Norbert Lennartz

@Shiva Is this a warning or admonition or directive or educational measure or something the Pope said?

The question you should ask yourself is, how would I develop myself if I had to do it against my expectations? So as not to be surprised by any external events. For example, that crypto technology suddenly makes tax revenues impossible. Or that the monasteries are confiscated, as Henry VIII of England did. Or the currency collapses so that you can find the notes in the gutter like in Venezuela.

It's no coincidence that a state monopoly works like a mafia syndicate. The mafia produces security. And if it can do that long enough, then it does it a bit far, so people say, wow, yes, without them I wouldn't know how to do that. Al Capone opens soup kitchens, which he did. After a while everyone says, oh, look, he's good to us. How else could we have managed that? What kind of stupid argument is that? You are occupied with opinions. And then you think, if enough voices come together, then that's probably right. Are you stupid? In Germany we now have knife stabbers and rapists to supply, because public opinion about immigration has turned 180 degrees in a short time without any apparent reason. And this is just one example among many things that all go down the drain. The grandma then still chooses a Christian Nazi successor party, because she doesn't know otherwise. The Fiat Money system alone. Anyone could know that this is a fake money system. But nothing happens. Are you kidding me because social development takes time? These systems will all have to collapse at some point. But now I've told way too much stuff. You have to deal with metaphysics. What is absolute? Instead I hear, yes, Laissez faire is of course a political ideology. Voluntary cooperation is a dangerous political ideology. Sure. The love associated with it must be a political ideology. But democracy, no, that is not an ideology. Democracy is God. The state is God. Coercion is a great idea to do something very social. Not to catch criminals, no, to let criminals in, or yet, but only small fish, we build roads with it, we build schools with it, we bake bread with it and in the end do a lot of stupid stuff with it.

For my part, it would have been a political discussion if I had addressed the traps that had been set.

when it is? straw man fallacy

What more can I say? It is not about being right. It is about wanting to understand the most important thing of all. Amen.

One last loving attempt. What is wrong with laissez faire? Is it greed, fear, ignorance, ideology or laissez faire? What is order? Greed, fear, ignorance, ideology, aggression, blackmail - is it order or disorder? Laissez faire, voluntary cooperation, respect, decency - Is it in conflict with love or with order? Are you really all so stupid?

This etatist discussion of tanks, liars, Marxists, ignorants, preachers, ideologues has the quality of the Greta Thunberg Hype, only another topic.

@Shadowraix It's not worth commenting on. First do your homework and learn economics of the Austrian School. But you don't want that. Trollery.

@Knock You're thanking the Mafia. That is so sick.

Of course, taxes are robbery. It takes a world view, a firmly burnt-in self-image, to negate this. It is pure, acquired fear and ignorance. The fear that something important would be missing without a nanny state.

Put all the eggs in one basket, and watch the basket carefully.

If you have to steal, steal, don't talk. That's an ideological prejudice. The materialists are of course the ones who want to live on stolen money. The taxes do not benefit the collective. That is impossible. It is an expensive zero-sum game. If state would be such a great thing, as you suggest, why is state not a voluntary thing? But in an unhindered society all productive actions are a gain for everyone. The more untaxed production can be, the more goods, the cheaper the prices. To take a look at the poor, on the other hand, is a mockery of 800 million undernourished people in the world.

Thank you very much for your question, although it is not meant seriously. lol There are several reasons. 1. Leo can benefit from it. He can make better videos. So it's a gift for Leo. 2. it's important to understand the big picture. 3. all this can be justified without making politics. 4. there are a lot of victims because of that who don't know why they are victims. 5. there are even Buddhists who get lost on the way to higher levels of spiral dynamics into a "fucking" green party. (In the German Green Party there were actually members with child fuck fantasies. Joke, but no joke.) 6. we would all benefit enormously from not filling the world with conflicts. This is basically the life's work of Jiddu Krishnamurti. 7. I have my fun. I can make jokes that seem to hurt others. But why do they hurt?

Leos examples: "What needs defending us is all the fabricated identities. Christians, Jews, Muslims, atheists as well. An atheist is a fabricated identity. A scientist is a fabricated identity." I add: Republican, Democrat, Classic Liberal, Etatist, judge, nearly all officials and active party memberships and all feet kissers of Greta Thunberg as well.

yes, to all.

@Shaun No. What are they supposed to say, except selfish nonsense.? Just invest in a few blue chips that you can understand personally. And then you just keep them. That is the safest way. Also in silver.

Must see.

If you haven't found anything doubtful like the Etatism, then you are caught.

What great stuff! Years ago I had been involved with Evolutionary Biology. But the known authors are not so fundamental. That's why I got stuck. I recently studied the work of Humberto Maturana and combined it with Ludwig von Mises. This was undoubtedly informative in many respects. The further combination with these videos by Leo Gura (respectively Peter Ralston) broaden my horizon once more. That is invaluable.

But is there something in our lives that is not survival? Wait a minute. Trying to be the way I am. Not trying to become something. Not trying to resist. Because life is based on movement. Hmm. I could let myself freeze.

.. Leo said. Let's debunk. What is not thinking in the widest sense?

A simplest answer would be: You recognize it when you are one with God. But that doesn't help as long as you are not. So I have put together a theory that harmonizes with non-duality. voila. It makes no claim to truth. But it works quite well for me. Past: It is in the memory.

You need to filter that. I cannot speak any other way because I am also affected by self-identification. Your consciousness arises from the fleeting moment in the course of the structure, where the memories of the past are projected into the present.

These are only analogies. "Your" consciousness about all this, as a state in the now, arises from the course of the autopoietic structure. And because this repeats itself constantly and you identify yourself with it, you think there is a constant of the "I", which is of course a great self-delusion. So you are not you. You are the self-delusion itself. Can you follow me? I would be wondering.