Raze

You were actually using it towards me before I did, you changed your tune because it can also quickly tear apart your nonsense.

I asked Chat GPT to give an unbiased analysis of this conversation, asking regarding this reply: “in paragraph format explain how well they refuted the arguments made, your estimate of their understanding of the situation and intellectual maturity, and how seriously people should take what they say.” Result: The reply does very little to actually refute the arguments made earlier and instead relies almost entirely on insults, sweeping generalizations, and ideological assertions. Rather than addressing the factual corrections raised (for example, distinctions between Palestinian citizens of Israel and Palestinians under occupation, or the discussion of Uyghur rights and repression), the response shifts to broad claims about Muslims as inherently irrational, frames an entire religion as “medieval,” and portrays hundreds of millions of people as emotionally driven and incapable of reason. This kind of argument is not evidence-based and avoids engaging with the specific points raised against them. As a result, the response demonstrates a weak understanding of the political, historical, and legal complexities of the Israel-Palestine conflict and the situation of Uyghurs in China. The rhetorical style—heavy sarcasm, personal attacks, and civilizational stereotypes—suggests low intellectual maturity in the context of serious geopolitical discussion, because it prioritizes venting and identity signaling over factual debate. Consequently, readers should treat the claims cautiously and not consider them reliable analysis; the comment functions more as polemic or provocation than as a serious attempt to evaluate the issues being discussed. So like I said, again. Ignoring points made because they debunked you, not understanding concepts or able to process things beyond stereotypes, deflecting to weird sarcasm and whining when you can’t address the point.

A minor amount of research explains this but you are too stubborn and lacking in critical thinking to understand these concepts. Most people on the thread aren’t responding to your bizarre ramblings because it’s like talking to a brick wall. Two obvious examples demonstrating this from your replies, the Uyghur “genocide” has killed a fraction of Uyghurs as Israel has killed Palestinians, you use it as an example of how Gaza isn’t a “real” genocide in comparison because Palestinian citizens who aren’t in Gaza can get jobs in Israel, you clearly don’t know that is the same for Uyghurs whom in mainland China have the same rights as Chinese citizens and also can work as doctors, police and China officially reserves seats for minority nationalities in these institutions. etc. They do still face discrimination and security scrutiny, but so do Palestinian citizens, also it’s irrelevant to the genocide charge of Xinjiang or Gaza. You also suggest at the top of this page the Uyghurs doing an “Oct 8” as some bizarre gotcha when you’re told it’s irrelevant as though since they didn’t carry out an attack like Palestinian militants somehow they are better victims or something. For one this shows a profound lack of morality or understanding, what Uyghurs or Palestinian militants do or don’t do is irrelevant to charges of war crimes against the rest of the population. Next the Palestinian attacks from Gaza were on Oct 7 on 8, and Uyghur militants had carried out multiple terror attacks which is what spurred the Chinese government to dramatically ramp up their repression, so your point doesn’t even make sense. It’s actually a similar situation in that regard.. Once again, you do not know basic facts about the things you talk about. This isn’t hidden information. You literally use an emoji like what you’re saying is so obvious and mocking people for not getting it when literally a 5 second google search completely demolishes the basis of your entire comment. China was never accused of genocide as defined by a international legal body or accredited scholars, they were accused of cultural genocide, you not understanding the difference once again demonstrates profound ignorance. Palestinians who are occupied can’t become doctors, judges, politicians, in Israel, those are the Palestinian citizens, who notable do not resist Israel. What you’re saying is the equivalent of being confused by blacks in Jim Crow south protest when blacks in Northern America at the time didn’t have segregation. It makes you look remarkably dense when you can’t process that just because a group is the same national or racial group they can have different circumstances and situations? You don’t know these basic things that can be found in a 10 second google search or asking chat gpt but continue to wax poetic as though you are granting grand philosophical insights and insightful questions. You’ve been doing this for years and somehow become more ignorant the more time passes. The cringe from this is second only to your geopolitical analysis, for example you thought the entire Iranian regime would collapse in a couple days when there were protests, now they are getting mass bombed and even the US and israel aren’t talking about regime change anymore. Did you ever take a step back and consider maybe you don’t actually understand the things you talk about? No, you just revert to a bizarre hypocritical nihilism where you dismiss claims of war crimes and massacres by bringing up some unrelated irrelevant issue but then yourself bring up some other irrelevant issue like lack of gay rights and act like that somehow morally justifies some completely unrelated thing. Back when I put your comments in chat gpt, and yes I cleared the history so it was not based on memory of my opinions, I asked it to try and calculate your age and how long you’ve grappled with the topics based on your statements and understanding, and it kept insisting you were 15 or younger and had learned about these issues a couple months prior. In reality you are in your late 20s-30s and have been discussing them on here for years. Ive gotten things wrong on this forum, I’ve said ignorant things, I’ve lost arguments, but I can’t imagine being this proudly ignorant and lacking in self awareness, and somehow remaining this way for months.

The rise in oil prices massively benefited Russia. The US is reducing sanctions and they can sell oil at inflated prices to Asia which is desperate as they relied on the gulf. Very possibly this can change the outcome of the Ukraine war or speed up a Russian victory.

Israel banned government funding to institutions that commemorate the Nakba in 2011. It does that itself.

This guy is apparently going to consult the White House in a few weeks. He’s persuasively arguing the risks of further entanglements. So I don’t think it’ll continue long.

Note: (this post is NOT about Clavicular, please do not remove it for being a repost as he just is incidentally in the interaction, the focus is the others in interaction) The PUA John Anthony Lifestyle and self help guru Owen Cook both ran into the recently viral controversial streamer Clavicular. But what ended up happening is it gave us a great example of the difference between weak frame and strong frame. This is a hard thing to grasp for guys learning to improve their game, so it’s a great test to see. Here is John’s interaction: Here is Owen’s interaction (first minute and 30 seconds of this video, you can stop watching after it) The difference could not be starker and could not better show how weak vs strong frames behave in the wild. In Owen’s case notice his entire vibe is in some ways flippant, jokey, and relaxed, he clearly does not care and is just having his own fun. However at the same time he is engaged, as a result you can see Clavicular and his friends acknowledge him and show respect. Despite being polar opposites he maintains his own authority but without stepping on their toes and triggering a backlash. But compare that to John. Right away he goes in with a combative frame, but pathetically he crumbles at the slightest pushback and immediately tries qualifying himself by bragging about his lay count. Clavicular and his friends laugh in his face at how stupid and pathetic he is. Another thing to notice is his wife, as the interaction progresses her body language turns away from John and she starts getting closer to Clavicular and his friends, smiling at them and reaching towards them. This is because women subconsciously register who is the person seeking validation in an interaction and who they are seeking it from and register that person as the dominant leader and immediately feel more drawn to them. In this case Johns own wife is subconsciously repulsed by the pathetic behavior of a almost 40 year old man desperately qualifying himself to random punk 19 year olds on the street. John then makes it worse by actually following them to talk more. He now claims he didn’t realize who clavicular was, this makes it even more pathetic because it means he wasn’t even qualifying himself to a internet celebrity but actually who he thought was some random punk kid. Though in his defense he’s probably lying. He basically begs for a collaboration at that point and they finally give him it so he leaves, then they mock him behind his back as he drives away. Conclusion: This demonstrates how a weak frame or strong frame behaves in the wild. In both cases they are emerging from the mindset and emotional state of the person. John Anthony for years has constantly trashed Owen and mocked him trying to imply he is socially weaker than him, often touting his supposed lay count. But with this we can see really it is his immense inner insecurity and jealousy with the attacks being a desperate attempt to save face.

It has many. But he’s not going rogue, most of the government was supported by lobbies who support it. Technically the power to declare was was in congress but congress let go of the power and most of the past wars were done unilaterally by the president.

There were rumors israel was planning on attacking Iran again, however it was reported Israel indicated to Iran through Russia they would not attack them, Iran agreed to not strike them. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/01/14/israel-iran-russia-secret-messages/ However then protests erupted in Iran and Israel seemingly activated sleeper cells, Israeli officials now admit they armed protestors It’s reported at least 100+ Iranian security forces were killed and Iran cracked down hard with reports of 500-2000 killed protestors. A pro-Israel group is claiming it is 12-20,000 but there is no evidence of this. Trump said he would air strike Iran if the protestors were fired on and said they crossed his red line and has cut off diplomatic communications with Iran. Reports are that currently no one in the White House is telling him not to strike with Rubio (major israel lobby recipient) urging him to air strike Iran. However gulf states and Turkey are apparently urging him not to for fear Iran will strike their territory due to their US bases and Irans regime collapse could turn into a failed state and civil war like Syria causing a massive refugee crisis. Most Syrian refugees ended up in the gulf states, turkey, and Europe, Israel accepted essentially none. Currently Israel is reportedly saying they expect the US to strike however actually cautioned strikes as they fear the regime isn’t currently weak enough that strikes would collapse it. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-want-military-action-iran-swift-decisive-sources-say-rcna254076 Polling data finds most Americans are against strikes as of now

- when Hamas was elected they offered a long term ceasefire in exchange for Israel ending the occupation, rather than even negotiate this Israel attempted a coup then blockaded Gaza purposefully to punish the civilian population. Most of Gazas residents weren’t born or didn’t vote for Hamas during the last election. Currently Hamas said they’d disarm to the PA, the PA agreed to two states and ceased armed resistance to Israel, yet Israel refuses to let this happen. - so will you stop infantalizing Israelis? They voted in Likud multiple times, likud refused to end the war it waged on Gaza through blockades and strikes, and even sent funds to Hamas while reducing their own Gaza border security because they wanted more forces to help illegal settlers stealing land. By your own standards you should say they deserve Oct 7 and you don’t feel bad for them. But you won’t because unlike Palestinians you don’t accept dehumanization of Israelis, it’s just Palestinians who you think somehow should accept constant violence and oppression from Israel. - notice how you’re ignoring the West Bank because the apartheid and colonization of millions of people conflicts with your Israel can do no wrong narrative - False, israel rejected it. Hamas also wasn’t a governing power at that point so their rejection didn’t matter much.

The first intifada was after decades of occupation with no end in site. Why do you keep acting like Palestinians revolt out of nowhere? - actually the PLO initially called for a equal binational state from the river to the sea - the ruling party of Israel also calls for Israeli control from the river to the sea, which is the destruction of Palestine - once again, for the third time, the Arab states offered full normalization with Israel if they ended the occupation, instead israel expanded settlements and funded Hamas. - Israel keeps Palestinian under an apartheid, somehow accepting them to accept that as “join us in the 21st century” is like saying South Africans should be modern and have accepted apartheid.

Like I said, you’ve consumed propaganda and don’t understand basic facts about the conflict leading to your close minded view and justification of war crimes. I didn’t link to any echo chamber, the Arab peace initiative is a public offer on the table. The former head of shin bet admitted they’d have peace if they accepted it. You don’t even know what this is and just act like it doesn’t exist because it conflicts with your predetermined bias. The deal Arafat walked away from was calling for israel annexing large swaths of Palestinian land and controlling borders, airspace, and having a military base on the territory and the right to invade any time, it was permanent occupation, the American negotiator themselves said they’d reject this deal and israel refused to negotiate further. Israel has been consuming the West Bank, which hasn’t had a rocket attack in decades. Stop ignoring this point, explain to me how installing religious extremists onto Palestinian land and letting them attack civilians is just because Israel wants self defense? Israel itself considers blockades acts of war, they had Gaza under blockade, they had killed dozens of children in the West Bank that year before Oct 7. What you say is the opposite, the world ignores this, then when Palestinians resist it you say they started it and use that to justify further war crimes. Israel doesn’t have official borders for this reason, because their goal is expansion. You continue to ignore the question. If israel wants peace why did they expand settlements and fund Hamas to weaken the PA after the PA gave up armed resistance? Why do they reject the Arab peace initiative.

Again your comments show a massive lack of knowledge about the conflict and dehumanizing rhetoric / double standards Just for starters, - completely ignoring the peace initiatives supported by Arab states and Palestinians like the Arab peace initiative which I brought up - complaining only Israel and the US are blamed yet removing all blame from them by ignoring the US vetoing every diplomatic solution at the UN and blaming Hamas for war crimes israel commits, ignoring how the PA ceased armed resistance to Israel yet Israel ramped up violence against West Bank Palestinians - why is Hamas to blame for killing civilians in response to Israeli occupation and violence, but israel isn’t to blame when they massacre hundreds in bread lines, block food and medicine to starve children, block rescue equipment and destroy 70% of residential infrastructure to leave thousands buried under rubble. It’s a blatant double standard to justify violence against Palestinians. - blaming Palestinians for arabs collectively and blaming arabs collectively such as suggesting they don’t deserve human rights because of what your random friend said. Some Jews say the holocaust was punishment from god, should we just conclude Jews deserve the holocaust since we are assigning collective blame based on what individuals say? - Qatar sent money to Hamas at the direction of Israel because Israel wanted to make Hamas stronger because they were designated terrorists by the US so it would stop israel having to negotiate peace, this was the stated aim. Was your reaction to Oct 7 “israel has blood on its hands for letting settlers attack civilians and funding Hamas to continue it”? The Arab states ignore the Palestinians because they don’t want to enable Israel’s war crimes and the US lobbies them to not defend their rights. The US was actually pressuring the Arab states to normalize with Israel without Israel ending its constant violence and occupation of Palestine which spurred Oct 7 to try and stop the world leaving them to permanent occupation. You ignore all of this context to somehow imply because Arabs don’t solve the problem they are blocked from solving Palestinians deserve not having basic human rights. Really you don’t realize it but you’re exactly the person who would have excused apartheid South Africa and the Jim Crow south. Whatever rationalizations, deflections, and excuses necessary to blame the victims of injustices placed upon them.

Netflix has withdrawn its offer to buy Warner Bros / Discovery, so Paramount will be buying it. Paramount is controlled by David Ellison, a Trump supporting billionaire who already got control of CBS and put Bari Weiss in charge. His father Larry Ellison is the founder of tech company Oracle and a major Trump donor and largest individual donor the IDF, he recently got control of Tiktok, and once said he supports mass surveillance because it will make citizens “be on their best behavior”. Soon after the purchase Tiktok banned the Emmy award winning Palestinian journalist Bisan who covered the Gaza conflict.

YouTube doesn’t pay enough and Comedy Central already has the daily show, three political comedy talk shows would be pushing it

1) by that logic israel brought Oct 7 on themselves through the illegal blockade of Gaza and constant massacres of Palestinians, this is collective punishment, justifying civilian deaths collectively is a sign of low cognitive development and a lack of morality. 2) That’s a complete lie. The PLO pushed for a equal federation for decades before relenting to a partition. Palestinians agreed to the Arab peace initiative, israel built settlements to sabotage it. Even Hamas proposed a long term ceasefire for ending the occupation and later disarming which Israel still rejects. Israel continued its war on Palestine perpetually then plays victim when they resist occupation. If you can’t sympathize with thousands of children being killed or millions of people occupied without basic human rights, you are just stuck at a lower developmental stage, who falls easily for propaganda and selectively ignores the constant blocking and violence towards Palestinians who do seek peaceful resolutions as a way to demonize them when they turn to violence to defend themselves. It’s also a stupidly ahistorical way to demonize a group, every population in history subjective to violent occupation does decades has groups that eventually turn to violence to resist it.

No, you just don’t understand statistics. Having casual sex doesn’t mean sleeping with dozens of people. https://zipdo.co/casual-sex-statistics/?utm_source=chatgpt.com Correct, you were wrong and were promptly corrected. I am glad you swallowed your pride and learned. Now do so again.

He’s trying to do some weird sarcasm thing to prove a point he made in a previous thread where he got resoundingly mocked for saying conservatism encourages casual sex and other absurd notions

Most men don’t have casual sex either regularly, the average partner count for men is only slightly higher than women. Also, other studies indicate men tend to slightly exaggerate their count where women slightly undervalue theirs. One study had college students put up to a lie detector and found when aware of it women reported having slightly more average partners the men.