rnd

Is it true for all Ayahuasca ceremonies? We had 1) honey drink b) 2 tea drinks How to know which of the two, Dmt or 5meo DMT, is used on a concreate ceremony?

I usually skip breakfast and the 1st time I eat is around 11:00 or 12:00. However, before that I also drink coffee in a coffeeshop -- black esperesso, with no sugar , no milk. And there's always a dilema: (1) have some fruits at home before drinking coffee (2) have nothing and only drink coffee For some time I went with (2) then switched to (1). And now I question the process again. Fasting and non-fasting windows for me have been 12h-12h for several years, but I want to make the fasting one longer. If I have some fruits before coffee, then that'll break my fasting window of time restrictive eating, by several hours, right? On the other hand, if I have coffee as the 1st meal per day, then it won't break my fasting window, but: coffee alone, as the 1st meal after 12 hours fasting, I guess, is harmful for the stomach. Not?

Doing nothing isn't an option because in the mornings I work with my laptop in a coffeshop, while my head is fresh. I don't drink tea, except when I may be sick with flu. And in coffeeshops there's no great tea anyway, they have only the cheapest crap which hardly can be called tea.

I drink strong coffee on purpose. What do you mean by "otherwise it doesn't matter" ? Heal what? I do it for health. What else can fasting be used for?

There's "time eating window" which is recommended to be 8-10 hours. What's that window precisely? Let's say, I'd eat 8:00 til 18:00 -- any time I want, any amount, like a pig. But from 18:00-8:00 of the next day - no food. That is, the window will be 10 hours: from 8-18; consequently, non-eating window - 14 hours. The former can be descreased, as the latter increased. Is that what how it's supposed to work?

You mean, per 24 hours you eat only within the window of 2-6 hours? Multiple times? And you fast during 18h-22 hours that are left?

I've liked this video: Why People WILLINGLY Give Up Their Freedoms W/ Prof. Mattias Desmet | Aubrey Marcus Podcast https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqPJiM5Ir3A The virus exists and is dangerous for **some people**, but this situation in the world, the narrative and non-sensical restrictions aren't only about the virus every country is innocently fighting against, and there's more to all that. No worries, 5G and Bill Gaits don't get mentioned

@Leo Gura there's, as well practical cases. The later for sure -- Mexico, at least, in December 2020 is an example. But you in "your current state of mind" won't be able to see that.

Such a pill, which among things can cure the same virus everyone is afraid about, exists for several decades already: Ivermectin

Of course. But prevention of a dease with a low mortality rate is done by.... healthy life-style. What a surpise. Non vaccinated people, and vaccinated too, who have no heath defects, simply don't have any issue with recovering from covid. For them it's nonthing but a flu. If you need a vaccine to prevent covid, or if you think you do, than either there're ALREADY problems with your health, or you've been watching and listening too much TV, news and wrong people. --- That doesn't imply that people don't die. They do. But look at the death rate. And compare it with deaths from other deases that occur and have been occuring always - cancer, diabet, yellow feaver, obesity, alcoholism, smoking... and so one.

Your theory is: a) scientifically wrong b) practically wrong a) there's no scientific theory that support the idea that mass vaccination, especially when a pandemic is going on, especially forceful, will stop it. None. However, there're scientific theories against it. b) look at the highly vaccinated countries: Korea, Singapore, Israel, most of Europe, even US. Do you see any sing of the defeated pandemic there? No. But what do you see? Right - surge in the infections and deaths, or spikes, and entrance into toilets by QR codes. And the fact that vaccinated now have begun to spread the virus only by themselves, for the most part. Therefore, you're spreading a lie while assuming that it's the truth.

Your problem is that you assume that there's a) only 1 virus - c19 - in this world and b) vaccine is the ONLY cure from it. That's a narrow naive worldview. There're 1000s of viruses out there. Some rare, some aren't. Let's take a 100 for simplicity. Then, using your reasoning: if you choose to live in the society, you'd have to give me, and everyone else, a 100% proof that you're not infected with ANY of those 100s of viruses, at ANY given time. And that proof must be not not pills, or immunity of a recovered, but with a vaccine. Go ahead and vaccinate yourself against 100 viruses. You can't? Then, lock yourself at home - you're dangerous for the society. --- You live in the society. Then accept it that you might get infected from someone, or infect some, no matter what. And are you certain that you've never infected anyone with, let's say, a influenza? Maybe that person, or people, died -- because of you. How can you know that that's not the case?

And somehow the anti-vaxxers/unvaccinated hasn't discriminated the pro-vaxxers. The former don't go around screaming "get de-vaxxed", "get unjabbed". Granted, some unvaccinated do scream some things. However, there haven't been any shops, cafes, entry requirements of a country, or places where "only anti-vaxxers/unvaccinated are allowed". Who among the two groups are more like fascists then? Who wants discrimination more?

I don't. I'm not that spiritual yet. As such, I even promote fu@@@ng prostitues for fun and pleasure. Ahhhaaa.

@Philipp if the governments listened to health experts, these nonsensical, non-working and stupid safety measures wouldn't be in place. Some do listen to them, but most - not (Europe, US, Canada, Australia) I've found that Japan, for instance, can be trusted in this situation. Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, probably, too. Most of Europe, US.... some others, mostly - not.

Precisely. Don't complain about others who are unvaccinated because it's YOU who has underlying heath problems and, thanks to those, c-19 is dangerous for YOU. For a normal person, who has no serious healh issues, whether it be flue, c19, headache or diarrhea - makes no difference. --- You're the representative of whole socienty who has the right to decide who can participate in it, who not? Or what? No say, no power -- that's what you have. No?

After omicron there'll, probably, emerge shomicron, gomicron, somicron, tomicron, delta, shmelta, gorelta and so on. The solution is, according to mass media of EU, US, CA, AU, their governments and some others as well, and those angry pro-vaxxers (not all but the most angry ones) and big farma, apparently, to get jabbed every half a year, or even every several months as it's in Greece already, against every possible variant. And this is only against this virus. The thing is, the natural immunity lasts normally, 1 year I guess, and is stronger because it includes antibodies AND T-cell memory; whereas the immunity from these vaccines lasts short periods of time and doesn't include T-cell immunity, but only antibodies, and the lattter even don't generated in all the cases. I fugure that after several vaccines and boosters the immune system of a person will say "I no longer am capable to generate protection by myself. Give me a vaccine". And such person has gotten himself on the hook.

In the 1st world countries the vaccination rate is 60...90%, even close to 100% in some smaller countries. For the herd immunity around 60% is enough. So, where is the herd immunity promissed by the governemtns and mass media, by "doctors", by vaccinated warriours, around a year ago? Everyone has forgotten already? Instead, there're new lockdowns, more cases and more deaths in the most vaccinated countries. In some countries, more so than when noone was vaccinated. More vaccinated, more cases, and more deaths, that is. Not less, not the same, but more! Who, or what, to blame this time? Where is that promissed heard immunity?

@Carl-Richard You've first divided people by vaccinated-unvaccinated and blamed unvaccinated for everything. Now, after I've shown you data that dispooves you and shows that vaccinated are the ones to blame too, increasingly, you're trying to change your mind and adjust for age and heath as well. Sneaky. --- * Healthy person recovers with no problem, even without a vaccine. * Very unhealthy person dies, even with a vaccine. * Some what healthy-unhealthy may benefit from those experimental vaccines. But the percentage of such people is low; 5-10% I guess. And they're the ones who probably should take those vaccines, as FOR THOSE people THOSE experimental vaccines may be beneficial.

You adjust your position depending on what's more convenient. Not? So, does remaining healthy and alive in this global situation have to do more with: a) one's current health / age or b) vaccination status ?

Japan's health authority admits there're side effects from some vaccines; doesn't push vaccines onto its citizens and recommends to assess risks(!) and benefits first, if one decides to go ahead https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/covid-19-japan-places-myocarditis-warning-on-vaccines-requires-informed-consent/ Compare it to Europe, Canada, US, AU, some other countries wherein people get jabbed like cattle.

You've just admited that "we didn't know in the past", but are trying to predict what would've happened otherwise. Or vise versa: nothing would have happened, because c-19 isn't a bubonic plague. As nothing outlandish happens with Influenza pandemic which happens every year or two, in many countries. And it's happening RIGHT NOW in Rio de Janeiro where I am now, and the figures are way higher than from c-19. But every idiot is busy with looking at c-19. --- Protection and minimising a risk are about taking care about your heath, by a) proper food b) proper lifestyle and not by injecting experimental serum into your body, especially every half a year.

Covid-19: Scotland’s official figures almost testify to ‘pandemic of the fully vaccinated’ https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/covid-19-fully-vaccinated-account-for-9-in-every-10-covid-19-deaths-in-scotland-since-august-according-to-latest-official-data/ Using the same logic, pro-vaxxers should be locked up then.

Ahhhh, those people (governments, toxic vaccine-warriours, most doctors) who assumed they knew -- didn't know..... I see.... that explains everything! But tell me: how did and do vaccine-sceptics DO know that? They were able to forsee that our knowledge could be limited then, and precisely because of that they were, and some are, against mass vaccination? Does the knowledge of pro-vaccine people incorporate the fact that, the same way, there might be something unknown now, again, about side-effects of these "safe" c-19 vaccines?

It's astonishing that some weak people with shitty health give advice to healthy people of how to care about health.