Raze

@Leo Gura you should add an update to that video or make a sequel with this in mind.

- Israel was using the US to strong arm Saudi Arabia into normalizing with it without ending the occupation of Palestine, trying to make their oppression permanent. Oct 7 stopped it for now. - Exposed the Zionist idea that they can occupy millions of Palestinians without significant enough issues as false, the occupation has a cost in security and economics. That’s exactly how French Algeria ended. - Brought the attention of the world right when Israel’s masked slipped and the world saw their true face, israel is now the most hated country in the world particularly among young people - It doesn’t matter what it accomplished or not. When I hear about the Warsaw Ghetto uprising or the Nat Turner rebellion my first thought isn’t “what did that accomplish? You all died”, my first thought is why the world allows people to go through the nightmare of oppression that leads them to do something like that.

The goal of the siege of Berlin wasn’t to destroy the population to replace them. The goal was to capture the capital of a independent nation state that has launched aggression at them. As soon as that happened it stopped and they began to rebuild Germany. The Israelis are rather doing to Palestinians more like what Americans did to native Americans, destroy them to replace them. If after the Soviets defeated Germany they then kept the Germans under permanent subjugation and brought in Russians to move into their homes and forced Germans into a ghetto and then later began trying to destroy them there declaring Germans don’t exist, that would be genocidal. Gaza isn’t a independent nation state, it’s a ghetto israel has blockaded and attacked for decades. A third of those killed on Oct 7 were Israeli security forces. Israel considers blockades acts of war and kept Gaza under blockade. So by your logic Oct 7 isn’t terrorism because israel made itself a legitimate war target. Those were the goals from the beginning as seen by multiple statements and acts. They tried to block all water and the US had to force them to stop. In the Rwanda genocide and the holocaust, there were multiple attempts at expelling portions of the targeted population. Also insisting Gaza can’t be a genocide because it’s not like the holocaust or Rwanda is like saying Iraq and Syria couldn’t be wars because they weren’t like world war 1 or 2. Those are two larger examples, but not the definition. Gaza fits just fine with the Bosnian genocide or Yazidi genocide.

Did US officials declare their goal was to kill and expel iraqs population to replace them with Americans than destroy 90% of residential infrastructure and try to starve them for months before they were pressured to stop?

Breath is used for spiritual development because it exposes unconsciousness. A relationship bringing up unconsciousness is itself spiritual development because that is the opportunity for purification.

What's the point of breathing? The whole operation is not genuine because it is ultimately driven by people's living desires. You're not genuinely broadening your horizons when there's breathing involved because the underlying urges drive a lot of it. Else you can just stop breathing and move on. And since the whole venture is corrupted, it's a distraction. You will almost certainly get sucked into this unconscious behavior. The whole escaping comformity Leo talks about? Get ready for more of it, much more conformity when breathing. Much more lower consciousness. That's another thing: you're entering into a giant pool of normie, low consciousness gunk. It's very unlikely your breathing will value truth, insight or thinking for yourself. People who breath don't care about those things. Idk maybe I'm cynical. Can we all agree breathing is not expanding your consciousness because of it's thick survival bias? It begs the question: why breath at all? To me it's a headache, more admin. I don't want to live, so what's the point?

Clavicular like Tate is ultimately a sad story about how society treats men and it leads them down dark paths. A young Tate grew up multiracial in a rough environment with a father who was in and out of his life, and had to create a hard exterior and a cut throat personality to survive. He read books by pimps and his vision of success became opulence. This just lead to him spiraling to more and more extremes. A young clavicular was prone to hyper fixating and isolating, so when he was bullied for his looks and isolated leading to him discovering blackpill forums. His way to status was by going to extremes for his looks and telling outlandish stories on the forums for attention. This just lead to his insecurity on his appearance increasing more and more. Everyone is quick to say they are toxic and represent perversions of masculinity, yet their biggest critics just fall into their frames. Tate critics say his wealth is fake, that women are disgusted by him, his fans are being scammed and will suck with women. Clavicular is most often mocked for his lack of social skills and looks. Everyone said the Australian reporter who made him rage quit “mogged” him. This is however just making any of their fans further entrenched in their beliefs. The implication is money, women, and looks actually is what makes a man and signify his status, and status is what actually matters if that is what targets it. People will say it’s their fault for being toxic, but in the end that is what the mainstream media rewards with attention, and non-toxic people are attacked regardless. Why did 60 minutes interview Clavicular and not a level headed a attraction teacher? Anthony Robbins is fairly wholesome and journalists were trying to cancel him long before Tate blew up. Justin Baldoni tried to be a pro feminist male influencer and he also got cancelled. Ironically it was his female fan base who defended him despite him pushing the believe all women message and being accused by a woman. In a recent talk Owen Cook basically said he thinks any guy who isn’t born socially privileged and wealthy is screwed despite thinking success was totally learnable. He pointed out he had hundreds of people who went to his training and went on to become billionaires, famous, influencers, and none of them would ever publicly say they knew him or ever was a unsuccessful male who learned success in dating or similar fields, because it would mean associating with such men.

Saying Sartain represents redpill is like saying some legitimate male stylist who uses some bp terms represents blackpill. Kind of associated but not really comparable to 99% of the rest of the space.

That’s already happened a few times. I don’t think Clav will set anything off, I don’t think he has fans in the normal sense, they vicariously live through him but kind of want him to fail.

It’s actually the opposite, Palestinians and Israel critics have shifted because they realized the liberal Zionists and Israel’s far right are the same. It is a zero sum game because that is how they view it, the narrative they would ever accept Palestinian self determination was just a ploy to buy time to further destroy Palestine. In the case of the left, they used to support Israel. However Israel continued to engage in aggression, expand occupation and settlements, and crush Palestinian protest. Then the left shifted to a middle ground two state support. Israel than engaged in a policy designed to make two states impossible. Since Oct 7 this has become so blatant and it became more obvious the goal was to strangle the Palestinians until there was a reaction to justify wiping them out which is why the left turned away from supporting Israel’s “Jewish state” argument because it is clearly just being used to distract and deflect long enough for them to finish the destruction of Palestine. Every liberal Zionist argument works this way. You once again brought up the Gaza pullout like it was somehow a good faith attempt at peace that Palestinians rejected. In reality Ariel Sharon’s chief aid specifically said the goal was to pause the peace process, and leaked emails show the head of Israel military intelligence saying they were glad Hamas would win the election so they can treat Gaza as a hostile entity. Because that was the goal, they turned Gaza into a ghetto and used it as a distraction to expand the occupation of the West Bank. Going as far as funding Hamas themselves. This is also what happened with Palestinians. There were many polls showing a majority of Palestinians supported a two state solution. In 2006 it was 70%, as late as 2017 polls found 51%. The PA already agreed to it under the Arab peace initiative (and no they did not demand a full right of return to end the jewish state). But every time it just is used as a cudgel to beat them with. What exactly is irrational here? There are long periods of minimal to no violent resistance by Palestinians, Israel doesn’t budge an inch, they finally have an uprising that Israel responds to so brutally it leads to international pressure that they actually stop holding an entire people hostage, Israel puts forward nonsense offers that even pro-Israel negotiators admit they wouldn’t accept, and it repeats, all the while we see Zionists openly celebrating more land being stolen. The former head of shin bet himself noted in an interview how so called liberal Israeli leaders would try to campaign on saying they built more settlements or successfully resisted removing them, and now it was absurd Palestinians would expect to trust them as legitimately seeking a end to their subjugation. In fact exit polls on the election Hamas won even found a majority of Hamas voters in Gaza supported two states. What happened was Israel continued to sabotage two states by putting forward deals calling for permanent occupation, acting like Palestinians block peace when they reject agreeing to their own permanent dispossession, then installing more and more illegal settlements with the stated intention of making two states impossible. Liberal Zionists only ever enabled this. Did they support pressuring Israel to negotiate the Arab peace initiative? Did they support pressuring Israel to remove its demands in its offers which were no-go for the Palestinians? No. Did they support non-violent Palestinian resistance? No, they worked to outlaw it and make sure weapons flow continued to Israel while they massacred peaceful protestors. The UK just did meager sanctions of settlements for the stated goal of wanting them to stop trying to destroy two states, and the liberal Zionists responded with a media campaign accusing them of antisemitism. It was always zero sum to Zionists, it just took the destruction of the people of Gaza for more people to realize this and that by going along with their media narrative they actually ever wanted a just solution was just enabling them. Frankly even that wasn’t enough, at this point they’re physically bringing down the world economy over their insane desire to protect a few hundred thousand squatters. The biggest pushback isn’t even people who care about Palestinians at this point.

That is false, Israel’s regulations were already lower than the US and they loosened them further, knowing Gaza had higher civilian density to allow for more civilians to be harmed https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-military-loosened-rules-engagement-start-gaza-war-new-york-times-reports-2024-12-26/ The entire country trying to ban the film they haven’t seen yet actually proves that.

For comparison, Afghanistan and Iraq have 10-20x the population as Gaza, and those wars went on for 7x as long, And israel killed more children in Gaza, than were killed in Afghanistan and Iraq combined. Israelis are currently trying to cancel a documentary that exposes this exactly, because they know it’s true but they support it and want it to continue, and the world finding out more would make it harder.

Completely wrong, you have 0 understanding of history or the current situation. Stop commenting on issues you don’t know anything about when you aren’t interested in learning, you and a couple of other users have been posting the same nonsense misinformation for multiple years now and ignoring everytime someone tears it apart and just repeating easily debunked claims while insisting everyone else is just attached to propaganda. If you aren’t interested in doing the bare minimum research stop replying and wasting peoples time.