Raze

That’s not evidence he murdered based on influence from redpill, it’s just an example of a abusive controlling husband, which was not invented by the redpill. Reading articles on it, it seems his motivation if he did kill her was jealousy from believing she was seeing other men. Thousands of killings like this happen every year with no connection to redpill ideology. Nope, it is a huge leap when these movements existed for years now and there is no evidence of widespread violence or violence increasing as a result of it. Hundreds of mass killings occurred and only a couple had evidence of motivations based on incel blackpill ideology, none from redpill. Crime rates are currently declining. You’re basically saying it’s not a huge leap to assume something that there isn’t evidence of it happening is happening. https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2023/07/Whyisnttheremoreincelviolence.pdf This study found no evidence incels are predisposed to violence. We actually do have some confirmed examples of incel inspired violence as well, I cannot find anything on redpill inspired violence. Nope, manosphere is a catch all term meaning The manosphere is a varied collection of websites, blogs, and online forums promoting masculinity, misogyny, and opposition to feminism. That is extremely broad and all movements in this do not whatsoever produce similar end results. There is a massive difference between MRAs calling for political reform, MGTOW insisting men should avoid women all together, incels saying you are subhuman and should looksmaxx, redpill etc. Part of collecting it as one group and not differentiating is some that they can be painted with the same brush based on extremists to pathologize and cancel unrelated groups. Then it’s being used incoherently and incorrectly. They’re declaring basically any example of a male killing his female partner or family member as femicide, no one ever says when a woman or gay man kills their male partner it is some sort of gender specific thing. All the articles saying there is a rise in femicide specifically also wouldn’t back this up, they just discuss crimes against women not necessarily evidence it happens because they are women.

Femicide is a complete nonsense term just used to separate killings of women as an issue so killings of men can go unaddressed and feminists can’t be countered with the fact that men are more likely to be killed when they try to paint murder as a uniquely female effecting issue. They did the same thing with domestic abuse, despite it in some ways making more sense in that context they turned it into a feminist issue which ignored many of the actual causes and painted it as a ideological oppression dynamic, which actually made it harder to address and reduce. There is absolutely zero evidence of redpill content being a significant cause of femicide. There are no example of known redpill ideological motivated killings and only a handful of incel / blackpill ones. Its a media narrative by feminists to try and pathologize struggling men. In the UK they were making schools watch the show adolescence which was about some incel killer when in reality it was totally fictional and there was never any incident like what the show depicted.

That is false, rape is a crime in India. India has 1 billion people. Assuming it’s all at one level of development based on crime, is like assuming all of America is like gang infested areas in Detroit or poor rural southern areas where people do meth. Gang rapes also occur in the US and Europe.

There isn’t so much rape in India, the rate is similar to other countries. It’s just that there are a billion Indians so more incidents take place, but not more proportionate to the population than most other countries.

Nope, US didn’t occupy Japan and South Korea permanently and engage in indefinite violent civilian settlements and blockade, they just rebuilt and returned it quickly, completely different scenario. Vietnamese killed thousands of Americans trying to expel them. North Korea hates America to this day because they are still sanctioned. You know nothing about history or politics. You suffer from dunning krueger effect, where a person is ignorant and uninformed but as a result of this has more confidence in the accuracy of the beliefs despite being constantly glaringly wrong. Combined with your inability to process new information the result is you revert to repeating incorrect statements over and over and your responses become more ignorant or just inane ramblings that are irrelevant to anything. You are literally getting debunked, responding to just part of the comment that doesn’t contain the debunk, write some dumb spiel, then repeat the same incorrect statement again. I’ve argued with actual children who don’t act this ridiculous. I suspect you have some sort of insecurity and need to latch onto governments killing people you view as inferior as some sort of pathetic way to boost self esteem. Maybe you behaved like this in school and when people got irritated at you from not getting the point despite being told it over and over it gave you a inferiority complex and you use sadistic joy of bloodshed as a way to tell yourself you’re better. And before you whine about insults, that’s not an insult, you’ve been trying to “psychologically analyze” me for weeks.

The problem is your analysis comes from a perspective that lacks understanding and has poor moral devlopment. Unbiased AI analaysis of your posts: In terms of intellectual and moral development, this reads like someone stuck at a very early stage: confident, dismissive, and attracted to harsh, absolutist narratives that make the world feel simple and justified. There’s no nuance, no willingness to grapple with ambiguity, and no consistent ethical framework—just a rotating set of arguments that all point in the same direction. That’s not critical thinking. It’s rationalization with a thin veneer of cynicism. So many of your points are so obviously stupid instead of whining about insults (no one insulted you, I insulted your arguments), actually try and learn something. - Gaza voted for Hamas over 10 years ago, most weren’t born or didn’t vote - you show blatant moral inconsistency by claiming massacre of Gaza is justified because they want to “destroy Israel” but Oct 7 isn’t justified when israel is destroying Palestine You once again ignored the refutation to the points and made some bizarre ramble that doesn’t address anything.

That happens over the course of thousands of years, professional sports is a recent phenomenon

No, biologically men have many advantages ranging from bone density to ability to track movement with eye site among other hormonal advantages for physical activities and greater upper body strength. Even if a woman competed with men she would still be at a major disadvantage against men. Female athletes often do train with men, it doesn’t make them capable of competing with men.

They used to practice with men and were told to stop to do better actually https://www.sportskeeda.com/tennis/venus-serena-williams-stop-practicing-men-when-andre-agassi-s-father-mike-gave-strongly-worded-advice-sisters-dad-richard

Serena and her sister did a match with the male 203, and he still easily beat them.

Prompt: User breakingthewall says this today but on January 9th he said “Yes, the ayatollahs are going to fall. It's a matter of days. It is an event of the utmost importance in the global geopolitical landscape” what does this tell us about his geopolitical understanding, his reasoning. result: It mainly tells you that his analysis is inconsistent and likely driven more by speculation or shifting narratives than by a stable, evidence-based framework. Predicting that Iran’s leadership would fall “in a matter of days” is an extremely strong, time-specific claim—and when that doesn’t happen, pivoting to a new, almost opposite framing (that the regime will be “morally strengthened” and strategically restrained) suggests he may be reacting to events rather than anticipating them with a disciplined model of how states behave. On reasoning, it points to overconfidence and a tendency toward dramatic, absolute conclusions. Serious geopolitical analysis usually deals in probabilities, uncertainties, and competing scenarios—not definitive, short-term predictions about regime collapse or sweeping claims like a single country being able to “collapse the global economy” at will. Those kinds of statements are typically red flags for overreach or rhetorical emphasis rather than careful analysis.

What would happen regarding your understanding is nothing because you are incapable of processing new information so you will keep stubbornly repeating stupid falsehoods like you are doing now. What you’re saying is so stupidly misinformed anyone with the slightest understanding can recognize how idiotic it is. You yourself have been told this multiple times, but you can’t respond to the arguments so you act like they don’t exist. - Gaza was under blockade specifically designed to destroy economic development - Hamas proposed long term ceasefires and disarmament for a Palestinian state, Israel refused - the West Bank is controlled by the compliant PA who doesn’t attack Israel, Israel murders Palestinians weekly - they rejected “state offers” because none of those offers were for a state, they were for occupation. - you were just whining about how evil it was to justify October 7 as an attack done in response to Israel destroying Palestine. yet now you are justifying mass murder of children because you think they want to “destroy Israel”. Its similar to how when anyone brings up atrocities by Israel you deflect to something else like China as though that makes it ok, but later whine about how they don’t have LGBTQ rights as though that justifies war crimes, then accuse others of being moralists. It’s just that you have no understanding, no morality, and no coherent reasoning, and are incapable of processing information to change your view.

Intifada is just the Arabic word for rebellion, it has nothing to do with genocide. Israel killed far more civilians on both intifadas. They are opposed consistently by everyone except Israelis who continue to defend their own. No one is defending what’s happening in Sudan.

The reason is irrelevant, the purpose of segregation and South African apartheid was also based on security concerns. Restricting human rights or committing war crimes doesn’t suddenly not count if you feel like you have a good reason. By that logic when Palestinian militants target Israeli civilians it’s ok because they’re trying to expel the invaders who are brutalizing, stealing from and occupying them outside of international law. It’s still targeting civilians which is a war crime, even if it’s a justified goal. Also security isn’t the reason, they also fund extremists themselves and target peaceful resistance with violence and repression as well which actually hurts their own security. Because we don’t have people like you defending it like you do the genocide israel commits. Nothing demonstrates the moral bankruptcy of Zionists more their current argument is you can’t critics their genocide because you don’t complain as much about other genocides.

Every human rights organization of relevance has found israel guilty of the crime of apartheid Former Israeli heads of mossad and shin bet have admitted it is apartheid Polls show the majority of Israelis support ethnic cleansing and believe Jews deserve more rights If America declared itself a white nation and passed a white nation law, allowed any white person to get citizenship and move here to live on land it kicked people out of, didn’t allow 70% of its blacks citizenship and instead forced them into occupation so they can’t vote so whites retain majority vote, had almost every white political party declaring they won’t work with black parties to sideline them even more, let random white lynch mobs take land and set buildings on fire and kidnap these occupied black civilians, it would be racial supremacy. As it is in Israel, which does exactly this except for Jews and Palestinians.

Ironically this comment itself shows how you represent the issue more than anyone else. You’ve spent months celebrating Israeli violence and defending it, making idiotic comparisons to other crimes as though that somehow is related. Now you act like it’s just because you have nuance that you dismiss any criticism towards them. Facts of the situation matter, you lack capacity to grasp them so you revert to caricatures, straw men and dumb sarcasm. It’s not that anyone is trying to be the “good guy”, it’s because they have basic comprehension and some moral fiber which you do not. It’s not my opinion, you constantly get the most basic facts wrong and use the most idiotic fallacious arguments which you completely contradict in a later comment.

By that logic you can’t complain about people who support Hamas if they just say they support them when they target military. Military operations invariably harm civilians. You can’t blame “psychopathic men” for a war which you support because it killed 170 elementary school children as collateral, you are supporting them doing this. Israel builds its military infrastructure embedded in residential areas, the idf headquarters is surrounded by residential buildings. You justified israel killing 100,000+ civilians with the excuse it’s because Hamas was “using human shields” (in reality just the claim that civilians were nearby a suspected Hamas member who was targeted). This is the issue with Zionism and why it becomes more hated the more people learn about it. It is straight up racial supremacy of the most sadistic and irritating kind. Unable to accept they aren’t always the victims, complete hypocrites who think they’re entitled to do far more violent things while complaining about even 1% of that being returned in their direction, and masking it all in nonsense about liberal and civilizational values when it’s the exact opposite. You try to mask it in feminism by blaming men and Nivsch masks it in gay rights like when he used to post pride flags to counter posts on Israeli war crimes (gay marriage isn’t even legal in Israel) but really the overwhelming majority of feminists and gay rights activists in the west have rapidly turned away from Zionism because they clearly see zionists just use their causes just being used as cover for the worst crimes imaginable.

Keep in mind when you see zionists feign concern for Iranians and insist the war is to help them, it’s all an act. This same group is perfectly happy with Israel’s far more violent oppression of Palestinians and continue to lie and say israel is a democracy because they want people to ignore the people to subjugate. Reports are already out that israel isn’t seeking regime change in Iran but rather regime collapse, they want to make Iran a failed state like Syria killing hundreds of thousands. Israelis are on board, only 20% of Israeli Jews say israel should take cautions to not harm Iranian civilians.

How do you know slight details and certain emotions didn’t change in the memories over time?

No, you supported strikes on Iran, and that caused this. So its not just psychopathic men, it’s also on you.

This was tested, they asked people where they were on 9/11 then asked the same people years later and most were saying something different

Post any video you found funny