rnd

Bingo! But the war broke out in 2014, actually. Yet for the same reason still.

Let me, as a non speaker, fix your American English: For example, Saudia Arabia was used to be infamous for not letting prohibiting the women to drive or and vote but they can do both now. But now(adays) they've been allowed to do both.

If a low birth rate in the Europe and partially US, Japan, Korea, hence aging population that almost isn't capable of working, thinking clearly and fastly, and doing other stuff, that requires constant attention in terms of care -- isn't a problem, why not have: * 1mln people in the US instead of 330 mln? * 100k instead of 125mln in Japan? * 10k instead of 0.5bln in Euro Zone? I'd be down for it if you yourself are. And as long as the other countries remain with a healthy birth rate. AI and Elon Musk will compensate for everything.

@An young being I may surprise you: in India there're 1.4 billion people. If they exist and are alive, they're able to. Even I was able to, during the little flu virus, for a year. And never fell sick there, never worn a muzzle, rarely washed hands, let alone with soap, ate with hands in public places.

What is this topic about? About a shitty TikTok video filmed in India? Which has made the OP conclude that India and the shitty TikTok video about it are the same thing? Hence the topic. The video which was deliberately filmed about an abnormal thing in India, otherwise why would one film it and upload onto TikTok in the first place? Masterpiece of idiocy and stupidity.

How does the freedom of speech work in the US, how well it does, if any topic related to Trump is a semi-taboo? It's a more sofisticated form of cencorship, isn't it? One may believe and talk about what he so desires as long as it's not too much in the support of Trump! Even on this forum. There's also contant support of Israel, and sentiment against China, Iran, Russia, Venezuela.... - against the countries that don't bow to US. They are't completely prohibited topics, but semi-so, aren't they? How's this compatible with freedom of speech? Or rather, with the claim that there's a great deal of freedom of speech in US.

What's more important, though, is don't get yourself to believe in your own propaganda and wishful thinking about Russia too much. @bebotalk The US and EU have been believing in their own propaganda for the 2 last years. As a result, they're now in crisis and resession, trying to bypass their own sanctions against Russia, bying the same russian oil and gas and other stuff but more expensively, are weaker geo-politically. And pouring money in the project Ukraine (which was supposed to break Russia and The Putin). And even admitting that this project - Ukraine - will fail no matter what. Russia will win. Whilst Russia has become stronger - both politically and economically, with more allies, better off internationally. With their own jets and fleet. And Putin - The Putin - as well. BRICS has gotten bigger, overtaken G7. Dollar has gotten weaker. Other than this.... there can be some people in Russia who envy the West. And there always will be.

You don't know what you're talking about. India, Brazil and Nigeria are certantly not experincing decline in population. Vice versa. China is, which is a result of "one famility - one child" policy back several dozens years ago. Europe is. Korea is, Japan is. US is at standstill, it seems The fact that Europe, US, Korea, Japan have advanced economies doesn't make them attractive for giving birth and raising children. So much so that it's the opposite. "Better health care -- less need for more children" -- meaning, in the past the woman would give birth to 10 children because 7-8 of them would die "along the way", whereas nowadays it's become so much better in terms of saving lifes that the woman would give birth only to 1-2 children? No need for more. Whatever it may be that you smoke it's too heavy for you.

Birthday rate on the West. And how to solve it.... Perhaps with more of that what the West already been encouraging - lgbt, gay, lesbians, one-sex marridges?

Russia looked at Europe with their Papa who became gay, with the their toxic, bitter and angry minorities, their middle-unknown-sex she/he/her/it/ello/оно/ and "God-knows-what", with - more importantly - their increasingly population extinction and aging... And decided to do that what will make itself better off. And as a result, for the russians. And Russia also has partially prohibited and restricted abortions. And it'll go further in this.

Why has Europe entered recession now then? Due to a sudden lack of creativity from the creative people? Or due to absense of cheap russian gas and oil? Remove all the gas, diesel, oil, manufacturing, food production, and imports from the US and Europe and let's see how well they'll function on pure creativity and knowledge, and for how many days they'll last. More accurately will be to say: one's creativity can also pay bills.

Biden now claims that "military aid to UA and IL will be good for the economy of US". https://responsiblestatecraft.org/biden-israel-ukraine-aid/ It used to be about "democrasy", "independence", "fight the evil", didn't it? What's changed? Or it can be that nothing has changed, though.

50 years ago there were sold-out doctors who used to claim that smoking was healthy, and nowadays it's the experts who, having also been paid, will manipulate the facts in the favour of their sponsors.

How do you know that it's "very few people"? And even in this case, shouldn't those few people be respected equally? Does the fact there they're "few" of them, make them less respectful? For gays and lgbt related shit - it doens't, it's opposite: the fewer of them, the less protected they're, the more they must become protected. Then following the logic of those in Europe and US, why shouldn't there a "horse-human" marriage then be legalized too analogously to the "gay" one? And the same will go for "father-daugther" sex and marrige. Not?

"Fail to recognize" or "succeed to ditch" that shit rather? Why can't it instead be the West and US who fail to recognize the traditional man-woman relationship and prohibit LGBT and gay stuff? If a country were to legalize the "horse-human" marriage, would it make it even more liberal and superiour to West and US? How about "father-daughter" sex and marrige? If not, why not?

When there's a need for unjustified, unhumain action, that goes against the same international law that West and US claim to follow, there'll always begin to appear debunking, facts and other shit that favour it, spread out by the Western and US mass media. "US and Israel aren't attacking. No.... They're defending themselves. They have no choice"

As of late the US has been needing oil, a sort for diesel that Venezuela, Iran and Russia produce. Therefore, the same Nicolas Maduro, from the same Venezuela, whom the same US was trying to remove from his presidential chair a few years ago, and who up till recently has been a dictator and his regime -- dictatorship, according to the US and Europe, has been turned into a non-dictator. And it's not even a regime anymore. Some sanctions have been lifted off Venezuela, for 6 months. It's magic. That's how dictators are born and gone. It's not that a president of a country becomes a dictator and then US and Europe call this out. It's vise versa. So remember chaps -- when you'll be arguying about the dictators in the world: for at least a half a year, whilst US is buying oil from Venezuela, Maduro is not one. And Venezuela, probably, has become a normal country. Later it may be reversed, though.

Seemingly smart and trustworthy guy. However, what all of the videos such as this one about Chinese collapse, which is "about to happen this time with 106% probability", miss or rather ignore is the fact that China may not only have some problems, but it also has had successes. Which of the two have had a greater impact? Why won't you guys mention that Chinese RMB has doubled its global market share as the trades in USD dollar diminishes? Still small share, though. More and more countries call for ditching dollar switching to either RMB or local currencies. Why won't you mention that China has archived a great success in the Middle East with Saudi Arabia and Iran? How about the Huawei's chip breakthrough? How about the fact that UnionPay has overtaken Visa in global debit card transactions? China is in BRICS which has recently overtaken G7 in terms of GDP. Besides, the problems in the Chinese economy not only arise, but get resolved too. Such videos won't mention this. Why won't the successes of China be mentioned then? Because these aren't the things that the listeners of a channel would like to hear about. Without taking them into account, though, an author will be creating videos about immininent collapse of China till the end of his life, beliving in its own narrative, yet a collapse may never occur.

The experts of Israly-Palestinian relashionships are being born right in this topic. What required to become one is to believe that you are. Knowledge about the topic isn't. And you should have some opinion. But you can borrow it from mainstream media. Have both? Ready to go.

This time US and EU sanctioned, apparently, no one but themselves And it's for 2022 This year Russia is growing still, bigger, and Germany is in recession, as Europe in general https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.PP.CD?most_recent_value_desc=true

I don't have one. And I'm too lazy to look for any. Yes. But being in QUAD on its own doesn't make India an enemy of China, does it? Likewise Türkiye being in NATO alone doesn't make it an enemy of Russia, and even wise-versa. Likewise, Türkiye and Greece as the members as NATO are rather enemies. Likewise, even a possibility of the UA joining NATO makes it -- its regime -- an enemy of Russia because there're other factors too. India's membership in QUAD is, I've heard, nominal.

Could be. But the Eastern Europe is mostly neutral or in favoure of China. Therefore you can't generalize all of it. But there's no Russia there, although YT is popular there. And in other stats Russia is present.

Is there an atricle about "Pro-Chinese sentiment" there? Why not? Such sentiment exists in India in some way. Why would you believe Wikipedepia when it comes to China, for instance? China doesn't write it, nor does India. Who controls the Wiki? The editors from the US and the West. Therefore, every fact that's against China will become blown out proportion. Every neutral fact will be interpereted against China. And every fact in favour of China will be neglected or mentioned briefly as something to be ignored. Moreover, it's benefical for the US and West to try to make India and China bark at each other. Wiki is sutable for studying more or less neutral topics, not geo-politics.

USA, India - yes. Europeans - no. Find stats somewhere. And I've mentioned in initial topic that that the dude talks not the truth but rather what its audience would like to hear.