Raze

None of that is backed up by science

Yet women constantly complain about being permanent girlfriends, curious.

Looks matter only insofar as they fulfill the emotional state needed to progress things forward, you still need to progress it, and there are other ways to fulfill said states

He actually relied less on his looks since his focus was on going indirect and avoiding rejection, not high volume and going direct

- pushing for affirmative action and specific funding to support women in areas they are less represented in, but not doing as much and in some cases being hostile to efforts to do the same for men. Currently the gender gap in college grads in the US is as large as it was when they began major projects to increase women graduating, but women in fact still have more scholarship money and I see feminists actually angry or mocking efforts to increase male graduates. For example a recent hit piece on the influencer Scott Galloway whose been pushing a similar message. - demanding women increase their individual economic power and work force participation which naturally kicks many men down the economic rung due to competition, but still demanding men earn as much or more than them and be high status to be worthwhile mates, see hosts of articles like this - demonizing men for taking the lead in pursuing women but still demand men pursue and demonize them for not doing so. There are many similar examples where they push cultural messaging supporting chivalrous traditions that benefit women and shame men who don’t do them, but also attack any such institution that had gendered expectations of women Similar incoherent demands such as attacking men for not being emotionally vulnerable but then immediately after they begin to be coining terms like mankeeping or emotional labor to demonize men when they express emotions and seek emotional support.

The biggest problem with modern feminism few mention is the inconsistency. Even incorrect or ineffective ideas can be made to work if they are consistent. So often I listen to feminists and they are just using feminist theory for rationalizing their own feelings and preferences without considering if it is consistent with their other demands. I don’t think seeking complete equity between men and women is a good idea, but I think it could more or less be functional if done consistently. But the same feminists demanding this want to maintain the forms of disparity they feel benefit them but it conflicts with their other demands and that’s not sustainable.

https://www.girlschase.com/article/attraction-models-can-you-combine-vac-sac https://s3.amazonaws.com/Misc-USA/SYSTEM+SOCIAL+CHARM-Aura2016.pdf

Why should they? Women said they are strong and independent and don’t need no man, so what don’t they take responsibility. Mothers dominate the household, women are all the teachers, men can’t say anything about how to educate boys without being pre-approved by women. They’re raising these men, it’s time they take responsibility for it.

Yes, but israel is still doing it, thanks to people like you who fight to stop any accountability for their crimes

Why would you be in a relationship with an asexual? Do you want a dead bedroom