Raze

Post any video you found funny

Exactly. And if we lived in a Christian puritan society which banned pornography and smut because it’s a sin they’d be saying that’s an example of patriarchal oppression. At this point patriarchy just means everything a man does they don’t like which they then add to an overarching theory assigning collective responsibility.

That paper was largely debunked https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513824000497?via%3Dihub

10,000 hour rule is nonsense and based on nothing coherent. It can be much more or much less depending on any number of factors. If someone does something for 30,000 hours but never learn or do it differently you’ll never get anywhere whereas someone else could master something for 1,000 hours if it’s all supervised by people who already mastered it giving directions.

You should probably add resource acquisition and networking

Regardless of his motivations is a great move and may be the first step in a great world revolution to avert the oncoming disasters. Believe it or not this may be seen in the long arc of history as one of the most impactful things a president has ever done. Also the fact that democrats didn’t do this particularly with the inclusion of Joe Rogan just shows how incompetent they are, this is just a easy political W. Imagine if Kamala went on Joe Rogan and said she’d do this on day one.

That’s what I’m saying. Different groups can use the labor of other groups to express their own power despite said group doing the actual heavy lifting. Those could be women.

There have been multiple Queens and Empresses in history who have waged war. If women decided they’ll only have sex with men who go to war we’d be in world war 3 within 24 hours.

No, your mind is full of insecurities and inferiority complex, seeking fulfillment it latches onto the first excuse to express sadistic desires as a attempt to establish feelings of superiority. The issue is the immense stubbornness, arrogance, and poor understanding results in horrible analysis and poor insight as shown here so it just fails. As quoted you said Iran would fall in a year, even in that thread people were already telling you how idiotic that was by bringing up multiple weaker regimes which lasted far longer in worse circumstances in just recent history, as always none of these arguments penetrated.

This was always one of the dumbest takes from Manson and why I never liked him that much. Neediness is the result of having unmet emotional needs and seeking to fill them. Being vulnerable has nothing to do with it. In the book where Manson says that he even brings up an example of a needy guy who tearfully confesses his feelings to Marks ex gf and how that’s an example of neediness not working. His book is full of contradictions like this. You can be vulnerable all you want that won’t resolve neediness. Abundance is spreading your neediness out between many sources so it doesn’t show up as much. But it doesn’t resolve the root issue either. Though it at least can temporarily numb it.

Sadly you are underestimating the issue. The female version of the manosphere is far more insidious then just telling them those things and is far more powerful and influential than the male manosphere, which is just a fringe group and meme.

How does waging war make men dominant as a group? The men who fight the wars just do so to serve the people in power, those people could be women. Its not like the soldier comes home and somehow uses his military knowledge to conquer his woman. In reality women are the ones who demand he take the lead and go toil at the factory and be the breadwinner or she’ll drop him like a hot potato.

It’s important to remember in 2023 you were insisting we should go to war with Iran and they’d fall quickly Note the current conflict began after Iran was severely weakened after 3 years of sanctions and attacks. Meaning it would have gone even worse at that point. This is the example of the issue of policy when rather than being based on nuance and reason, it’s based on the bigoted emotional tirades of people like Trump who can’t comprehend complex information or critical thinking. At least in Trumps case he needed to be convinced after Iran became far more vulnerable.

I already posted multiple studies showing religious couples report higher marital satisfaction Blacks aren’t necessarily more liberal than whites, they are more likely to vote democrat but they more often say they are moderate or even conservative but support democrats regardless.

Some form of communism can probably work in a pure stage Green society. It failed because classic communism had too much baggage and the cultural context wasn’t developed enough. It would fail currently because stage green is too toxified and society isn’t far enough into green.

This says liberals are higher than conservatives

Other surveys find evangelicals divorce at the same rate https://www.christiantoday.com/news/us-evangelical-christians-are-divorcing-at-the-same-rate-as-the-general-population-study-finds Also this is just cherry picking a specific group. Evangelicals have many other issues such as living in rural areas that got harmed by jobs going overseas and the opioid crisis.

That’s nonsense. Justice isn’t what makes a relationship work, emotions are. Women will clown you for thinking there is any justice in the realm of romance.

Conservatives and religious people are more likely to be married in general which opens them up to the possibility of divorce more than others regardless of the actual rate per marriage.

- Irrelevant, it had standard survey procedure, there isn’t evidence they falsify data - No, it says “religious service attendance is associated with 50% lower divorce rates in later life”

Nope. The quote you posted proves my point. The data was from the American family survey which is from the Wheatley institute. The states overall rate is irrelevant, there are many other factors related to that such as poverty rates and different subcultures. Research consistently finds religious and conservative Americans are less likely to get divorced and more likely to be satisfied in their marriages. long-term Harvard-linked study found ~50% lower divorce rates among regular religious service attendees https://hfh.fas.harvard.edu/religion-and-divorce Higher religiosity is associated with higher reported marital satisfaction https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5319260/ Religious participation is linked to overall satisfaction among both married and unmarried couples in urban America https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2533156/

- The article is based on scientific data from a large yearly survey not collected by them. Just complaining about the organization is irrelevant to the points made. - religious and conservative people are less likely to get divorced

The problem with ascribing traits to feminity and masculinity is those words have baggage and it’s implied culturally that it’s better for women to be more feminine and men more masculine.

https://ifstudies.org/in-the-news/conservative-women-3-times-happier-than-liberal-peers-for-these-reasons

It’s an example of how demanding men pay for women on dates and spend money on them for courtship encourages a toxic possessive mindset, it’s entitlement that creates a harmful atmosphere but some women defend it for their own personal benefit. The truth is they don’t have a problem with traditional patriarchy when it benefits them at the expense of men or other women.