Raze

He actually relied less on his looks since his focus was on going indirect and avoiding rejection, not high volume and going direct

- pushing for affirmative action and specific funding to support women in areas they are less represented in, but not doing as much and in some cases being hostile to efforts to do the same for men. Currently the gender gap in college grads in the US is as large as it was when they began major projects to increase women graduating, but women in fact still have more scholarship money and I see feminists actually angry or mocking efforts to increase male graduates. For example a recent hit piece on the influencer Scott Galloway whose been pushing a similar message. - demanding women increase their individual economic power and work force participation which naturally kicks many men down the economic rung due to competition, but still demanding men earn as much or more than them and be high status to be worthwhile mates, see hosts of articles like this - demonizing men for taking the lead in pursuing women but still demand men pursue and demonize them for not doing so. There are many similar examples where they push cultural messaging supporting chivalrous traditions that benefit women and shame men who don’t do them, but also attack any such institution that had gendered expectations of women Similar incoherent demands such as attacking men for not being emotionally vulnerable but then immediately after they begin to be coining terms like mankeeping or emotional labor to demonize men when they express emotions and seek emotional support.

The biggest problem with modern feminism few mention is the inconsistency. Even incorrect or ineffective ideas can be made to work if they are consistent. So often I listen to feminists and they are just using feminist theory for rationalizing their own feelings and preferences without considering if it is consistent with their other demands. I don’t think seeking complete equity between men and women is a good idea, but I think it could more or less be functional if done consistently. But the same feminists demanding this want to maintain the forms of disparity they feel benefit them but it conflicts with their other demands and that’s not sustainable.

https://www.girlschase.com/article/attraction-models-can-you-combine-vac-sac https://s3.amazonaws.com/Misc-USA/SYSTEM+SOCIAL+CHARM-Aura2016.pdf

Why should they? Women said they are strong and independent and don’t need no man, so what don’t they take responsibility. Mothers dominate the household, women are all the teachers, men can’t say anything about how to educate boys without being pre-approved by women. They’re raising these men, it’s time they take responsibility for it.

Yes, but israel is still doing it, thanks to people like you who fight to stop any accountability for their crimes

Why would you be in a relationship with an asexual? Do you want a dead bedroom

Yes he is narcissistic and got stuck in his ways. When did he say that? In the book he mentions it’s wrong to sleep with a woman under the pretense you committed then to discard her. You need to keep in mind he was coming up in a time where most guys didn’t even think you could get better with women or thought you just get women by having a job and buying them stuff. There were no YouTube videos with full infield. In that context it’s insane how many many insights he had. - smiling, eye contact, and talking louder on the open, 99% of guys fail to do this but it increases open dramatically - how to approach groups - negs, body rocking, these are nuanced topics so most guys do it wrong but when done correctly allowed average guys to open girls who normally are dating models and rockstars and would automatically reject everyone - false time constraints, simple way to dramatically increase opening success - preselection and other attraction switches to directly create interest, keep in mind before mystery most people had no idea this was even possible, also examples of creating preselection like merging sets and pivots - concept of attraction before comfort, remember most guys and most advice was all about comfort first and got guys friend zoned or worse when the girl had no interest in connecting because she wasn’t interested - qualification, one of his former students Sin said prior to learning this he slept with 8 girls in his life, after implementing this he slept with 8 in a month - moving locations creates the illusion of more time spent together creating rapid comfort - frame control as a concept at all Keep in mind before mystery there was little effective advice, most guys good with women didn’t know what they were doing right and didn’t care to tell others, he was the first resource that broke down everything and turned it into a system that can be logically understood. And yes, the complexity is the issue because most guys lack the baseline skill and experience to understand and apply it. Ironically though he democratized game advice to guys in a way he showed the dangers of presenting too high level concepts to people at a time when most weren’t ready or the tools of transmission weren’t adequate.

I think that’s because it’s easier to do but isn’t necessarily the best way

I hate pedophiles not just for the crimes but how they create so much distrust and paranoia in society. I also wonder if there are any theories on how they keep ending up in positions of influence.