Raze

Member
  • Content count

    7,213
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Raze

  • Rank
    - - -

Personal Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

14,815 profile views
  1. The most effective and least painful execution method would be the guillotine, it’s also far cheaper. But because it looks worse the use a more difficult method of injections.
  2. Read the history of the Jews in Rome. It’s eerily similar. They’ve arguably risked the state multiple times in seeking expansion and Aggrievement. They refused diplomatic offers to return the Sinai and only did so after the 73 war and when they had unsustainable levels of military spending. For decades they were told endless occupation was not sustainable and they needed to partition and instead they installed settlements for the stated reason of making partition impossible, meaning they are forcing maintaining millions of Palestinians in their orbit knowing a national movement for rights would ruin their situation where Jews are the majority with rights. They have since been going out of their way to insult every ally they have. Starmer went against his entire voting base to not push measures against them, after he resigned they began discussing measures, and the idf who killed the British WCK workers stated he was proud of it, they then got sanctioned. Germany has gone out of its way to defend them, and they publicly lambast Merz for mild criticism. After helping them cover up settler violence for years Huckabee finally had to say something after they killed multiple Americans, to just look like he is doing something, and they spray painted insults towards him on Palestinian homes and did an attack within viewing distance of him. They’re also threatening Turkey now. This isn’t rational.
  3. The difference is that was accidental friendly fire, whereas Hamas offered to release the hostages and Israel rejected and did indiscriminate bombing and shooting knowing they’d harm their own hostages. That’s because Zionism prioritizes harming Palestinians over protecting Jews.
  4. Does nothing inherent in Christianity about supporting Israel. America was always Christian and didn’t care about evicting Palestinians until the 20th century. Christian Zionism is a relatively recent phenomenon.
  5. 1) both the family being spared and the testimony of the Oct 7 survivor are direct quotes from them that were reported in Israeli media 2) IDF targeting families has been affirmed by multiple IDF whistleblowers testimony. https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClRY-8Z_LYw There is no “brainwashing” I’m responding to the evidence, in reality you are brainwashed to support IDF unconditionally and while knowing this is true want to distract to hide it so it keeps occurring.
  6. It’s relevant because there are other examples of this, Hamas releasing children who they could have killed. Compared to Israel which had a protocol of specifically waiting until targets were near families of children to try and kill the children as well.
  7. Because the US wasn’t binded on hatred for a specific group responsible as a national goal like hatred for Palestinians is what binds Zionism. When America responded to 9/11 notice how the language was about we are bringing freedom and democracy. When Israel reacted it was calling the enemy human animals, amalek, calling for a second Nakba. In both cases the government calls back to the true core principles that unite the people in their messaging. Also in both cases the actual action was for the interests of those actually in power.
  8. Dj Fuji is 5’4 and got married Neil Strauss is 5’6 and publicly dated a famous musician and his ex wife was a model
  9. It was Facebook posts with words by difference in use by gender or something
  10. Unfortunately this simply does not line up with real life experiences. People have different personalities, demographics interests, and yes intelligence and development level. The average person is not interested in dense conversations about philosophy or high level emotional understanding. Their conversational interests is more like this and you will need to relate to them on that level to get anywhere socially. You’re assuming they don’t already do that, that’s actually what they do and why they’re frustrated by the shallow nature of relationships without being on the same wavelength intellectually.