Raze

https://www.girlschase.com/article/attraction-models-can-you-combine-vac-sac https://s3.amazonaws.com/Misc-USA/SYSTEM+SOCIAL+CHARM-Aura2016.pdf

Why should they? Women said they are strong and independent and don’t need no man, so what don’t they take responsibility. Mothers dominate the household, women are all the teachers, men can’t say anything about how to educate boys without being pre-approved by women. They’re raising these men, it’s time they take responsibility for it.

Yes, but israel is still doing it, thanks to people like you who fight to stop any accountability for their crimes

Why would you be in a relationship with an asexual? Do you want a dead bedroom

Yes he is narcissistic and got stuck in his ways. When did he say that? In the book he mentions it’s wrong to sleep with a woman under the pretense you committed then to discard her. You need to keep in mind he was coming up in a time where most guys didn’t even think you could get better with women or thought you just get women by having a job and buying them stuff. There were no YouTube videos with full infield. In that context it’s insane how many many insights he had. - smiling, eye contact, and talking louder on the open, 99% of guys fail to do this but it increases open dramatically - how to approach groups - negs, body rocking, these are nuanced topics so most guys do it wrong but when done correctly allowed average guys to open girls who normally are dating models and rockstars and would automatically reject everyone - false time constraints, simple way to dramatically increase opening success - preselection and other attraction switches to directly create interest, keep in mind before mystery most people had no idea this was even possible, also examples of creating preselection like merging sets and pivots - concept of attraction before comfort, remember most guys and most advice was all about comfort first and got guys friend zoned or worse when the girl had no interest in connecting because she wasn’t interested - qualification, one of his former students Sin said prior to learning this he slept with 8 girls in his life, after implementing this he slept with 8 in a month - moving locations creates the illusion of more time spent together creating rapid comfort - frame control as a concept at all Keep in mind before mystery there was little effective advice, most guys good with women didn’t know what they were doing right and didn’t care to tell others, he was the first resource that broke down everything and turned it into a system that can be logically understood. And yes, the complexity is the issue because most guys lack the baseline skill and experience to understand and apply it. Ironically though he democratized game advice to guys in a way he showed the dangers of presenting too high level concepts to people at a time when most weren’t ready or the tools of transmission weren’t adequate.

I think that’s because it’s easier to do but isn’t necessarily the best way

I hate pedophiles not just for the crimes but how they create so much distrust and paranoia in society. I also wonder if there are any theories on how they keep ending up in positions of influence.

Yes. It’s not perfect and is dated in places but it also as high level nuanced concepts and a lot of intelligent technology. That’s actually an issue with it since most people can’t figure it out from a book without being reviewed in person by someone else who was taught it in person or mystery himself.

That’s just a method for your own mood and a philosophy of learning, not a complete method. Owen and Julien would teach multiple things from mystery.

Not really. Most of what he says is done by guys who are naturally good with women by default.

His advice was nuanced and ahead of its time in many ways. Some naturals went back and learned it and said their results exploded.

I found multiple better models, they are largely forgotten and lesser known.

A woman once did an experiment where she lived as a man

Try finding one that’s a closeted atheist like yourself

Post any video you found funny

Exactly. And if we lived in a Christian puritan society which banned pornography and smut because it’s a sin they’d be saying that’s an example of patriarchal oppression. At this point patriarchy just means everything a man does they don’t like which they then add to an overarching theory assigning collective responsibility.

That paper was largely debunked https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513824000497?via%3Dihub