants and made the public think democrats were supportive of open borders due to all their past bashing of trump over the border stuff. Now immigration has become one of trumps strongest issues despite how extreme he’s become.

No, he said they weren’t paying him what he was owed then he made a separate company to work with them to create boundaries, then shifts to the whole conflict. I’m guessing he was taking what he believes he was entitled to and rsd viewed it as him taking what was there’s from the brand and tried to disappear him.

Todd is leaving out why they fired him in the first place. Nick said that Todd was embezzling from the company. Owen mentioned this without naming Todd recently too. I believe I saw karisma king or someone mention they saw Todd in massive arguments over money with other people at rsd back when he was still there. Currently he already won the case with the company, this is about attempts to go after them as individuals. It’s unclear how much of this is Owen and how much is Nick. Owen and Nick also had a falling out over this and don’t work together anymore. Owen heavily implied that he offered to resolve their dispute by just paying them out of his pocket what they claim they lost if they wouldn’t go to court over it but was refused. Its also unclear how successful his current business is. RSD was dismantled and he said Covid tanked his new stuff so he just spent all his time on vacation trying to fund that.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/after-service/201907/5-reasons-women-and-men-both-care-about-big-muscles

Most guys would choose the relationship, and even most of the minority who choose the latter would get bored and want a relationship. We can see this in how celebrity men usually still settle down with one woman, often even after getting reamed in divorces or cheated on they’ll do it again and again.

Oslo didn’t grant Palestinians self determination, it was just to buy time to destroy their hopes further, Netanyahu himself bragged about how he sabotaged it on leaked videos.

I don’t want to keep piling on Emerald, but I think the disconnect between her perception and the perception of the guys arguing with her is mainly two things 1) The mainstream advice is closer to what she’s saying, and the ultra masculine cult stuff emerges because guys become bitter after the mainstream advice, which is more just be kind / be a regular guy / chase women fails to work for them, rather than what she seems to lean towards as the inverse, that guys start with the masculine cult stuff and refuse to try the other way. So we are naturally skeptical to what she’s saying because we feel we’ve been there and it doesn’t match our experience. 2) I strongly suspect there is a perception bias. What she refers to as a regular guy or guy in touch with their femininity, is what most guys here are referring to as a top 20% masculinity guy on a spectrum of masculinity. And when we discuss a top 20% masculinity guy, she’s thinking of what we would see as the guy on the top 1% of a masculinity scale, which yes is way too much masculinity than what most women prefer.

Because 1) those groups have no capability to destroy israel 2) they only do that because the US and Israel are trying to strangle them and they’re doing it to counter this Even Iran signed onto the peace initiative https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2017/12/israel-iran-hassan-rouhani-istanbul-arab-peace-initiative.html But Israel rejects it because it requires ending the apartheid

“Arabs hit first” No they didn’t. The civil war happened after the British had killed, injured, or expelled thousands. Zionist militias were regularly carrying out bombings and attacks. Example: On 15 August 1947, the Haganah blew up the house of a Palestinian family near Petah Tikva killing twelve occupants, including a woman and six children It was during the civil war that Zionist’s began the ethnic cleansing operations and carried out mass killings and expelled 400,000. As I have already told you at least eight times, there is a peace deal on the table that every relevant country is signed on which Israel unilaterally rejects and gets the US to block. Every year at the U.N. general assembly a vote on the two state solution appears. It’s not asking for Israel to abolish its ethnic supremacy state, just to stop the occupation of millions of people without rights. Guess who votes no and who vetoes it every time.

It’s the opposite, Hamas’s whole argument was they shouldn’t recognize Israel unless Israel first recognizes Palestine. The PA disagreed and recognized israel, Israel’s response was to take their land and build settlements, proving Hamas right. Their offer was not giving nothing, it was offering peace. Your narrative is that Arab states won’t remove the threat which is why Israel continues violence. This is wrong, as I’ve pointed out to you about seven times now, Arab states have offered israel full normalization decades ago, israel rejected it. It is israel rejecting removing the threat, not the Arab states. Iran is irrelevant, they’ve also said they are against any fight with Israel and instead just fund rebel groups. Both Hamas and Hezbollah who they fund offered to cease fighting if a Palestinian state was established. Israel rejected this.

This guy is a shill who made the Kamala campaign spend their funds to pay him to interview her. Odds are hes a paid operative. The fact is he got his way, Bernie lost in both primaries he ran in partially because of many black voters. Yet despite this leading to disasters of two trump terms he just doubles down on accusing Bernie of racism for daring to suggest maybe something aside from the failed approach should be tried.

Maybe in theory, but generally the more you want something and the more you invest in it the more needy and attached you become. As a woman you would also find yourself more clingy or nervous around a guy you really like as opposed to one you only mildly like. If you spend lots of time and investment in a man you would find yourself being more prone to jealousy related to him opposed to a man you just met and haven’t invested in. it’s the same for guys.

That’s actually a common complaint from women we hear, the guys they are most interested in don’t want anything long term. Also again your idea of hyper masculine is not what we are referring to. Yes women mostly don’t prefer roided out body builders, probably not even for short term relationships. Your regular guy examples like Brad Pit or Ryan Gosling would be examples of the alpha. High status, tall, handsome, stoic, etc. Would you consider this video how a beta guy or regular guy operates? We who are arguing with you or most Guys using the term would not. If what you’re saying was true it would be easier for guys to get lots of women to enter short term relationships and harder to get them to enter long term relationships. But it really isn’t. The exception being if a guys lifestyle is a complete disaster but he’s also freakishly charming and handsome.

Yes, but the point is distribution. More women can have sex overall if a larger portion of women have sex with a smaller portion of men. Ex imagine there is 100 women and 100 men, 2 of the men sleep with all 100 women, now it’s 100 women who have each slept with 2 people, but 98 men who slept with no one and 2 who slept with 100.