rnd

You're claiming this because you've thought of this extensively and haven't found anything? Or are you repeating someone's words?

The video about Maturity: Why did you, Leo, in the past choose to become a game designer with nice salary as opposed to a toilet cleaner for pennies? Nowadays, why are you selling your courses, or whatever you're making money as, as opposed to working in McDonalds or Starbucks? A low paying job in McDonalds, Starbucks or as a toilet clearner would still allow you to work on Actualized, smoke 5meoDmt and contemplate. However, it would've made all this more difficult, hence, more worth it and a new win would've been more rewarding. How dare are you Leo to have chosen an easier path? How dare? Otherwise, your video lacks a nuance

In some sense -- yes. However, one makes way more money from creating videos than from cleaning toilets. Provided that videos are of good quality and in demand by some people. And in case of the videos one creates leverage, assets, earn money even during sleep. Cleaning toilets doesn't give you any leverage, recognition, doen't build brain mussle, doesn't give moral contenment. Shitty job. Which of the 2 jobs is then easier ? Or better? And which is more difficult? So Leo has chosen an easier job or activity. But in his video about Maturity he claimed that one, if one is mature, shouldn't seek easier ways.

"Why has Leo chosen an easier path" -> "Because an easier path is in reality a harder one" -> "Who says so?" -> "Leo, in his yet another video, about Paradox" Why is that then true? -> Because Leo says so. Circular proof. You quote Leo as he was a prophet and you were a peasant.

What values? How does it precisely? Cleaning toilets doesn't hurt anyone, directly or indirectly. Nice job. Why do talk on Leo's behalf?

In the dozens of other countries that not only on par with the US but better.

I'd love for Biden to get re-elected. With Biden there have been: * several bank-runs already * loss and shit of a few key allies: Brazil, Saudy Arabia, India * Russia has become not weaker but stronger and more influential * ever accelerating rate of de-dollarisation * distrust to dollar by other countries; open talks about ditching it and actually doing so * Chinese high officials won't talk to him by phone, let alone inviting him or going to the US * high inflation, at times * sending weapons to "fight the evil" thus pouring oil in fire * G7 has gotten surpassed by BRICS in terms of the economic might * weaker Europe, high inflation China and Russia won't even need to do anything other than allowing Biden to do its thing.

Whenever Leo mentions cryptocurrencies, he'll inject the worlds "bullshit" or "shit" in the same sentence at least 4 times. Whether it reflects Leo's knowlegde about the topic or ignorance, it's an open question: * crypto is used, for instance, as a means to exchange cash for fiat, and vise versa, in order to bypass expensive, scrutinysome and slow international transfers * crypto is used in the countries under the sanctions that Leo's own country tends to impose "to support demoncrasy" to attempt to cause a revolt * crypto can be used to preserve one's money in the countries with high inflation rate * crypto isn't controlled by anyone What will a freelancer from Iran, for instance, use to receive to a payment from an employers from a 1st world country? He could use a bank or a payment system, if he's able to open an account. But the most cheap and fast way, without any fuckingly stupid KYC will be crypto. In 2020 I got paid in Ethereum, right before it began to grow. And it then grew 4-5x. 400-500% that is. I was lucky with the timing, yes. And I remembered this as I was listening to a Leo's video in which he called "bullshit any scheme which promises even 50% of growth."

Yes, there is. One should learn to separate shitcoins from bitcoin and decentralisation. I personally haven't heard any pro-bitcoin statement from Leo, nor in a single of Leo's videos. Moreover, I remember a video in "insights" which was supposed to "reveal" something about bitcoin. But as I started to watch it, a sorry-ass guru in it would generalise a lot, and distort the facts.

Leo, whether it be by accident or deliberately, has used this picture, with which a general person, I guess, would i agree with https://actualized.org/insights/conspiracy-theory-master-chart However, there're not 1, but 4 points about the same topic in it, which has been hot for the last 2 years, and which, of course are almost at the top. Hmmmmm. 4 points of the same topic.... in a picture about conspiracy theories... Leo, or whoever has drawn this picture, isn't only capable of spreading conspirasy theories, sometimes, but in a smart way: - pretend that you're against conspirasy theories - perhaps even be against it in reallity - AND, whenever you want to, inject some conroversial seeds into your narrative -- the seeds which you WANT everyone to believe to be misinformation For if almost everything in your story is deemed correct, then those controversial seeds, mixed in with, would by extension become believable as well -- as misinformation or conspiracy theories, or not, depending on where you'd place them in this pyramid.

I've started to watch the Leo's video about Andrew Tate. It's so simple Leo. >> "I've never played in Las Vegas casinos once. One should'n't go there." Then how can you possibly know that the casinos are bad? There might be things you're unaware about. >> "I can smell once character within 5 seconds of talking to him" You could. Probably. But you also could very well delude yourself within 5 seconds and then assume that you've read one's personality. And you may not find out for years that you've been wrong the whole time about a person >> "You can't make a considerable amount of money within a year -- multiple those $70k -- unless you resort to criminal activities" How can you know? You can only know that what's been YOUR experience. In your experience - it's impossible. >> "Once you find out that someone is drug lord, you turn away and never do business with him. Never talk, never communicate." That's bullshit, Leo. Firstly, how many drug lords have you done business with? How many have you studied? How many of them have let you down? If none, and if you've never done bussiness with them, then how can you possibly make this claim? Secondly, you may not want to do business with a person who IS a drug lord. But everyone always changes. A person who used to be a drug lord and now has changed to become a normal person -- is the one, one would want to do business with.

Leo will mention in his videos sometime how bad nazies are, and rightly so. Alright this is 2018 Nonetheless the same Ukranian neo nazies also, nowadays, get welcomed in the US. 2022 How can it be? Leo, whenever you mention nazies in your videos, why won't you mention this funny fact too?

Why would the collective West - US, EU, UK ... not sensor those who claim that the Earth is flat? But they'll gladly, whenever the stakes are high, censor certain people -- the ones who go and speak against the herd -- and almost any news that come certain countries that they don't like? "Ohhhhh, I see. This is propaganda from X again. Why would you even read it?" Or "Let's finally shut it down. More over, let's counterfight it by creating "fact-checks". But those "fact check" websites are nothing but pure disinformation itself. Therefore, can it be that what's censored is not a lie? But the truth? Or least, partially? And to find out what the truth is, one has to look at what's being censored as opposed to what's in the mainstream news, and what everyone says echoing everyone else. There's censoredship in other countries too - I'm aware. But at least those don't claim, for the most part, that they are democratic, just and transparent. And don't stick their nose in the matters of other countries for this very issue.

Leo in one of this videos called the conflict in Ukraine "Putin's stupid war". If Leo, however, had known that there's a 8-year old history of it, as well as had applied system thinking by following the chains of events back to 2014, when a US-induced and sponsored "democrasy" revolution, or rather a US-puppet and anti-russian government, came into power in Ukraine, Leo probably would've called this conflict "Biden's stupid war", or "yet another US stupid war" instead. Here are some videos from Scott Ritter who's an ex US marine who lives in the US and who dealt with the USSR back in a day:

"An idea".... Why not "a scientific experiment with a termonuclear reactor which can only be conducted in labratory by 5 scientists in the world once in 7 years"? Therefore, you won't be able to test it youself. All one has to do to prove you wrong is provide one example wherein censored information has turned out true later on. Or maybe not one, but there're plethora of them anyway. Do you want me to provide such examples? Too simplistic thinking and hence wrong. You're looking at it as black/white. Well, look at it as "most of the time, most likely" or "most unlikely", "one more red flag"... instead

I'm not one, I'm not even familiar with those. Too difficult -- I'm not this smart. I'll put it this way: if something is called propaganda, why would govenment censor it? For if it was propaganda, it'd so obvious, or almost obvious, that everyone would've identified it as propaganda. If something gets censored as propaganda, it may very well be that it's not one, but the truth that exposes the uglyness and crime of, let's say, a government. Or of some agent, a group of people, or whoever it may be. Otherwise, why would they would even bother to censor it? In other words: to learn the truth, look at what's being censored.

Am I bitching or is it you're saying that I'm bitching? Alright, let's apply the same logic to you: Today there exists more of scrientific innovation than ever in human history, as well as access to scientific work for ordinary people, including for free. But don't let this fact interupt your bitching whenever you're bitching about science, academia and bureaucracy in them. Or Today there exists more of innovation in the medicine than ever in human history. But don't let this fact interupt your bitching whenever you're bitching about big pharma calling them "mafia".

This man is also a doctor, and you can't argue. But he has always recommended ivermectin. Granted he also talks about those experimental vaccines. But at least he does recommend ivermectin supporting it with real data. Ivermectin cost next to nothing and big pharma can't make any money on it, because it's been around for decades and has no longer a patent. What a coincidence that big pharma has always demonized ivermectin since 2020, huh?

You mean, lost for UK, US and EU who call for the war to escalete and continue? So be it. Ukraine has been just a means and a smokescreen to first a) provoke, and then b) attack Russia. A proxy. When else would US and Co have such an opportunity to try to hurt Russia using the hands of the ukranian soldiers? Who, by the way, die in droves.

The funny thing is, the "little flu disinformation" has been precisely the claim that nearly everyone would die, or irreversibly get hurt, if he or she doesn't get a jab. Only one and you're free! Actually two. But no, this quickly has become insufficient. Then one would die unless he gets his booster. And then another booster, and then one more booster, and then one more booster, and then one more booster, and then one more booster, and then one more booster, and then booster..... And then ... what's there now on the market nowadays? A new placebo that those big pharma companies have invented. Oh, pills. Yeah. I myself should've died at least 100 times already, according to those mainstream media "doctors", truth carries and newspapers. And according to Leo too, by the way With his "original thoughts" that closely resemble the ones from mainstream media, for some reason. At least in regards to the little flu, I mean.

Has Bolsonaro call it a stolen election? No. And he's not going to, as he's said. But Leo, as usual, with his "original thoughts" is quick to make shallow conclusions that, sometimes, are anything but original thoughts.

Leo, if Trump is a con artist who always seeks to exploit the system for the material benefit, who's Biden then? There've been tens and hundreds of millions, upon other millions, upon others billions of dollars that Biden has been approving for Ukraine-Russia war. Who is Biden if not a criminal who's been killing, indirectly but certantly, both russians and ukranians? Including *civilians* who'll get bombed everyday and killed from the US weapons, which Biden has been sending to Ukraine. Has Biden even once given a hint that he's for peace or negotiations? Trump has (this is part of his game, of course ). Isn't it better to be a relatively peaceful con-artist than a seemingly good man, but at the same time -- a war criminal? How's Biden, you say, more spiritually developed than Trump if Biden basically kills people while pretending that he's doing good?

My ego always likes to post links to the videos that support my point of view, and here's one of them https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVXzwnU1H6U Joe Rogan, and a talk about Putin ... therefore, it must be a conspirasy theory, propaganda and lie, of course, unless it critisizes Russia and prases US and its allies. One the other hand: what is it, factually, would you disagree about in this video? Would you say that the war started out of the blue, with the only objective to enlarge the territory of Russia, with no provokative moves from Ukraine, NATO and US? And Ukraine, EU and NATO are fighting against the "evil force", in the name of the freedom for the whole humanity -- the way that the most of US and EUropean mass media portray it?

No, it doesn't. Why not? Because you've preassumed that the Western and US people are somehow more grown up, superiour and pieceful, whereas russians, and virtually every one country that's not US, CA, UK, EU block, AU, NZ, have mentally stuck in the stone age. Let's apply the same logic to the West and US, shall we? (1) Do you blame US that it's been bombing civilians in the Middle East? Do you blame US for that it bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki by a nuclear bomb? How about Vietnam? How about Kosovo? Do you blame the US that it's been provoking haous all over the Globe over the past 50-100 years? Or "do you help barbaric americans" to grow? (2) The same can be applied to the European countries -- they've also been bombing other countries, including the Middle East. Right now they're buying off wheat from Russia (!) thus preventing African countries to buy it, thus provoking femin in Africa. Should "we" help barbaric european people to grow up as well? (3) And both US and Europe have been prolonging the Ukraine-Russia war by pouring oil in fire. They essentially have been killing ukranians and russians. The americans and eruopeans are not evil, are they? They may be a little barbaric and inferiour but they are good. Huh? And "we" as russians, chinese, latin americans, indians, asians, africans.... simply should understand those a little primive, sometimes a little bit stupid too and blood-firsty americans and europeans! And we should feel compassion towards them; see their potential, good motives, and therefore help them overcome their inner daemons, barbaric traits and primitive, greedy behaviour --- Have I applied your logic to the americans and europeans correctly?