Raze

Post any video you found funny

That’s not a pickup artist thing, it’s a human nature thing to look past morality for personal benefit For example when Israel blocked all food and medicine for months to Gaza you said “But am I expert in war strategies to tell what should be done or not? No.” and talked about how it was effective, so you won’t speak against it. This resulted in children getting amputations without anesthesia and multiple children starving to death, but you looked past it. Similar to how Nazis looked past starving Jews in ghettos. Many said it was “ugly” but they thought it got the job done so they didn’t speak against it. So be careful judging others for being Nazi like as though it’s a separate thing.

https://www.npr.org/2026/02/10/nx-s1-5703636/nj-primary-election-mejia-malinowski In the democrat house primary there were two pro-israel candidates and one progressive anti-israel candidate. Malinowski, the favorite to win and one of the pro-israel candidates, said he doesn’t “unconditionally support” everything Netanyahu wants, despite his pro-israel record. AIPAC, the pro-israel lobbying group then went on a crusade against him dumping millions into ads against him. The ads were not about israel however, mostly instead accusing him of supporting ICE because of a vote he made years ago. AIPAC backed a third pro Israel candidate, Theresa Way. In the end, Malinowski has no conceded to Aneja, the Bernie sanders supported progressive who is much harsher on Israel having accused them of genocide. Way came in third. Malinowski put out this statement:

That wouldn’t help and would make things worse. Democrats don’t have power to do this ans they’d just be accused of being authoritarian censors.

I finally finished the video, and frankly her points are silly. She projects how women view things onto men, and ignores the biggest issues with modern dating. Women wearing more makeup is not making it harder for women to attract men with a makeup arms race, men barely can tell the difference.

It clearly causes a lot of resentment towards men, so often when you dig down into why a woman is bashing men is because she projects her experiences onto the entire group. Like once I read an article from a feminist about how she knew men who were sleeping with dozens of women through manipulative tactics or were pumping and dumping women one after the other, and women in the replies were saying stuff like “this is why the male loneliness crisis is good” or “I hate men”. It made me realize a lot of the man bashing is because they are referring to a small segment of men as men and not factoring in everyone else.

I made a thread a while back when that survey came out. It did change, it was closer in prior surveys from years before. However that survey was a soon after COVID, as far as I know more recent surveys found the gap isn’t as extreme anymore (though still larger than before). So it probably inflated a bit from more people using apps after COVID.

I can’t get through her videos in five sittings. These women advocating for mens dating struggles channels keep popping up and it’s obvious they don’t know or care and are just reading some script from AI because they know guys will watch it because it’s weirdly therapeutic to have a woman agreeing with you so it’s an easy way to make a quick buck. Its so insincere and dumb.

If you want to be taken seriously you need to not be so generalized. I get what you’re saying, there is definitely a thing about women being more prone to tone policing as a way to enforce social order. https://expression.fire.org/p/male-students-show-more-tolerance However just blanket saying you “rarely” see this is wrong, there are many examples of men doing this as well. You need nuance or your point will get dismissed out if hand if people can instantly think of many counter examples.

A matriarchy can’t form because women still demand the special privileges they get from patriarchy, they just want to deconstruct the parts they don’t like. That’s not how balanced systems work so it just results in confusion and chaos in which case feminists just double down and blame men. We see this in liberal feminist culture being toxic and unsustainable socially with high rates of mental illness and collapsing fertility rate. Rather than address this they just want it to spread. The American black community is one example of this, they didn’t have any real defenses to it (aside from a significant amount of religiosity) since they relied on the left movements due to discrimination, and they didn’t build up a lot of wealth and stability to have a more managed decline since they only got more equal economic participation relatively recently. Socially, the American black community got hollowed out. Massive single parenthood rate, tons of chaos with radical beliefs and gangs filling the void. From what I heard dating in that community is a nightmare. I see a ton of black women and men actually brag about dating outside their culture and moving elsewhere. Lately white people are following a similar trajectory, theirs is just less extreme because they had built up advantages before hand since they didn’t have the same repression / had a longer period to grow power and wealth as a group. Really what a lot of feminisms cultural push was, was a minority of mentally masculine women resting the feminine cultural role and wanting the roles of men and women to be the same. Since women are mostly feminine and follow masculine leads they followed these women. Feminism became more democratized and included more normal feminine women however it just becomes incoherent because it is more about them just rationalizing their vibes and feelings creating hypocrisy and double standards that don’t make sense and rather than having concrete specific goals instead have vague demands and periodic hysterias.

Are you sure? This poll found disapproval of israel increased in Germany in the last two years.

There were rumors israel was planning on attacking Iran again, however it was reported Israel indicated to Iran through Russia they would not attack them, Iran agreed to not strike them. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/01/14/israel-iran-russia-secret-messages/ However then protests erupted in Iran and Israel seemingly activated sleeper cells, Israeli officials now admit they armed protestors It’s reported at least 100+ Iranian security forces were killed and Iran cracked down hard with reports of 500-2000 killed protestors. A pro-Israel group is claiming it is 12-20,000 but there is no evidence of this. Trump said he would air strike Iran if the protestors were fired on and said they crossed his red line and has cut off diplomatic communications with Iran. Reports are that currently no one in the White House is telling him not to strike with Rubio (major israel lobby recipient) urging him to air strike Iran. However gulf states and Turkey are apparently urging him not to for fear Iran will strike their territory due to their US bases and Irans regime collapse could turn into a failed state and civil war like Syria causing a massive refugee crisis. Most Syrian refugees ended up in the gulf states, turkey, and Europe, Israel accepted essentially none. Currently Israel is reportedly saying they expect the US to strike however actually cautioned strikes as they fear the regime isn’t currently weak enough that strikes would collapse it. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-want-military-action-iran-swift-decisive-sources-say-rcna254076 Polling data finds most Americans are against strikes as of now

They don’t need to whack Massie. He said a bunch of Israeli billionaires are dumping millions against him in his primary. Trump also endorsed his opponent. It’s a closed primary, only registered republicans can vote in it. So all this support Massie is getting from independents and democrats won’t help him. Politically his goose is already cooked.

Is it written in the form of narration or a systematic treatise with graphs, tables, lists and charts? Are you studying the structure of writing process of any books to base its organization on?

except you claimed “replaced a system that made the vast majority of women’s lives miserable. . The burden of proof is on you to prove that, how do you know the vast majority of women were miserable prior to each wave of feminism The waves of feminism themselves happened because of those same structural changes and persisted them. The major changes related to women would be increased workforce participation, declining marriage rates, casual dating, etc. many of which were changes influenced by feminism. What are the examples of similar feminist movements not causing a decline in different countries? Anyway, there is also this, liberal young women who are more likely to be feminist are more likely to have mental health problems. And before you say “correlation”, the same pattern was shown in measuring neuroticism.

Feminists are responsible for that because they advocated dismantling the traditional “patriarchal” structures. Which include social conditioning related to encouraging chastity and marriage which kept a lid on it. Notice how it becomes more common and normalized the more feminist society becomes. Phenomenon like “incels” and “alpha ideology” are just symptoms. This is one problem with feminism wherein when a negative aspect of their ideology occurs rather than acknowledge it they just blame men / the patriarchy even when it’s the opposite.

It’s insane to me the Iranian diaspora is still praising republicans and israel, in reality they’ve made their situation much worse. The sanctions which israel lobbied for have crushed the Iranian people, and shrunk the middle class and caused brain drain which was the group most effectively opposing the regime with the resources for transition. Trump then encouraged the protestors that he’d help them but just abandoned them. Then due to the constant war threats the regime was able to get its military to unite and use that as a pretext to use massive amounts of violence to crush the protests claiming it’s a national security issue, and Pompeo and Israel gloating about using mossad agents just helps them with this narrative. The reaction was far more violent than the 2022 protests and during those protests part of the military had refused to join in crushing them, indicating there was the possibility of splits. Now Israel has just had Trump ramp up the sanctions even more and Trump is trying for a deal with the regime. Israel is demanding Iran basically abandon any military power it has which they know they’ll refuse. The fact that any Iranian diaspora wants a regime change war with Iran after everything that happened in Iraq, Syria, and Libya is insane. That would harm the Iranian people far more than the regime at its worst.

What’s your evidence for this? Female happiness has overall declined since they started recording in the 70s, and women report higher levels of alcoholism, anxiety, depression, etc.

Having the right to do something is not the same as it being the right move to do something. Even if the aggressor is responsible, its also the responsibility of the leadership of the victims side to mitigate harm and pursue the best outcome, even if it’s unfair.

That seat is a safe democrat seat democrats win each time No, in reality the establishment democrat supporters are the most cult like of all three groups. You put forward Biden when he was literally barely functioning, they even cancelled the primary essentially and kept pushing the narrative he was fine until it was too late. It wasn’t establishment democrats who first sounded the alarm, it was progressives, and republicans who were just mocking the stupidity of this move. If people vote for party, they aren’t going to vote based on AOC when she doesn’t represent the party. Hillary and Kamala were the representatives and they lost. The dislike of them would have a far greater impact than anyones dislike of AOC. and once again, you try to bring up current recent wins as though that proves your point when as I already told you by your own logic it does the opposire. AOC is still in the party, infact even more far left people like Mamdani are in the party. You somehow blame AOC for democrats losing because she’s in the party, but when she’s in the party and they win that’s proof your side separate from AOC in the party is right. That is bad faith contradictory reasoning I already pointed out to you .

Stop being obtuse. AOC didn’t run for president and lose. Those would be your precious non-socialists.

>I did like Harris and she lost badly, so clearly your views on what works are worthless. She’s also fundamentally no different than Biden, so it’s obvious you’re just going off of vibes. >corrupt or dump, like AOC or Bernie They’ve called out reality of what will happen far more than Hillary, Biden, or Kamala. Also neither are even remotely as corrupt as Hillary, Biden, or Kamala. Biden essentially worked for credit card companies when was in congress. >nothing Biden did him running again was the disaster, as well as failing to forward a lot of his agenda The democrats have not once ever ran on “socialist rhetoric” and lost from it, this is entirely a fiction of your imagination. I don’t care if you don’t like Hillary. Hillary, Biden, and Kamala were your ”non socialist” democrat champions and were all disasters. Stop blaming socialists for your sides failures.