Raze

That is unrealistically optimistic. This whole thing is the result of bad parenting to begin with. http://archive.vn/rgv6L

https://slate.com/human-interest/2020/06/colorblind-parenting-race-care-and-feeding.html

they aren't just random spoiled children, they are the next generation, they will be the ones in charge eventually.

In my opinion stage green people are damaging the closest things we have to stage yellow institutions.

That's good but you should be careful not to become dependent on alcohol to express yourself otherwise you could become an alcoholic.

A book called White Fragility is becoming very popular with stage green people, it's become a best seller and the author gets paid a lot of money to train people at different companies. Here is a passage from it. Could this be an example of how language and relationships will change if/when society becomes majority stage green?

1. Porn is addictive 50 brain studies showing that porn causes brain changes similar to the changes in substance abuse addicts this German study on men not addicted to porn found addiction-related brain changes and less brain activation to porn correlating with more porn consumed. As of 2016, more than a quarter of porn users surveyed are showing signs of problematic porn use. In one study, (27.6%) of a large French-speaking sample self-assessed their consumption of online sex activity as problematic. In a Yale study of 1298 men who had viewed pornography in the last 6 months, 28% scored at or above the cutoff for hypersexuality disorder. Meaning at least 27% of porn users become addicts This study asked if internet users experienced anxiety when they couldn’t access porn on the internet (a withdrawal symptom): 24% experienced anxiety. 2. Porn hurts your sex life An Italian study found that 16% of high school seniors who consumed porn more than once a week self-reported abnormally low sexual desire. Compare that to 0% of non-porn users reporting low sexual desire. Over 70 studies have reported more porn use linked to poorer sexual or relationship satisfaction. This study found 12.0% of respondents reported the need for longer stimulation to reach orgasm, 17.6% reported the need and more sexual stimuli to reach orgasm, and 24.5% reported a decrease in sexual satisfaction. Among those surveyed who declared themselves to be current pornography consumers , 51.0% admitted to making at least one attempt to give up using it (proof it's addiction, they tried to quit but can't). 72.2% of those attempting to quit pornography use indicated the experience of at least one associated effect, and the most frequently observed included erotic dreams (53.5%), irritability (26.4%), attention disturbance (26.0%), and sense of loneliness (22.2%) (withdrawal symptoms). 3. You become desensitized to normal porn and escalate a 2018 YOUPorn survey reported that 40% of women and 64% of men report that their porn tastes have changed in the past 5 years. another study found that 49% of the men reported viewing porn that was not previously interesting to them or that they once considered disgusting. The study also found problematic Internet porn use was associated with reduced erectile function and reduced overall sexual satisfaction. Yet problematic porn users experienced greater cravings. 4. You can get erectile dysfunction In the 1940s, the Kinsey report concluded that the prevalence of ED was less than 1% in men younger than 30 years, less than 3% in those 30–45. And a 1999 cross-sectional study (based on data gathered in 1992) published by the Journal of the American Medical Association reported erectile dysfunction rates of only 5%, and low sexual desire in 5%. a 2012 cross-sectional study of Swiss men aged 18-24 found ED rates of 30%, and a 2010 Brazilian study of men 18-40 reported ED rates of 35%. A 2013 Italian study reported one in four patients seeking help for new onset ED were younger than 40. Astonishingly, the rate of severe ED was nearly 10% higher in younger men than in men over 40. What changed? The spread of the internet and streaming porn. In an experiment employing video porn, 50% of the young men couldn’t become aroused or achieve erections without porn (average age was 29). The shocked researchers discovered that the men’s erectile dysfunction was. A 2014 study on Canadian adolescents reported that 53.5% of males aged 16-21 have symptoms indicative of a sexual problem. Erectile dysfunction was the most common (27%), followed by low sexual desire (24%), and problems with orgasm (11%). The authors were baffled why rates were so high, and were surprised that sexual dysfunction rates for males surpassed females, unlike in earlier published literature. Porn addiction symptoms: Distress about escalation to more extreme porn, Difficulty maintaining an erection while putting on a condom, Delayed ejaculation, Loss of libido, Copulatory impotence (can get it up for porn, but not partners), Frequent masturbation, little satisfaction, Uncharacteristic, worsening social anxiety or lack of confidence, Growing erectile dysfunction, even with extreme porn., Morphing porn tastes that don’t match sexual orientation (also triggering HOCD), Inability to concentrate, extreme restlessness, Depression, anxiety, brain fog. There are a few studies denying the problems with porn online that received significant media attention. They were purposefully misleading studies made by people involved in the porn industry. Here is a video presentation debunking them. All this info was taken from yourbrainonpron.com

not what I said. are you really suggesting America would be better off with no police? Do I really need to explain how ridiculous that is?

I don't think people realize how serious this situation is. Police are already resigning one after another and their morale is at an all time low. Especially if this officer gets charged they are going to be far more averse to action and in their head in serious situations out of fear. This isn't a good thing, it may reduce some brutality but it will also result in more cops and people dying for years now. Who is even going to want to become a cop anymore? If the people becoming cops were already meatheads, imagine now that everyone feels like cops are hated and if they get in a dangerous situation and kill someone a angry mob will go nuts and they'll be in even more danger as they get fired and marked for life. Remember cops don't have to act in dangerous situations, they don't have a duty to respond. As bad as police brutality is a problem, crime and murder causes far more damage to people and society by a lot. I don't think people realize how much crime and violence happens in the USA, and once a crime wave happens it is very hard to bring a state back, because people who would actually improve the area won't come or will flee and it will become even worse. It's a shame the dialogue became so extreme, I truly believe there was a middle way that could reduce police brutality without harming policing in the country.

After the Baltimore riots they put in reforms for the police and now Baltimore's crime rate is the worst it's ever been. I don't know if the reforms caused it, but just because bad things exist does not mean to see things from a lens where the worst is assumed for everything. That just makes the problem worse.

You can't just compare countries like that. Iraq and Sudan are much smaller countries and the police don't have full control there, a lot of criminals literally control areas and do whatever they want. Also they probably have primative reporting, police who work with the gangs and are corrupt, and many of the criminals getting weeded out by the military or rebels. America is a far bigger country than Germany with a far higher crime rate. It's just a different country, America has way more guns available meaning it is far more likely for a fight between a civilian and a cop to turn into a fire fight than in Germany. No one is saying that police brutality and excessive force shouldn't be addressed, but no country in the world would not allow a cop to respond with lethal force if you try to tase them in the face, not even Germany. Just assuming the police are in the wrong by default isn't going to help the problem.

@Godhead In 2018 Germany had 901 murders, and the USA had over 16,000. The rate of Germany's police killings is irrelevant, look at the size of Germany's population and amount of murders compared to America's. There are more violent criminals in America so the police kill more often. @Preety_India The drunk guy followed their orders perfectly fine for 30 minutes before he went nuts and started fighting them. Nothing indicates that he was attacking them because he didn't understand their orders. Even if he didn't understand their orders and that's why, it doesn't matter, whatever the reason is once you point a taser at a cop's face they can respond with deadly force. He wasn't killed as punishment for a DUI, he was killed because he tried to shoot a cop in the face with a taser and the cop responded by defending himself. Why not involve weapons when arresting a drunk person? If you are afraid the drunk person is dangerous enough to steal them, that is more reason to bring them, if they didn't have them that would mean they end up in a fist fight with a drunk person. The police always need to be a step ahead. The police did arrest him without using a taser or guns, it was only until he started resisting that they tried to tase him, and only when he aimed the taser at them that they shot him. They couldn't have easily chased him down because he pointed a taser right at the cop's face, there is no place in the world where you can point a taser at a armed cop's face and they can't respond with lethal force, the cop can't just stand there and let himself be tased in the face. You don't understand how dangerous the situation is, a taser shot at you by a drunk person can result in death, paralysis, losing an eye, a cop cannot allow themselves to be subdued because then their gun can be stolen. He was clearly a threat to the cops because he already assaulted them and was aiming the taser behind. It doesn't matter if he has trouble aiming, he was trying too, and was in distance where it could hit. The police fired at him because he tried to shoot them in the face with a taser, not because they got tired of running. If it was the second reason, they would have shot him right as he started running not until he reached behind with the taser. The cop was fired because the police department had to quell the angry mob.

he pointed the taser at him though

btw after this the police officer did get fired after protesters burned down the wendy's. Here is the full video:

Good video on the problems with the demands to change and defund the police and how it could make the problem worse.

He answers it at 23:43 I don't have a link but he said in another video he has the same peace all the time, sometimes it's more intense, and he occasionally feels angry or sad for a couple seconds like when his parents died when he was watching tv and saw some people kicking a dog but then it goes away.

Porn doesn't just give you a sexual release. It changes you, dulls your senses, and it's addictive. If something has a 30% chance of addicting you, that is serious. There are now hundreds of accounts of men who quit porn saying that it's changing their lives, they think clearer, have less anxiety and depression, and feel butterflies when a girl smiles at them.

There are specific pathways in the brain designed for sex. Porn is literally conditioning it to behave differently. Simple explanation as too why it's not the same, how intense does it feel to masturbate to porn compared to how intense it feels to talk on a forum? The intensity is the result of serious chemical reactions in the body that are addictive.

It's not, humans did not evolve to watch sex on a screen like that. It rewires the mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8wl-pSfMdY&list=PL5xpYlM156zYu2rZwvle5byHqfZJiyRZz Eckhart Tolle lecture after 9/11

Trump has no chance at this point. If you look at the polls and study the map it's obvious. I know polls said Hillary would win, but it's not the same, even if the polls are as wrong now and you remove the lead Hillary had from Biden's lead, he's still winning by a lot.