Raze

I found a couple other channels that were dedicated to just videos complaining about Americans, very strange trend.

The issue is after having sex she will rationalize why she had sex and her body releases oxytocin which bonds her to the man. So if you make her wait she can bang someone else who got to it faster and will be more likely to go with him.

Seems like a bad idea to me. She can feel rejected and will go bang someone else.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/28/middleeast/israel-young-people-extremist-views-intl-cmd They do in historic Palestine, Palestinians are occupied in the 20% they have left https://www.newarab.com/news/israeli-ministers-debate-shooting-gaza-children-near-yellow-line https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/03/more-human-can-bear-israels-systematic-use-sexual-reproductive-and-other https://www.btselem.org/routine_founded_on_violence/20191022_hcj_greenlights_holding_palestinian_bodies_as_bargaining_chips https://www.btselem.org/administrative_detention

That’s because they calculated the calories needed to avoid a full blown starvation crisis. But they banned and limited a variety of civilian items ranging from chocolate, medicines, wheelchair parts, water desalination equipment, etc.

This is a thread where we can post news about the Isreal and Palestine conflict. I am aware there is another thread but I don’t like the OP being biased and it’s already full of arguments. Israel announces largest West Bank land seizure since 1993 https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/03/22/israel-largest-west-bank-settlement-blinken-visit/

Actually israel purposefully blockaded Gaza to keep the economy on the brink of collapse. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna40926651 You can’t do anything “good faith” when Israel doesn’t operate in good faith. The PA in the West Bank ceased armed resistance to Israel, and this is what israel was doing before Hamas “started it” according to you https://www.savethechildren.net/news/2023-marks-deadliest-year-record-children-occupied-west-bank

This guy is a liar who has been debunked repeatedly and blocks everyone who points it out https://substack.com/@historyspeaks/p-153545160 Heres a former IDF soldier who completely debunks an article he wrote this is the only reply he gave completely failing to refute a single point made Here he is claiming a photo of a Gaza child is AI (the photo was published by the New York Times) with 0 evidence, even the people who doubted the photo never said it was AI, and here he is claiming a dead Gaza baby is a doll with no evidence, meanwhile their identity was confirmed as Ahmad al-Najjar. This guy is likely mentally ill. He had to be ejected from the Oxford Union for having a public meltdown. Here is calling for genocide and killing every person in Gaza

Does that number not count widows?

Post any video you found funny

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRFB51pSuZM https://www.girlschase.com/article/how-know-if-youll-succeed-how-many-men-do-it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsLrEX7wZnw https://www.girlschase.com/article/dating-autistic-men-ultimate-guide

The speaker outlines three “versions” — Israel using starvation as a weapon, Hamas mismanaging aid, and Israel restricting supplies for psychological pressure — then claims the truth lies “between” the second and third. This assumes all narratives are equally valid and that truth lies in the middle, a false balance fallacy. Humanitarian crises aren’t understood by averaging claims but through verifiable evidence — UN data, aid agencies, and independent monitors There is significant credible evidence that the situation in the Gaza Strip is not simply one of scarcity but of **starvation that has been intensified – and in some respects caused – by actions of the State of Israel (Israel). For example: The World Health Organization (WHO) described Gaza as “suffering man-made mass starvation” caused by the Israeli-led blockade that prevents sufficient food, water and medicine from entering. The Guardian+2Foreign Affairs+2 Multiple senior Israeli officials have publicly declared that blocking humanitarian aid is a deliberate policy pressure tool. For instance, Israel Katz, then-Defence Minister, said “no humanitarian aid will enter Gaza… blocking this aid is one of the main pressure levers preventing Hamas from using it as a tool with the population.” United Nations+1 Aid-agencies and human rights groups report that thousands of trucks worth of food aid remain stuck, access is heavily limited, and key crossings have been shut or bottlenecked. For example, Oxfam states Israel is “deliberately hindering” aid and that “virtually all households across Gaza are starving” in parts of the enclave. Al Jazeera+1 On a ground-level basis, interviews and reports show dramatic change in diet among Palestinians in Gaza: one family interviewed had a Friday meal of four cans of peas and carrots, shared among 11 people including six children, reflecting a collapse of meaningful nutrition. The food-security monitoring body IPC (Integrated Food Security Phase Classification) already flagged large parts of Gaza at Phase 5 (catastrophe/famine) level. Citing a single video of “a healthy man” as proof against starvation is also flawed. Individual cases can’t represent population-wide conditions, especially in conflict zones where suffering is uneven and videos are selectively shared. This anecdotal fallacy substitutes personal observation for data. The claim that “both sides lie completely” further weakens credibility, reflecting cynicism, not critical thinking. True critical inquiry weighs sources for reliability and transparency; rejecting all information leaves no factual basis, making “detached logic” detached from reality. Their view rests on flawed logic, selective observation, and misunderstanding of humanitarian evidence. In short, the speaker projects the appearance of critical thinking without its substance. The argument is a selective, one-sided narrative that reduces a complex history to a moral dichotomy — “Palestinians want destruction, Israel wants survival.” While the timeline includes factual milestones, it omits crucial context and misrepresents motives on both sides. The 1947 UN Partition Plan was indeed accepted by Jewish leaders and rejected by Arab ones, but the rejection stemmed from seeing the plan as unjust: Arabs made up two-thirds of the population and viewed partition as granting most of the land to a newly arrived minority owning less than 10%. The 1948 war was not a unified campaign of extermination but a regional conflict with complex causes, and Israel also expelled or barred hundreds of thousands of Palestinians — a key source of enduring mistrust. The portrayal of later peace offers (2000, 2001, 2008) as generous yet irrationally rejected distorts reality. Each contained major flaws: continued Israeli control of borders, airspace, and settlements that fragmented Palestinian territory, and unresolved issues like refugees and East Jerusalem. Even U.S. and Israeli negotiators later admitted these offers were incomplete. The 2008 Olmert plan was never formalized and came as Olmert was leaving office under indictment. The claim that the “Palestinian objective is the disappearance of Israel” ignores decades of evidence showing repeated Palestinian acceptance of coexistence through a two-state solution. The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)officially recognized Israel’s right to exist within the 1967 borders in its 1988 Declaration of Independence, effectively conceding 78% of historic Palestine and limiting its claim to the remaining territories of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem. Since then, Palestinian leaders have repeatedly affirmed support for a two-state framework — from the 1993 Oslo Accords, which created mutual recognition between Israel and the PLO, to later initiatives like the Arab Peace Initiative of 2002, which offered Israel full normalization in exchange for withdrawal from occupied territories. Even groups often branded as rejectionist, such as Hamas, have in recent years issued statements supporting a long-term truce or state along 1967 borders if Israel reciprocates. Consistent polling by organizations such as the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research shows that, despite deep frustration and disillusionment, large portions of the Palestinian public continue to support either a two-state arrangement or a single democratic state with equal rights for Jews and Arabs. By contrast, Israel has repeatedly acted to undermine Palestinian self-determination. It continues to expand settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem — a direct violation of international law — making a contiguous Palestinian state increasingly unviable. Successive Israeli governments have rejected or delayed negotiations over core issues like borders, refugees, and Jerusalem, while entrenching military control and permitting settler violence. Leaders such as Benjamin Netanyahu have explicitly opposed the creation of a Palestinian state, calling it a security threat. Israel has also rejected alternatives such as a single, binational state with equal citizenship, preferring to maintain permanent dominance under occupation. Taken together, these actions and statements show that it is not Palestinians who uniformly seek Israel’s disappearance, but rather that Israeli policy has consistently denied Palestinians any form of genuine sovereignty or equality — whether through two states or one shared democracy. If someone claims to have “studied all perspectives” yet presents this binary view, it shows surface-level knowledge and confirmation bias — accepting facts that fit a preconceived moral narrative while ignoring others. Though articulate, such reasoning lacks depth and balance. Their view is ideologically filtered, not scholarly, and should not be treated as a reliable or well-informed analysis of the conflict.

There wasn’t a single insult in that reply, if that counts as an insult you have 0 authority to complain about it because you’ve said similar things to me multiple times long before I was this caustic towards you. The claim “Israel provides 75 % of food to Gaza” is not well-substantiated I did not find credible, up-to-date, independently verified data that Israel itself (as a government actor) provides 75 % of the food used in Gaza, or that “75% of supply and distribution comes from Israel.” That figure seems more like a rhetorical exaggeration or a misinterpretation of how many trucks cross, or how much of aid is enabled via Israel-controlled crossings. The distinction between “Israel allows trucks in” and “Israel directly supplies food” is crucial, and the quoted person is conflating them. Assuming that “food must be delivered inside by Gazans, and Gazans are ruled by Hamas” implies full control This is a sweeping generalization. Even though Hamas is the dominant political authority, Gaza is not a uniform bloc. There are internal factions, municipal authorities, NGOs, activists, and civilians who may resist or circumvent control. The fact that Hamas is armed and holds power does not mean it has perfect control over every distribution point or individual’s access to food. Also, in many conflicts, control of aid does not strictly map to control of territory in such a simplified way. Putting full responsibility for hunger on Hamas ignores many structural and external factors Hunger and famine are rarely the result of misdistribution alone. They typically involve lack of supply, obstruction of aid, damage to infrastructure, restrictions on agriculture, displacement, military destruction of food storage and farms, and restrictions on movement. By attributing hunger to “Hamas’ fault,” the person is ignoring the role of Israeli military operations, the blockade, constraints on crossings, restrictions on humanitarian access, and the destruction of Gaza’s food systems. Logical inconsistency and rhetorical aggression weaken credibility The speaker repeatedly accuses the interlocutor of insulting or failing to understand, using a tone that blends insult and accusation. That suggests rhetorical defensiveness. Also, they shift between different claims (e.g. “I didn’t say Hamas stole aid” vs. “there are black markets”), which makes it harder to pin down their thesis. The attempt to present arithmetic (2 million ÷ 35,000 = ~50) as a refutation is simplistic: even if control is exerted by a small elite, it does not guarantee perfect enforcement of every distribution outcome. Appeal to witnesses/anecdotes are weak as evidence They mention “testimonies from Gazans” about Hamas hoarding or selectively distributing food. While those testimonies may exist, in conflict reporting such accounts must be critically evaluated, cross-checked, and compared to broader data. Anecdotes alone are insufficient to prove systemic causation.

https://www.girlschase.com/content/how-be-resilient-and-bounce-back-rejection https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVvLQ7EVwyA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjjxU3zjH4Q https://www.girlschase.com/article/how-really-tell-if-girl-likes-you-its-not-her-words https://www.girlschase.com/content/how-get-laid-college-pt-i-big-man-campus-game https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RDcxRcJZSA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6MxPx6DBaM