Raze

You were complaining about being an incel and every woman rejecting you just a few months ago. You can’t transcend something you tried and failed at.

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-05-28/ty-article-magazine/.premium/yes-to-transfer-82-of-jewish-israelis-back-expelling-gazans/00000197-12a4-df22-a9d7-9ef6af930000 https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20240131-72-of-israelis-say-aid-deliveries-to-gaza-must-be-stopped-survey-finds/ https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-855689

Actually, you do identify with a team. The team is maintaining your self perception of moral superiority while also fulfilling your bloodlust. The reason why you run to nuance and not identifying with a team, is because that’s a necessary excuse to try and defend war crimes, the reality is morally, there isn’t nuance, you can’t somehow complain about random third world crimes while defending apartheid and genocide because of nuance, that just demonstrates no moral consistency. You have never applied your “nuance” once to the side you don’t like. It’s just that now the war crimes in israel are so obvious and public opinions tide is turning you need to backtrack to maintain the perception you have some sort of moral consistency, you don’t. The tell is you’ve now for the third time accused me of being Muslim despite having no evidence and me telling you I’m not three times. You can’t comprehend that someone could be against war crimes effecting Muslims because you see them as “other, so you assume anyone who doesn’t manufacture consent for said crimes and excuse them must have the same bias as you but be on the other team.

You were supporting them for months, openly called for them to destroy Iran, repeatedly justified their treatment of Palestinians, all while knowing they had killed tens of thousands of children. It’s convenient you try to walk it all back now to maintain an image as a moral arbiter. The reality is you’re morally inferior to all the support for immoral actions by Muslims you complain about. At least they didn’t manufacture consent for genocide. Rather than use it as a learning opportunity, you do a walk back and pretend it didn’t happen, while deflecting back to complain about other things. This is why your moral development remains so low, you don’t learn, you need to maintain a image as morally superior even when you’ve revealed yourself as morally lesser.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JG8mbtiwcSo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IynRIMHxPTw

I think it’s called brain fog

https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/democratic-party-poll-voter-confidence-july-2025-9db38021?

How do you know it’s not helping his business? For all you know keeping people on the forum increases the likelihood they’ll buy the course later.

Based on how stage green behaved during the wokeness wave, I suspect their will be a strong shift leftward when the boomers are gone, but it will be so toxic and self destructive, combined with other social and economic forces, it will fail and society will revert to lower stages for a long time. What passes for stage green in the US just enables the worst of lower stages and collapses social structures needed for early stage development, and causes chaotic gender and race wars.

I remember seeing an old clip of Chomsky where someone asks him about theories that 9/11 was an inside job and he said it doesn’t matter and he doesn’t care. I was always confused by this until years later when I understood his morality better. Basically if all human life was considered of equal value, it would actually not be a major crime for the government to have done it in comparison to all the things I did before and after with how many it killed in foreign countries. I think he said something similar about not caring if JFK’s assassination was an inside job, because I think he doesn’t think it makes a difference any more then some third world countries leader being killed due to an internal government dispute, when what matters are the proxy wars and policies that effect hundreds of thousands and millions of people.

I recall seeing an interview with Daniel Ingram where he mentioned something about doubting the official 9/11 story but didn’t want to talk about it publicly. I can’t find it now so it may have been removed. Ironically in the same interview he bashed Covid conspiracy theories.

Post interesting charts / data about society here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPTIQpfoxUs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejsCZWrV8PQ https://www.shinzen.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/art_urges.pdf

Well you said super model, not just random 25 year olds. The problem with these numbers is while they may be true in theory, there are practical issues that stand in the way. How does he meet them? He’d have to be actively interacting with hundreds of 25 year old women to find that minority. The women who specifically seek him out would be more likely the gold diggers or clout chasers. They may have potential to like him, but that has to actually be manifested in the interaction. Does he have the charisma and skills to make something happen? I’d speculate not, in interviews he comes across slightly feminine and due to the nature of his job he’s probably busy and a bit square. Dating coaches I’ve seen have said in many ways their wealthier clients have it harder. Because they are stressed out from constantly working it makes them worse at socializing for fun. They usually have to hide their wealth to avoid gold diggers, of course the famous ones don’t have that option, it’s not easy to sort. If it was that easy for wealthy famous older guys to get younger women who genuinely love them I’d expect way more would do it. But they seem to usually end up with women closer to their age. Bezos current wife had dated many celebrities before him. It’s clear she sought him out and knew how to seduce him. I doubt Bezos was doing some advanced filtering system and surrounded in 25 year olds who genuinely like him.

Nah he was not that good