Raze

TITLE: Adyashanti interview with Bob Cowart - Part 07 of 11 4:20 yellowish turquoise opinion on relativity (I am NOT saying Adyashanti is stage turquoise, just that this may be an example of stage turquoise reasoning) TITLE: Adyashanti interview with Bob Cowart - Part 08 of 11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRjZsxtTBiM

TITLE: Judge Joe Brown : Caller Said Judge Joe Brown Saved His Life | ManUp Clip

TITLE: Adyashanti: Time is Running Out

TITLE: Hostile Uber driver refuses to take me to ER

TITLE: The Godcast Episode 185: Judge Joe Brown

TITLE: Transgender Parent Tries To Breastfeed Child in BIZARRE Viral Video Stage blue reaction to stage orange to green transitioning society

TITLE: Dartmouth College #BlackLivesMatter Protest TITLE: Oakland To Provide $500 A Month In Universal Basic Income To 600 BIPOC Families TITLE: ALL men should have a 6pm curfew after Sarah Everard 'murder', says Green Party peer

Is it Rife machine?

https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-jeff-foster-recover-from-chronic-lyme-disease Jeff Foster is an American spiritual teacher and is suffering from chronic lyme disease, he is unable to work, so if you can spare a donation, share the page, or send him a message of support and well wishes. The infection reached his brain and he's posting suicidal messages on facebook and instagram, (lyme disease sufferers are more likely to commit suicide than the average population) You can learn more about Jeff's beliefs and story in this interview at 51:11

what is that? google isn't turning up anything.

I have found an example of a conflict within stage green to study. The stage green feminist movement seems to be having a 'civil war' moment. Basically it is splitting into two sides, "Radical Feminists" (also called TERFS, and Gender Critical), and LGBTQ affirming Feminists (also called trans affirming feminists, or transfeminism). The conflict is arising because radical feminists insist transwomen are transwomen, not women, and as such they should not be allowed to do various things like be allowed in women's bathrooms or play sports with women. The transfeminists are arguing that gender is a social construct, and transwomen are women, and it is discrimination to treat them differently. example 1: The Maya Forstater incident. https://archive.ph/Kq8gs Maya was a tax expert, but lost her job after she said things deemed transphobic on twitter, ex: The situation got more attention after J.K. Rowling tweeted out in support of her: She continued to double down on the position including retweeting Gender critical articles and mocking genderless language in other articles, as well as posting an essay espousing her viewpoints. https://www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k-rowling-writes-about-her-reasons-for-speaking-out-on-sex-and-gender-issues/ This heavily damaged Rowling's reputation among liberal circles despite her massive initial popularity. Various actors from the Harry Potter films as well as her publisher made counter statements, and a lot of Harry Potter fan sites and forums distanced themselves from her. A J.K. Rowling billboard in Vancouver was taken down https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/j-k-rowling-billboard-taken-down-in-vancouver-after-facing-backlash You can look up 'Jk Rowling' on twitter to see many of the tweets criticizing her and denouncing her. Transfeminists argue that she is wrong and harming trans people, for example this tweet from a trans child support UK Charity Mermaids example 2: Conservative author Abigail Shrier released a book called 'Irreversible Damage', basically arguing that many girls who don't actually have gender dysphoria are claiming to be trans because they are confused and pressured by peers, but the medical industry is fast tracking them to transition and many will regret it. The radical feminists embraced and supported her book. However the trans-affirming feminists criticized her book and argued that it's misinformation and she is unfairly attacking trans people and putting them in danger and are campaigning against the book. Amazon refused to take the book down despite employee protest, but barred it from being advertised. LGBT supporting organization PRIDE petitioned for a library to not carry the book, but after they refused to remove it PRIDE cut ties with them. The American Booksellers association posted an apology because the book ended up being included in one of their reading lists, they stated it was an act of violence against Trans people that they do not support. But they privated their twitter account after getting backlash from both the radical feminists and the trans affirming feminists who felt their apology wasn't sufficient. example 3: Famous Nigerian feminist author Chimamanda Adichie stated in an interview that 'Transwomen are transwomen', After this she received backlash and walked it back stating that it's because transwomen have different problems that need their own attention. However she later backed J.K. Rowling. Recently she published an essay basically saying that after making this statement people she had helped were attacking her on twitter and lying about her https://www.chimamanda.com/news_items/it-is-obscene-a-true-reflection-in-three-parts/ example 3: The issue is accelerating. Although it seems that the large feminist organizations are backing the trans affirming feminists side, more famous feminists like Julie Bindel are coming out in support of the radical feminist side, and a radical feminist organization called WoLF (women's liberation front) has formed. There was a conflict at a location called 'Wi Spa' in California which I made a thread about before. Lessons: This is a good example of not only how stage green handles conflicts, but how it handles conflicts within itself. Some traits I noticed 1. Putting enemies in one basket Both sides have a tendency to accuse the other side of being a part of other groups that they are against, for example here is a trans affirming feminist accusing TERF's of being part of the GOP, you can also find many posting that TERF's are alt-right adjacent Likewise the TERF's accuse the transwomen of being misogynistic men, and the trans affirming feminists to be a branch of the 'Men's Right's' movement, which is a smaller movement comprised of critics of feminists from varying political leanings. Even J.K. Rowling tweeted this In reality, men's rights activists are ignored and attacked by both sides of the feminist debate, and seem to have not picked a side in this conflict. Basically, the tactic is to associate a group you disagree with, with other groups you disagree with. 2. Accusations of wide bigotry The trans-affirming feminists, rather than just accuse terfs of transphobia, actually widen their claims and accuse them of various other isms and phobia's, here is one example. At the same time terfs accuse trans affirming feminists of being misogynistic and anti-woman, and call transwomen men. 3. Censorship Both sides seem to support the idea of speech limitations to avoid harm. As a result they support censorship for the other side as they believe they pose a danger to minorities. At the moment the TERF's are losing this battle, and the trans affirming feminists have managed to get some victories such as getting reddit to shut down the largest TERF form /r/gendercritical and other related subreddits. In addition TERF's seem to be unable to get on mainstream news outlets aside from conservative ones, with an exception being a brief part of a 60 minutes segment which they took some heat over. 1. Do you support a side? Do you believe both sides have good points? 2. How would this conflict change if it was comprising stage yellow people? 3. Who will 'win'? At the moment it seems TERF's are gaining ground in the UK, while mostly losing in the USA. The Biden administration has supported the trans affirming feminist side, while the TERF's are supporting republican bills to limit transgender treatment for minors or ban transgenders from competing in sports.

How are they blue and orange? Their reasoning is classic green identity politics.

TITLE: Eckhart Tolle wywiad PL From 54:43 - 56:50 What a stage turquoise society may be like

TITLE: See Color | The Crystal Gems Say Be Anti-Racist | Cartoon Network TITLE: Women Read From The Viral Google Memo That Argues Men Are Better Leaders | CNBC Make It.

you can try this free masterclass, https://www.davidtianphd.com/masterclass/ it seemed solid to me, but use a different email as he tries to follow up with sales pitches

TITLE: CCS 2020 8 Dec. Peter Turchin TITLE: Cultural macroevolution: Understanding the rise of large-scale complex societies in human history

TITLE: Politicized Language Stage orange critique of stage green language evolution

TITLE: "Are You Destined to Deal?" With Goldman Sachs Managing Director Jim Donovan

TITLE: Jonathan Haidt w/ Prof. Adam Grant: Authors@Wharton - The Coddling of the American Mind

RSD Tyler made a new video on toxic relationships It's long, but to summarize he says that a very toxic relationship has lead him into believing things like demonic possession and energies take over people and control them. In short he was in a toxic relationship where his partner would become very toxic but when he is about to leave become nice again and he'd come back and the cycle would repeat. But more interestingly he said he began adopting some of her behaviors and later on saw her doing the same behaviors to other people or other people doing the same things to her. Do you have experience with a highly toxic relationship? How did you escape it?

TITLE: Glaciers, Gender, and Science: We Need More Stories of Ice. | M Jackson | TEDxMiddlebury TITLE: Watch as Lewis, Clark and Sacajawea statue is removed in Charlottesville

Derek Chauvin's trial is march. It is going to receive immense media coverage. They are adding barbed wire fencing to the court house among other defenses in preparation. It is a potential disaster because Derek Chauvin might get off. Most people seem to think the evidence is overwhelming, however that doesn't mean it is set that he will be found guilty. They bumped up the charge to 2nd degree murder, which is much harder to prove. Here is a video of a police prosecutor who is basically arguing Derek Chauvin is innocent, my point is not to get you to agree to him, but to demonstrate how the case might be presented to the jurors, and thus how possible it is they can be convinced. From what I understand of police brutality cases, it's extremely hard to convict because of the way the law is written. According to Dr. Michael Wood Jr, a police whistler blower and activist, the law is written so that the action of the police is justified if they can reasonable explain why they feel they were threatened. Now here is why Derek Chauvin getting off could be a disaster: 1. The riots would be worse. Even though the George Floyd riots happened after he died, normally police riots actually happen after a court case where the police officer is found innocent. For example, the infamous Rodney King riots didn't actually happen when the video of Rodney King being beaten got released, but rather after the police involved were acquitted. As bad as the George Floyd riots were, they were probably settled down when Derek Chauvin and the other police officers involved got arrested. If they get acquitted for this reason the riots could be much worse. And that means more white flight, which exacerbates the conditions of many poor neighborhoods. I suspect that there are many people who wanted to riot but were scared, however if a chance to riot happens again they won't be anymore. This is because the response to the riots was very strange. It was very popular in social media circles to say the riots were not bad, or were a necessary evil. There was even a large campaign by celebrities to donate to bail funds of people arrested, Kamala Harris even donated to it. It's possible that once a riot gets going, far more people will jump in now because they will have an added feeling that they are actually not doing a bad thing, or that it's not as bad/dangerous as their initial feelings which lead to them not rioting originally. 2. Police tensions remain extremely high. The USA has had a noticeable increase in violent crime lately, and especially in some of the areas that have the biggest risk of riots. Police were already having a hard time recruiting, now the problem has gotten much worse. If a large scale riot happens again, so soon after the last one, I fear the violence the police return with could possibly be even worse, and thus feed into the riots more. Often times the worst police brutality comes from police panicking and being nervous rather than being malicious.

https://www.voiceamerica.com/episode/107986/who-is-really-in-control-neuroscience-re-imagining-leadership Interesting example of a conversation between stage orange-green and stage yellow-turquoise

TITLE: Army Recruitment Ads: China vs Russia vs USA Comparison between stage blue-orange recruitment ads and stage orange-green recruitment ads.