Tanz

@Hardkill Even when you love a candidate having them rule for too long is dangerous for the country; that's why they set term limits. That being said, they need to create term limits for Supreme Court positions.

Kyle offers some good commentary.

Despite some people may dislike him for his "anti" covid vax stance, if you look at the totality of his political career, he's been consistent in his beliefs. I think he could clean up the democratic party at the very least, divide it to the point where people may feel there are some honest actors in the democratic party. Like what Trump did to the republican party, RFK can do to the Dems. I can see a situation where he somehow becomes president where his life may be on the line, just as JFK was.

Fox must have been smart enough to create a contract just like the sports teams do for the athletes to prevent them from going to another team. If he quits, he doesn't get paid, and he can't go to another competitor in the case of firing him, Fox is contractually obligated to pay him or give up the contract to allow him to work anywhere. I believe the source is Megan Kelly so there must be some kind of legitimacy. It works well for Tucker because he gets paid to do nothing and it may be smart for Fox to hold his contract so he doesn't eat away from their revenue during the election.

If Tucker were smart, he would go completely independent and start his own thing on Rumble instead of being attached to Dailywire or whomever. It's reported Tucker is still officially under contract with Fox and it may not end until X amount of time, some people are speculating they will hold the contract until after the election.

No, they are not safe except the recent vax that was made for you know what, its the safest

Any time you get any type of ism or ist you will get some resistance because whenever people get married to any type of identity there will be failures.

Tucker has spoken against the military-industrial complex. He also talked about the Jan 6 insurrection, and he interviewed Robert F Kennedy Jr to talk about corruption with big pharma not to mention he was trying to get an interview with Putin which was probably the biggest reason IMHO

Once people realize being married to any specific identity is greatly limiting then we wouldn't have to obsess about gender, race sexuality, pronouns or any sort. People getting riled up about such things on either side are spiritually immature.

If the entire world had the same system of governing things would not work on a macro level. Socialism or capitalism works on those country where it works because other countries are either worst off than them which allows them to function. ie some African countries, China with its low cost labor, Apple factories in China had to suicide proof their factories because workers were literally killing themselves so apple could be the most valuable company in the world. North Korea undoubtedly offers lots of resources to China which in turn creates cheap Chinese products to sell on Amazon When people live well, others have to suffer in return. The survival game is real ugly and I don't think anyone really has an idea to change that.

Dont worry; humans have a wonderful imagination. If there weren't guns, they would use other means. In fact guns are not very effective compared to other things someone can make or create if they wanted to hurt lots of people. The human intellect and imagination is the most dangerous tool

The conversation needs to be had. I prefer humans to reduce it and have criteria for when and when not to. If it's for boner medication then no. The type of animal would matter too. Rats and mice have lower priority, whereas primates should be ranked higher. I don't know if I want to live for 10 or 20 years longer if it means torturing a bunch of monkeys. I have even asked my kids if they were dying, would they want animals to be tortured so they can live, and they said no. On the other hand, I can understand why people would do such things, and certainly, I can understand what a parent would do to save their child. At the very least, there should be some prayer or ritual in the name of the animals that are "giving up" their lives, like in Avatar or what Native Americans used to do when they hunted. We are more conscious than them, so our responsibility is higher. Despite of where Cov#d came from, it's fair to say our meddling with nature caused it. Karma has a mysterious way of working its way back to humans. We can consider such events as tax being paid. The tax bill wasn't that high, considering. A tax bill that costs less than 1% of us isn't expensive compared to the animals we wiped out of extinction or dramatically reduced their population. Without medicine, we wouldn't be where we are, but we are at a time in history where consuming less, and taking less from the environment will save us more than producing new medicines and even technologies. Here is a terrible video about monkeys being tested on by vice:

Getting rid of medicine that uses animals will be difficult because humans weigh human life is more valuable than animals. From there, it becomes an argument on who or what you love more. Lab-grown meat is a new thing, and the jury is still out there on whether or not it's safe to eat in the long run compared to the diet humans have been eating for more than 4 million years. If it all comes out to be a mistake to go in that direction it could bankrupt entire countries because the rise in healthcare cost. Every chronic disease known to man results in "science" being clever by manipulating nature or developing cost-effective processes to increase profit. Our technology is improving life for humans but costing the environment tremendously. I instead grow my food and raise my fish and chickens as a protein source. Regenerative farming ironically reverses climate change, and the best part is people don't have to stop eating meat; in fact, doing so would be better for the environment. https://www.syngentagroup.com/en/regenerative-agriculture https://regenerationinternational.org/why-regenerative-agriculture/

This thread is meant to excite people; if you are even half awake you wouldn't fall for it. It's crazy how many people are responding to it lol

From what I hear from Russian people, it seems true.

The same reason they can't stop anyone in their own countries. The underlying problem is the citizens not bold and intelligent enough to take proper action. Putin is no fool, he managed to climb up the ranks of the KGB and manage a country that is riddled with gangsters. He had to be the #1 gangster to pull that off. I don't think he has anyone to challenge him, and from the looks of it, they seem unified in their country. Anyone that contested against them in any sort of power is probably either dead or in jail.

I'd be interested in a documentary following a few trans people in everyday life and seeing how society treats them. I think one of the many problems the right have with trans they don't come across them to understand them.

Walls are too expensive. It would be easier to use some kind of heat mapping imaging, lidar or something along those lines

Yes, it is possible, but it is extremely rare because most people do not have the physiology to be sensitive enough to receive the information. Even people that have access to psychedelics do not all become fully realized.

Yes, as is anything under the realm of existence, including even inorganic matter.

Except for puppies, cute children, and gorgeous women, someone from royal blood, most people worldwide have to earn respect. I have had women reject me and tell me to my face I'm too short for them. My feelings were hurt initially, but expecting them to give me a chance would be unreasonable. Nonetheless, its good to have a conversation on treating trans people fairly but we have to be real here, they aren't going to cast a trans Wonder Woman to make trans people feel better. Someone like Gal Gadot will make a room stop and look at her with awe, that's why they cast her as Wonder Woman.

Which exclusions are you talking about? In things like college admissions, race and gender both exclude one group and include another while overlooking academic performance. If you solely focus on academic performance, then you exclude another group. When it comes to these things, as with just about everything, things are not so black and white.

For the most part, most people agree Trans women should not compete against women in sports, by allowing them to do so ironically alienates biological women from striving in their sport. Some women feel insecure with a trans woman is in the bathroom with them. Should we ignore how they feel because a trans person feels they are being discriminated against? As a man, if a trans man is in the bathroom with even a beautiful woman or me, I would not at all feel uncomfortable. An obvious solution would be to have three bathrooms. One for men, one for women, and the other a neutral one. On the other hand, imagine the cost it would take on taxpayers in public places and businesses if we added bathrooms wherever there are bathrooms inside buildings. Trans account for about maybe 1% of the population. If the effort is given to that population, what about other minorities that perhaps deserve more attention, such as indigenous ones? I have plenty of gay friends, but I don't come across any trans people in my life, except when I go shopping in the stores and I see one working. People want to change overnight, but it takes time for these things; ultimately, it's all about personal exposure. It is difficult for most people, and it's unreasonable to expect others to sympathize with your suffering because they also suffer in different ways. They are making the trans issue a BIG issue because they are trying to distract people from more significant problems. This allows them to not work on actual cases that the majority face in their lives.

If they create a form of socialism, then it will be harder for an individual to acquire wealth and make a difference. Democracy will he harder because the wealthy will have less competition. If you keep things the same, then there will be a big gap between rich and poor this will and has undermined democracy. These problems are rooted beyond systems that come from man, rather something more fundamental in creation. All you have to do is walk down the street and count how many good-looking women and men you see.

The older people get, the less they want change to happen. It's easy to fall into nostalgia. Also, once you lived long enough, and worked hard, it's easy to get cynical when you hear other people complaining about things. I think people leaning more right than the left is a method both parties are trying to do in order to balance things out. Even if that is not the case, the side making more money are the people with a university degree and leans left; power corrupts and the corruption on the left is greater because there is more access to money. Before all that big oil, the automobile industry and other commodities have been a source of the world's wealth until the dot com boom in the 90s started to slowly shift the tide. Now technology and data is the new oil.