Raze

It was Facebook posts with words by difference in use by gender or something

Unfortunately this simply does not line up with real life experiences. People have different personalities, demographics interests, and yes intelligence and development level. The average person is not interested in dense conversations about philosophy or high level emotional understanding. Their conversational interests is more like this and you will need to relate to them on that level to get anywhere socially. You’re assuming they don’t already do that, that’s actually what they do and why they’re frustrated by the shallow nature of relationships without being on the same wavelength intellectually.

It’s the same for guys including me, so I don’t judge them. The second claim is false, I believe there are highly developed people who are naturally drawn to it. I’ve seen two women who I would consider like this. I’ve seen countless women who have understanding of spiritual qualities, high intuitive intelligence, etc, but it’s hard to describe, they have the same kind of “hurt essence” and “trying to appease” that most everyone else has. These two women are the exception to me since they seem almost naturally highly tapped in, like the hurt essence isn’t there. I didn’t consider their spiritual understanding or knowledge that great and they themselves had experienced childhood trauma and said they had mental health issues in the past, but they just “live” high conscious to some degree. Basically I’ve accepted this is extremely rare and the odds I or anyone else will meet such a woman and be compatible for a relationship is like winning the lottery in which case you will be so lacking in abundance and wanting it to work it’ll fail since like all women she’d be turned off by that desperation.

That’s strange given Tony Robbins usually pushes that message exactly. I would actually criticize Tony in that so much of his relationship interventions seems to be ignoring what they say and just telling the guy to be more alpha. Maybe he saw something not shown in the video to make him think that’s not the issue here.

Don’t watch it, it has a lot of gore involving children

So why was he calling for genocide on video? Probably he talks honestly to Israeli audiences and in interviews he knows will be translated to English he speaks differently. This is what he did at Oxford That sounds like openly insulting the audience because he was upset they were clearly losing the debate. I don’t really see why someone who seems to have mental illness (he’s posted threats to multiple people) and is regularly caught making up lies, while also on video claiming 1 million children must be eradicated should be taken seriously.

They stopped fighting because they stopped being attacked, currently natives have equal citizenship in the US.

Why can’t you relay the advice from high development level experts

That guy is a mentally ill propagandist who has threatened multiple people and had to be kicked out of the Oxford Union, and has openly called for genocide. He is not a reliable source.

What you’re saying is ahistorical nonsense. There is zero evidence native Americans would have genocided the colonists, when they fist arrived multiple tribes tried to ally with them, they also had no capability to do that. There’s also zero reason the colonists had to commit genocide, they did it for land and wealth. The British actually originally tried to halt further expansion stating they considered it native land and colonists disagreed. Native Americans aren’t a death cult for resisting the people killing them, a death cult would be accepting their deaths. They are victims because the war was aggression launched against them, that would also be the case if they won. By your logic if a burglar takes your home and kills you when you try to stop him we should be waxing poetic about how you were a death cult and would have done the same in his shoes and that’s just history.

That’s the point, if the government because authoritarian and ban enough Americans with guns could have the option of outlasting them with guerrilla tactics

It matters because ceding the linguistic ground is the same as ceding land in a war, it is another layer of the battle, a more sophisticated and more important layer. If your enemy defines the narrative, you already lost .